Insight certainty 3/5 debate potential 3/5

Davenport: Pure corporate automation triggers a race to the bottom in margins

Tom Davenport · a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income) · Jan 2, 2019 · at 24:11

Tom Davenport, author and professor, explains why companies should pursue human-machine augmentation rather than relying purely on cost-cutting automation.

0:00 / 0:12exact quote · 12.5s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“Pursuing automation tends to be kind of a race to the bottom in many ways. It sort of lowers everybody's cost, but it also lowers everybody's margins, and everybody ends up doing kind of similar, not so innovative things”

quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →

More from Tom Davenport

Assertion Contradicted
Davenport: Basic income experiment recipients mostly spend extra time watching TV
“But in the experiments thus far, it appears that instead of doing, you know, highly meaningful activities, people just watch more TV.”
Tom Davenport Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:29 a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income)
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Tom Davenport: Humans will prefer human-created art and humor over AI
“I think at some point there will probably be just a human preference for human created art and humor and so on, just because it's human.”
Tom Davenport Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 15:43 a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income)
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Davenport: AI will struggle to read human psychological cues like bluffing
“The whole thing about looking in your opponent's eyes and figuring out whether they're bluffing or not. I think that's going to be tough for machine to do for a while.”
Tom Davenport Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 17:19 a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income)
Opinion
Davenport: Society should offer guaranteed work rather than basic income
“Because of this belief in the importance of work for, you know, meaning and life satisfaction, we'd argue for guaranteed work, which would be compensated rather than guaranteed income alone.”
Tom Davenport Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:01 a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income)
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Davenport: Augmentation is the most likely path for AI in work
“I think that augmentation-oriented future we think is by far the most likely one for how AI travels through the occupational world.”
Tom Davenport Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 5:02 a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income)
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Davenport: Almost every tech vendor will add cognitive AI capabilities
“You know, big companies like IBM are hiring thousands of people to do this, and I think there's every reason to expect that as these technologies take hold, almost every vendor will have some level of cognitive capabilities, and a lot of people will need to be…”
Tom Davenport Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 10:33 a16z Podcast | Automation, Jobs, & the Future of Work (and Income)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.