Jul 21, 2022 · 44m · big-technology

Jonathan Haidt: Why Social Media Makes Our Society Stupid

Jonathan Haidt · 29m spoken Alex Kantrowitz · 10m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt joins Alex Kantrowitz on the Big Technology Podcast to analyze how social media architecture induces 'structural stupidity' across democratic institutions, while proposing regulatory, cryptographic, and design-based solutions to restore constructive public discourse.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Alex holds 25.2% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Alex as informed peer 5.8 Guest teaching 4.6 Guest disagreement 2.0 Alex pushing back 3.4
05100:0015:0030:000:00–2:54 · Alex as informed peer 4/10 Defining Structural Stupidity in Academia and Journalism Kantrowitz asks Haidt to define 'the stupid' and Haidt explains the concept of structural stupidity in academia and journalism. Haidt controls the floor with sociological framing while Kantrowitz mostly listens.2:54–5:20 · Alex as informed peer 6/10 Social Media Dart Guns and Polarization Demographics Kantrowitz cites exact demographic figures from the Hidden Tribes study to prompt Haidt on who uses social media 'dart guns'. Haidt builds on the data to explain how small extreme groups intimidate moderates.5:20–8:39 · Alex as informed peer 7/10 Architectural Shifts from Connection to Hyper-Virality Haidt praises Kantrowitz's reporting on the creator of the retweet button (Chris Wetherell) to explain how platforms shifted from connection to hyper-virality. Kantrowitz elaborates on his thesis about performative outrage.8:39–11:53 · Alex as informed peer 5/10 Performative Platforms, Internet Trolls, and Russian Active Measures Kantrowitz synthesizes Haidt's argument, prompting Haidt to add male trolls and Russian active measures as key actors destabilizing the public square.11:54–15:43 · Alex as informed peer 6/10 Political Asymmetry and Cultural Left Overreach Kantrowitz pushes back by pointing out that centrist Joe Biden won the presidency if politics is purely dominated by stupidity. Haidt reframes the issue around the asymmetry between political party dysfunction and cultural left overreach.15:43–19:15 · Alex as informed peer 6/10 Institutional Accountability Versus Digital Mob Justice Kantrowitz challenges Haidt's negative view of social media call-out culture by noting it has provided accountability against corrupt power figures. Haidt responds by distinguishing accountable whistleblower processes from anonymous mob witch hunts.19:16–25:16 · Alex as informed peer 7/10 Disinformation Virality and National Security Vulnerabilities Kantrowitz pushes back on whether foreign state disinformation is an overstated threat given tech platform defenses, but Haidt counters by detailing how small initial foreign seeds achieve massive virality through downstream amplifiers.25:16–29:22 · Alex as informed peer 5/10 The Social Media Commons Dilemma and Regulatory Oversight Kantrowitz asks whether individual user demand and responsibility play a larger role than platform mechanics. Haidt immediately rejects user blame, explaining collective action traps through commons dilemmas and calling for government regulation.29:22–32:28 · Alex as informed peer 6/10 Radicalization Mechanics and Unchecked Online Anonymity Kantrowitz cites Brendan Nyhan's research suggesting extremist content is largely self-selected rather than algorithmic. Haidt concedes the finding but argues unverified anonymous accounts still provide an unnecessary accelerant to radicalization.32:28–36:29 · Alex as informed peer 7/10 Proposed Solutions for Zero-Knowledge User Authentication Kantrowitz raises concerns that authenticating accounts could endanger dissidents and activists, citing his own reporting on Saudi spies at Twitter. Haidt explains zero-knowledge level-2 authentication where human uniqueness is verified without storing PII.36:29–41:22 · Alex as informed peer 6/10 Adding Friction to Virality and User Trollishness Ratings Kantrowitz proposes forcing users to copy-paste links to create friction, and Haidt suggests rating users on a 1-to-5 trollishness scale. Kantrowitz constructively notes the edge cases and difficulty of defining trolling.41:22–44:13 · Alex as informed peer 4/10 Long-Term Technological Optimism and Podcast Conclusion Both guest and host share optimistic long-term perspectives on technology maturing over historical cycles before Kantrowitz closes the show.0:00–2:54 · Guest teaching 5/10 Defining Structural Stupidity in Academia and Journalism Kantrowitz asks Haidt to define 'the stupid' and Haidt explains the concept of structural stupidity in academia and journalism. Haidt controls the floor with sociological framing while Kantrowitz mostly listens.2:54–5:20 · Guest teaching 4/10 Social Media Dart Guns and Polarization Demographics Kantrowitz cites exact demographic figures from the Hidden Tribes study to prompt Haidt on who uses social media 'dart guns'. Haidt builds on the data to explain how small extreme groups intimidate moderates.5:20–8:39 · Guest teaching 2/10 Architectural Shifts from Connection to Hyper-Virality Haidt praises Kantrowitz's reporting on the creator of the retweet button (Chris Wetherell) to explain how platforms shifted from connection to hyper-virality. Kantrowitz