May 24, 2021 · 1h 4m · capital-allocators

Ashby Monk – Innovation in Institutional Portfolios (Capital Allocators, EP.196)

Ashby Monk · 48m spoken Ted Seides · 10m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Stanford's Dr. Ashby Monk joins Ted Seides to analyze the dual role of institutional asset owners, dissect systemic governance and transparency barriers, and present modern technology frameworks for 21st-century portfolio navigation.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 18.2% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Ted as informed peer 5.1 Guest teaching 3.8 Guest disagreement 1.9 Ted pushing back 1.3
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:00:005:33–8:04 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 The Dual Role of Institutional Asset Owners Ted opens the interview by asking Ashby to contextualize why he dedicates his academic career to large asset owners. Ashby outlines the dual role of these institutions as the bedrock of both the social welfare state and global capitalism.8:05–12:46 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Governance Pitfalls and Modeling Cash Liabilities Ted prompts a discussion on governance failure and competing institutional objectives. Ashby highlights contradictory mission statements and notes the widespread absence of proactive cash-flow liability modeling.12:47–17:48 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Transparency and the Biden White Paper Ted brings up Ashby's Biden administration white paper on transparency. Ashby explains how granular data on cash flow, climate risk, and diversity enables asset owners to make better capital allocations rather than hoarding unallocated cash.17:48–20:50 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Incentives and Career Risks Hindering Transparency Ted pushes back by noting that top endowments like Yale already had deep portfolio transparency two decades ago. Ashby counters directly, diagnosing a systemic perversion where investment staff conceal hefty private fund fees from trustees out of self-preservation.20:51–24:21 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Structural Impediments to Institutional Innovation Ted asks what structural hurdles prevent innovation across institutional pools of capital. Ashby explains that prudent person rules, monopoly asset bases, undercompensated CIOs, and consultant scale economics inherently punish first-time fund bets and novel ideas.24:22–29:14 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Mechanisms for Change: Collaboration and Crises Ted inquires how institutions can overcome inertia to drive real change. Ashby discusses peer-collaborative risk sharing and historically crisis-driven shifts, arguing mandatory transparency reporting can spur progress before crises occur.29:16–32:47 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Investment Management Platform Following a sponsor break, Ted asks what core reporting metrics a board should mandate. Ashby specifies full cost breakdowns, climate exposure reporting, and workforce diversity metrics as foundational disclosures.32:47–37:35 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Global Case Studies: New Zealand, Australia, and Canada Ted asks for international case studies, focusing on New Zealand, Australian, and Canadian pensions. Ashby breaks down NZ Super's iterative climate process, Australian regulatory pressure and lawsuits, and Canadian collaborative analytics groups.37:36–40:31 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Translating Alternative and ESG Data into Financial Metrics Ted asks why ESG remains siloed if CIOs are increasingly focused on it. Ashby explains that ESG data fails unless it is translated directly into standard financial economics like discount rates and property damage models via startups like Future Proof.40:31–48:50 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Portfolio Navigation: RCI Navigator, Addepar, and Net Purpose Ted asks Ashby about his tech ventures. Ashby provides an extensive breakdown of Net Purpose, RCI Navigator's GPS-like deterministic portfolio modeling, and the Addepar aggregation partnership.48:50–53:25 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Case Study in Governance Breakdown: Pennsylvania Ted brings up Ashby's consulting engagement with the state pension of Pennsylvania. Ashby details the extreme lack of internal trust, 40-person group interviews, and a board incapable of supervising complex derivative portfolios.53:26–55:23 · Ted as informed peer 4/10 Long Game: Gamifying Personal Savings Ted asks for an update on Ashby's consumer fintech company Long Game. Ashby summarizes their behavioral economics thesis of using gamification and prize mechanics to encourage young Americans to save.5:33–8:04 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Dual Role of Institutional Asset Owners Ted opens the interview by asking Ashby to contextualize why he dedicates his academic career to large asset owners. Ashby outlines the dual role of these institutions as the bedrock of both the social welfare state and global capitalism.8:05–12:46 · Guest teaching 4/10 Governance Pitfalls and Modeling Cash Liabilities Ted prompts a discussion on governance failure and competing institutional objectives. Ashby highlights contradictory mission statements and notes the widespread absence of proactive cash-flow liability modeling.12:47–17:48 · Guest teaching 4/10 Transparency and the Biden White Paper Ted brings up Ashby's Biden administration white paper on transparency. Ashby explains how