The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Michael: Anthropic's autonomous weapons concerns were driven mostly by marketing
“The idea that autonomous weapons were an issue was sort of, I think, more marketing than anything. Because we have our own policy before that showed up that talks about that.”
Michael: AI vendors restricting kinetic use pose legitimate military supply chain risks
“If Lockheed Martin builds a weapon for me, and they're using, ah, a technology to help them do some of these science-oriented things, physics, aerodynamics, and so on, and the vendor has expressed an unwillingness to want that to be part of the use case, well,…”
Michael: Authoritarian regimes will replace untrusted generals with AI decision-making
“I worry about other countries who don't have that, using AI to take humans out of the decision-making progress. They don't trust their generals. Because of graft, because of because they don't have the expertise, and they start to use machines in place of huma…”
Michael: Tech-Pentagon Friction Stems from Mistaken Belief in Defense Safety
“The image that they might have, and this is not unique to them, of the Department of War or the administration, is that we don't have the safeguards that we do, that we're not paying attention to sort of the risks. We are, if not more so than most Americans wo…”