The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Jay Komarneni: Human input is required for human-interpretable AI ontologies
“The only way you're going to get the representations that are most valuable to humans is from human beings themselves, right?”
Komarneni: Token rewards incentivize decentralized collective intelligence and knowledge creation
“The ability to ultimately compensate people with application specific tokens is a really interesting incentive to use ontologies and distributed knowledge creation, collective intelligence to come to better answers around given issues or given problems.”
Jay Komarneni: Human intelligence excels at multi-scale data synthesis
“One place where that you see that natural place that humans are really good is when there's a high number of scales of different types of information or data, right? So, for example, in healthcare, everything from how your mitochondria or the electron transpor…”