granular data on cash flow, climate risk, and diversity enables asset owners to make better capital allocations rather than hoarding unallocated cash.17:48–20:50 · Guest teaching 5/10 Incentives and Career Risks Hindering Transparency Ted pushes back by noting that top endowments like Yale already had deep portfolio transparency two decades ago. Ashby counters directly, diagnosing a systemic perversion where investment staff conceal hefty private fund fees from trustees out of self-preservation.20:51–24:21 · Guest teaching 4/10 Structural Impediments to Institutional Innovation Ted asks what structural hurdles prevent innovation across institutional pools of capital. Ashby explains that prudent person rules, monopoly asset bases, undercompensated CIOs, and consultant scale economics inherently punish first-time fund bets and novel ideas.24:22–29:14 · Guest teaching 4/10 Mechanisms for Change: Collaboration and Crises Ted inquires how institutions can overcome inertia to drive real change. Ashby discusses peer-collaborative risk sharing and historically crisis-driven shifts, arguing mandatory transparency reporting can spur progress before crises occur.29:16–32:47 · Guest teaching 3/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Investment Management Platform Following a sponsor break, Ted asks what core reporting metrics a board should mandate. Ashby specifies full cost breakdowns, climate exposure reporting, and workforce diversity metrics as foundational disclosures.32:47–37:35 · Guest teaching 4/10 Global Case Studies: New Zealand, Australia, and Canada Ted asks for international case studies, focusing on New Zealand, Australian, and Canadian pensions. Ashby breaks down NZ Super's iterative climate process, Australian regulatory pressure and lawsuits, and Canadian collaborative analytics groups.37:36–40:31 · Guest teaching 4/10 Translating Alternative and ESG Data into Financial Metrics Ted asks why ESG remains siloed if CIOs are increasingly focused on it. Ashby explains that ESG data fails unless it is translated directly into standard financial economics like discount rates and property damage models via startups like Future Proof.40:31–48:50 · Guest teaching 4/10 Portfolio Navigation: RCI Navigator, Addepar, and Net Purpose Ted asks Ashby about his tech ventures. Ashby provides an extensive breakdown of Net Purpose, RCI Navigator's GPS-like deterministic portfolio modeling, and the Addepar aggregation partnership.48:50–53:25 · Guest teaching 4/10 Case Study in Governance Breakdown: Pennsylvania Ted brings up Ashby's consulting engagement with the state pension of Pennsylvania. Ashby details the extreme lack of internal trust, 40-person group interviews, and a board incapable of supervising complex derivative portfolios.53:26–55:23 · Guest teaching 3/10 Long Game: Gamifying Personal Savings Ted asks for an update on Ashby's consumer fintech company Long Game. Ashby summarizes their behavioral economics thesis of using gamification and prize mechanics to encourage young Americans to save.5:33–8:04 · Guest disagreement 1/10 The Dual Role of Institutional Asset Owners Ted opens the interview by asking Ashby to contextualize why he dedicates his academic career to large asset owners. Ashby outlines the dual role of these institutions as the bedrock of both the social welfare state and global capitalism.8:05–12:46 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Governance Pitfalls and Modeling Cash Liabilities Ted prompts a discussion on governance failure and competing institutional objectives. Ashby highlights contradictory mission statements and notes the widespread absence of proactive cash-flow liability modeling.12:47–17:48 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Transparency and the Biden White Paper Ted brings up Ashby's Biden administration white paper on transparency. Ashby explains how granular data on cash flow, climate risk, and diversity enables asset owners to make better capital allocations rather than hoarding unallocated cash.17:48–20:50 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Incentives and Career Risks Hindering Transparency Ted pushes back by noting that top endowments like Yale already had deep portfolio transparency two decades ago. Ashby counters directly, diagnosing a systemic perversion where investment staff conceal hefty private fund fees from trustees out of self-preservation.20:51–24:21 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Structural Impediments to Institutional Innovation Ted asks what structural hurdles prevent innovation across institutional pools of capital. Ashby explains that prudent person rules, monopoly asset bases, undercompensated CIOs, and consultant scale economics inherently punish first-time fund bets and novel ideas.24:22–29:14 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Mechanisms for Change: Collaboration and Crises Ted inquires how institutions can overcome inertia to drive real change. Ashby discusses peer-collaborative risk sharing and historically crisis-driven shifts, arguing mandatory transparency reporting can spur progress before crises occur.29:16–32:47 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Investment Management Platform Following a sponsor break, Ted asks what core reporting metrics a board should mandate. Ashby specifies full cost breakdowns, climate exposure reporting, and workforce diversity metrics as foundational disclosures.32:47–37:35 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Global Case Studies: New Zealand, Australia, and Canada Ted asks for international case studies, focusing