why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Weisman: Tokens on fully decentralized networks are likely not securities
“If you have a token that's operating on a fully decentralized network, that's probably clearly not. A security.”
Assertion Supported
Weisman: CFTC ruled Bitcoin is a commodity under its jurisdiction
“And it's been, one of their rulings said that Bitcoin is a commodity, so it falls under their jurisdiction.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Weisman: Crypto tech is unregulated, but financial applications face existing laws
“The underlying technology is not regulated, and it would be very difficult to regulate, but when you have applications of the technology, some of which we've heard about earlier today, when those applications cross into an area where there is an existing set o…”
Assertion Supported
Weisman: IRS classifies cryptocurrency as property, not currency
“The IRS designated cryptocurrency as property and not currency.”
Assertion Supported
Weisman: Coinbase led early crypto companies in highlighting legal compliance
“I think we're beginning to see in a lot of areas, and early on Coinbase was a leader in this, really priding themselves on the fact that they do comply with the laws, like they have a selling point.”
Assertion Partly supported
Weisman: Money transmitters must secure licenses across every US state
“States have money transmission licensing, and if you want to be a money transmitter, you have to obtain a license in every jurisdiction in the United States”