why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
SAP: AI rollout across 40,000 developers has caused no job reductions
“Where we have actually rolled out tools to broadly our 35, 40,000 developers, as you pointed out earlier, that is already giving significant efficiency in terms of development, in terms of execution engineering systems, pipeline management that we do internall…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Alam: Every engineer will need to become a manager for AI agents
“I think every engineer would need to learn the skills of being an engineering manager because you'll have a set of agents, if not humans working with you to be able to sort of deal with code that from a size and a scale perspective is exponential compared to w…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Alam: Enterprise adoption of autonomous AI agents will take a full decade
“That end state of everything is going to be run by agents, billions of agents. I mean, I think it's just, it's an unrealistic, hyped up end state right now that we're not ready to get to, and I think there's a lot of other people that are now saying the same t…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Alam: Enterprise AI will advance from efficiency assistants to autonomous financial closes
“Now, these capabilities ladder up to an assistant that makes that role 20% efficient to begin with, As we add more, it becomes 50% more efficient, 60%. Eventually, it will get to a place where you can say that, hey, most of the recommendations, eight or nine o…”