Jul 22, 2024 · 1h 4m · capital-allocators

Rob Small and Anil Seetharam - Public Equity Adjacent to Private Equity at Stockbridge (EP.397)

Rob Small · 25m spoken Anil Seetharam · 20m spoken Ted Seides · 12m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Rob Small and Anil Seetharam of Stockbridge at Berkshire Partners about managing a concentrated $5 billion public equity strategy within a $20 billion private equity firm. They discuss their outside-in research methodology, dynamic conviction polling, collaborative board governance, and key lessons from seventeen years of long-term compounder investing.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 20.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Ted as informed peer 5.0 Guest teaching 4.8 Guest disagreement 0.4 Ted pushing back 1.2
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:00:006:57–10:36 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Professional Backgrounds of Rob Small and Anil Seetharam Ted guides the biographical narrative smoothly, asking how Berkshire Partners evaluated adding public equities as a distinct product. Rob and Anil explain their career paths and the firm's three-part acid test for launching new initiatives.10:37–12:41 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Designing a Long-Only, Concentrated Public Equity Strategy Ted brings historical industry context about how past private equity crossovers into public markets largely failed. Rob details how Stockbridge rejected standard long-short hedge fund models to stay concentrated and long-only on advice from David Swensen.12:42–16:32 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Building Public Market Muscles and Achieving Conviction Ted asks how the team developed public market investment muscles from a private equity background. Anil offers a vivid analogy of comparing private equity diligence to a timed puzzle box and public equity to missing puzzle pieces scattered without a clock.16:35–20:06 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Inside-Out vs. Outside-In Research and Private-to-Public Diligence Gaps Ted probes the operational research gaps between private and public market diligence. Rob and Anil explain that while inside data is necessary for restructuring theses, outside-in research is just as telling for stable compounding businesses.20:06–24:41 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Navigating Potential Conflicts and Sharing Insights Across Teams Ted asks how Stockbridge navigates material non-public information and potential conflicts when both teams evaluate similar companies. Anil explains that the firm trades in industry insights rather than non-public information, resolving conflicts through co-investment.24:42–28:04 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Deep-Dive Diligence in Practice: Pediatrix and Vulcan Materials Ted inquires how deep-dive research manifests practically relative to standard public equity analysts. Anil provides concrete case studies, describing demographic modeling on neonatology for Pediatrix and mapping every quarry in the US for Vulcan Materials.28:05–34:24 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Filtering the Investment Universe and the Discipline of Passing Ted asks how the team quickly filters ideas to avoid getting bogged down in extensive research, and how consensus decision-making works. Rob explains the firm's conviction polling system and the psychological discipline of distinguishing passing from declaring a stock bad.34:40–36:46 · Ted as informed peer 0/10 Sponsor Advertisement: Ridgeline Investment Management Tech Host mid-roll sponsor advertisement read for Ridgeline investment technology. No guest interaction or substantive discussion.36:46–43:02 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Strategic Philosophy on Public Company Board Participation Ted asks about the cost-benefit trade-offs of public company board seats. Anil and Rob emphasize that they never seek board seats to impose activist changes, but rather to support management and strengthen holding conviction in compounders like TransDigm and ADS.43:03–47:40 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Weathering Volatility, Short Attacks, and Operating Discipline Ted asks how Stockbridge handles inevitable stock drawdowns and bumps in the road. Rob recounts how a short attack on TransDigm prompted rigorous outside-in verification that enabled them to aggressively buy more rather than panic.47:41–50:56 · Ted as informed peer 6/10 Navigating Large-Cap Winners and the Circle of Competence Ted presses the guests on why their private-equity style public equity approach initially overlooked the mega-cap tech stocks driving index returns. Anil and Rob discuss owning Amazon and Microsoft based on circle of competence while deliberately passing on Nvidia.50:56–54:02 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Selling Discipline, Modeling Limitations, and Behavioral Lessons Ted asks about sell discipline and operational errors. Anil discusses the pitfall of overly rigid spreadsheet IRR modeling that causes managers to sell compounders