The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

clear all ✕

why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Opinion
Routine political amicus briefs by tech firms diminish their court impact
“I think it diminishes the importance of the briefs to the court because it starts to become more just like how, and you have plenty of the, plenty of groups like that on both sides of the dialogue in cases that you know are going to show up, and they're going …”
Erin Murphy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 14:38 a16z Podcast | Tech Policy and the Courts
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Supreme Court encryption rulings will explicitly urge Congress to update laws
“I suspect, however the court ends up dealing with it, there will be a lot of language in someone's opinion saying, Congress, please fix all this, because they, and you saw that in a few of these recent cases of theirs, where they're like, look, we shouldn't be…”
Erin Murphy Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 19:48 a16z Podcast | Tech Policy and the Courts
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.