Jun 18, 2018 · 1h 4m · capital-allocators

Brian Portnoy – From Complex to Simple (Capital Allocators, EP.57)

Brian Portnoy · 49m spoken Ted Seides · 9m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Brian Portnoy, Director of Investment Education at Virtus Investment Partners, exploring manager due diligence, choice theory, and behavioral finance. Portnoy breaks down his 'Geometry of Wealth' framework, demonstrating how investors can move from complexity to clarity by defining wealth as funded contentment rather than the endless pursuit of riches.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 17.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Ted as informed peer 4.0 Guest teaching 2.8 Guest disagreement 1.0 Ted pushing back 0.9
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:00:005:26–8:23 · Ted as informed peer 3/10 Transition from Academia to Morningstar Ted opens the interview by asking about Brian's transition from academia to finance. Brian shares his personal narrative about leaving a PhD program to join Morningstar, setting a collaborative and reflective tone.8:23–14:03 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Honing Manager Due Diligence and Asking Hard Questions Ted probes on what constitutes a truly 'hard question' in manager research, noting that standard process questions sound generic. Brian provides a concrete example of confronting underperforming managers, establishing a shared allocator vocabulary.14:03–20:03 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 Career Inflection Point and Pivot to Writing Brian discusses the midlife realization that led him to write The Investor's Paradox after conducting 4,000 interviews. He articulates how expectations formation and behavioral finance trump raw benchmark outperformance.20:03–22:33 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 The Paradox of Choice and the Complexity Trap Brian unpacks choice theory and how complex investment strategies are inherently prone to disappoint because expectations are harder to calibrate. Ted validates this perspective based on recent institutional experience.22:34–27:16 · Ted as informed peer 3/10 Joining Virtus Investment Partners and Empowering Advisors Brian explains his pivot from product structuring to investment education at Virtus. He details how modern financial advisors prioritize behavioral coaching and content over commoditized investment products.27:18–31:17 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Ted contrasts the institutional allocator mindset with the private wealth advisor mindset. Brian candidly critiques institutional allocators for manufacturing complexity and over-analyzing data to the fourth decimal place without adding a complexity premium.31:17–35:01 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 'The Geometry of Wealth' and Funded Contentment Brian introduces the core thesis of The Geometry of Wealth: defining true wealth as 'funded contentment' rather than the unending treadmill of getting rich. Ted prompts Brian to explore how this philosophy translates to everyday money decisions.35:02–40:06 · Ted as informed peer 3/10 The Circle: Defining Purpose and the Four C's Brian outlines the first shape, the Circle, representing the non-linear pursuit of life purpose across the 'Four Cs': Connection, Control, Competence, and Context. The discussion is constructive and instructional.40:06–45:08 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 The First Triangle: Setting Priorities (Protect, Match, Reach) Brian describes the first Triangle: setting priorities via Protect, Match, and Reach. He emphasizes prioritizing risk mitigation and being 'less wrong' over attempting to be 'more right.'45:09–47:42 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 The Second Triangle: Decision Hierarchy and Behavior Brian explains the second Triangle focusing on decision-making, where behavioral management forms the foundational layer beneath asset allocation and security selection. Ted acknowledges how this flips conventional thinking on its head.47:42–53:35 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 The Square: Growth, Pain, Fit, and Flexibility Brian outlines the Square's four dimensions (growth, pain/volatility, fit, flexibility), directly challenging Warren Buffett and Howard Marks by asserting that volatility is very real behavioral risk. Ted demonstrates peer expertise by connecting this dynamic to illiquidity in private equity.53:35–56:51 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 Personal Meaning and Timeless Lessons for Family Ted and Brian reflect on how professional managers often mismanage their own personal finances and discuss creating timeless lessons for their children. The conversation closes on an aligned, warm note.5:26–8:23 · Guest teaching 1/10 Transition from Academia to Morningstar Ted opens the interview by asking about Brian's transition from academia to finance. Brian shares his personal narrative about leaving a PhD program to join Morningstar, setting a collaborative and reflective tone.8:23–14:03 · Guest teaching 2/10 Honing Manager Due Diligence and Asking Hard Questions Ted probes on what constitutes a truly 'hard question' in manager research, noting that standard process questions sound generic. Brian provides a concrete example of confronting underperforming managers, establishing a shared allocator vocabulary.14:03–20:03 · Guest teaching 3/10 Career Inflection Point and Pivot to Writing Brian