The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Wang: The Chat Paradigm Is Too Constrictive for AI Agents
“I mean, right now we're so stuck as a I think tech industry still on the sort of like chat paradigm and, you know having everything be a chat with one of these models. And I think that's a constrictive paradigm to enable agents to actually really start working…”
Wang: Designing UX for imperfect outputs is 99% of the agent challenge
“Having a product experience, which Where you don't expect it to be perfect, but you expect it to be pretty good. I think that's like, 99% of the challenge, and that's why we haven't seen it yet, despite the fact that the models already can do a lot of this stu…”
Wang: Dynamic single-model reasoning is superior to rigid multi-agent pipelines
“It's a very sort of regimented way to try to enable the systems to do multi-step reasoning. Cause ideally what you want the model to do is to just like how a human does, be able to sort of go through and figure out what are the bits of pieces it needs to know …”
Wang: Ideal AI agents must passively observe all digital communication flows
“An ideal AI agent is one that, that I think is observing and naturally in all the sort of like core flows of information and core flows of context that you are in digitally. So, you know, it's in all your Slack threads. It's only your email threads that like, …”