Jan 2, 2019 · 37m · a16z

a16z Podcast | When Humanity Meets A.I.

Fei-Fei Li · 24m spoken Sonal Chokshi · 5m spoken Frank Chen · 5m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the a16z podcast, Sonal Chokshi and Frank Chen speak with Dr. Fei-Fei Li about artificial intelligence transitioning from theoretical laboratory research to real-world deployment. They explore compute hardware co-evolution, algorithm limitations, semi-autonomous safety ethics, and Dr. Li's humanistic approach to expanding AI diversity.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The host holds 16.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 5.3 Guest teaching 4.8 Guest disagreement 1.4 The host pushing back 2.5
05100:0010:0020:0030:000:34–6:26 · The host as informed peer 7/10 In Vitro vs. In Vivo AI & Drivers of AI Growth Frank and Sonal demonstrate high technical expertise by bringing up specific hardware details like TPU development, ASIC tape-out costs, and parallelization. Fei-Fei clarifies that hardware and algorithm R&D must happen concurrently rather than sequentially, lightly reframing Frank's assertion.6:26–9:04 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Machine Learning History & Limits of Deep Learning Frank asks if deep learning is just a passing trend. Fei-Fei educates the hosts on the 60-year history of AI, covering symbolic logic, 30 years of non-deep statistical machine learning (SVMs, Bayesian nets), and the early roots of neural networks.9:04–11:10 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning & AGI Sonal correctly identifies the limitation of supervised learning compared to human child development. Fei-Fei expands on this, detailing why supervised paradigms fail for home robotics and differentiating task-driven AI from AGI.11:10–15:35 · The host as informed peer 6/10 AI Creativity and Learning to Learn When Fei-Fei cites AlphaGo's unexpected Go moves as AI creativity, Sonal explicitly pushes back, rejecting logical creativity in favor of irrational artistic expression like Jackson Pollock. Sonal references Kevin Kelly and artistic history to support her counter-position.15:35–20:23 · The host as informed peer 5/10 In Vivo Real-World Deployment: Big Tech vs. Startups Frank introduces Andrew Ng's critique of Tesla's Autopilot to challenge Fei-Fei's view on autonomous safety. Fei-Fei shares her perspective on consumer communication and machine ethics, while Frank and Sonal detail startup vs incumbent dynamics.20:23–24:08 · The host as informed peer 6/10 Human-Machine Interaction & The Trolley Problem Sonal demonstrates domain knowledge by referencing Nissan's staff anthropologist Dr. Melissa Cefkin and ethicist Patrick Lin. Frank details the algorithmic mechanics and legal liability implications of the Trolley Problem.24:08–29:17 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Jackrabbit: AI Navigating Social Dynamics and Public Spaces Sonal highlights Stanford's Jackrabbit project research on social navigation. Frank raises a sharp question about cross-cultural social norms across cities, prompting Fei-Fei to discuss incremental online learning.29:17–34:13 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Humanistic AI & Bridging the Diversity Gap Fei-Fei synthesizes existential AI anxiety and the CS diversity gap into a unified thesis on missing humanistic mission statements. Sonal contributes data on Stanford CS female enrollment and structural attrition across career stages.0:34–6:26 · Guest teaching 4/10 In Vitro vs. In Vivo AI & Drivers of AI Growth Frank and Sonal demonstrate high technical expertise by bringing up specific hardware details like TPU development, ASIC tape-out costs, and parallelization. Fei-Fei clarifies that hardware and algorithm R&D must happen concurrently rather than sequentially, lightly reframing Frank's assertion.6:26–9:04 · Guest teaching 6/10 Machine Learning History & Limits of Deep Learning Frank asks if deep learning is just a passing trend. Fei-Fei educates the hosts on the 60-year history of AI, covering symbolic logic, 30 years of non-deep statistical machine learning (SVMs, Bayesian nets), and the early roots of neural