prematurely, and Rob recalls a 2016 emotional sell mistake.54:03–56:46 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 Avoiding the Endowment Effect and Evaluating Analytical Conviction Ted asks how they distinguish stubbornness from conviction when an investment goes south. Rob illustrates this using a coin-flip probability model, while Anil explains doing continuous work to avoid the endowment effect.56:46–59:46 · Ted as informed peer 5/10 The Blurring Boundaries Between Public and Private Markets Ted asks about the blurring line between public and private valuations. Rob and Anil reflect on twenty years of compounding and note that the biggest lesson is making a very small number of consequential, high-conviction decisions.6:57–10:36 · Guest teaching 4/10 Professional Backgrounds of Rob Small and Anil Seetharam Ted guides the biographical narrative smoothly, asking how Berkshire Partners evaluated adding public equities as a distinct product. Rob and Anil explain their career paths and the firm's three-part acid test for launching new initiatives.10:37–12:41 · Guest teaching 4/10 Designing a Long-Only, Concentrated Public Equity Strategy Ted brings historical industry context about how past private equity crossovers into public markets largely failed. Rob details how Stockbridge rejected standard long-short hedge fund models to stay concentrated and long-only on advice from David Swensen.12:42–16:32 · Guest teaching 6/10 Building Public Market Muscles and Achieving Conviction Ted asks how the team developed public market investment muscles from a private equity background. Anil offers a vivid analogy of comparing private equity diligence to a timed puzzle box and public equity to missing puzzle pieces scattered without a clock.16:35–20:06 · Guest teaching 5/10 Inside-Out vs. Outside-In Research and Private-to-Public Diligence Gaps Ted probes the operational research gaps between private and public market diligence. Rob and Anil explain that while inside data is necessary for restructuring theses, outside-in research is just as telling for stable compounding businesses.20:06–24:41 · Guest teaching 5/10 Navigating Potential Conflicts and Sharing Insights Across Teams Ted asks how Stockbridge navigates material non-public information and potential conflicts when both teams evaluate similar companies. Anil explains that the firm trades in industry insights rather than non-public information, resolving conflicts through co-investment.24:42–28:04 · Guest teaching 6/10 Deep-Dive Diligence in Practice: Pediatrix and Vulcan Materials Ted inquires how deep-dive research manifests practically relative to standard public equity analysts. Anil provides concrete case studies, describing demographic modeling on neonatology for Pediatrix and mapping every quarry in the US for Vulcan Materials.28:05–34:24 · Guest teaching 5/10 Filtering the Investment Universe and the Discipline of Passing Ted asks how the team quickly filters ideas to avoid getting bogged down in extensive research, and how consensus decision-making works. Rob explains the firm's conviction polling system and the psychological discipline of distinguishing passing from declaring a stock bad.34:40–36:46 · Guest teaching 0/10 Sponsor Advertisement: Ridgeline Investment Management Tech Host mid-roll sponsor advertisement read for Ridgeline investment technology. No guest interaction or substantive discussion.36:46–43:02 · Guest teaching 5/10 Strategic Philosophy on Public Company Board Participation Ted asks about the cost-benefit trade-offs of public company board seats. Anil and Rob emphasize that they never seek board seats to impose activist changes, but rather to support management and strengthen holding conviction in compounders like TransDigm and ADS.43:03–47:40 · Guest teaching 6/10 Weathering Volatility, Short Attacks, and Operating Discipline Ted asks how Stockbridge handles inevitable stock drawdowns and bumps in the road. Rob recounts how a short attack on TransDigm prompted rigorous outside-in verification that enabled them to aggressively buy more rather than panic.47:41–50:56 · Guest teaching 5/10 Navigating Large-Cap Winners and the Circle of Competence Ted presses the guests on why their private-equity style public equity approach initially overlooked the mega-cap tech stocks driving index returns. Anil and Rob discuss owning Amazon and Microsoft based on circle of competence while deliberately passing on Nvidia.50:56–54:02 · Guest teaching 6/10 Selling Discipline, Modeling Limitations, and Behavioral Lessons Ted asks about sell discipline and operational errors. Anil discusses the pitfall of overly rigid spreadsheet IRR modeling that causes managers to sell compounders prematurely, and Rob recalls a 2016 emotional sell mistake.54:03–56:46 · Guest teaching 5/10 Avoiding the Endowment Effect and Evaluating Analytical Conviction Ted asks how they distinguish stubbornness from conviction when an investment goes south. Rob illustrates this using a coin-flip probability model, while Anil explains doing continuous work to avoid the endowment effect.56:46–59:46 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Blurring Boundaries