Feb 3, 2020 · 1h 15m · capital-allocators
Peter Kraus - Widening the Aperture on Alpha (First Meeting, EP.14)
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
Peter Kraus, Chairman and CEO of Aperture Investors, joins Ted Seides to critique the structural flaws and fee misalignments of traditional asset management. Drawing on his four-decade career leading Goldman Sachs IMD and AllianceBernstein, Kraus explains Aperture's ETF-benchmarked performance fee model and shares his rigorous qualitative framework for selecting portfolio managers.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 14% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Ted as informed peer 4.4 Guest teaching 5.3 Guest disagreement 2.2 Ted pushing back 1.4
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 43:25 Dissecting hedge fund short-book alpha illusions
Peter forcefully rejects hedge fund fee economics, arguing that 40-stock short portfolios fail to generate alpha and exist merely to dampen volatility while collecting 20% on residual beta.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 49:10 Ted pushes on analyst versus portfolio manager skillsetsTed directly interrupts and pushes back on Peter's PM evaluation criteria, pointing out that deep analysts often struggle with sizing conviction and constructing balanced portfolios.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 29:40 Educating regulators on passive pricing tipping pointsPeter details his meeting with US Treasury and SEC officials, walking them through the market fragility caused by passive investing lacking genuine price discovery mechanisms.
Ted holds their own ▶ 49:10 Ted demonstrates PM construction nuancesTed demonstrates sharp domain expertise by pressing Peter on how to identify whether a fundamentally skilled analyst possesses the instinctual chops required to trade and construct risk-weighted portfolios.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Fascination with Behavioral Finance and Markets | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ted opens with an open-ended question asking about Peter's early interest in investing. Peter recounts setting up a closet chart-room in high school and writing his undergraduate thesis on fear and greed utility curves before behavioral finance was formalized. | |
| Education, Travel, and Early Career at Peat Marwick | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted prompts Peter on his progression from college through Peat Marwick and into Goldman Sachs. Peter explains Goldman's unique partnership compensation structure that rewarded specialized roles equally rather than forcing generalism. | |
| Servicing Financial Institutions and Asset Management Growth | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ted asks how Peter moved through Goldman, leading Peter to detail the creation of the Financial Institutions Group amid the deregulation of interstate banking and the secular growth of institutional asset pools. | |
| Leading Goldman's IMD and Stepping Down Before the 2008 Crisis | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | Peter explains taking over Goldman's Investment Management Division and why asset management is fundamentally a complex behavioral business rather than a simple balance sheet operation, leading to his decision to step down in 2008. | |
| Navigating Merrill Lynch's Sale and Taking the Helm at AllianceBernstein | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Peter describes joining Merrill Lynch days before its sale to Bank of America and taking over AllianceBernstein in December 2008, reassuring the unlevered firm while realizing the challenges were structural rather than cyclical. | |
| Identifying Structural Flaws and Misaligned Incentives in Asset Management | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | Peter dissects how the asset management industry became addicted to asset gathering rather than alpha generation, charging 20% on beta and carry rather than pure outperformance. | |
| Three Epiphanies: Capacity, Passive Disruption, and Market Structure | 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | Peter outlines three defining epiphanies: manager capacity delusion, the unstoppable disruption of low-cost passive vehicles, and conversations with the Treasury and SEC regarding the systemic risks of passive market saturation. | |
| The Genesis of Aperture Investors and Performance-Linked Pricing | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | Peter explains founding Aperture Investors to decouple beta pricing from alpha incentives, charging ultra-low ETF-level base fees and earning performance fees only when exceeding appropriate benchmarks. | |
| Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Cloud Software | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ted presents a sponsor read for Ridgeline before asking Peter about Aperture's business scale and partnership with Generali. Peter explains why offering multiple standalone strategies with long capital runways beats single-fund models. | |
| Challenging Hedge Fund Economics and Establishing True Alignment | 5 | 6 | 5 | 1 | Peter critiques hedge fund short books as disguised volatility dampeners that fail to generate alpha while levying 20% carry on market beta. He contrasts this with Aperture's strict alignment model. | |
| Manager Selection: The Triad of Analyst, Engineer, and Trader | 7 | 6 | 3 | 6 | Ted pushes back directly on Peter's criteria, noting that great analysts frequently lack portfolio construction skills and conviction weighting. Peter validates the challenge, defining the essential PM triad of analyst, engineer, and trader. | |
| Evaluating Track Record Realities vs. Real-Time Execution | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | Ted asks about evaluating proven PMs versus untested analysts. Peter explains tracking candidates in real-time shadow books for over a year to observe error correction rather than relying on backwards-looking track records. | |
| Idea Origination, Self-Awareness, and Team Dynamics in Due Diligence | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | Peter explains assessing idea origination along value chains, testing investor humility through being the villain in your own narrative, and managing introverted investment teams over 30 to 45 hours of diligence. | |
| Industry Aspirations and Novel Social Media Engagement | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Ted transitions to closing questions regarding Peter's industry goals, contemporary art collecting, pet peeves, and Aperture's social media strategy, including Simon Thorpe's LinkedIn videos. |
Statements from this episode (20)
Kraus: Goldman Sachs partners received equal compensation across different specialties
“What was really curious to me about Goldman Sachs was, Goldman Sachs allowed people to specialize, and they compensated the different specialties equally. So at the partnership level, I mean, if you became a partner, you could be a corporate finance specialist…”
Kraus: Alpha was easier to generate in the 1980s and 1990s
“And back at that time, Alpha was obviously easier to earn, fewer competitors, much smaller amounts of assets. You know, hedge funds in the eighties and early nineties were, some were large, some might have been multiple billions, but most were less than a bill…”
Kraus: Asset management is extraordinarily complex because it is behaviorally driven
“Most people looking at asset management think it's simple, but in fact, it's extraordinary complex. And as I like to say to people, if it was so simple, every manager would outperform. And we know that that's not the case. So, it's actually a very complex and …”
Kraus: Merrill Lynch free cash plummeted from $90B to $10B in 2008
“I remember the time we had some ninety-odd billion dollars of free cash. I tell you that because that 90 went to below 10 within a short period of time. Just basically from mark to mark, it's not losses.”