discusses the midlife realization that led him to write The Investor's Paradox after conducting 4,000 interviews. He articulates how expectations formation and behavioral finance trump raw benchmark outperformance.20:03–22:33 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Paradox of Choice and the Complexity Trap Brian unpacks choice theory and how complex investment strategies are inherently prone to disappoint because expectations are harder to calibrate. Ted validates this perspective based on recent institutional experience.22:34–27:16 · Guest teaching 2/10 Joining Virtus Investment Partners and Empowering Advisors Brian explains his pivot from product structuring to investment education at Virtus. He details how modern financial advisors prioritize behavioral coaching and content over commoditized investment products.27:18–31:17 · Guest teaching 3/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Ted contrasts the institutional allocator mindset with the private wealth advisor mindset. Brian candidly critiques institutional allocators for manufacturing complexity and over-analyzing data to the fourth decimal place without adding a complexity premium.31:17–35:01 · Guest teaching 3/10 'The Geometry of Wealth' and Funded Contentment Brian introduces the core thesis of The Geometry of Wealth: defining true wealth as 'funded contentment' rather than the unending treadmill of getting rich. Ted prompts Brian to explore how this philosophy translates to everyday money decisions.35:02–40:06 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Circle: Defining Purpose and the Four C's Brian outlines the first shape, the Circle, representing the non-linear pursuit of life purpose across the 'Four Cs': Connection, Control, Competence, and Context. The discussion is constructive and instructional.40:06–45:08 · Guest teaching 3/10 The First Triangle: Setting Priorities (Protect, Match, Reach) Brian describes the first Triangle: setting priorities via Protect, Match, and Reach. He emphasizes prioritizing risk mitigation and being 'less wrong' over attempting to be 'more right.'45:09–47:42 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Second Triangle: Decision Hierarchy and Behavior Brian explains the second Triangle focusing on decision-making, where behavioral management forms the foundational layer beneath asset allocation and security selection. Ted acknowledges how this flips conventional thinking on its head.47:42–53:35 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Square: Growth, Pain, Fit, and Flexibility Brian outlines the Square's four dimensions (growth, pain/volatility, fit, flexibility), directly challenging Warren Buffett and Howard Marks by asserting that volatility is very real behavioral risk. Ted demonstrates peer expertise by connecting this dynamic to illiquidity in private equity.53:35–56:51 · Guest teaching 2/10 Personal Meaning and Timeless Lessons for Family Ted and Brian reflect on how professional managers often mismanage their own personal finances and discuss creating timeless lessons for their children. The conversation closes on an aligned, warm note.5:26–8:23 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Transition from Academia to Morningstar Ted opens the interview by asking about Brian's transition from academia to finance. Brian shares his personal narrative about leaving a PhD program to join Morningstar, setting a collaborative and reflective tone.8:23–14:03 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Honing Manager Due Diligence and Asking Hard Questions Ted probes on what constitutes a truly 'hard question' in manager research, noting that standard process questions sound generic. Brian provides a concrete example of confronting underperforming managers, establishing a shared allocator vocabulary.14:03–20:03 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Career Inflection Point and Pivot to Writing Brian discusses the midlife realization that led him to write The Investor's Paradox after conducting 4,000 interviews. He articulates how expectations formation and behavioral finance trump raw benchmark outperformance.20:03–22:33 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Paradox of Choice and the Complexity Trap Brian unpacks choice theory and how complex investment strategies are inherently prone to disappoint because expectations are harder to calibrate. Ted validates this perspective based on recent institutional experience.22:34–27:16 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Joining Virtus Investment Partners and Empowering Advisors Brian explains his pivot from product structuring to investment education at Virtus. He details how modern financial advisors prioritize behavioral coaching and content over commoditized investment products.27:18–31:17 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Ted contrasts the institutional allocator mindset with the private wealth advisor mindset. Brian candidly critiques institutional allocators for manufacturing complexity and over-analyzing data to the fourth decimal place without adding a complexity premium.31:17–35:01 · Guest disagreement 1/10 'The Geometry of Wealth' and Funded Contentment Brian introduces the core thesis of The Geometry of Wealth: defining true wealth as 'funded contentment' rather than the unending treadmill of getting rich. Ted prompts Brian to explore how this philosophy translates to everyday money decisions.35:02–40:06 · Guest disagreement 0/10 The Circle: Defining Purpose and the Four C's Brian outlines the first shape, the Circle, representing the non-linear pursuit of life purpose across the 'Four Cs': Connection, Control, Competence, and Context. The discussion is constructive and instructional.40:06–45:08 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The First Triangle: Setting Priorities (Protect, Match, Reach) Brian describes the first Triangle: setting priorities via Protect, Match, and Reach. He emphasizes prioritizing risk mitigation and being 'less wrong' over attempting to be 'more right.'45:09–47:42 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Second Triangle: Decision Hierarchy and Behavior Brian explains the second Triangle focusing on decision-making, where behavioral management forms the foundational layer beneath asset allocation and security selection. Ted acknowledges how this flips conventional thinking on its head.47:42–53:35 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Square: Growth, Pain, Fit, and Flexibility Brian outlines the Square's four dimensions (growth, pain/volatility, fit, flexibility), directly challenging Warren Buffett and Howard Marks by asserting that volatility is very real behavioral risk. Ted demonstrates peer expertise by connecting this dynamic to illiquidity in private equity.53:35–56:51 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Personal Meaning and Timeless Lessons for Family Ted and Brian reflect on how professional managers often mismanage their own personal finances and discuss creating timeless lessons for their children. The conversation closes on an aligned, warm note.5:26–8:23 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Transition from Academia to Morningstar Ted opens the interview by asking about Brian's transition from academia to finance. Brian shares his personal narrative about leaving a PhD program to join Morningstar, setting a collaborative and reflective tone.8:23–14:03 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Honing Manager Due Diligence and Asking Hard Questions Ted probes on what constitutes a truly 'hard question' in manager research, noting that standard process questions sound generic. Brian provides a concrete example of confronting underperforming managers, establishing a shared allocator vocabulary.14:03–20:03 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Career Inflection Point and Pivot to Writing Brian discusses the midlife realization that led him to write The Investor's Paradox after conducting 4,000 interviews. He articulates how expectations formation and behavioral finance trump raw benchmark outperformance.20:03–22:33 · Ted pushing back 1/10 The Paradox of Choice and the Complexity Trap Brian unpacks choice theory and how complex investment strategies are inherently prone to disappoint because expectations are harder to calibrate. Ted validates this perspective based on recent institutional experience.22:34–27:16 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Joining Virtus Investment Partners and Empowering Advisors Brian explains his pivot from product structuring to investment education at Virtus. He details how modern financial advisors prioritize behavioral coaching and content over commoditized investment products.27:18–31:17 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Ted contrasts the institutional allocator mindset with the private wealth advisor mindset. Brian candidly critiques institutional allocators for manufacturing complexity and over-analyzing data to the fourth decimal place without adding a complexity premium.31:17–35:01 · Ted pushing back 1/10 'The Geometry of Wealth' and Funded Contentment Brian introduces the core thesis of The Geometry of Wealth: defining true wealth as 'funded contentment' rather than the unending treadmill of getting rich. Ted prompts Brian to explore how this philosophy translates to everyday money decisions.35:02–40:06 · Ted pushing back 0/10 The Circle: Defining Purpose and the Four C's Brian outlines the first shape, the Circle, representing the non-linear pursuit of life purpose across the 'Four Cs': Connection, Control, Competence, and Context. The discussion is constructive and instructional.40:06–45:08 · Ted pushing back 1/10 The First Triangle: Setting Priorities (Protect, Match, Reach) Brian describes the first Triangle: setting priorities via Protect, Match, and Reach. He emphasizes prioritizing risk mitigation and being 'less wrong' over attempting to be 'more right.'45:09–47:42 · Ted pushing back 1/10 The Second Triangle: Decision Hierarchy and Behavior Brian explains the second Triangle focusing on decision-making, where behavioral management forms the foundational layer beneath asset allocation and security selection. Ted acknowledges how this flips conventional thinking on its head.47:42–53:35 · Ted pushing back 2/10 The Square: Growth, Pain, Fit, and Flexibility Brian outlines the Square's four dimensions (growth, pain/volatility, fit, flexibility), directly challenging Warren Buffett and Howard Marks by asserting that volatility is very real behavioral risk. Ted demonstrates peer expertise by connecting this dynamic to illiquidity in private equity.53:35–56:51 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Personal Meaning and Timeless Lessons for Family Ted and Brian reflect on how professional managers often mismanage their own personal finances and discuss creating timeless lessons for their children. The conversation closes on an aligned, warm note.

speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%3:00 · Ted 84% · guest 16%3:00 · Ted 84% · guest 16%6:00 · Ted 1.4% · guest 98.6%6:00 · Ted 1.4% · guest 98.6%9:00 · Ted 8.5% · guest 91.5%9:00 · Ted 8.5% · guest 91.5%12:00 · Ted 14.2% · guest 85.8%12:00 · Ted 14.2% · guest 85.8%15:00 · Ted 8.5% · guest 91.5%15:00 · Ted 8.5% · guest 91.5%18:00 · Ted 0.9% · guest 99.1%18:00 · Ted 0.9% · guest 99.1%21:00 · Ted 4.4% · guest 95.6%21:00 · Ted 4.4% · guest 95.6%24:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%24:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%27:00 · Ted 50.4% · guest 49.6%27:00 · Ted 50.4% · guest 49.6%30:00 · Ted 4.3% · guest 95.7%30:00 · Ted 4.3% · guest 95.7%33:00 · Ted 19.8% · guest 80.2%33:00 · Ted 19.8% · guest 80.2%36:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%36:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%39:00 · Ted 6.7% · guest 93.3%39:00 · Ted 6.7% · guest 93.3%42:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%42:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%45:00 · Ted 8.1% · guest 91.9%45:00 · Ted 8.1% · guest 91.9%48:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%48:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%51:00 · Ted 9% · guest 91%51:00 · Ted 9% · guest 91%54:00 · Ted 21.8% · guest 78.2%54:00 · Ted 21.8% · guest 78.2%57:00 · Ted 7.4% · guest 92.6%57:00 · Ted 7.4% · guest 92.6%1:00:00 · Ted 6.4% · guest 93.6%1:00:00 · Ted 6.4% · guest 93.6%1:03:00 · Ted 32.8% · guest 67.2%1:03:00 · Ted 32.8% · guest 67.2%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 49:40 Rejecting standard wisdom on volatility and risk