elaborates on his thesis about performative outrage.8:39–11:53 · Guest teaching 4/10 Performative Platforms, Internet Trolls, and Russian Active Measures Kantrowitz synthesizes Haidt's argument, prompting Haidt to add male trolls and Russian active measures as key actors destabilizing the public square.11:54–15:43 · Guest teaching 5/10 Political Asymmetry and Cultural Left Overreach Kantrowitz pushes back by pointing out that centrist Joe Biden won the presidency if politics is purely dominated by stupidity. Haidt reframes the issue around the asymmetry between political party dysfunction and cultural left overreach.15:43–19:15 · Guest teaching 5/10 Institutional Accountability Versus Digital Mob Justice Kantrowitz challenges Haidt's negative view of social media call-out culture by noting it has provided accountability against corrupt power figures. Haidt responds by distinguishing accountable whistleblower processes from anonymous mob witch hunts.19:16–25:16 · Guest teaching 6/10 Disinformation Virality and National Security Vulnerabilities Kantrowitz pushes back on whether foreign state disinformation is an overstated threat given tech platform defenses, but Haidt counters by detailing how small initial foreign seeds achieve massive virality through downstream amplifiers.25:16–29:22 · Guest teaching 6/10 The Social Media Commons Dilemma and Regulatory Oversight Kantrowitz asks whether individual user demand and responsibility play a larger role than platform mechanics. Haidt immediately rejects user blame, explaining collective action traps through commons dilemmas and calling for government regulation.29:22–32:28 · Guest teaching 5/10 Radicalization Mechanics and Unchecked Online Anonymity Kantrowitz cites Brendan Nyhan's research suggesting extremist content is largely self-selected rather than algorithmic. Haidt concedes the finding but argues unverified anonymous accounts still provide an unnecessary accelerant to radicalization.32:28–36:29 · Guest teaching 6/10 Proposed Solutions for Zero-Knowledge User Authentication Kantrowitz raises concerns that authenticating accounts could endanger dissidents and activists, citing his own reporting on Saudi spies at Twitter. Haidt explains zero-knowledge level-2 authentication where human uniqueness is verified without storing PII.36:29–41:22 · Guest teaching 4/10 Adding Friction to Virality and User Trollishness Ratings Kantrowitz proposes forcing users to copy-paste links to create friction, and Haidt suggests rating users on a 1-to-5 trollishness scale. Kantrowitz constructively notes the edge cases and difficulty of defining trolling.41:22–44:13 · Guest teaching 3/10 Long-Term Technological Optimism and Podcast Conclusion Both guest and host share optimistic long-term perspectives on technology maturing over historical cycles before Kantrowitz closes the show.0:00–2:54 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Defining Structural Stupidity in Academia and Journalism Kantrowitz asks Haidt to define 'the stupid' and Haidt explains the concept of structural stupidity in academia and journalism. Haidt controls the floor with sociological framing while Kantrowitz mostly listens.2:54–5:20 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Social Media Dart Guns and Polarization Demographics Kantrowitz cites exact demographic figures from the Hidden Tribes study to prompt Haidt on who uses social media 'dart guns'. Haidt builds on the data to explain how small extreme groups intimidate moderates.5:20–8:39 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Architectural Shifts from Connection to Hyper-Virality Haidt praises Kantrowitz's reporting on the creator of the retweet button (Chris Wetherell) to explain how platforms shifted from connection to hyper-virality. Kantrowitz elaborates on his thesis about performative outrage.8:39–11:53 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Performative Platforms, Internet Trolls, and Russian Active Measures Kantrowitz synthesizes Haidt's argument, prompting Haidt to add male trolls and Russian active measures as key actors destabilizing the public square.11:54–15:43 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Political Asymmetry and Cultural Left Overreach Kantrowitz pushes back by pointing out that centrist Joe Biden won the presidency if politics is purely dominated by stupidity. Haidt reframes the issue around the asymmetry between political party dysfunction and cultural left overreach.15:43–19:15 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Institutional Accountability Versus Digital Mob Justice Kantrowitz challenges Haidt's negative view of social media call-out culture by noting it has provided accountability against corrupt power figures. Haidt responds by distinguishing accountable whistleblower processes from anonymous mob witch hunts.19:16–25:16 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Disinformation Virality and National Security Vulnerabilities Kantrowitz pushes back on whether foreign state disinformation is an overstated threat given tech platform defenses, but Haidt counters by detailing how small initial foreign seeds achieve massive virality through downstream amplifiers.25:16–29:22 · Guest disagreement 4/10 The Social Media Commons Dilemma and Regulatory Oversight Kantrowitz