Mar 24, 2025 · 1h 18m · capital-allocators
Ed Grefenstette – Bold Allocations at The Dietrich Foundation (EP.437)
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of Capital Allocators, host Ted Seides interviews Ed Grefenstette, CEO and CIO of The Dietrich Foundation, exploring how the institution achieved an industry-leading endowment track record through an unconventional 90% illiquid asset allocation, delegated governance, and disciplined global venture capital and private equity underwriting.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Ted holds 18.8% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Ted as informed peer 4.0 Guest teaching 2.4 Guest disagreement 0.1 Ted pushing back 0.1
speaking balance: gold is Ted, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 1:01:00 Challenging institutional claims on co-investment outperformance
Ed openly disputes the mathematical logic of large institutional allocators claiming their co-investments outperform underlying GP fund returns.
Hardest push from Ted ▶ 39:03 Host pushes on emerging markets thesisTed directly challenges Ed on maintaining an emerging markets allocation given prolonged underperformance relative to U.S. equities.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 30:20 Public equity liquidity discount vs private equity premiumEd educates the audience on why private equity is true equity return while public equity represents a discounted return for liquidity.
Ted holds their own ▶ 26:16 Host distinguishes Dietrich from standard delegated authority modelsTed demonstrates his deep understanding of endowment governance by questioning the specific mechanics differentiating Dietrich from other delegated programs.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Ted as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Ted pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guest Overview: Ed Grefenstette and The Dietrich Foundation | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ted opens the episode with a detailed introduction outlining Ed Grefenstette's career, the Dietrich Foundation's 11.5x asset growth, and its unique 90% illiquid allocation structure. As this is an introductory framing monologue, there is no pushback or combativeness. | |
| Ed Grefenstette's Roots and Early Venture Influences | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted prompts Ed to recount his early entry into investing. Ed details his upbringing in Pittsburgh and his father's foundational role at the Hillman Company as an early venture pioneer in Kleiner Perkins and KKR. | |
| Transition from Law to Finance via Carnegie Mellon | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted guides Ed through his transition from litigation to business school at Carnegie Mellon, followed by investment banking and launching a lower-middle-market private equity fund where he first pitched Bill Dietrich. | |
| Private Equity Lessons and Appointment as CMU CIO | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ed recounts lessons learned managing small industrial turnarounds and Bill Dietrich recruiting him to become CIO at Carnegie Mellon and ultimately successor at the Dietrich Foundation. | |
| The Intellectual World and Ambitions of Bill Dietrich | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about Bill Dietrich's background and intellectual worldview. Ed describes Dietrich's voracious reading habits, disciplined intellect, and motivation to establish a perpetual philanthropic endowment. | |
| Dietrich Industries Success and Carnegie's Philanthropic Blueprint | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ed explains how Dietrich built Dietrich Industries into a dominant steel stud manufacturer and placed all proceeds into a trust following Andrew Carnegie's philosophy on intelligent wealth distribution. | |
| Designing a Better Mousetrap: Maximizing Illiquid Capital | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Ted explores how Dietrich structured his in-perpetuity capital. Ed explains that unconstrained mean-variance optimization mathematically pushes a perpetual pool entirely into illiquid assets. | |
| Governance by Design: Delegated Authority and No Investment Committee | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | Ted asks how governance was structured to permit high illiquidity. Ed explains Dietrich eliminated the investment committee entirely and codified delegated investment authority to minimize career risk aversion. | |
| Embracing Idiosyncrasy and Filtering Short-Term Performance Noise | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks what makes Dietrich different from other delegated models. Ed explains the necessity of embracing an idiosyncratic portfolio, showing long-term horizon charts first to filter short-term noise. | |
| Trustee Accountability and Managing Conviction Through Market Cycles | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Ed reframes conventional investment theory, arguing that private equity represents true equity return while public equity represents a discounted return due to paying for the luxury of immediate liquidity. | |