networks.9:04–11:10 · Guest teaching 5/10 Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning & AGI Sonal correctly identifies the limitation of supervised learning compared to human child development. Fei-Fei expands on this, detailing why supervised paradigms fail for home robotics and differentiating task-driven AI from AGI.11:10–15:35 · Guest teaching 4/10 AI Creativity and Learning to Learn When Fei-Fei cites AlphaGo's unexpected Go moves as AI creativity, Sonal explicitly pushes back, rejecting logical creativity in favor of irrational artistic expression like Jackson Pollock. Sonal references Kevin Kelly and artistic history to support her counter-position.15:35–20:23 · Guest teaching 4/10 In Vivo Real-World Deployment: Big Tech vs. Startups Frank introduces Andrew Ng's critique of Tesla's Autopilot to challenge Fei-Fei's view on autonomous safety. Fei-Fei shares her perspective on consumer communication and machine ethics, while Frank and Sonal detail startup vs incumbent dynamics.20:23–24:08 · Guest teaching 4/10 Human-Machine Interaction & The Trolley Problem Sonal demonstrates domain knowledge by referencing Nissan's staff anthropologist Dr. Melissa Cefkin and ethicist Patrick Lin. Frank details the algorithmic mechanics and legal liability implications of the Trolley Problem.24:08–29:17 · Guest teaching 5/10 Jackrabbit: AI Navigating Social Dynamics and Public Spaces Sonal highlights Stanford's Jackrabbit project research on social navigation. Frank raises a sharp question about cross-cultural social norms across cities, prompting Fei-Fei to discuss incremental online learning.29:17–34:13 · Guest teaching 6/10 Humanistic AI & Bridging the Diversity Gap Fei-Fei synthesizes existential AI anxiety and the CS diversity gap into a unified thesis on missing humanistic mission statements. Sonal contributes data on Stanford CS female enrollment and structural attrition across career stages.0:34–6:26 · Guest disagreement 2/10 In Vitro vs. In Vivo AI & Drivers of AI Growth Frank and Sonal demonstrate high technical expertise by bringing up specific hardware details like TPU development, ASIC tape-out costs, and parallelization. Fei-Fei clarifies that hardware and algorithm R&D must happen concurrently rather than sequentially, lightly reframing Frank's assertion.6:26–9:04 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Machine Learning History & Limits of Deep Learning Frank asks if deep learning is just a passing trend. Fei-Fei educates the hosts on the 60-year history of AI, covering symbolic logic, 30 years of non-deep statistical machine learning (SVMs, Bayesian nets), and the early roots of neural networks.9:04–11:10 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning & AGI Sonal correctly identifies the limitation of supervised learning compared to human child development. Fei-Fei expands on this, detailing why supervised paradigms fail for home robotics and differentiating task-driven AI from AGI.11:10–15:35 · Guest disagreement 2/10 AI Creativity and Learning to Learn When Fei-Fei cites AlphaGo's unexpected Go moves as AI creativity, Sonal explicitly pushes back, rejecting logical creativity in favor of irrational artistic expression like Jackson Pollock. Sonal references Kevin Kelly and artistic history to support her counter-position.15:35–20:23 · Guest disagreement 2/10 In Vivo Real-World Deployment: Big Tech vs. Startups Frank introduces Andrew Ng's critique of Tesla's Autopilot to challenge Fei-Fei's view on autonomous safety. Fei-Fei shares her perspective on consumer communication and machine ethics, while Frank and Sonal detail startup vs incumbent dynamics.20:23–24:08 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Human-Machine Interaction & The Trolley Problem Sonal demonstrates domain knowledge by referencing Nissan's staff anthropologist Dr. Melissa Cefkin and ethicist Patrick Lin. Frank details the algorithmic mechanics and legal liability implications of the Trolley Problem.24:08–29:17 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Jackrabbit: AI Navigating Social Dynamics and Public Spaces Sonal highlights Stanford's Jackrabbit project research on social