asks whether individual user demand and responsibility play a larger role than platform mechanics. Haidt immediately rejects user blame, explaining collective action traps through commons dilemmas and calling for government regulation.29:22–32:28 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Radicalization Mechanics and Unchecked Online Anonymity Kantrowitz cites Brendan Nyhan's research suggesting extremist content is largely self-selected rather than algorithmic. Haidt concedes the finding but argues unverified anonymous accounts still provide an unnecessary accelerant to radicalization.32:28–36:29 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Proposed Solutions for Zero-Knowledge User Authentication Kantrowitz raises concerns that authenticating accounts could endanger dissidents and activists, citing his own reporting on Saudi spies at Twitter. Haidt explains zero-knowledge level-2 authentication where human uniqueness is verified without storing PII.36:29–41:22 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Adding Friction to Virality and User Trollishness Ratings Kantrowitz proposes forcing users to copy-paste links to create friction, and Haidt suggests rating users on a 1-to-5 trollishness scale. Kantrowitz constructively notes the edge cases and difficulty of defining trolling.41:22–44:13 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Long-Term Technological Optimism and Podcast Conclusion Both guest and host share optimistic long-term perspectives on technology maturing over historical cycles before Kantrowitz closes the show.0:00–2:54 · Alex pushing back 2/10 Defining Structural Stupidity in Academia and Journalism Kantrowitz asks Haidt to define 'the stupid' and Haidt explains the concept of structural stupidity in academia and journalism. Haidt controls the floor with sociological framing while Kantrowitz mostly listens.2:54–5:20 · Alex pushing back 2/10 Social Media Dart Guns and Polarization Demographics Kantrowitz cites exact demographic figures from the Hidden Tribes study to prompt Haidt on who uses social media 'dart guns'. Haidt builds on the data to explain how small extreme groups intimidate moderates.5:20–8:39 · Alex pushing back 1/10 Architectural Shifts from Connection to Hyper-Virality Haidt praises Kantrowitz's reporting on the creator of the retweet button (Chris Wetherell) to explain how platforms shifted from connection to hyper-virality. Kantrowitz elaborates on his thesis about performative outrage.8:39–11:53 · Alex pushing back 2/10 Performative Platforms, Internet Trolls, and Russian Active Measures Kantrowitz synthesizes Haidt's argument, prompting Haidt to add male trolls and Russian active measures as key actors destabilizing the public square.11:54–15:43 · Alex pushing back 6/10 Political Asymmetry and Cultural Left Overreach Kantrowitz pushes back by pointing out that centrist Joe Biden won the presidency if politics is purely dominated by stupidity. Haidt reframes the issue around the asymmetry between political party dysfunction and cultural left overreach.15:43–19:15 · Alex pushing back 5/10 Institutional Accountability Versus Digital Mob Justice Kantrowitz challenges Haidt's negative view of social media call-out culture by noting it has provided accountability against corrupt power figures. Haidt responds by distinguishing accountable whistleblower processes from anonymous mob witch hunts.19:16–25:16 · Alex pushing back 6/10 Disinformation Virality and National Security Vulnerabilities Kantrowitz pushes back on whether foreign state disinformation is an overstated threat given tech platform defenses, but Haidt counters by detailing how small initial foreign seeds achieve massive virality through downstream amplifiers.25:16–29:22 · Alex pushing back 4/10 The Social Media Commons Dilemma and Regulatory Oversight Kantrowitz asks whether individual user demand and responsibility play a larger role than platform mechanics. Haidt immediately rejects user blame, explaining collective action traps through commons dilemmas and calling for government regulation.29:22–32:28 · Alex pushing back 5/10 Radicalization Mechanics and Unchecked Online Anonymity Kantrowitz cites Brendan Nyhan's research suggesting extremist content is largely self-selected rather than algorithmic. Haidt concedes the finding but argues unverified anonymous accounts still provide an unnecessary accelerant to radicalization.32:28–36:29 · Alex pushing back 4/10 Proposed Solutions for Zero-Knowledge User Authentication Kantrowitz raises concerns that authenticating accounts could endanger dissidents and activists, citing his own reporting on Saudi spies at Twitter. Haidt explains zero-knowledge level-2 authentication where human uniqueness is verified without storing PII.36:29–41:22 · Alex pushing back 3/10 Adding Friction to Virality and User Trollishness Ratings Kantrowitz proposes forcing users to copy-paste links to create friction, and Haidt suggests rating users on a 1-to-5 trollishness scale. Kantrowitz constructively notes the edge cases and difficulty of defining trolling.41:22–44:13 · Alex pushing back 1/10 Long-Term Technological Optimism and Podcast Conclusion Both guest and host share optimistic long-term perspectives on technology maturing over historical cycles before Kantrowitz closes the show.

