why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Antani: AI Models Fail When Attacking Actively Defended Networks
“These models work really well, especially from a cyber standpoint in lab environments, cyber ranges and so on, but they're actually not good at all in, in, in networks that are actively fighting back and networks that are actively defending themselves in netwo…”
Assertion Supported
Antani: AI Models Trigger Cyber Decoys 92% Of The Time Versus Humans
“An expert human clicks on those decoys, 37% of the time. Four, six, four, seven, four, eight, click on those decoys, 92% of the time. More than twice as much as an expert hacker.”
Assertion Contradicted
Antani: 86% of Claude Code tokens are spent fixing its own errors
“And the, these models, I was reading a research paper, 86% of the tokens spent by cloud code are spent fixing mistakes cloud code made.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Antani: Training data corruption will pose massive risk to enterprise AI adoption
“And so the integrity of these models and whether they can be triggered because of training data corruption, that's intentional or inadvertent is going to be a really interesting area of discovery over the next couple of years. And it's going to be a massive am…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Antani: Horizon3.ai Hacked a Defense Tech Firm Autonomously in 77 Seconds
“And we actually hacked a defense tech company in 77 seconds with no humans involved.”
Assertion Supported
Antani: 50% of CISA known exploited vulnerabilities remain unpatched after two months
“Well, 50% of CISA KEVs are still unpatched two months after notification.”