Apr 30, 2018 · 1h 20m · capital-allocators

James Williams – Curating The Getty's Assets (Capital Allocators, EP.50)

Jim Williams · 58m spoken Ted Seides · 14m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Jim Williams, Chief Investment Officer of the J. Paul Getty Trust, exploring how the seven-billion-dollar endowment balances operational liquidity, specialist team governance, high-conviction manager selection, and strategic co-investments to sustain the institution's cultural mission.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 20.7% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Ted as informed peer 5.2 Guest teaching 1.8 Guest disagreement 0.2 Ted pushing back 0.8
05100:0020:0040:001:00:001:20:005:14–10:59 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 Jim Williams' Career Journey from Engineering to Finance Ted opens the interview warmly and prompts Jim to recount his transition from automotive assembly line engineering to institutional finance and the University of Chicago. Jim shares his background collaboratively with no pushback or friction.10:59–17:06 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 The Getty Trust: Operational Mission and Liquidity Management Ted demonstrates solid allocator expertise by pressing Jim on the mechanics of liquidity modeling and capital calls for the Getty's spending requirements. Jim explains their stress tests, one-year liquidity horizon, and asset allocation breakdown collaboratively.17:06–20:28 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Funding Major Art Acquisitions Through Long-Term Alpha Ted invites Jim to explain how excess investment alpha directly subsidizes major art acquisitions. Jim details how fifteen years of outperformance provided over a billion dollars in net added alpha.20:28–25:22 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Specialist Team Architecture and Cross-Asset Integration Ted prompts Jim on organizational architecture, and Jim defends a specialist asset-class team structure over a generalist model, explaining how cross-asset integration meetings prevent siloed thinking.25:22–30:06 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Manager Alpha Sourcing and Sizable Conviction in China Ted references classic Brinson studies on asset allocation, and Jim gently pushes past the conventional narrative by arguing that manager selection is the real primary driver, citing their significant overweight to top Chinese managers.30:06–33:10 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Evaluating Public Versus Private Market Manager Skill Ted drills down into specific diligence techniques for discerning manager skill between public and private markets. Jim explains using operational reference checks with company operators rather than traditional peer references.33:12–38:00 · Ted as informed peer 0/10 Sponsor Message: Modern Investment Operations with Ridgeline Mid-roll sponsorship announcement and ad read for Ridgeline. No interview dynamic present.38:00–46:01 · Ted as informed peer 7/10 Due Diligence, Mezzanine Financing, and Position Sizing Ted pushes Jim on how an allocator team can practically underwrite rapid-turnaround direct co-investments and mezzanine debt without being full direct-deal specialists. Jim defends their approach by emphasizing strict alignment of interest and external industry checks.46:01–52:11 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Manager Concentration and Long-Term Venture Capital Dynamics Ted probes whether having up to 200 manager relationships leads to over-diversification. Jim candidly concedes the point, noting pushback from his own board and explaining the difficulties of exiting long-tail venture capital stubs.52:11–54:52 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Public Equity Overweights and Hedge Funds as Point Guards Ted asks about public equities and hedge fund integration. Jim uses a basketball point guard metaphor to describe hedge funds orchestrating relative value and passing information across the portfolio.54:52–1:04:23 · Ted as informed peer 7/10 Trustee Governance, Internal Culture, and Mitigating Biases Ted presses Jim repeatedly on decision-making post-mortems and dealing with personal investment biases when a thesis goes wrong. Jim reflects candidly on his historical skepticism toward Latin American investments and how his team brought data to change his mind.1:04:23–1:09:14 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Talent Development, Recruiting, and Department