navigation. Frank raises a sharp question about cross-cultural social norms across cities, prompting Fei-Fei to discuss incremental online learning.29:17–34:13 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Humanistic AI & Bridging the Diversity Gap Fei-Fei synthesizes existential AI anxiety and the CS diversity gap into a unified thesis on missing humanistic mission statements. Sonal contributes data on Stanford CS female enrollment and structural attrition across career stages.0:34–6:26 · The host pushing back 3/10 In Vitro vs. In Vivo AI & Drivers of AI Growth Frank and Sonal demonstrate high technical expertise by bringing up specific hardware details like TPU development, ASIC tape-out costs, and parallelization. Fei-Fei clarifies that hardware and algorithm R&D must happen concurrently rather than sequentially, lightly reframing Frank's assertion.6:26–9:04 · The host pushing back 1/10 Machine Learning History & Limits of Deep Learning Frank asks if deep learning is just a passing trend. Fei-Fei educates the hosts on the 60-year history of AI, covering symbolic logic, 30 years of non-deep statistical machine learning (SVMs, Bayesian nets), and the early roots of neural networks.9:04–11:10 · The host pushing back 1/10 Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning & AGI Sonal correctly identifies the limitation of supervised learning compared to human child development. Fei-Fei expands on this, detailing why supervised paradigms fail for home robotics and differentiating task-driven AI from AGI.11:10–15:35 · The host pushing back 6/10 AI Creativity and Learning to Learn When Fei-Fei cites AlphaGo's unexpected Go moves as AI creativity, Sonal explicitly pushes back, rejecting logical creativity in favor of irrational artistic expression like Jackson Pollock. Sonal references Kevin Kelly and artistic history to support her counter-position.15:35–20:23 · The host pushing back 3/10 In Vivo Real-World Deployment: Big Tech vs. Startups Frank introduces Andrew Ng's critique of Tesla's Autopilot to challenge Fei-Fei's view on autonomous safety. Fei-Fei shares her perspective on consumer communication and machine ethics, while Frank and Sonal detail startup vs incumbent dynamics.20:23–24:08 · The host pushing back 2/10 Human-Machine Interaction & The Trolley Problem Sonal demonstrates domain knowledge by referencing Nissan's staff anthropologist Dr. Melissa Cefkin and ethicist Patrick Lin. Frank details the algorithmic mechanics and legal liability implications of the Trolley Problem.24:08–29:17 · The host pushing back 2/10 Jackrabbit: AI Navigating Social Dynamics and Public Spaces Sonal highlights Stanford's Jackrabbit project research on social navigation. Frank raises a sharp question about cross-cultural social norms across cities, prompting Fei-Fei to discuss incremental online learning.29:17–34:13 · The host pushing back 2/10 Humanistic AI & Bridging the Diversity Gap Fei-Fei synthesizes existential AI anxiety and the CS diversity gap into a unified thesis on missing humanistic mission statements. Sonal contributes data on Stanford CS female enrollment and structural attrition across career stages.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 23.7% · guest 76.3%0:00 · the host 23.7% · guest 76.3%3:00 · the host 8.2% · guest 91.8%3:00 · the host 8.2% · guest 91.8%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 14.2% · guest 85.8%9:00 · the host 14.2% · guest 85.8%12:00 · the host 34.6% · guest 65.4%12:00 · the host 34.6% · guest 65.4%15:00 · the host 13% · guest 87%15:00 · the host 13% · guest 87%18:00 · the host 14.9% · guest 85.1%18:00 · the host 14.9% · guest 85.1%21:00 · the host 17.8% · guest 82.2%21:00 · the host 17.8% · guest 82.2%24:00 · the host 20.1% · guest 79.9%24:00 · the host 20.1% · guest 79.9%27:00 · the host 26% · guest 74%27:00 · the host 26% · guest 74%30:00 · the host 3.4% · guest 96.6%30:00 · the host 3.4% · guest 96.6%33:00 · the host 23.4% · guest 76.6%33:00 · the host 23.4% · guest 76.6%36:00 · the host 14.2% · guest 85.8%36:00 · the host 14.2% · guest 85.8%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 5:34 Fei-Fei reframes chip tape-out premise

