Pritzker: Comprehensive immigration reform would add $1.4 trillion to US economy
Penny Pritzker · a16z Podcast | Trade, Commerce, Manufacturing, Immigration, & Cuba -- with Penny Pritzker · Jan 2, 2019 · at 8:41
US Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker makes the economic case for comprehensive immigration reform during an interview on the a16z Podcast.
0:00 / 0:07exact quote · 7.4s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“It's hugely beneficial if we were to do comprehensive immigration reform. It's worth about 1.4 trillion dollars to our economy”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Penny Pritzker
Pritzker: Indonesian minister asked her to recruit Apple despite hostile data laws
“When I was first in this job, I'm in Indonesia, and a minister comes to me and says, we really want apple here in Indonesia, and would you please call Tim Cook? We'd like apple. I said, you know, look, I'm happy to call Tim Cook, but you are, Putting in place …”
Pritzker: Privacy Shield has unanimous European Commission approval
“The privacy shield is, as we call, the new structure. Is, I think it's satisfies the court case. It will allow data back and forth. It has the unanimous approval of the European Commission.”
Pritzker: Asia-Pacific middle class will reach 2.5B-3.5B in 15 years
“Over the next 15 years, you're going to see it go from about five hundred million to five hundred and seventy million middle class to Somewhere between two and a half and three and a half billion. I've seen numbers in, in, in that range. In 15 years.”
Pritzker: U.S. GDP statistics fail to adequately capture the gig economy
“In fact, one of the challenges we have right now, and I'm fighting to get access to this information, is we don't have, really, we're not counting, I don't think, in GDP, the gig economy, as fulsomely as it ought to be accounted in our GDP, and one of the thin…”