Reputation Ted inquires about talent development without a direct university feeder pipeline. Jim explains their deliberate two-year analyst model designed as a springboard to top business schools.1:09:14–1:13:04 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Investing in a 'Least Dirty Shirt' Macro Environment Ted asks about macro positioning, and Jim introduces his 'least dirty shirt' metaphor to describe picking the best relative opportunities in energy and mid-market credit while strictly managing leverage and liquidity.5:14–10:59 · Guest teaching 1/10 Jim Williams' Career Journey from Engineering to Finance Ted opens the interview warmly and prompts Jim to recount his transition from automotive assembly line engineering to institutional finance and the University of Chicago. Jim shares his background collaboratively with no pushback or friction.10:59–17:06 · Guest teaching 2/10 The Getty Trust: Operational Mission and Liquidity Management Ted demonstrates solid allocator expertise by pressing Jim on the mechanics of liquidity modeling and capital calls for the Getty's spending requirements. Jim explains their stress tests, one-year liquidity horizon, and asset allocation breakdown collaboratively.17:06–20:28 · Guest teaching 1/10 Funding Major Art Acquisitions Through Long-Term Alpha Ted invites Jim to explain how excess investment alpha directly subsidizes major art acquisitions. Jim details how fifteen years of outperformance provided over a billion dollars in net added alpha.20:28–25:22 · Guest teaching 3/10 Specialist Team Architecture and Cross-Asset Integration Ted prompts Jim on organizational architecture, and Jim defends a specialist asset-class team structure over a generalist model, explaining how cross-asset integration meetings prevent siloed thinking.25:22–30:06 · Guest teaching 3/10 Manager Alpha Sourcing and Sizable Conviction in China Ted references classic Brinson studies on asset allocation, and Jim gently pushes past the conventional narrative by arguing that manager selection is the real primary driver, citing their significant overweight to top Chinese managers.30:06–33:10 · Guest teaching 2/10 Evaluating Public Versus Private Market Manager Skill Ted drills down into specific diligence techniques for discerning manager skill between public and private markets. Jim explains using operational reference checks with company operators rather than traditional peer references.33:12–38:00 · Guest teaching 0/10 Sponsor Message: Modern Investment Operations with Ridgeline Mid-roll sponsorship announcement and ad read for Ridgeline. No interview dynamic present.38:00–46:01 · Guest teaching 2/10 Due Diligence, Mezzanine Financing, and Position Sizing Ted pushes Jim on how an allocator team can practically underwrite rapid-turnaround direct co-investments and mezzanine debt without being full direct-deal specialists. Jim defends their approach by emphasizing strict alignment of interest and external industry checks.46:01–52:11 · Guest teaching 3/10 Manager Concentration and Long-Term Venture Capital Dynamics Ted probes whether having up to 200 manager relationships leads to over-diversification. Jim candidly concedes the point, noting pushback from his own board and explaining the difficulties of exiting long-tail venture capital stubs.52:11–54:52 · Guest teaching 1/10 Public Equity Overweights and Hedge Funds as Point Guards Ted asks about public equities and hedge fund integration. Jim uses a basketball point guard metaphor to describe hedge funds orchestrating relative value and passing information across the portfolio.54:52–1:04:23 · Guest teaching 2/10 Trustee Governance, Internal Culture, and Mitigating Biases Ted presses Jim repeatedly on decision-making post-mortems and dealing with personal investment biases when a thesis goes wrong. Jim reflects candidly on his historical skepticism toward Latin American investments and how his team brought data to change his mind.1:04:23–1:09:14 · Guest teaching 2/10 Talent Development, Recruiting, and Department Reputation Ted inquires about talent development without a direct university feeder pipeline. Jim explains their deliberate two-year analyst model designed as a springboard to top business schools.1:09:14–1:13:04 · Guest teaching 1/10 Investing in a 'Least Dirty Shirt' Macro Environment Ted asks about macro positioning, and Jim introduces his 'least dirty shirt' metaphor to describe picking the best relative opportunities in energy and mid-market credit while strictly managing