| Managing Liquidity: Mature Cashflows, Credit Lines, and 3% Payouts | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Ted probes how Dietrich safely operates at 90% illiquidity. Ed explains the structural safeguards: a mature 7.1-year average fund vintage, a supporting organization structure requiring only 3% spend, and an undrawn credit line. | |
| Constructing the 10% Liquid Sleeve without US Equities | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about the composition of the 10% liquid sleeve and overall portfolio. Ed details the breakdown across venture, growth, and buyouts, anchored in innovation and emerging market themes. | |
| Re-Underwriting Geopolitics in a Post-Globalization Era | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Ted pushes on the emerging markets thesis given U.S. outperformance over the past decade. Ed acknowledges the post-1989 globalization trade has ended and allocators must now underwrite geopolitical friction. | |
| The Evolution and Realization of the Foundation's China Strategy | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about the evolution of the foundation's China allocation. Ed describes how Bill Dietrich entered China privates in 2006, which eventually grew to 38% of NAV before significant distributions. | |
| Adopting a Pencils-Down Stance Amid Shifting Chinese Policy | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about forward commitment pacing in China. Ed explains their 'pencils down' stance following the 2022 Party Congress, shifting from active deployment to monitoring policy predictability. | |
| Manager Sourcing, Ground Due Diligence, and Laurel Valley Invitational | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks about manager sourcing and access. Ed describes their intensive travel schedule, peer LP network, and the annual Dietrich Private Equity Invitational at Laurel Valley Golf Club. | |
| Underwriting GP Authenticity and the Hypothetical Failure Test | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks how Dietrich diligences new managers. Ed shares his key underwriting question: asking GPs to assume fund underperformance absent macro shocks to test their self-awareness and risk mitigation. | |
| Portfolio Sizing Philosophy: Concentrated VC Reserves vs. Equal Weighting | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted explores portfolio sizing and reserves management. Ed contrasts multi-billion venture funds concentrating heavily in Series A/B winners against smaller seed managers with single-check approaches. | |
| Assessing Co-Investments, Adverse Selection, and Power Laws | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Ted asks whether co-investments serve as a viable tool to defray fees. Ed expresses deep skepticism, arguing that adverse selection and power-law distribution make claims of beating underlying fund returns mathematically implausible. | |
| Evaluating Continuation Vehicles and Alignment Incentives | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks for Ed's perspective on continuation vehicles. Ed emphasizes evaluating GP alignment and fee drag, citing an instance where a GP required 5.6x gross to generate a 3.0x net return. | |
| Secondary Market Management and Capital Call Preparedness | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Ed details how Bill Dietrich utilized secondaries during the 2008 financial crisis and contextualizes current S&P 500 concentration against past historical market bubbles in energy, Japan, and tech. | |
| The Magnificent Seven vs. AI Vertical Applications | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ted asks how Dietrich navigates the Magnificent Seven dominating AI innovation. Ed explains that AI infrastructure may become a utility commodity, shifting outperformance to vertical application layers. | |
| Emerging Opportunities: Defense Tech and Rebuilding India | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Ted wraps up asking about forward opportunities. Ed highlights defense tech and India's demographics before answering closing questions, including his critique of American waterfalls. |
Statements from this episode (42)
Hillman Company anchored Kleiner Perkins Fund 1 and KKR Fund 1
“The 19 seventies venture finally began to take form, and Henry Hillman and my father were anchor investors in Kleiner Perkins Fund One, and a few years later in KKR Fund One.”
Grefenstette's early micro-market buyout fund delivered a 2x net return
“We got two X net for our investors, but what we discovered in investing, and we were targeting the micro market, so control transactions of industrial companies, one to three million in EBITDA.”
Micro-market private equity returns mirror venture capital distributions
“That's an incomplete metaphor, and that modest waves can also capsize a small ship. So the distribution of returns looked more like a venture portfolio. We had a horrible zero transaction, and we had an eight X.”
