why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Liu: Protein structure prediction is essentially solved for many common proteins
“In the past, like, four or five years, this problem of protein structure prediction went from, you know, something that was, you know, quite far away from being solved, to now you could argue that, It's pretty much been solved for a lot of, like, common kind o…”
Insight
Liu: Generative AI in science makes validation much harder than idea generation
“In science, you know, it's actually the inverse. Like, it's actually, it's probably easier to generate ideas, but way harder to validate.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Bowen Liu calls labeled data scarcity the core bottleneck in scientific AI
“Yeah, I think you touched on, like, probably the core problem of, like, you know, ML applied to science. While we have a lot of, like, unlabeled data, like, there's just not that much label data out there. And a lot of it is because, like, it's very experiment…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Bowen Liu: Small Molecules Currently Lack Self-Supervised Learning Frameworks
“Because like with protein sequences and biological sequences, like you can actually do self-supervised learning, right? Because there is this like complicated generative process with like evolutionary pressure that you can learn from. There's no equivalent for…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Liu: 100 active compounds is a drug candidate but tiny for ML
“Usually in a drug discovery project, you know, if you have a hundred actives, you should be close to a drug, but a hundred data points is, like, tiny for machine learning, right?”