on New Zealand, Australian, and Canadian pensions. Ashby breaks down NZ Super's iterative climate process, Australian regulatory pressure and lawsuits, and Canadian collaborative analytics groups.37:36–40:31 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Translating Alternative and ESG Data into Financial Metrics Ted asks why ESG remains siloed if CIOs are increasingly focused on it. Ashby explains that ESG data fails unless it is translated directly into standard financial economics like discount rates and property damage models via startups like Future Proof.40:31–48:50 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Portfolio Navigation: RCI Navigator, Addepar, and Net Purpose Ted asks Ashby about his tech ventures. Ashby provides an extensive breakdown of Net Purpose, RCI Navigator's GPS-like deterministic portfolio modeling, and the Addepar aggregation partnership.48:50–53:25 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Case Study in Governance Breakdown: Pennsylvania Ted brings up Ashby's consulting engagement with the state pension of Pennsylvania. Ashby details the extreme lack of internal trust, 40-person group interviews, and a board incapable of supervising complex derivative portfolios.53:26–55:23 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Long Game: Gamifying Personal Savings Ted asks for an update on Ashby's consumer fintech company Long Game. Ashby summarizes their behavioral economics thesis of using gamification and prize mechanics to encourage young Americans to save.5:33–8:04 · Ted pushing back 1/10 The Dual Role of Institutional Asset Owners Ted opens the interview by asking Ashby to contextualize why he dedicates his academic career to large asset owners. Ashby outlines the dual role of these institutions as the bedrock of both the social welfare state and global capitalism.8:05–12:46 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Governance Pitfalls and Modeling Cash Liabilities Ted prompts a discussion on governance failure and competing institutional objectives. Ashby highlights contradictory mission statements and notes the widespread absence of proactive cash-flow liability modeling.12:47–17:48 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Transparency and the Biden White Paper Ted brings up Ashby's Biden administration white paper on transparency. Ashby explains how granular data on cash flow, climate risk, and diversity enables asset owners to make better capital allocations rather than hoarding unallocated cash.17:48–20:50 · Ted pushing back 3/10 Incentives and Career Risks Hindering Transparency Ted pushes back by noting that top endowments like Yale already had deep portfolio transparency two decades ago. Ashby counters directly, diagnosing a systemic perversion where investment staff conceal hefty private fund fees from trustees out of self-preservation.20:51–24:21 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Structural Impediments to Institutional Innovation Ted asks what structural hurdles prevent innovation across institutional pools of capital. Ashby explains that prudent person rules, monopoly asset bases, undercompensated CIOs, and consultant scale economics inherently punish first-time fund bets and novel ideas.24:22–29:14 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Mechanisms for Change: Collaboration and Crises Ted inquires how institutions can overcome inertia to drive real change. Ashby discusses peer-collaborative risk sharing and historically crisis-driven shifts, arguing mandatory transparency reporting can spur progress before crises occur.29:16–32:47 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Investment Management Platform Following a sponsor break, Ted asks what core reporting metrics a board should mandate. Ashby specifies full cost breakdowns, climate exposure reporting, and workforce diversity metrics as foundational disclosures.32:47–37:35 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Global Case Studies: New Zealand, Australia, and Canada Ted asks for international case studies, focusing on New Zealand, Australian, and Canadian pensions. Ashby breaks down NZ Super's iterative climate process, Australian regulatory pressure and lawsuits, and Canadian collaborative analytics groups.37:36–40:31 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Translating Alternative and ESG Data into Financial Metrics Ted asks why ESG remains siloed if CIOs are increasingly focused on it. Ashby explains that ESG data fails unless it is translated directly into standard financial economics like discount rates and property damage models via startups like Future Proof.40:31–48:50 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Portfolio Navigation: RCI Navigator, Addepar, and Net Purpose Ted asks Ashby about his tech ventures. Ashby provides an extensive breakdown of Net Purpose, RCI Navigator's GPS-like deterministic portfolio modeling, and the Addepar aggregation partnership.48:50–53:25 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Case Study in Governance Breakdown: Pennsylvania Ted brings up Ashby's consulting engagement with the state pension of Pennsylvania. Ashby details the extreme lack of internal trust, 40-person group interviews, and a board incapable of supervising complex derivative portfolios.53:26–55:23 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Long Game: Gamifying Personal Savings Ted asks for an update on Ashby's consumer fintech company Long Game. Ashby summarizes their behavioral economics thesis of using gamification and prize mechanics to encourage young Americans to save.

speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%3:00 · Ted 95.3% · guest 4.7%3:00 · Ted 95.3% · guest 4.7%6:00 · Ted 16.5% · guest 83.5%6:00 · Ted 16.5% · guest 83.5%9:00 · Ted 10.8% · guest 89.2%9:00 · Ted 10.8% · guest 89.2%12:00 · Ted 14.4% · guest 85.6%12:00 · Ted 14.4% · guest 85.6%15:00 · Ted 6.3% · guest 93.7%15:00 · Ted 6.3% · guest 93.7%18:00 · Ted 17.8% · guest 82.2%18:00 · Ted 17.8% · guest 82.2%21:00 · Ted 7.9% · guest 92.1%21:00 · Ted 7.9% · guest 92.1%24:00 · Ted 4.1% · guest 95.9%24:00 · Ted 4.1% · guest 95.9%27:00 · Ted 24.5% · guest 75.5%27:00 · Ted 24.5% · guest 75.5%30:00 · Ted 26.6% · guest 73.4%30:00 · Ted 26.6% · guest 73.4%33:00 · Ted 0.8% · guest 99.2%33:00 · Ted 0.8% · guest 99.2%36:00 · Ted 12.9% · guest 87.1%36:00 · Ted 12.9% · guest 87.1%39:00 · Ted 3.5% · guest 96.5%39:00 · Ted 3.5% · guest 96.5%42:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%42:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%45:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%45:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%48:00 · Ted 15% · guest 85%48:00 · Ted 15% · guest 85%51:00 · Ted 10.8% · guest 89.2%51:00 · Ted 10.8% · guest 89.2%54:00 · Ted 4.5% · guest 95.5%54:00 · Ted 4.5% · guest 95.5%57:00 · Ted 4.9% · guest 95.1%57:00 · Ted 4.9% · guest 95.1%1:00:00 · Ted 3.8% · guest 96.2%1:00:00 · Ted 3.8% · guest 96.2%1:03:00 · Ted 25.3% · guest 74.7%1:03:00 · Ted 25.3% · guest 74.7%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 18:23 Calling out allocator secrecy around excessive fees