Carnegie Mellon transitioned its endowment from Cambridge Associates to internal staff
“It was a great opportunity because they wanted to move the program from consultant-centric to staff-centric. So we were relying on Cambridge. We moved away from them. I hired Chuck Kennedy, who is now the current CIO at CMU, as my number two, and we built out …”
Bill Dietrich funded The Dietrich Foundation with $170M in 1997
“So before he sold the company, he put all the stock of Dietrich Industries into a trust. So he had made the commitment there that the proceeds would go into the trust designed to fund the foundation upon his death And that's what he did. So he started with a h…”
Unconstrained mean-variance optimization pushes institutional portfolios entirely into private assets
“And anytime you use the mean variance optimization model, unconstrained, it pushes you entirely into privates, because that's the historical return profile.”
The Dietrich Foundation operates entirely without an investment committee
“Yeah, he put in the controlling trust document the fact that he wanted the trustees to delegate investment authority to the CIO and CEO of the foundation. That's unusual. We do not have an investment committee.”
Separating asset allocators from governance oversight enables necessary boldness
“Career risk aversion drives a lot of behavior, and Bill felt to the extent you could put some distance between the asset allocator and the oversight or governance group, you had a shot at allowing the CIO to be more bold, because Bill always said, boldness is …”
Illiquid assets, small caps, and equities will outperform long-term
“We believe over long periods of time, Illiquid's going to outperform liquid. Small's going to outperform large. Equities are going to outperform fixed income.”
Dietrich Foundation has held zero direct U.S. index exposure since 1997
“We have not had a direct exposure to the U.S. S&P. 500 or any U.S. Index since 1997, ok?”
Institutional outperformance requires embracing an uncomfortably idiosyncratic portfolio
“You can't possibly target a performance over the long period that outperforms everyone else unless you're willing to embrace an uncomfortably idiosyncratic portfolio, and part of that has to be a willingness to look wrong some periods of time, something becaus…”
Dietrich Foundation returns rank first across major institutional surveys
“Fortunately, we have been performing, as far as we can tell by all reported surveys, our returns are number one for the trailing in 1015, and 20 years.”
Public equity offers lower expected returns as the price of liquidity
“I think private equity is true equity return, and public equity is a discounted or a lower expected return.”
Dietrich Foundation currently allocates 90% of its portfolio to illiquid assets
“As we sit here today, we're 90% illiquid, which is pretty much the upper threshold of my comfort.”
Dietrich Foundation's private equity portfolio averages 7.1 years in age
“If you look at the dollar weighted average age of all of the partnerships we're in, it's about 7.1 years old. So we are as a portfolio out of the J curve.”
Dietrich Foundation received $1.4B in private distributions over ten years
“If you look at our last 10 years, we've gotten distributions of 1.4 billion dollars. On capital calls of one billion. So that's four hundred million.”
Dietrich Foundation distributes 3% of NAV annually under 509(a) structure
“We are not a private foundation, but structured as a five oh nine a supporting organization under the code. As such, we don't have to comply with that five percent payout otherwise required, and we can pay out three percent of our NAV each year”
Dietrich allocates roughly 55% of its private portfolio to venture capital
“So if I take the 90 as a whole pie, a hundred percent, probably 55% of that pie is venture. And then the other is split evenly, roughly, between growth equity funds and buyout funds. We don't touch any real estate. We do very little in the energy space.”
Dietrich Foundation splits its venture portfolio equally between US and international
“That venture piece is probably split Evenly, roughly, between the U.S. And non-U.S. Most of the non-U.S. In venture is in emerging Asia and Latin America. Little bit in Europe.”
Dietrich heavily targets special situations buyouts anticipating market distress
“Most recently, I'd say the last five or six years, We've been really leaning in on the special situation subsector within buyouts because we think there's going to be some challenges ahead and some shoes are going to fall.”
Institutional CIOs avoid cheap Chinese assets due to career risk
“It's not easy because there can be screaming opportunities and China might be perfect example today where intellectually a lot of CIOs know these valuations are getting unjustifiably cheap. But back to career risk. They don't want to walk in, in front of their…”
Dietrich Foundation's total portfolio exposure to China peaked at 38% in 2020
“We peaked at a total portfolio exposure in China of 38% in late twenty-twenty, which is a big number. Today, as we sit here, we're about 19 or 20%.”
