Guido Appenzeller, General Partner at a16z, discusses model unit economics and why flat-rate subscriptions are unsustainable for compute-heavy AI applications.
Opinion
Appenzeller: Intel-Nvidia partnership means AMD is 'fucked'
“I think AMD is fucked, right? I mean, they're, you're just, If your two arch nemesis suddenly team up, that's the worst possible news you can have, right? They were already struggling, right? Their cards are good, their software stack is not, right? They were …”
Opinion
Appenzeller: Capital moats in AI are shallow speed bumps
“If that assumption is true, I think this means that the moat that's created by these large capital investments is actually not particularly deep, right? It's more of a speed bump than Then, you know, something that prevents new entrants.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Appenzeller: Intel lacks competitive AI chips and its Gaudi effort is done
“They can't, they don't have anything competitive, right? There was the Gaudi effort that's more or less done, right? There was the internal graphics chips, which never competed really at the high end, right?”
Disclosure
Appenzeller: Intel's customer concentration allowed hyperscalers to push down prices
“One of the biggest problems we had was that our customer base sucked, right? I mean, we were selling to, most of the chips went to the large hyperscalers, you know, which they're way too concentrated, and they build their own chips, and so you can push down yo…”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Appenzeller: Novel coding lacking AI training data is only 0.01% of development
“I think the good news is that is 0.01% of all software development, right, for the, I don't know, you know, 100,000 ERP system implementation or so, right, that we have tons of training data, and I think these tools can be very, very powerful.”
Insight
Appenzeller: Guaranteeing LLMs never produce forbidden output is an unsolvable problem
“You're trying to have an LM that is very helpful and never even implicitly gives investment advice. That's sort of an unsolvable problem, right? You can get better and better and better, but you can never completely rule it out. And you can add a second LM tha…”