leverage and liquidity.5:14–10:59 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Jim Williams' Career Journey from Engineering to Finance Ted opens the interview warmly and prompts Jim to recount his transition from automotive assembly line engineering to institutional finance and the University of Chicago. Jim shares his background collaboratively with no pushback or friction.10:59–17:06 · Guest disagreement 0/10 The Getty Trust: Operational Mission and Liquidity Management Ted demonstrates solid allocator expertise by pressing Jim on the mechanics of liquidity modeling and capital calls for the Getty's spending requirements. Jim explains their stress tests, one-year liquidity horizon, and asset allocation breakdown collaboratively.17:06–20:28 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Funding Major Art Acquisitions Through Long-Term Alpha Ted invites Jim to explain how excess investment alpha directly subsidizes major art acquisitions. Jim details how fifteen years of outperformance provided over a billion dollars in net added alpha.20:28–25:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Specialist Team Architecture and Cross-Asset Integration Ted prompts Jim on organizational architecture, and Jim defends a specialist asset-class team structure over a generalist model, explaining how cross-asset integration meetings prevent siloed thinking.25:22–30:06 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Manager Alpha Sourcing and Sizable Conviction in China Ted references classic Brinson studies on asset allocation, and Jim gently pushes past the conventional narrative by arguing that manager selection is the real primary driver, citing their significant overweight to top Chinese managers.30:06–33:10 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Evaluating Public Versus Private Market Manager Skill Ted drills down into specific diligence techniques for discerning manager skill between public and private markets. Jim explains using operational reference checks with company operators rather than traditional peer references.33:12–38:00 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Sponsor Message: Modern Investment Operations with Ridgeline Mid-roll sponsorship announcement and ad read for Ridgeline. No interview dynamic present.38:00–46:01 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Due Diligence, Mezzanine Financing, and Position Sizing Ted pushes Jim on how an allocator team can practically underwrite rapid-turnaround direct co-investments and mezzanine debt without being full direct-deal specialists. Jim defends their approach by emphasizing strict alignment of interest and external industry checks.46:01–52:11 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Manager Concentration and Long-Term Venture Capital Dynamics Ted probes whether having up to 200 manager relationships leads to over-diversification. Jim candidly concedes the point, noting pushback from his own board and explaining the difficulties of exiting long-tail venture capital stubs.52:11–54:52 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Public Equity Overweights and Hedge Funds as Point Guards Ted asks about public equities and hedge fund integration. Jim uses a basketball point guard metaphor to describe hedge funds orchestrating relative value and passing information across the portfolio.54:52–1:04:23 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Trustee Governance, Internal Culture, and Mitigating Biases Ted presses Jim repeatedly on decision-making post-mortems and dealing with personal investment biases when a thesis goes wrong. Jim reflects candidly on his historical skepticism toward Latin American investments and how his team brought data to change his mind.1:04:23–1:09:14 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Talent Development, Recruiting, and Department Reputation Ted inquires about talent development without a direct university feeder pipeline. Jim explains their deliberate two-year analyst model designed as a springboard to top business schools.1:09:14–1:13:04 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Investing in a 'Least Dirty Shirt' Macro Environment Ted asks about macro positioning, and Jim introduces his 'least dirty shirt' metaphor to describe picking the best relative opportunities in energy and mid-market credit while strictly managing leverage and liquidity.5:14–10:59 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Jim Williams' Career Journey from Engineering to Finance Ted opens