Dietrich Foundation's China portfolio generated $160M in excess liquidity
“In fact, our portfolio in China over the last 10 years produced a hundred and sixty million of excess liquidity. One hundred and sixty million distributions over capital calls over the last decade in our China book.”
China's official GDP figures are inaccurate but directionally correct
“Those GDP numbers are all wrong, by the way, but they're directionally correct.”
Dietrich Foundation dramatically slowed its allocation pacing to China
“So we put pencils down. We haven't stopped looking. We haven't stopped investing entirely in China, but our allocation pacing has changed dramatically.”
A private market GP who lacks fear about execution is concerning
“If a GP doesn't have any fear about execution, I have a lot of fear.”
GPs selling strong assets cheaply to boost DPI is a red flag
“And we've often said that the GPs who are selling good assets, probably at a low valuation just to get the DPI up, that's a red flag.”
Multi-billion VC funds need 50% concentration in few winners to 4x
“When they see a company they've backed in the seed in Series A, they will lean in hard on the subsequent Rounds to the point where at the end of portfolio construction, they might have 40, 50% of the fund in three or four companies. That, to us, is exactly how…”
Taking half-bite fund allocations on lower conviction is a dangerous trap
“It's good discipline, I think, to be biased toward equal weighting, because there's a tendency to say, okay, well, I'm not quite sure about this one. Let's do a half of a bite on this one and see what happens. I think that's a very dangerous, slippery slope to…”
Dietrich Foundation holds roughly 32 co-investments totaling 5-6% of NAV
“So I think we've done about 32 in the total portfolio, and it only amounts to
On a cost basis, maybe about five, six percent of the total NAV.”
Grefenstette is skeptical of LP claims that co-investments beat underlying funds
“So I'm skeptical of those who have large co-investment programs who claim they're outperforming the underlying fund managers, because it's hard, and if they're doing a better job than their GPs, they should bring their GPs in and give them some instruction.”
Underwriting continuation vehicles requires interrogating why assets aren't sold naturally
“We always start by asking, why isn't this company being sold right now? What's preventing this company from being sold in the normal operations of the fund? And is there a reason to hold it? And is this GP the right GP to be holding this asset at this point, a…”
A European GP waterfall requires 5.6x gross to deliver 3x net
“We have a European GP. We actually are underwriting right now. We really like the firm, but the way the waterfall is calculated and the fact that the GP is actually charging some fees to the portfolio companies, they need to generate a 5.6 X gross to hit a thr…”
Historical private equity outperformance and manager persistence are under pressure
“The evidence of persistence of high quality funds and that premium, they're both under pressure. So this is not an easy game, but we think it's still worth playing.”
Dietrich Foundation's unfunded private equity commitments represent 19% of NAV
“Today, that unfunded as a percentage of NAV for us is about 19%.”
U.S. public equity market concentration is at a 100-year high
“If you take the top decile relative to the remainder public securities in the U.S., it's at three X. It's the highest ratio Market cap in a hundred years.”
Energy companies made up 24% of the S&P 500 in the 1970s
“Energy stocks, six of the top 10 market cap companies in the world in the seventies were energy stocks, and they were 24% of the S&P 500 versus four percent today.”
Vertical AI applications may be more attractive than commoditized platform layers
“People are just buying their share of time, and the more interesting plays from this point forward might be the verticals that sit atop.”
Anduril will not be the only major winner in defense tech
“We have a nice exposure to Enduro, and we have a couple of others that we're really excited about, and Enduro's not going to be the only winner in that space.”
India's demographic profile is far superior to China's
“It's hard to compare India to China for many reasons, but the demographics are far superior. I think 50% of Indians are under 30 years old. I think it's 32% of Chinese.”
Dietrich Foundation's unfunded India commitments roughly equal its China commitments
“India's exciting theme for us, so we have probably as much unfunded commitment there as we do in China.”
LPs agreeing to American deal-by-deal carry waterfalls is absurd
“So professionally, I wonder how any LP could agree to terms where there's an American waterfall. Okay, and for those who are uninitiated on this topic, an American waterfall pays the GP a carry on a deal-by-deal basis. Okay, imagine the absurdity of this in an…”