The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Clark: Passing government evals proves Claude has emergent reasoning capabilities
“If Claude can figure out things and trigger, like, threshold points on those evals, we know something creative is happening. Because Claude has reasoned its way to things that the government has believed are very hard to reason your way to unless you have acce…”
Clark: General intelligence requires real-world interplay that current AI lacks
“General intelligence comes from, like, interplay with the world around you and interaction with it, and today's systems don't really do that at all. To the extent they do, it's kind of a fiction, and we need to teach them how to do that.”
Clark: AI models need long-term storage instead of massive context windows
“Well, our AI systems today are kind of operating with short term memories that are millions of numbers in length, and it feels very unintuitive. Ultimately, we want them to instead be able to bake stuff into some kind of long term storage, and that's going to …”
Clark: AI Safety Talent Pool Heavily Overlaps With Effective Altruism
“Of the group of people in the world that have spent a long time thinking about AI, are really good at math and science, and have worried about some of the safety issues, there is a huge overlap with this community of people called effective altruists, and so s…”