the interview warmly and prompts Jim to recount his transition from automotive assembly line engineering to institutional finance and the University of Chicago. Jim shares his background collaboratively with no pushback or friction.10:59–17:06 · Ted pushing back 1/10 The Getty Trust: Operational Mission and Liquidity Management Ted demonstrates solid allocator expertise by pressing Jim on the mechanics of liquidity modeling and capital calls for the Getty's spending requirements. Jim explains their stress tests, one-year liquidity horizon, and asset allocation breakdown collaboratively.17:06–20:28 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Funding Major Art Acquisitions Through Long-Term Alpha Ted invites Jim to explain how excess investment alpha directly subsidizes major art acquisitions. Jim details how fifteen years of outperformance provided over a billion dollars in net added alpha.20:28–25:22 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Specialist Team Architecture and Cross-Asset Integration Ted prompts Jim on organizational architecture, and Jim defends a specialist asset-class team structure over a generalist model, explaining how cross-asset integration meetings prevent siloed thinking.25:22–30:06 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Manager Alpha Sourcing and Sizable Conviction in China Ted references classic Brinson studies on asset allocation, and Jim gently pushes past the conventional narrative by arguing that manager selection is the real primary driver, citing their significant overweight to top Chinese managers.30:06–33:10 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Evaluating Public Versus Private Market Manager Skill Ted drills down into specific diligence techniques for discerning manager skill between public and private markets. Jim explains using operational reference checks with company operators rather than traditional peer references.33:12–38:00 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Sponsor Message: Modern Investment Operations with Ridgeline Mid-roll sponsorship announcement and ad read for Ridgeline. No interview dynamic present.38:00–46:01 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Due Diligence, Mezzanine Financing, and Position Sizing Ted pushes Jim on how an allocator team can practically underwrite rapid-turnaround direct co-investments and mezzanine debt without being full direct-deal specialists. Jim defends their approach by emphasizing strict alignment of interest and external industry checks.46:01–52:11 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Manager Concentration and Long-Term Venture Capital Dynamics Ted probes whether having up to 200 manager relationships leads to over-diversification. Jim candidly concedes the point, noting pushback from his own board and explaining the difficulties of exiting long-tail venture capital stubs.52:11–54:52 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Public Equity Overweights and Hedge Funds as Point Guards Ted asks about public equities and hedge fund integration. Jim uses a basketball point guard metaphor to describe hedge funds orchestrating relative value and passing information across the portfolio.54:52–1:04:23 · Ted pushing back 3/10 Trustee Governance, Internal Culture, and Mitigating Biases Ted presses Jim repeatedly on decision-making post-mortems and dealing with personal investment biases when a thesis goes wrong. Jim reflects candidly on his historical skepticism toward Latin American investments and how his team brought data to change his mind.1:04:23–1:09:14 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Talent Development, Recruiting, and Department Reputation Ted inquires about talent development without a direct university feeder pipeline. Jim explains their deliberate two-year analyst model designed as a springboard to top business schools.1:09:14–1:13:04 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Investing in a 'Least Dirty Shirt' Macro Environment Ted asks about macro positioning, and Jim introduces his 'least dirty shirt' metaphor to describe picking the best relative opportunities in energy and mid-market credit while strictly managing leverage and liquidity.

speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%3:00 · Ted 85.3% · guest 14.7%3:00 · Ted 85.3% · guest 14.7%6:00 · Ted 2.6% · guest 97.4%6:00 · Ted 2.6% · guest 97.4%9:00 · Ted 7.4% · guest 92.6%9:00 · Ted 7.4% · guest 92.6%12:00 · Ted 16.4% · guest 83.6%12:00 · Ted 16.4% · guest 83.6%15:00 · Ted 24% · guest 76%15:00 · Ted 24% · guest 76%18:00 · Ted 9.6% · guest 90.4%18:00 · Ted 9.6% · guest 90.4%21:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%21:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%24:00 · Ted 8% · guest 92%24:00 · Ted 8% · guest 92%27:00 · Ted 4% · guest 96%27:00 · Ted 4% · guest 96%30:00 · Ted 23.4% · guest 76.6%30:00 · Ted 23.4% · guest 76.6%33:00 · Ted 46.2% · guest 53.8%33:00 · Ted 46.2% · guest 53.8%36:00 · Ted 13.1% · guest 86.9%36:00 · Ted 13.1% · guest 86.9%39:00 · Ted 22.4% · guest 77.6%39:00 · Ted 22.4% · guest 77.6%42:00 · Ted 16% · guest 84%42:00 · Ted 16% · guest 84%45:00 · Ted 15.5% · guest 84.5%45:00 · Ted 15.5% · guest 84.5%48:00 · Ted 5.4% · guest 94.6%48:00 · Ted 5.4% · guest 94.6%51:00 · Ted 9.4% · guest 90.6%51:00 · Ted 9.4% · guest 90.6%54:00 · Ted 10.2% · guest 89.8%54:00 · Ted 10.2% · guest 89.8%57:00 · Ted 15.3% · guest 84.7%57:00 · Ted 15.3% · guest 84.7%1:00:00 · Ted 18.6% · guest 81.4%1:00:00 · Ted 18.6% · guest 81.4%1:03:00 · Ted 22.6% · guest 77.4%1:03:00 · Ted 22.6% · guest 77.4%1:06:00 · Ted 17.5% · guest 82.5%1:06:00 · Ted 17.5% · guest 82.5%1:09:00 · Ted 10.5% · guest 89.5%1:09:00 · Ted 10.5% · guest 89.5%1:12:00 · Ted 14.9% · guest 85.1%1:12:00 · Ted 14.9% · guest 85.1%1:15:00 · Ted 8.6% · guest 91.4%1:15:00 · Ted 8.6% · guest 91.4%1:18:00 · Ted 35.4% · guest 64.6%1:18:00 · Ted 35.4% · guest 64.6%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 25:29 Jim challenges the primacy of asset allocation over manager selection

Jim directly dismisses the common institutional dogma stemming from 1990s studies that asset allocation drives 90%+ of returns, arguing that finding elite managers is what truly generates significant outperformance.

Hardest push from Ted ▶ 1:02:40 Ted presses Jim on re-underwriting flawed manager decisions

Ted refuses to accept a generic process answer and explicitly tells Jim he has to push him further on how he distinguishes bad luck from bad judgment when re-underwriting investments.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 30:45 Jim details referencing operating executives over financial engineers

Jim educates the audience and host on the limitations of standard LP reference calls, explaining that talking directly to underlying corporate operators reveals whether a GP actually adds operational value.

Ted holds their own ▶ 41:45 Ted challenges allocator competency in rapid direct deal diligence

Ted leverages his own deep experience in fund management to question how an allocator team whose primary skillset is selecting funds can reliably underwrite a direct company co-investment within 48 to 72 hours.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicTed as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementTed pushing backWhy
Jim Williams' Career Journey from Engineering to Finance 4100 Ted opens the interview warmly and prompts Jim to recount his transition from automotive assembly line engineering to institutional finance and the University of Chicago. Jim shares his background collaboratively with no pushback or friction.
The Getty Trust: Operational Mission and Liquidity Management 6201 Ted demonstrates solid allocator expertise by pressing Jim on the mechanics of liquidity modeling and capital calls for the Getty's spending requirements. Jim explains their stress tests, one-year liquidity horizon, and asset allocation breakdown collaboratively.
Funding Major Art Acquisitions Through Long-Term Alpha 5100 Ted invites Jim to explain how excess investment alpha directly subsidizes major art acquisitions. Jim details how fifteen years of outperformance provided over a billion dollars in net added alpha.
Specialist Team Architecture and Cross-Asset Integration 6311 Ted prompts Jim on organizational architecture, and Jim defends a specialist asset-class team structure over a generalist model, explaining how cross-asset integration meetings prevent siloed thinking.
Manager Alpha Sourcing and Sizable Conviction in China 5311 Ted references classic Brinson studies on asset allocation, and Jim gently pushes past the conventional narrative by arguing that manager selection is the real primary driver, citing their significant overweight to top Chinese managers.
Evaluating Public Versus Private Market Manager Skill 6201 Ted drills down into specific diligence techniques for discerning manager skill between public and private markets. Jim explains using operational reference checks with company operators rather than traditional peer references.