Ashby forcefully rejects the benign view of institutional opacity, calling out staff for hiding 2/20 and 3/30 fee checks from stakeholders because they fear political interference.

Hardest push from Ted ▶ 17:48 Ted challenges the narrative of allocator data ignorance

Ted draws directly from his own experience at Yale twenty years prior to question Ashby's premise that large institutions lack basic granular knowledge of what is inside their portfolios.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 37:59 Ashby explains the necessity of translating ESG into financial models

Ashby educates the host and listeners on why ESG initiatives get sidelined unless qualitative factors are converted into concrete financial economics like cash flows, damage projections, and discount rates.

Ted holds their own ▶ 37:36 Ted challenges whether ESG is still truly siloed

Ted demonstrates his close industry observation by pushing back on Ashby's claim that ESG sits apart from core operations, citing CIOs actively integrating it into frontline investment decisions.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicTed as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementTed pushing backWhy
The Dual Role of Institutional Asset Owners 5311 Ted opens the interview by asking Ashby to contextualize why he dedicates his academic career to large asset owners. Ashby outlines the dual role of these institutions as the bedrock of both the social welfare state and global capitalism.
Governance Pitfalls and Modeling Cash Liabilities 5421 Ted prompts a discussion on governance failure and competing institutional objectives. Ashby highlights contradictory mission statements and notes the widespread absence of proactive cash-flow liability modeling.
Transparency and the Biden White Paper 5411 Ted brings up Ashby's Biden administration white paper on transparency. Ashby explains how granular data on cash flow, climate risk, and diversity enables asset owners to make better capital allocations rather than hoarding unallocated cash.
Incentives and Career Risks Hindering Transparency 6543 Ted pushes back by noting that top endowments like Yale already had deep portfolio transparency two decades ago. Ashby counters directly, diagnosing a systemic perversion where investment staff conceal hefty private fund fees from trustees out of self-preservation.
Structural Impediments to Institutional Innovation 5431 Ted asks what structural hurdles prevent innovation across institutional pools of capital. Ashby explains that prudent person rules, monopoly asset bases, undercompensated CIOs, and consultant scale economics inherently punish first-time fund bets and novel ideas.
Mechanisms for Change: Collaboration and Crises 5421 Ted inquires how institutions can overcome inertia to drive real change. Ashby discusses peer-collaborative risk sharing and historically crisis-driven shifts, arguing mandatory transparency reporting can spur progress before crises occur.
Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Investment Management Platform 4311 Following a sponsor break, Ted asks what core reporting metrics a board should mandate. Ashby specifies full cost breakdowns, climate exposure reporting, and workforce diversity metrics as foundational disclosures.
Global Case Studies: New Zealand, Australia, and Canada 5421 Ted asks for international case studies, focusing on New Zealand, Australian, and Canadian pensions. Ashby breaks down NZ Super's iterative climate process, Australian regulatory pressure and lawsuits, and Canadian collaborative analytics groups.
Translating Alternative and ESG Data into Financial Metrics 6422 Ted asks why ESG remains siloed if CIOs are increasingly focused on it. Ashby explains that ESG data fails unless it is translated directly into standard financial economics like discount rates and property damage models via startups like Future Proof.
Portfolio Navigation: RCI Navigator, Addepar, and Net Purpose 5411 Ted asks Ashby about his tech ventures. Ashby provides an extensive breakdown of Net Purpose, RCI Navigator's GPS-like deterministic portfolio modeling, and the Addepar aggregation partnership.
Case Study in Governance Breakdown: Pennsylvania 6432 Ted brings up Ashby's consulting engagement with the state pension of Pennsylvania. Ashby details the extreme lack of internal trust, 40-person group interviews, and a board incapable of supervising complex derivative portfolios.
Long Game: Gamifying Personal Savings 4311 Ted asks for an update on Ashby's consumer fintech company Long Game. Ashby summarizes their behavioral economics thesis of using gamification and prize mechanics to encourage young Americans to save.

Statements from this episode (26)