Kraus: Asset management fee structures reward market beta over true alpha
“The whole motivation of the business, the way the fee structure is set up with the way portfolio managers are paid is all based on asset flow and growth. And unfortunately, while We thought that performance-based managers were really based on performance. They…”
Kraus: Concentrated portfolios produce better returns than diversified ones on average
“Are concentrated portfolios better than diversified portfolios? Yes. Is it a panacea? No. But on the whole, concentrated portfolios produce better returns, much more volatile.”
Kraus: Passive investing and high-frequency trading do not create price discovery
“Passive models do not discover prices. High frequency trading trades around prices, but it doesn't create price discovery. It creates liquidity, but it's not price discovery. It's not determining value.”
Kraus: Active management will keep losing assets without performance-aligned fees
“We need to have a level playing field where active managers can compete with passive and get paid for their performance. Because if they don't, I think over time, active is just going to continue to lose money, which has been the case and continues to be.”
Kraus: Holding 20 to 25 positions captures 95% of diversification benefits
“What you learn about diversification as well is that the benefits of diversification continue. As you add more and more positions, but it's asymptotic. It becomes significantly less valuable once you're beyond 12 or 15. And 20 to 25, you've gotten 95% of the f…”
Kraus: Nearly all ETFs outside US large cap trail their benchmarks
“Virtually all ETFs, with the exception of US large cap, actually earn less than the index. There's friction cost. Security lending doesn't overcome all the friction cost. Can't always buy all the securities.”
Kraus: High-yield ETFs hold 100 bonds versus 1,000 in index
“For example, in high yield, the high yield ETF owns a hundred bonds. The actual index owns over a thousand, and so replicating the index is almost impossible.”
Kraus: Giving Portfolio Managers Unconstrained Mandates Outperforms Constraining Them
“Another thing I found in my career is that allowing managers to be unconstrained is far better than constraining managers.”
Kraus: Clients Misunderstand Leverage Risk in Long-Short Hedge Fund Strategies
“I don't actually think clients understand that one of the things they're doing in that case is accepting leverage and the risk that comes with leverage, which is very hard to quantify.”
Kraus: Hedge funds generated no alpha in short positions over the last decade
“In general, across the industry, for long periods of time, last 10 years, there is no alpha in the short positions.”
Kraus: Performance fee deals fail if managers maintain mostly fixed-fee assets
“If the portfolio manager is managing 90% of their assets in fixed fees and 10% of their assets in performance, it doesn't actually achieve that.”
Kraus: Most asset managers are business-building index huggers, not risk-takers
“Oftentimes the managers in the industry are actually not risk takers. They're constructors of an index-like portfolio against an index. They're attempting to build a business. They're more businessmen than they are portfolio managers. And they aren't really co…”
Kraus: Few analysts have the engineering and trading skills to run portfolios
“So you need to be an analyst, an engineer, and a trader. The number of analysts that can become an engineer and a trader is small. The ability to identify an analyst who actually can be successful being the trader and the engineer is very difficult to the poin…”
Kraus: Real-time decision monitoring yields higher allocator conviction than historical track records
“When you watch somebody perform, meaning they tell you why they're buying something, what the thesis is, why they're weighting it that way, why they're selling something, then you can actually see, does that play out? And more importantly, you can see when it …”
Kraus: 85% to 90% of managers rely on identical screening processes
“What I find is 90%, maybe 85% of the managers source things pretty much the same way. They have some kind of a screen process that identifies a large universe and brings it down to a smaller universe, and then they start to actually think about what they want …”