The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Traditional data pipelines over-extract and over-clean due to unmeasurable impact
“So in contrast, if you think about the way that people build these extraction and integration and cleaning systems, they tend to over-extract, over-integrate, and over-clean Because they have no idea if their cleaning or extraction is actually gonna prove the …”
Modern scientific literature is universally accessible but impossible for humans to read
“For even the narrowest of scientific questions, They couldn't possibly read all the information that was relevant to them, or even a significant fraction of it. So this is why I say that scientific knowledge is accessible in a way like never before, but it's n…”