Between Public and Private Markets Ted asks about the blurring line between public and private valuations. Rob and Anil reflect on twenty years of compounding and note that the biggest lesson is making a very small number of consequential, high-conviction decisions.6:57–10:36 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Professional Backgrounds of Rob Small and Anil Seetharam Ted guides the biographical narrative smoothly, asking how Berkshire Partners evaluated adding public equities as a distinct product. Rob and Anil explain their career paths and the firm's three-part acid test for launching new initiatives.10:37–12:41 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Designing a Long-Only, Concentrated Public Equity Strategy Ted brings historical industry context about how past private equity crossovers into public markets largely failed. Rob details how Stockbridge rejected standard long-short hedge fund models to stay concentrated and long-only on advice from David Swensen.12:42–16:32 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Building Public Market Muscles and Achieving Conviction Ted asks how the team developed public market investment muscles from a private equity background. Anil offers a vivid analogy of comparing private equity diligence to a timed puzzle box and public equity to missing puzzle pieces scattered without a clock.16:35–20:06 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Inside-Out vs. Outside-In Research and Private-to-Public Diligence Gaps Ted probes the operational research gaps between private and public market diligence. Rob and Anil explain that while inside data is necessary for restructuring theses, outside-in research is just as telling for stable compounding businesses.20:06–24:41 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Navigating Potential Conflicts and Sharing Insights Across Teams Ted asks how Stockbridge navigates material non-public information and potential conflicts when both teams evaluate similar companies. Anil explains that the firm trades in industry insights rather than non-public information, resolving conflicts through co-investment.24:42–28:04 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Deep-Dive Diligence in Practice: Pediatrix and Vulcan Materials Ted inquires how deep-dive research manifests practically relative to standard public equity analysts. Anil provides concrete case studies, describing demographic modeling on neonatology for Pediatrix and mapping every quarry in the US for Vulcan Materials.28:05–34:24 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Filtering the Investment Universe and the Discipline of Passing Ted asks how the team quickly filters ideas to avoid getting bogged down in extensive research, and how consensus decision-making works. Rob explains the firm's conviction polling system and the psychological discipline of distinguishing passing from declaring a stock bad.34:40–36:46 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Sponsor Advertisement: Ridgeline Investment Management Tech Host mid-roll sponsor advertisement read for Ridgeline investment technology. No guest interaction or substantive discussion.36:46–43:02 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Strategic Philosophy on Public Company Board Participation Ted asks about the cost-benefit trade-offs of public company board seats. Anil and Rob emphasize that they never seek board seats to impose activist changes, but rather to support management and strengthen holding conviction in compounders like TransDigm and ADS.43:03–47:40 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Weathering Volatility, Short Attacks, and Operating Discipline Ted asks how Stockbridge handles inevitable stock drawdowns and bumps in the road. Rob recounts how a short attack on TransDigm prompted rigorous outside-in verification that enabled them to aggressively buy more rather than panic.47:41–50:56 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Navigating Large-Cap Winners and the Circle of Competence Ted presses the guests on why their private-equity style public equity approach initially overlooked the mega-cap tech stocks driving index returns. Anil and Rob discuss owning Amazon and Microsoft based on circle of competence while deliberately passing on Nvidia.50:56–54:02 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Selling Discipline, Modeling Limitations, and Behavioral Lessons Ted asks about sell discipline and operational errors. Anil discusses the pitfall of overly rigid spreadsheet IRR modeling that causes managers to sell compounders prematurely, and Rob recalls a 2016 emotional sell mistake.54:03–56:46 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Avoiding the Endowment Effect and Evaluating Analytical Conviction Ted asks how they distinguish stubbornness from conviction when an investment goes south. Rob illustrates this using a coin-flip probability model, while Anil explains doing continuous work to avoid the endowment effect.56:46–59:46 · Guest disagreement 0/10 The Blurring Boundaries Between Public and Private Markets Ted asks about the blurring line between public and