The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Chi: AI data vendors create gimmick benchmarks to sell data
“And actually a lot of that industry has now Built these gimmick style benchmarks as a mechanism to sell their data. And so that, that's become kind of their go-to-market as well.”
Ryan Chi: AI industry lacks shared framework for recursive self-improvement
“There isn't a shared language to talk about the RSI potential of models, and so we created this as an apples to apples way to actually benchmark across the models.”
Chi: AI policy discussions have been too abstract to define regulation
“I think the main issue though is that policy conversations as they've happened over the last couple of years have been very abstract. And there, there's been no material grounding to figure out what policy should cover.”
Chi: AI cybersecurity risks are primarily in infrastructure, not code
“But actually a lot of the biggest concern or risk is in the infrastructure level. And so these are not things that are expressed in code, but take simulating larger environments of enterprise cloud infrastructure, or even grid infrastructure, for us to be able…”