speaking balance: gold is Alex, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Alex 12.6% · guest 87.4%0:00 · Alex 12.6% · guest 87.4%3:00 · Alex 27.6% · guest 72.4%3:00 · Alex 27.6% · guest 72.4%6:00 · Alex 11.7% · guest 88.3%6:00 · Alex 11.7% · guest 88.3%9:00 · Alex 21.5% · guest 78.5%9:00 · Alex 21.5% · guest 78.5%12:00 · Alex 6.8% · guest 93.2%12:00 · Alex 6.8% · guest 93.2%15:00 · Alex 32% · guest 68%15:00 · Alex 32% · guest 68%18:00 · Alex 53.6% · guest 46.4%18:00 · Alex 53.6% · guest 46.4%21:00 · Alex 11.7% · guest 88.3%21:00 · Alex 11.7% · guest 88.3%24:00 · Alex 37.7% · guest 62.3%24:00 · Alex 37.7% · guest 62.3%27:00 · Alex 20.2% · guest 79.8%27:00 · Alex 20.2% · guest 79.8%30:00 · Alex 17.7% · guest 82.3%30:00 · Alex 17.7% · guest 82.3%33:00 · Alex 16.1% · guest 83.9%33:00 · Alex 16.1% · guest 83.9%36:00 · Alex 35% · guest 65%36:00 · Alex 35% · guest 65%39:00 · Alex 27.6% · guest 72.4%39:00 · Alex 27.6% · guest 72.4%42:00 · Alex 55% · guest 45%42:00 · Alex 55% · guest 45%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 25:25 Haidt rejects citizen responsibility framing