private valuations. Rob and Anil reflect on twenty years of compounding and note that the biggest lesson is making a very small number of consequential, high-conviction decisions.6:57–10:36 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Professional Backgrounds of Rob Small and Anil Seetharam Ted guides the biographical narrative smoothly, asking how Berkshire Partners evaluated adding public equities as a distinct product. Rob and Anil explain their career paths and the firm's three-part acid test for launching new initiatives.10:37–12:41 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Designing a Long-Only, Concentrated Public Equity Strategy Ted brings historical industry context about how past private equity crossovers into public markets largely failed. Rob details how Stockbridge rejected standard long-short hedge fund models to stay concentrated and long-only on advice from David Swensen.12:42–16:32 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Building Public Market Muscles and Achieving Conviction Ted asks how the team developed public market investment muscles from a private equity background. Anil offers a vivid analogy of comparing private equity diligence to a timed puzzle box and public equity to missing puzzle pieces scattered without a clock.16:35–20:06 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Inside-Out vs. Outside-In Research and Private-to-Public Diligence Gaps Ted probes the operational research gaps between private and public market diligence. Rob and Anil explain that while inside data is necessary for restructuring theses, outside-in research is just as telling for stable compounding businesses.20:06–24:41 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Navigating Potential Conflicts and Sharing Insights Across Teams Ted asks how Stockbridge navigates material non-public information and potential conflicts when both teams evaluate similar companies. Anil explains that the firm trades in industry insights rather than non-public information, resolving conflicts through co-investment.24:42–28:04 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Deep-Dive Diligence in Practice: Pediatrix and Vulcan Materials Ted inquires how deep-dive research manifests practically relative to standard public equity analysts. Anil provides concrete case studies, describing demographic modeling on neonatology for Pediatrix and mapping every quarry in the US for Vulcan Materials.28:05–34:24 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Filtering the Investment Universe and the Discipline of Passing Ted asks how the team quickly filters ideas to avoid getting bogged down in extensive research, and how consensus decision-making works. Rob explains the firm's conviction polling system and the psychological discipline of distinguishing passing from declaring a stock bad.34:40–36:46 · Ted pushing back 0/10 Sponsor Advertisement: Ridgeline Investment Management Tech Host mid-roll sponsor advertisement read for Ridgeline investment technology. No guest interaction or substantive discussion.36:46–43:02 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Strategic Philosophy on Public Company Board Participation Ted asks about the cost-benefit trade-offs of public company board seats. Anil and Rob emphasize that they never seek board seats to impose activist changes, but rather to support management and strengthen holding conviction in compounders like TransDigm and ADS.43:03–47:40 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Weathering Volatility, Short Attacks, and Operating Discipline Ted asks how Stockbridge handles inevitable stock drawdowns and bumps in the road. Rob recounts how a short attack on TransDigm prompted rigorous outside-in verification that enabled them to aggressively buy more rather than panic.47:41–50:56 · Ted pushing back 2/10 Navigating Large-Cap Winners and the Circle of Competence Ted presses the guests on why their private-equity style public equity approach initially overlooked the mega-cap tech stocks driving index returns. Anil and Rob discuss owning Amazon and Microsoft based on circle of competence while deliberately passing on Nvidia.50:56–54:02 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Selling Discipline, Modeling Limitations, and Behavioral Lessons Ted asks about sell discipline and operational errors. Anil discusses the pitfall of overly rigid spreadsheet IRR modeling that causes managers to sell compounders prematurely, and Rob recalls a 2016 emotional sell mistake.54:03–56:46 · Ted pushing back 1/10 Avoiding the Endowment Effect and Evaluating Analytical Conviction Ted asks how they distinguish stubbornness from conviction when an investment goes south. Rob illustrates this using a coin-flip probability model, while Anil explains doing continuous work to avoid the endowment effect.56:46–59:46 · Ted pushing back 1/10 The Blurring Boundaries Between Public and Private Markets Ted asks about the blurring line between public and private valuations. Rob and Anil reflect on twenty years of compounding and note that the biggest lesson is making a very small number of consequential, high-conviction decisions.

speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%0:00 · Ted 100% · guest 0%3:00 · Ted 89.9% · guest 10.1%3:00 · Ted 89.9% · guest 10.1%6:00 · Ted 41.1% · guest 58.9%6:00 · Ted 41.1% · guest 58.9%9:00 · Ted 13.9% · guest 86.1%9:00 · Ted 13.9% · guest 86.1%12:00 · Ted 3.8% · guest 96.2%12:00 · Ted 3.8% · guest 96.2%15:00 · Ted 7.4% · guest 92.6%15:00 · Ted 7.4% · guest 92.6%18:00 · Ted 7.7% · guest 92.3%18:00 · Ted 7.7% · guest 92.3%21:00 · Ted 23.6% · guest 76.4%21:00 · Ted 23.6% · guest 76.4%24:00 · Ted 12.5% · guest 87.5%24:00 · Ted 12.5% · guest 87.5%27:00 · Ted 12.7% · guest 87.3%27:00 · Ted 12.7% · guest 87.3%30:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%30:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%33:00 · Ted 40.8% · guest 59.2%33:00 · Ted 40.8% · guest 59.2%36:00 · Ted 10.9% · guest 89.1%36:00 · Ted 10.9% · guest 89.1%39:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%39:00 · Ted 0% · guest 100%42:00 · Ted 12.2% · guest 87.8%42:00 · Ted 12.2% · guest 87.8%45:00 · Ted 10.6% · guest 89.4%45:00 · Ted 10.6% · guest 89.4%48:00 · Ted 1.3% · guest 98.7%48:00 · Ted 1.3% · guest 98.7%51:00 · Ted 7.9% · guest 92.1%51:00 · Ted 7.9% · guest 92.1%54:00 · Ted 21.7% · guest 78.3%54:00 · Ted 21.7% · guest 78.3%57:00 · Ted 9.3% · guest 90.7%57:00 · Ted 9.3% · guest 90.7%1:00:00 · Ted 5% · guest 95%1:00:00 · Ted 5% · guest 95%1:03:00 · Ted 32.5% · guest 67.5%1:03:00 · Ted 32.5% · guest 67.5%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 49:55 Anil explicitly rejecting hype around owning Nvidia

Anil candidly admits that despite Nvidia's stellar market run, Stockbridge refuses to own it because it falls outside their circle of competence and they would lack conviction during drawdowns.

Hardest push from Ted ▶ 47:41 Ted challenging the omission of mega-cap tech winners

Ted presses the guests on how a private equity mindset in public equities could justify missing the Magnificent Seven tech companies that drove the bulk of market returns over the past decade.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 15:05 Anil's puzzle box analogy for private versus public research

Anil educates the listener and host by framing private equity diligence as a timed puzzle box with full data versus public equity as missing ninety percent of the puzzle pieces thrown in the woods with no clock.

Ted holds their own ▶ 10:37 Ted frames the historical failure of PE-to-public crossovers

Ted demonstrates deep allocator knowledge by pointing out that over the preceding twenty years, most private equity firms attempting to run public market strategies failed due to conflicting cultural mindsets.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicTed as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementTed pushing backWhy
Professional Backgrounds of Rob Small and Anil Seetharam 5401 Ted guides the biographical narrative smoothly, asking how Berkshire Partners evaluated adding public equities as a distinct product. Rob and Anil explain their career paths and the firm's three-part acid test for launching new initiatives.
Designing a Long-Only, Concentrated Public Equity Strategy 6412 Ted brings historical industry context about how past private equity crossovers into public markets largely failed. Rob details how Stockbridge rejected standard long-short hedge fund models to stay concentrated and long-only on advice from David Swensen.
Building Public Market Muscles and Achieving Conviction 5611 Ted asks how the team developed public market investment muscles from a private equity background. Anil offers a vivid analogy of comparing private equity diligence to a timed puzzle box and public equity to missing puzzle pieces scattered without a clock.
