Sep 9, 2024 · 1h 2m · capital-allocators
Jase Auby - Risk, Size, and Talent at Texas Teachers (EP.404)
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Jase Auby, Chief Investment Officer of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas, exploring how one of the largest public pensions in the United States navigates quantitative risk modeling, fee innovation, decentralized governance, and forward-looking macroeconomic asset allocation.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 21.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Jase pushes back against conventional top-down ESG frameworks, noting catastrophic risk modeling has existed for 500 years and asserting that TRS already knows how to underwrite physical asset risks.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 36:32 Challenging the fusion of quantitative risk and bottom-up judgmentTed presses Jase on how a CIO with a strictly quantitative horizontal risk background evaluates and reconciles qualitative, bottom-up manager assessments from vertical teams.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 13:20 Explaining the uniqueness of unlevered pension balance sheetsJase educates the audience on why risk management in a 26-year horizon unlevered public pension focuses on risk efficiency rather than existential insolvency risk.
Ted holds their own ▶ 49:07 Probing adoption pushback on hedge fund cost-of-capital hurdlesTed demonstrates keen industry awareness by questioning the actual traction and resistance institutional signatories encounter when imposing strict cash hurdles on legacy managers.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jase Auby's Early Technological Background and Wall Street Entry | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Ted prompts Jase on his background entering Wall Street with a computer engineering background. Jase describes transitioning into fixed income at Goldman Sachs when technologists were first joining trading floors. | |
| Structuring Cash Flow CDOs at Lehman Brothers and Returning to Texas | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks Jase about structuring early CDO products at Lehman and his entrepreneurial ventures after moving to Austin. Jase details building the cash flow CDO desk and technical lessons learned from startup ventures. | |
| Rethinking Pension Fund Risk Management Post-GFC | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | Jase provides a deep conceptual breakdown of why pension fund risk management differs fundamentally from levered institutions. Ted listens closely as Jase outlines TRS's 26-year horizon and unlevered balance sheet. | |
| De-Smoothing Private Market Risk and Developing Public Proxies | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | Ted probes how Jase approached measuring risk in a large portfolio with heavy private allocations. Jase explains the statistical necessity of stripping out valuation smoothing and developing public proxies. | |
| Adopting Public Market Equivalent (PME) Performance Benchmarks | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about portfolio adjustments following the proxy modeling and how TRS approaches energy. Jase explains transitioning fully to Public Market Equivalent (PME) benchmarking and capitalizing on traditional energy divestment by peers. | |
| Bifurcating the Hedge Fund Portfolio: Stable Value vs. Directional | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Ted inquires into TRS's stable value approach and modest portfolio leverage. Jase breaks down the rationale for separating hedge funds into zero-beta stable value versus directional equity overlays. | |
| Navigating the Competitive Advantages and Capacity Constraints of Scale | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Ted and Jase discuss the trade-offs of managing $200 billion in assets. Jase details relationship advantages and access against the structural capacity constraints in asset classes like venture capital. | |
| Organizational Architecture and the Special Opportunities Group | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks how TRS structures teams to evaluate cross-asset opportunities and win the war for talent. Jase explains their Special Opportunities Group and their 4-pillar talent value proposition. | |
| Transitioning to CIO and Decentralizing Decision-Making Authority | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Ted inquires into Jase's shift from CRO to CIO. Jase describes deliberately decentralizing decision authority away from a monolithic CIO office and creating dedicated asset-class investment committees. | |
| Sponsor Message: Ridgeline Investment Management Technology | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2 | Following the mid-roll sponsor break, Ted pushes on how Jase balances a quantitative horizontal risk background against qualitative bottom-up manager decisions. Jase explains setting quantitative boundary parameters while delegating qualitative selection. | |
| Craftsmanship Alpha and Investment Committee Dynamics | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks for concrete examples of improving decision architecture. Jase outlines craftsmanship alpha, optimal committee sizing of 5 to 6 people, and the operational principle of avoiding 'slow maybes.' | |
| Innovation and Identifying Emerging Niches in Real Estate | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | Jase challenges the conventional obsession with office real estate by pointing out that modern indices are dominated by industrial and niche sectors, underscoring that innovation is mandatory for sustaining alpha. | |
| TRS Emerging Manager Program and Graduation Framework | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Ted and Jase discuss TRS's 20-year Emerging Manager program. Jase outlines the three core tenets (performance first, diversity, and graduation) and why they discontinued emerging VC allocations due to lack of demonstrated edge. | |
| Fee Innovation: The '1-or-30' Model and Cash Hurdle Campaigns | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | Ted asks about TRS's fee leverage. Jase details the adoption of the '1-or-30' fee structure and their recent institutional campaign demanding cash hurdle benchmarks in a 5% rate environment. | |
| Global Expansion Strategy and Establishing the London Office | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | Jase outlines why TRS established a London outpost for private markets and defends their strict fiduciary approach against top-down ESG activism, introducing their Global Board Aligned proxy voting model. | |
| Macro Outlook: AI Power Infrastructure, Diversified Beta, and India | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | Jase shares macro views on data center power infrastructure bottlenecks and makes a contrarian call that diversified beta via risk parity and Indian equities will outshine US large-cap equities in the coming decade. |