Brian directly challenges investment legends Warren Buffett and Howard Marks, firmly stating that dismissing volatility as risk is flawed when behavioral drop-out risk prevents investors from reaching their goals.

Hardest push from Ted ▶ 9:43 Challenging generic descriptions of hard questions

Ted pushes back on Brian's initial examples of due diligence questions, pointing out that asking about investment process is common and prompting Brian to clarify what actually makes a question hard.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 45:20 Inverting the investment decision hierarchy

Brian educates listeners and reframes investment analysis by showing that investor behavior and emotional coaching matter vastly more to real-world outcomes than manager selection or security picking.

Ted holds their own ▶ 53:20 Institutional insight into private equity liquidity advantages

Ted steps in to translate Brian's framework on liquidity constraints into the institutional domain, explaining how lockups in private equity deliberately remove destructive human emotion from the decision process.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicTed as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementTed pushing backWhy
Transition from Academia to Morningstar 3100 Ted opens the interview by asking about Brian's transition from academia to finance. Brian shares his personal narrative about leaving a PhD program to join Morningstar, setting a collaborative and reflective tone.
Honing Manager Due Diligence and Asking Hard Questions 5212 Ted probes on what constitutes a truly 'hard question' in manager research, noting that standard process questions sound generic. Brian provides a concrete example of confronting underperforming managers, establishing a shared allocator vocabulary.
Career Inflection Point and Pivot to Writing 4311 Brian discusses the midlife realization that led him to write The Investor's Paradox after conducting 4,000 interviews. He articulates how expectations formation and behavioral finance trump raw benchmark outperformance.
The Paradox of Choice and the Complexity Trap 4321 Brian unpacks choice theory and how complex investment strategies are inherently prone to disappoint because expectations are harder to calibrate. Ted validates this perspective based on recent institutional experience.
Joining Virtus Investment Partners and Empowering Advisors 3200 Brian explains his pivot from product structuring to investment education at Virtus. He details how modern financial advisors prioritize behavioral coaching and content over commoditized investment products.
Sponsor Message: Ridgeline 5322 Ted contrasts the institutional allocator mindset with the private wealth advisor mindset. Brian candidly critiques institutional allocators for manufacturing complexity and over-analyzing data to the fourth decimal place without adding a complexity premium.
'The Geometry of Wealth' and Funded Contentment 4311 Brian introduces the core thesis of The Geometry of Wealth: defining true wealth as 'funded contentment' rather than the unending treadmill of getting rich. Ted prompts Brian to explore how this philosophy translates to everyday money decisions.
The Circle: Defining Purpose and the Four C's 3400 Brian outlines the first shape, the Circle, representing the non-linear pursuit of life purpose across the 'Four Cs': Connection, Control, Competence, and Context. The discussion is constructive and instructional.
The First Triangle: Setting Priorities (Protect, Match, Reach) 4311 Brian describes the first Triangle: setting priorities via Protect, Match, and Reach. He emphasizes prioritizing risk mitigation and being 'less wrong' over attempting to be 'more right.'
The Second Triangle: Decision Hierarchy and Behavior 4411 Brian explains the second Triangle focusing on decision-making, where behavioral management forms the foundational layer beneath asset allocation and security selection. Ted acknowledges how this flips conventional thinking on its head.
The Square: Growth, Pain, Fit, and Flexibility 5432 Brian outlines the Square's four dimensions (growth, pain/volatility, fit, flexibility), directly challenging Warren Buffett and Howard Marks by asserting that volatility is very real behavioral risk. Ted demonstrates peer expertise by connecting this dynamic to illiquidity in private equity.
Personal Meaning and Timeless Lessons for Family 4200 Ted and Brian reflect on how professional managers often mismanage their own personal finances and discuss creating timeless lessons for their children. The conversation closes on an aligned, warm note.

