The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

2statements match

0resolved → 0open claims → 0supported → 0contradicted →

why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Assertion Not checkable as stated

Olson: Small non-state groups now possess former nation-state cyber attack capabilities

“We see individual small groups of people, as you said, gaining the capabilities of what were nation state capabilities in terms of the ability to carry out attacks from just a few years ago.”

Matthew Olson Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 2:23 a16z Podcast | Changing the Conversation about Cybersecurity

Assertion Not checkable as stated

Olson: Public cybersecurity discussions suffer from threat inflation and imprecise risk assessment

“I do think we face a bit of inflation about the nature of the threat, or at least a little bit of lack of care in talking about the threat.”

Matthew Olson Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:32 a16z Podcast | Changing the Conversation about Cybersecurity

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

The Ledger

Turn any episode into a week of clips.