Opinion
Monk: Pension funds and endowments are Earth's most important organizations
“I really truly do believe, Ted, that these are the most important organizations on the earth, and that's full stop. I don't even have a caveat around that or a constraint.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 6:20
Assertion Supported
Monk: Institutional allocators deploy $120 trillion into global investment funds
“With a 120 trillion dollars, their capital flows out into the hedge funds, the mutual funds, the private equity funds, the venture funds.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 7:14
Assertion Supported
Monk: Most public pensions and endowments lack aligned definitions of success
“I've done this in a research project in the last four years, and I have to tell you, I was blown away that most of these organizations actually have different definitions of success.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 9:05
Insight
Monk: Pension active-passive debates always boil down to governance
“And without fail, that active-passive conversation inside a pension fund actually boils back to governance.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 9:50
Opinion
Monk: Public pensions contrive asset allocations to hit aggressive return targets
“In the case of public pension funds, yes, like you'll have actuaries come along and do a pretty rigorous Examination of the liabilities. They'll tell you what your asset allocation strategy would be, but then it gets complicated because the assumptions underpi…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 11:35
Insight
Monk: Granular cash flow modeling allows pension funds to hold less cash
“We found that if you can really kind of model out those cash flows that we were talking about, cash flows, liquidity, unfunded pacing commitments and all of that you can drive. In fact, there's a UK based pension fund that did this. You can drive these organiz…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 15:53
Assertion Supported
Monk: Fee transparency drove portfolio changes at CalPERS, CalSTRS, and UC Regents
“We've seen tons of examples like CalPERS and CalSTRS and even UC Regents where fees and costs have driven changes in their portfolio, just the transparency.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 17:01
Assertion Partly supported
Monk: Measuring diversity prompted London Pension Protection Fund to alter strategy
“And then most recently, the neat one that I saw was PPF in London recently, Pension Protection Fund. They measured the diversity and inclusion in their organization and portfolio, and realized the moment they started measuring it that there was like fundamenta…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 17:10
Insight
Monk: Allocators hide data fearing stakeholders will block high-fee strategies
“I think there's a lot of investment professionals at these organizations that believe that if they reported it to the stakeholders wouldn't let them pursue the strategy that they believe in their heart of hearts is needed to meet the obligation of the plan. So…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 18:34
Insight
Monk: Institutional investors get fired for innovating or violating social missions
“In fact, I'd say there's only a handful of ways to get fired in this industry, and one of them is innovation and looking different from your peers. The other is if you've been shown to do something that kind of Is seen as against the social mission of the fund…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 20:02
Insight
Monk: Permanent allocator monopolies remove organizational survival pressure to innovate
“Most of these organizations have monopolies over the asset base, which means Stanford management company isn't going away. CalPERS isn't going away, but the people in those organizations can be fired. And so you as an employee of these organizations, and I'm n…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 21:42
Insight
Monk: Board bans on first-time funds force allocators into expensive managers
“A lot of the boards of directors think they're protecting their organization from failure by telling their teams they can't do first time funds, or they can't invest in hedge funds below a certain AUM, which is another way of saying you can only invest in fund…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 22:26
Insight
Monk: Investment consultant margins discourage deep diligence on new managers
“The consulting businesses are based on scale. So if they go and do a diligence on a manager, A deep dive and really understand that manager. They want to use those reports many times because that's how they make the business work. That's how you get the margin…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 23:33
Insight
Monk: Asset owners innovate by pooling career risk with peer institutions
“How is like we've seen, and I've written about this like collaborative model of investment where Pension funds and endowments and sovereign funds will come together and collaborate. They'll pool resources. They will pool career risk. If I'm working with Ontari…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 25:34
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Monk: COVID-19 pandemic will be remembered for triggering digital transformation
“The crisis that we're living through now will go down as the crisis that like triggered the digital transformation and frankly, the integration of ESG, but that'll be kind of a secondary part of that digital transformation.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 27:37
Opinion
Monk: Australian superannuation funds represent the future of pensions globally
“Australian super and the Australians in general, they're just the future of pensions in the world.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 34:04
Assertion Supported
Monk: Australian pension fund REST settled member lawsuit over climate negligence
“And oh, by the way, Ted, one of them rest retail employee super trust was sued by a member for not taking climate change seriously. And yes, the lawsuit was settled.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 34:37
Assertion Supported
Monk: Eight Canadian pension plans launched joint climate analytics initiative
“There's like eight plans that came together, commissioned a working group, and they're collaborating on the development and all these new climate risk analytics that they're trying to bake right into their decision making. And that launched in the last 12 mont…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 36:31
Insight
Monk: ESG factors are pre-financial risks that become financial over time
“The reality is the ESG stuff is just pre-financial risk. I'm on the Future of Finance Council at the CFA, and it's actually Roger Irwin who instructed me on this. He's like, look, we should just be thinking about ESG as pre-financial risk. It will become finan…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 37:17
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Monk: Data shows ESG provided downside protection during recent crisis
“Like we've seen through the recent crisis, ESG does offer some downside protection. That's in the data.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 38:26
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Monk: Unifying institutional portfolio data across custodians and GPs takes months
“What was really hard to do was to get all the data unified, to get it into the system. It could take six months. It's like when you said at Yale we had all this data. It's a huge lift to get this stuff out of The custodians, out of the general partners, out of…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 46:48
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Monk: Pennsylvania pension staff interviews required speaking before 40 colleagues
“My interview at one of those organizations was me sitting in a room with 40 people, and every single person had to say what they were going to say to me in front of the other 40 people.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 50:54
Opinion
Monk: Pennsylvania pension board misunderstood portfolio complexity, hurting risk-adjusted returns
“And when we got done with all of the analysis on a risk adjusted basis, It was much worse than I thought. And then there was a sense for me that this was a governance challenge and that because the board struggled to understand the complexity of the portfolio …”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 52:22
Insight
Monk: Pension boards need technical expertise on derivatives to enforce accountability
“All these organizations need boards of directors that can like hold the staff accountable, that understand derivatives contracts and how they're priced and what the tail risks are for certain different assets.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 52:48
Insight
Monk: Gamification and variable rewards are behavioral finance's next phase
“Our thinking and our thinking remains that this is the next phase of behavioral finance. And what we think of as like the nudges of personal finance, we're going the next step. Which is to bring a bunch of extrinsic motivators, gains, variable rewards, into th…”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 54:07
Insight
Monk: Innovation and efficiency are opposites because innovation inherently requires failure
“And by the way, you cannot innovate without failure. The two are inextricably linked. It's like saying we want to be efficient and innovative at the same time. They're opposites. Innovation is failure and learning how to manage failure.”
Ashby Monk May 24, 2021 ▶ 59:58
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.