Inside-Out vs. Outside-In Research and Private-to-Public Diligence Gaps 6501 Ted probes the operational research gaps between private and public market diligence. Rob and Anil explain that while inside data is necessary for restructuring theses, outside-in research is just as telling for stable compounding businesses.
Navigating Potential Conflicts and Sharing Insights Across Teams 6512 Ted asks how Stockbridge navigates material non-public information and potential conflicts when both teams evaluate similar companies. Anil explains that the firm trades in industry insights rather than non-public information, resolving conflicts through co-investment.
Deep-Dive Diligence in Practice: Pediatrix and Vulcan Materials 5601 Ted inquires how deep-dive research manifests practically relative to standard public equity analysts. Anil provides concrete case studies, describing demographic modeling on neonatology for Pediatrix and mapping every quarry in the US for Vulcan Materials.
Filtering the Investment Universe and the Discipline of Passing 6512 Ted asks how the team quickly filters ideas to avoid getting bogged down in extensive research, and how consensus decision-making works. Rob explains the firm's conviction polling system and the psychological discipline of distinguishing passing from declaring a stock bad.
Sponsor Advertisement: Ridgeline Investment Management Tech 0000 Host mid-roll sponsor advertisement read for Ridgeline investment technology. No guest interaction or substantive discussion.
Strategic Philosophy on Public Company Board Participation 5501 Ted asks about the cost-benefit trade-offs of public company board seats. Anil and Rob emphasize that they never seek board seats to impose activist changes, but rather to support management and strengthen holding conviction in compounders like TransDigm and ADS.
Weathering Volatility, Short Attacks, and Operating Discipline 5611 Ted asks how Stockbridge handles inevitable stock drawdowns and bumps in the road. Rob recounts how a short attack on TransDigm prompted rigorous outside-in verification that enabled them to aggressively buy more rather than panic.
Navigating Large-Cap Winners and the Circle of Competence 6512 Ted presses the guests on why their private-equity style public equity approach initially overlooked the mega-cap tech stocks driving index returns. Anil and Rob discuss owning Amazon and Microsoft based on circle of competence while deliberately passing on Nvidia.
Selling Discipline, Modeling Limitations, and Behavioral Lessons 5601 Ted asks about sell discipline and operational errors. Anil discusses the pitfall of overly rigid spreadsheet IRR modeling that causes managers to sell compounders prematurely, and Rob recalls a 2016 emotional sell mistake.
Avoiding the Endowment Effect and Evaluating Analytical Conviction 5501 Ted asks how they distinguish stubbornness from conviction when an investment goes south. Rob illustrates this using a coin-flip probability model, while Anil explains doing continuous work to avoid the endowment effect.
The Blurring Boundaries Between Public and Private Markets 5501 Ted asks about the blurring line between public and private valuations. Rob and Anil reflect on twenty years of compounding and note that the biggest lesson is making a very small number of consequential, high-conviction decisions.