Haidt bluntly interrupts Kantrowitz to reject the idea that citizens are to blame for foreign manipulation or social media harms, characterizing it as a systemic trap.

Hardest push from Alex ▶ 11:53 Kantrowitz challenges societal stupidity thesis using Biden

Kantrowitz directly tests Haidt's core thesis by asking how society is uniquely stupid if moderate centrist Joe Biden won the presidency decisively.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 20:20 Haidt illustrates downstream virality of small disinformation seeds

Haidt educates Kantrowitz on information flows, using the Soviet AIDS conspiracy theory to prove that low direct exposure does not equate to low real-world impact.

Alex holds their own ▶ 32:45 Kantrowitz cites Saudi Twitter infiltration regarding authentication

Kantrowitz demonstrates deep domain expertise by citing his own investigative reporting on Saudi infiltration at Twitter to challenge mandatory identity verification.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicAlex as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementAlex pushing backWhy
Defining Structural Stupidity in Academia and Journalism 4522 Kantrowitz asks Haidt to define 'the stupid' and Haidt explains the concept of structural stupidity in academia and journalism. Haidt controls the floor with sociological framing while Kantrowitz mostly listens.
Social Media Dart Guns and Polarization Demographics 6412 Kantrowitz cites exact demographic figures from the Hidden Tribes study to prompt Haidt on who uses social media 'dart guns'. Haidt builds on the data to explain how small extreme groups intimidate moderates.
Architectural Shifts from Connection to Hyper-Virality 7211 Haidt praises Kantrowitz's reporting on the creator of the retweet button (Chris Wetherell) to explain how platforms shifted from connection to hyper-virality. Kantrowitz elaborates on his thesis about performative outrage.
Performative Platforms, Internet Trolls, and Russian Active Measures 5422 Kantrowitz synthesizes Haidt's argument, prompting Haidt to add male trolls and Russian active measures as key actors destabilizing the public square.
Political Asymmetry and Cultural Left Overreach 6536 Kantrowitz pushes back by pointing out that centrist Joe Biden won the presidency if politics is purely dominated by stupidity. Haidt reframes the issue around the asymmetry between political party dysfunction and cultural left overreach.
Institutional Accountability Versus Digital Mob Justice 6525 Kantrowitz challenges Haidt's negative view of social media call-out culture by noting it has provided accountability against corrupt power figures. Haidt responds by distinguishing accountable whistleblower processes from anonymous mob witch hunts.
Disinformation Virality and National Security Vulnerabilities 7636 Kantrowitz pushes back on whether foreign state disinformation is an overstated threat given tech platform defenses, but Haidt counters by detailing how small initial foreign seeds achieve massive virality through downstream amplifiers.
The Social Media Commons Dilemma and Regulatory Oversight 5644 Kantrowitz asks whether individual user demand and responsibility play a larger role than platform mechanics. Haidt immediately rejects user blame, explaining collective action traps through commons dilemmas and calling for government regulation.
Radicalization Mechanics and Unchecked Online Anonymity 6525 Kantrowitz cites Brendan Nyhan's research suggesting extremist content is largely self-selected rather than algorithmic. Haidt concedes the finding but argues unverified anonymous accounts still provide an unnecessary accelerant to radicalization.
Proposed Solutions for Zero-Knowledge User Authentication 7624 Kantrowitz raises concerns that authenticating accounts could endanger dissidents and activists, citing his own reporting on Saudi spies at Twitter. Haidt explains zero-knowledge level-2 authentication where human uniqueness is verified without storing PII.
Adding Friction to Virality and User Trollishness Ratings 6413 Kantrowitz proposes forcing users to copy-paste links to create friction, and Haidt suggests rating users on a 1-to-5 trollishness scale. Kantrowitz constructively notes the edge cases and difficulty of defining trolling.
Long-Term Technological Optimism and Podcast Conclusion 4311 Both guest and host share optimistic long-term perspectives on technology maturing over historical cycles before Kantrowitz closes the show.

Statements from this episode (23)

