why aren't all 6 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Partly supported
Dixon: Crypto users in 2018 already exceed Netscape's peak user base
“I think Netscape at their peak was, like, fifty million users or something. I mean, the numbers, like, crypto's probably above that right now.”
Assertion Supported
Andreessen: Netscape Almost Acquired Yahoo for $3M–$5M
“Netscape, we almost bought Yahoo. There was like a bid ass spread between like 3,000,005 million dollars.”
Assertion Supported
Andreessen: Cross-site scripting was unknown when Netscape invented JavaScript in 1995
“When we invented JavaScript at Netscape in 1995, the concept of cross-site scripting was a complete unknown.”
Assertion Supported
Horowitz: Netscape had 90% market share of 55M internet users in 1996
“96, I think we had 90% browser share mark and we had fifty million users. So there was like fifty five million people on the internet.”
Assertion Supported
Hastings: Pure Software doubled annually and IPO'd one week before Netscape
“Because then I was able to start a company, it doubled every year, went public, one week before Netscape, actually, and so for one week, we were the big topic.”
Assertion Partly supported
Andreessen: Netscape held 90% market share when the internet had 50M users
“We had at one point over 90%, you know, market share for all people on the internet using our browser, and it turned out there were fifty million people on the internet. Like, fifty million people around the world were on the internet. By the way, twenty-five …”