Partly raw tape
D 2 · C 3 · P 3 · Cm 3 2.70
Q numbers. In certain parts of the world. So why wouldn't, why wouldn't such a country want to put some sulfur into the stratosphere to, to cool things down? You know, it's a tourniquet. It's, it's like, it's the emergency thing that you do on your way to the emergency room to, to get, to, to get a real cure. And the real cure is, is going to be carbon removal.
A Yeah, it doesn't, it doesn't solve the problem. It is a band-aid until you remove the carbon from the atmosphere. Well, Neil, I want to say thank you for taking so much time throughout this interview. I think you've inspired a bunch of people with your work, but also I think it's extremely important to note that you are a builder in this space. You have been for many years, whether it was at Blue Origin, Magic Leap, now with Lamina One, and I think many people are excited to see what Lamina One brings to the space, whether it really can build a better ecosystem for creators, whether we can use some of these design decisions to make a more interoperable More fair, more equitable ecosystem for the people participating within it. So yeah, I just want to say thank you again, um, for taking the time here.
AI assessment note: “Yeah, it doesn't, it doesn't solve the problem. It is a band-aid”
Redirected raw tape
D 1 · C 4 · P 3 · Cm 3 2.70
Q like, is, you know, do we have the right balance of like remote versus like offsite? Do we need to have, you know, people have more soak time. Do we have the right tools? And since this is in place, are we running the firm, you know, we have the right management practices. And so, you know, we're, we're certainly still figuring it out, but we're definitely on that path.
A Yeah, and like we talked about, that comes with time, but the reason I asked you how you made that shift, or almost in some way changed your opinion as you got new data, is because I wonder how perhaps we might be able to do that within the framing of how people view innovation and technology. Kind of returning to what we talked about at the very beginning of this conversation, it does feel like there is this perception of technology, of course not everyone holds it, that, you know, we're in a bad place, or again, the world's getting worse, or insert negative thing about our current state of affairs, And I think it's really inspiring, at least at A-Six and Z, to see that people do hold this very optimistic view, and I wonder what you think maybe we can do as a collective, as a society, to maybe orient more around this more positive view of technology, because from my understanding, and I'd actually love for you to go into this history, it doesn't sound like this was always the case, that technology, I mean, specific technologies were viewed quite negatively, but a sense around innovation, I think, has been different in the past. Is that right?
AI assessment note: “the reason I asked you how you made that shift, or almost in some way”