Assertion Supported
Haidt: IQ is rising over decades in the US and globally
“Americans are getting smarter over the decades. IQ is rising in our country and around the world. It's not that Americans are getting stupid.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 0:36
Insight
Haidt: Structural stupidity occurs even when individual members are not stupid
“Just as you can have structural racism, even if nobody is a racist, you can have structural stupidity, even if no one is stupid.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 0:50
Opinion
Haidt: Mandatory diversity training does not work and makes things worse
“Mandatory diversity training you know, all these things we did in response to protesters that don't work or that make things worse.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 2:04
Insight
Haidt: Social media intimidation by vocal minorities degrades group intelligence
“A small number of young people use social media, not to make arguments, not to respond to arguments, but to destroy anyone who contradicts their sacred values. And that's what makes a group stupid.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 2:29
Opinion
Haidt: Twitter is the worst platform for reputational attacks and social shaming
“Twitter in particular, Twitter is the worst here, but it's also on Facebook and Slack and other channels.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 3:38
Insight
Haidt: Social media intimidation prevents university leaders from defending academic values
“Social media gave everybody a dart gun, and as a result, Because most people don't want to shoot anybody, but the far left, the far right, trolls, a few groups of people shoot moderates in their institutions, and they shoot the leaders of the institutions. So …”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 4:10
Assertion Supported
Kantrowitz: Progressive activists and devoted conservatives dominate political social media
“The furthest to the right, known as devoted conservatives comprised six percent of the U S population, the group furthest to the left, the progressive activists comprised eight percent of the population. The progress the progressive act activists were by far t…”
Alex Kantrowitz Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 4:48
Opinion
Haidt: Progressive activists are mostly young, white, and rely on intimidation
“The group furthest left, the progressive activists, that's the second whitest of all the groups. It's actually very interesting. This is mostly young white people who have a kind of politics in which, again, they don't learn to make arguments. They don't persu…”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 6:30
Insight
Haidt: Social media toxicity began with 2009 virality mechanics, not 2004 networking
“Social media was not at all toxic in 2004, you know, when the Facebook came out and in my space, and if you're sharing photos of your dog, there's no problem. It really was the move to the newsfeed and then especially The implementation of the retweet button, …”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 7:41
Opinion
Haidt: Performative social platforms destroy youth mental health and damage democracy
“We're talking about a small number of platforms where people do the labor. They create the content in exchange for prestige. That's what I think is, is destroying a generation in terms of mental health. And that's what I think is most damaging to democracies.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 9:54
Opinion
Haidt: Internet trolls are almost exclusively men
“There are two other groups that use this very effectively. One is trolls and these are men. They're almost always men. I've never heard of a female troll who enjoy harassing, burning things down, causing trouble.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 10:35
Opinion
Haidt: Republican Party has purged almost all of its moderates
“The Republican party is the stupid party. They shoot their moderates. They don't have any more moderates other than Liz Cheney and a couple, you know, but they used to have more than three and now they down to whatever, just a couple. The Republican Party is a…”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 12:54
Opinion
Haidt: Democratic Party is functional because moderates usually win debates
“It's not the Democratic Party that's stupid. The Democratic Party Has moderates and the far left and guess who wins? Usually the moderates. So the democratic party is a functional party. They have debates. The moderates usually win.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 13:14
Assertion Supported
Haidt: Studies show majorities across all demographic groups dislike wokeness
“The hidden tribe study and others find that majorities of everybody hate wokeness, black, white, male, female, even majority of Democrats don't like wokeness.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 14:54
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Haidt: Democrats are likely to get wiped out electorally
“But the Democrats aren't, are likely to get wiped out because Most people really hate what the cultural left is doing in their schools, their companies and their country.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 15:14
Assertion Supported
Kantrowitz: Major #MeToo Stories Originated from Investigative Reporting, Not Twitter
“And a lot of the big stories in the Me Too era didn't really originate on Twitter. They resulted from reporters actually getting sources to come on record.”
Alex Kantrowitz Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 18:33
Opinion
Haidt: China will probably be more competent at online influence than Russia
“The Chinese have much more focused interests. Of course they want us to think well of China. They want to suppress anyone who criticizes China. And they're probably in the long run a lot more competent and capable and persistent than the Russians.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 23:16
Opinion
Haidt: Tech platforms cannot stop foreign disinformation without intelligence agency coordination
“Yes, of course they took some easy steps, but there is no way they can get a handle on this. This has to be, and I think they call it for this. This has to be a sort of a government-wide partnership between Coordinated between the CIA, the FBI, NSA, Facebook, …”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 24:52
Opinion
Haidt: Instagram will not enforce underage bans because kids would switch to TikTok
“They won't do anything about it because if they do keep kids off below 13, then the kids will just go to TikTok. So, you know, I understand why Instagram doesn't do much about underage use but it's a trap.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 27:39
Assertion Supported
Haidt: No US government agency has regulatory jurisdiction over social media
“There is no government agency that has jurisdiction over social media. It doesn't go out over the airwaves. So it's not FCC.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 28:46
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Haidt: American democracy is likely to fail catastrophically within two decades
“I think that American democracy is likely to fail catastrophically at some point in the next decade or two decades. It's very hard to predict the future, but I think we are, the way we're headed is a very, very bad direction.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 32:00
Opinion
Haidt: humanID and Worldcoin could work for social media authentication
“Human ID.org and world coin, those are two that would work for level two authentication.”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 34:57
Opinion
Haidt: Condition Section 230 liability protection on basic platform responsibilities
“I would like us to consider that the federal government mandate That if you want the benefit of level of, you want the benefit of section two 30 protection and this incredible freedom from lawsuits that only you and the gun lobby have because of lobbying, you …”
Jonathan Haidt Jul 21, 2022 ▶ 35:34
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 300 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.