Statements from this episode (37)

Assertion Partly supported
Small: Private companies traded at higher multiples than publics in 2005-2007
“For the first time, we did comparable sheets with public companies, and we were seeing private companies go for more than public companies. So the control premium was higher than the liquidity premium.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 8:52
Disclosure
Small: Berkshire Partners Is Largest Investor in Its PE Funds and Stockbridge
“We're the largest investor in our private equity funds, and we're also, as a group, the largest investor in Stockbridge.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 10:04
Insight
Small: PE firms must build public market teams internally for effective collaboration
“Building it internally was important because the relationships of the people were a key to making it work. It wasn't just saying, Geez, Berkshire partners should have a public firm. Let's go hire a team to go do it. That would not get the collaboration that we…”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 11:13
Disclosure
Small: Stockbridge is essentially long-only and has rarely shorted
“We're essentially long only. We have a right to short, but we've done it only a couple times in our history”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 11:49
Opinion
Small: Short selling consumes too much time and rarely makes sense
“Very, very few people were good at it, and it took up most of your time. To get shorts. Plus you were in some ways leveraging your longs in order to justify your shorting. So it just seemed to us to make no sense to do that.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 12:03
Disclosure
Seetharam: Stockbridge abandoned short selling after a one-week trial
“For the first two years, I think we invested exclusively internal capital and tried a lot of things. So like Rob mentioned, we tried to short. The first short, I think, lasted a week. And we realized we were not going to be good at it. We didn't want to do it,…”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 13:56
Insight
Seetharam: Public investing gives less data than PE but no time constraints
“In the private equity business, the way it works is you have access to a data room. And you have a certain amount of time to understand as much as you can about a company with full access to the information and the management team. So if you were to use an ana…”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 14:56
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Seetharam: Stockbridge matched private equity diligence conviction on Skillsoft
“There was a business that we were invested in at Stockbridge, a company called Skillsoft. It's an education software business that Berkshire private equity ended up taking private. And we got to see what public information would allow us to understand about th…”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 15:44
Insight
Small: Internal data is necessary for operational change theses
“The private data would be great if you had an enormous change thesis. If you thought management was doing the wrong thing on major operational issues and you thought you could do better, I don't know how you make that decision without internal data.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 18:14
Disclosure
Berkshire maintains no internal walls between its PE and public equity teams
“Across the firm, we chose not to have any walls between the two businesses.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 18:39
Disclosure
Rob Small: Stockbridge embeds members into Berkshire PE industry teams
“The private equity side is divided into industry teams. We put one of our people on each one of their industry teams, so that way they can learn about what they're learning about the industry.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 19:03
Disclosure
Seetharam: Berkshire Private Equity Targets Smaller Businesses Than Stockbridge
“Berkshire private equity tends to invest in smaller businesses has always invested in smaller businesses than we tend to invest in. So there's very little direct overlap in the companies we're looking at.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 20:53
Disclosure
Seetharam: Stockbridge Rarely Encounters MNPI from Berkshire Private Equity
“So we found it's extremely rare that we end up with MNPI on a company and the places where we've run into issues They've tended to be opportunities, not conflicts or issues. We've co-invested in things.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 21:04
Disclosure
Small: Stockbridge avoids biotech approvals and commodity-driven businesses
“So we don't invest in things like, is the drug going to be approved, or where commodity prices will ultimately drive the answer.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 22:10
Insight
Small: Investors must be cautious expecting management teams to pivot
“And we found that managements, ah, are really good at executing, continuing to do what they have done in the past, and that you have to be really, really careful before you're asking a management team to do something different.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 23:01
Disclosure
Small: Stockbridge models 5 years out and targets mid-teens returns
“We build a five-year model. Which tends to make you have to think at least 10 years out because someone's gonna buy the business from you, and we want mid-teens or better returns.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 23:20
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Stockbridge built a database of every US quarry and surrounding population trends
“And one of the things we've done is assembled a database of Every single quarry in the United States and what the ownership is of that quarry and the population trends around that quarry.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 26:27
Disclosure
Stockbridge makes only two to three new investments per year
“We invest in two to three things a year. We probably look deeply at 10 to 20 things a year with a pretty big team, and so the several hundred that we look at, we're putting them down very quickly for one of those reasons.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 29:06
Insight
Small: Passing on Investments Means Lacking Conviction, Not Predicting Failure
“Our no is not that this isn't going to be a great investment, it's that we're not going to get to high conviction that this is going to be a great investment, and that makes it a little easier.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 29:38