Statements from this episode (18)

Assertion Not checkable as stated
Portnoy: Morningstar's Don Phillips invented the field of manager research
“Don Phillips, who really invented the field of manager research, you know, I think he has a master's degree in literature from the University of Texas.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 6:42
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Portnoy: Institutional hedge fund wave began after 2000-2002 drawdown
“The big institutional wave into hedge funds began after the 2000 to 2002 drawdown because so many funds, as we've talked about for a long time, were prescient enough or smart enough to be long value and short growth, and they survived 99, and they put up absol…”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 10:37
Insight
Evaluating allocator skill requires tracking the performance of passed investment opportunities
“Well, you can't really say whether you're skilled or not if, unless you think about the 99 that you passed on and whether they worked out on an absolute basis and relative to the one decision that you did make.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 16:58
Insight
Portnoy: Investing success means meeting client expectations, not beating benchmarks
“What I concluded after putting a lot of thought and time into it over a couple years was that true success in investing, broadly defined, is when expectations Map up with outcomes. And I began to realize, not in its fullest fruition, in the second book I explo…”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 17:09
Assertion Supported
Portnoy: ETF count grew from 50 in 1999 to 4,000-5,000
“There's now four or 5000 ETFs. There were only 50 in 1999.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 21:18
Insight
Portnoy: Complex investment strategies are most likely to disappoint
“The more complex a strategy, the more moving pieces it has, the harder it is to set expectations. So, precisely the funds that we think are positioned, To do the best for us during complex times are probably the ones best positioned to disappoint us.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 22:11
Insight
Bundling educational content with commoditized products is the modern wealth management recipe
“As so much product has become commoditized and it's less of an edge, the ability to bundle content with very compelling product is, is sort of the recipe. And so we think about how do you generate mindshare before generating market share.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 26:09
Opinion
Institutional allocators excel at creating confusion and solving non-existent problems
“I would say on the institutional side, allocators are very good at creating confusion and problems that don't exist.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 28:52
Insight
Portnoy: Complexity benefits professionals' careers in asset management
“Complexity is a good thing for people's careers in our industry.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 29:27
Opinion
Investors do not earn a complexity premium for intricate investment strategies
“I would argue that there's not a complexity premium for investors.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 29:33
Insight
True wealth is funded contentment, whereas being rich is a hedonic treadmill
“Wealthy is funded contentment. Rich is the quest for more. And I could cite you a 1001 articles from social psychology and other disciplines that show that the quest for more is nothing better than a treadmill.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 34:11
Assertion Supported
Portnoy: Wealth management shifted from brokerage to financial plans only recently
“It wasn't that long ago that the advice business was really a brokerage business. It was selling stocks and bonds and funds for a nice fee. It's only over the last five, 10, 15 years that the bulk of the wealth management industry has bought into this idea tha…”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 44:35
Insight
Portnoy: Working with advisors improves outcomes through behavioral coaching
“That's why I think generally people who work with financial advisors tend to have much better outcomes, not because the advisor is a market guru, but because the advisor can be a coach.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 46:05
Opinion
Volatility is genuine risk because it induces investors to abandon their plans
“The smartest of the smart guys say that volatility is not risk. And I strongly, strongly disagree. Because if you're, what you're really trying to do is achieve your goals in life, and the more volatile an investment is, Makes it more likely that you're going …”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 50:55
Assertion Supported
Portnoy: Target date and defined contribution funds produce better behavioral outcomes
“We know that people who are in target date funds And who are in sort of the institutional or defined contribution share classes of big funds tend to have better behavioral outcomes than those who are in the daily discretionary versions of the exact same funds.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 52:54
Opinion
An astounding number of professional money managers mismanage their own personal finances
“Like the number of professional money managers whose own personal balance sheet is not quite in the shape it should be. It's kind of astounding, right?”
Ted Seides Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 55:06
Opinion
Portnoy: Vast majority of money managers refuse to accept luck plays a role
“It drives me crazy that I would say a vast majority of money managers I've met over the years, and it's a big number, simply will not accept that luck is part of the equation.”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 58:37
Insight
Portnoy: Success comes from sourcing cheap options, not swinging for home runs
“The idea that much of success is, is not about pointing to the fences and hitting that one home run and walking off the field. It's more about having lots and lots of iterations across multiple games in your life where you're trying to source as many cheap opt…”
Brian Portnoy Jun 18, 2018 ▶ 1:03:07
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.