Sponsor Message: Modern Investment Operations with Ridgeline 0000 Mid-roll sponsorship announcement and ad read for Ridgeline. No interview dynamic present.
Due Diligence, Mezzanine Financing, and Position Sizing 7202 Ted pushes Jim on how an allocator team can practically underwrite rapid-turnaround direct co-investments and mezzanine debt without being full direct-deal specialists. Jim defends their approach by emphasizing strict alignment of interest and external industry checks.
Manager Concentration and Long-Term Venture Capital Dynamics 6312 Ted probes whether having up to 200 manager relationships leads to over-diversification. Jim candidly concedes the point, noting pushback from his own board and explaining the difficulties of exiting long-tail venture capital stubs.
Public Equity Overweights and Hedge Funds as Point Guards 5100 Ted asks about public equities and hedge fund integration. Jim uses a basketball point guard metaphor to describe hedge funds orchestrating relative value and passing information across the portfolio.
Trustee Governance, Internal Culture, and Mitigating Biases 7203 Ted presses Jim repeatedly on decision-making post-mortems and dealing with personal investment biases when a thesis goes wrong. Jim reflects candidly on his historical skepticism toward Latin American investments and how his team brought data to change his mind.
Talent Development, Recruiting, and Department Reputation 5200 Ted inquires about talent development without a direct university feeder pipeline. Jim explains their deliberate two-year analyst model designed as a springboard to top business schools.
Investing in a 'Least Dirty Shirt' Macro Environment 5100 Ted asks about macro positioning, and Jim introduces his 'least dirty shirt' metaphor to describe picking the best relative opportunities in energy and mid-market credit while strictly managing leverage and liquidity.

Statements from this episode (25)

Assertion Supported
Getty Trust endowment fully supports 95% of operational budget
“Here we fully support 95% of what the Getty does.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 11:41
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Getty Trust private equity beats public equity by 6% over full cycles
“From studies we've done, we've known that our private equity returns are the highest asset class return that we have. We know that over full market cycles, it's a good full six percentage points above public equity or above the total fund return.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 15:30
Disclosure
Getty Trust targets equal allocations to public and private illiquid assets
“It'll be between 40 to 50% illiquid is, is pretty comfortable. And then you have that area in the middle that is hedge funds. So there's about 40 to 45% that are really public market. And then you have that hedge fund semi-liquid stuff in the middle. And then …”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 16:13
Disclosure
Getty Trust targets an 8% long-term expected return across market cycles
“So we have a long-term expected return through market cycles of something, eight percent plus.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 17:43
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Getty Trust endowment generated $1 billion in alpha over 15 years
“If we looked at our returns versus benchmark going back over the 15 years that we're here, it's between one and two percent, call it a percent and a half, do a percent and a half on the assets that we have compounded over 15 years. We've had over seven billion…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 19:44
Disclosure
Getty Trust's investment team consists of 10 professionals across asset classes
“We're organized along asset class categories. So we have four managing directors. Each of them has an analyst, and then an assistant and myself. So the whole department is 10. We have no responsibilities for back office work.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 21:46
Insight
Specialists select better managers, but generalists make better asset allocation decisions
“From that expertise, I think you can do a superior job in manager selection under an asset class structure, but it has shortcomings. You can become too narrow and too insulated or isolated within your asset class, and the generalists do a better job on asset a…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 22:46
Insight
Portfolio returns are driven primarily by manager selection over asset allocation
“And our internal analysis and look across this is that it's really more manager driven.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 25:54
Disclosure
Getty overweights China as managers outperform benchmarks by 1,000 basis points
“And right now we have a really big overweight on China, but I think it has more to do that we have high conviction in several Chinese managers than it is about a view on China. We like China. We think there's a tailwind story there, but the real reason we have…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 26:31
Assertion Supported
Venture capital is one of few asset classes with persistent returns
“There is some statistical persistence and Venture capital. It's one of the few that has statistical persistence”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 29:42
Disclosure
Getty Trust investment office holds final authority on manager selection decisions