Disclosure
Stockbridge has entire team vote on admitting portfolio investments
“As an entire group, we discuss every idea that's making its way into the portfolio from a very early stage, which we call our tear sheet stage, where we're just introducing the whole team to the business to a final investment memo. Everybody from the newest an…”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 30:04
Insight
Small: Sizing public equity positions purely on modeled IRR is suboptimal
“We were religious about keeping our five-year internal rate of return models up to date and trading off that. The higher the IRR, the bigger the position. We learned that wasn't the best way. We changed over time at that point to adding a conviction element”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 32:07
Disclosure
Stockbridge limits its portfolio to 15 names, capping positions at 25%
“And so that ultimately leads to a portfolio of typically around 15 names. We've had a position become up to a quarter of the portfolio. That's more the exception. Typically the largest position will be in the 15%. And then a bunch of things around six percent.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 34:07
Insight
Small: Fast-twitch trading funds require single decision-makers rather than consensus
“I think if we were a fast-twitch Hedge fund making multiple decisions every day on trading, it wouldn't work. You'd need single points of decision, whether there's a number of them or one of them, but we don't make a lot of decisions.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 36:04
Disclosure
Seetharam: Stockbridge sells troubled holdings rather than pursuing activist board seats
“So the key is if we have a problem with the company, it's better for us to sell than it is for us to go on the board and try and change it.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 37:24
Disclosure
Berkshire Partners held Advanced Drainage Systems continuously from the late 1980s until 2010
“Berkshire Partners invested in the company in the late eighties when it was a small agricultural plastic pipe producer and held the business continuously until 2010 through multiple funds and then sold it to another P firm who took it public in 2014.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 38:40
Disclosure
Stockbridge and Berkshire PE acquired ~20% of ADS in 2017 after accounting restatement
“In 2017, we bought about 20% of the company after they were through their accounting restatement and then subsequently joined the board.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 40:09
Disclosure
TransDigm was Stockbridge's first investment and largest position through most of its history
“And so when we started Stockbridge, that was the first company we looked at and we invested, it has become and been our largest position through most of our history.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 42:34
Opinion
Small: Public markets exhibit far crazier mispricings than private equity
“We've seen crazier prices on both sides by far in the public markets than I think you tend to see in the private markets.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 47:34
Disclosure
Seetharam: Stockbridge passes on Nvidia because it sits outside its competence
“While let's say a company like NVIDIA is an extraordinary business by all accounts and one we've looked at, we just don't think we would be a great owner of that business at this point in time. Because while I can tell you all the great things about NVIDIA, I …”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 50:32
Disclosure
Small: Stockbridge Sells for Only Three Specific Reasons
“Well, there's three reasons that you sell. One is you lose conviction in the thesis, and you think you should move on. Two is it gets so expensive that you think the returns looking forward aren't acceptable, or at least certainly compared to what else. Or thr…”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 51:00
Insight
Seetharam: Spreadsheet valuations fail to model great companies creating their own luck
“Excel-based valuation methodology doesn't really capture the full distribution of outcomes. A good business with great tailwinds and a great management team can create their own luck, and it's hard to model that.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 52:02
Disclosure
Seetharam: Selling Winners Too Early Is Stockbridge's Biggest Mistake
“Selling winners too early has been a constant source of frustration, one that you can just open up your Bloomberg and see it hit you in the face every single day.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 52:57
Insight
Seetharam: Long-term investors must track non-price markers to validate an investment thesis
“It's important to have evidence in a long-term investment that things are working. That may or may not show up in the stock price, but there's a set of markers along the way that give you confidence that your long-term thesis is right.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 55:30
Disclosure
Stockbridge does multiples more research after buying a stock to combat bias
“We do a lot of work up front, but we do multiples of that work after we own a company. And just ensuring that we're not holding onto something simply because we did a lot of work and we have endowment effect and it's in our portfolio.”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 55:53
Disclosure
Small: Berkshire will not make macro-timing bets between public and private equity
“I don't think we will make market-based bets of now's the moment to invest in public and now's the moment to invest in private.”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 57:47
Disclosure
Stockbridge requires unanimity among senior partners for new investments
“That's why we demand unanimity among the senior people to invest in something, because you're gonna get hit with a bump, and so when you get hit with a bump, you have to have enough information, enough belief to evaluate the new information, but be able to sti…”
Rob Small Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 58:32
Insight
Seetharam: A Very Small Number of Decisions Drive Portfolio Returns
“It's very easy in this to think about making a shorter term trade or adding a smaller position to the portfolio, but that's not really what we're set up to do. And when we do that, We're more likely to make a mistake, and so what we've really honed in on is ju…”
Anil Seetharam Jul 22, 2024 ▶ 59:24
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 700 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.