Kaditz: Annual physicals show no correlation with better patient health outcomes
Jeff Kaditz · a16z Podcast | Health Data -- A Feedback Loop for Humanity · Jan 2, 2019 · at 0:41
Jeff Kaditz, co-founder of Q (q.bio), argues against the utility of traditional annual physicals during a discussion on continuous quantitative health tracking.
0:00 / 0:12exact quote · 12.5s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“If you think about what the annual physical consists of, and actually if you ask most physicians and most research, there is actually no real correlation between outcomes and consistently doing annual physicals.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Jeff Kaditz
Kaditz: Building disease predictive models using single variables is asinine
“Human body is an extremely complicated system to build predictive models based on a single variable, which is exactly what clinical studies do. Because that's, you know, what they're designed to do, really, is, is pretty asinine.”
Kaditz: Genomic disease prediction requires time-series biomarker data
“I think in order for genomics to be used in diagnostics or predictive models of are you going to get sick, I think it has to be combined with actual time series biomarker data”
Kaditz: Longitudinal physiological data contains more information than genetics alone
“Even if you're a twin, even if two people have the same genome, they actually won't necessarily express the same phenotypes, which to us means that there's more information encoded in the evolution of your physiological state and the trajectories in your physi…”
Kaditz: Genetic code alone cannot be the silver bullet for personalized medicine
“Human physiology is a long tail distribution. So your genetic code cannot be the kind of, you know, silver bullet that is magically going to bring us to the age of personalized medicine.”
Kaditz: Data scientists would never discard 70-percent accurate diagnostics like mammograms
“If mammograms have a predictive power information value in terms of defining or predicting whether or not somebody has breast cancer with the 70% accuracy, no data scientist in the world would throw out a variable that gave you That amount of information. They…”