“And the speed advantage is just that the trustees have delegated broad authority to us in the investment office that we have final authority on manager decisions. We don't have to go back to the committee.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 36:19
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Co-investments are the Getty Trust's best-performing asset class
“If we put all of our co-investments together from all the different asset classes and put all the co-investments into one pool, it would be our best performing asset class.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 36:58
Disclosure
Getty Trust only executes co-investments alongside existing high-conviction managers
“The big but is that it has to be with an existing high conviction manager only. We never do a co-investment that comes in over the transom. We don't do a cold call co-investment. We only do it with our highest conviction managers.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 37:14
Insight
Limited partners must require GP financial alignment because GPs know more
“We will never know as much as a GP does. You just have to accept that about anything you underwrite. You do not know as much as a GP. So there needs to be a pretty strong alignment of interest. A knowledge that the GP is putting some of their own money in this…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 39:58
Disclosure
Getty Trust concentrates up to 5% of total fund in single managers
“Our largest public equity in domestic equity is a five percent position, and in international equity, we have a five percent position. That's at the manager level. A manager for the total fund, not in the asset class. So it's a very sizable, 30% piece of an as…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 47:07
Insight
Secondary market bids for legacy fund stubs carry excessively steep discounts
“Anytime you look at the secondary markets to do a sale, what you're offered for these old stubs is such a large discount that it's not worth doing that. So we'll let this pretty meaningfully big number of small stubs stay in the portfolio and let it run off.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 48:36
Disclosure
Getty Trust remains underweight US public equities due to rich valuations
“US markets are pretty richly valued, so we are underweight, our targets, but not by huge amounts, but you try to maintain some discipline in your targets, but we are underweight.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 52:24
Disclosure
Getty Trust overweights international equities, emerging markets, and China
“In international, we are overweight. We think they're earlier in their cycle, so we're overweight. Particularly in emerging and within emerging, particularly in China.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 52:41
Disclosure
Getty Trust's hedge fund portfolio focuses on relative value and arbitrage
“We tend to be more in relative value and arbitrage type strategies. The beta is down around a .3. So it's not a big, heavy equity presence there. We don't do much in macro. The binary bets of up or down are less appealing to us.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 54:24
Disclosure
Getty Trust investment analysts must leave rather than expect internal promotion
“We had one person move from being an analyst to being a managing director, but that's not a normal process, and that may never happen again. So the analyst will eventually have to leave. There's not a step for them, and I try to tell them that really early on.…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 1:05:03
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Over 500 candidates applied for recent Getty Trust investment analyst openings
“The last couple of people we hired, we had over 500 people apply for the opening.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 1:06:31
Opinion
The current macroeconomic environment is a least dirty shirt market
“This is kind of a least dirty shirt market. So portfolios are made up of a collection of least dirty shirts. There aren't a lot of great opportunities today. It's a least dirty shirt portfolio.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 1:09:47
Disclosure
Getty Trust holds virtually no core fixed income, preferring credit risk
“Our overweights, we still have some overweights in credit. We have virtually no core fixed income. It's all, we'd rather take credit risk than any kind of duration risk.”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 1:10:15
Disclosure
Getty Trust overweights energy on strong fundamentals despite negative sentiment
“We have the overweights that I mentioned in China, and the other big overweight is in energy. And what we like about energy, and still do, is the fundamentals are really, really good, but the attitudes, the news reports, the emotions are not good, and that's r…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 1:10:35
Insight
Small-to-mid-market managers offer greater inefficiencies and better opportunities across asset classes
“And again, as in all of the asset classes, we have a pretty big bias toward small to mid-market. The smaller managers in virtually every asset class is the space where we're more focused. We think there's more inefficiencies and greater opportunities in that s…”
Jim Williams Apr 30, 2018 ▶ 1:11:38
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.