Fei-Fei directly corrects Frank's assertion that it is too early or risky to design specialized chips before winning algorithms are settled, explaining that algorithm and hardware R&D must happen concurrently.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 11:55 Sonal challenges AlphaGo creativity definition

Sonal refuses Fei-Fei's framing of AlphaGo's optimal move-making as creativity, insisting on irrational, non-logical artistic creation like Jackson Pollock as the true benchmark.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 7:01 Fei-Fei details full ML history

Fei-Fei broadens the conversation beyond deep learning by educating the hosts on 60 years of AI foundation, explaining how non-deep statistical machine learning still powers most industrial applications.

The host holds their own ▶ 20:47 Frank analyzes explicit algorithmic choices in the Trolley Problem

Frank articulates a nuanced legal and technical distinction regarding split-second human reaction times versus calculated explicit decision-making in autonomous software.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
In Vitro vs. In Vivo AI & Drivers of AI Growth 7423 Frank and Sonal demonstrate high technical expertise by bringing up specific hardware details like TPU development, ASIC tape-out costs, and parallelization. Fei-Fei clarifies that hardware and algorithm R&D must happen concurrently rather than sequentially, lightly reframing Frank's assertion.
Machine Learning History & Limits of Deep Learning 4611 Frank asks if deep learning is just a passing trend. Fei-Fei educates the hosts on the 60-year history of AI, covering symbolic logic, 30 years of non-deep statistical machine learning (SVMs, Bayesian nets), and the early roots of neural networks.
Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning & AGI 4511 Sonal correctly identifies the limitation of supervised learning compared to human child development. Fei-Fei expands on this, detailing why supervised paradigms fail for home robotics and differentiating task-driven AI from AGI.
AI Creativity and Learning to Learn 6426 When Fei-Fei cites AlphaGo's unexpected Go moves as AI creativity, Sonal explicitly pushes back, rejecting logical creativity in favor of irrational artistic expression like Jackson Pollock. Sonal references Kevin Kelly and artistic history to support her counter-position.
In Vivo Real-World Deployment: Big Tech vs. Startups 5423 Frank introduces Andrew Ng's critique of Tesla's Autopilot to challenge Fei-Fei's view on autonomous safety. Fei-Fei shares her perspective on consumer communication and machine ethics, while Frank and Sonal detail startup vs incumbent dynamics.
Human-Machine Interaction & The Trolley Problem 6412 Sonal demonstrates domain knowledge by referencing Nissan's staff anthropologist Dr. Melissa Cefkin and ethicist Patrick Lin. Frank details the algorithmic mechanics and legal liability implications of the Trolley Problem.
Jackrabbit: AI Navigating Social Dynamics and Public Spaces 5512 Sonal highlights Stanford's Jackrabbit project research on social navigation. Frank raises a sharp question about cross-cultural social norms across cities, prompting Fei-Fei to discuss incremental online learning.
Humanistic AI & Bridging the Diversity Gap 5612 Fei-Fei synthesizes existential AI anxiety and the CS diversity gap into a unified thesis on missing humanistic mission statements. Sonal contributes data on Stanford CS female enrollment and structural attrition across career stages.

Statements from this episode (20)

Prediction Not checkable as stated
Fei-Fei Li: AI Is Transitioning From Laboratories to Real-World Application
“But now going forward, we're entering what I call the AI in vivo time, which AI is entering real life.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:15
Insight
Fei-Fei Li: AI's Moment Is Driven by ML Algorithms, Big Data, and Hardware
“So the convergence of, I'd say mathematical foundations and statistical machine learning tools, the big data and the hardware is created this historical moment of AI.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 2:12
Insight
Fei-Fei Li: Edge AI inference chips offer huge market opportunity beyond GPUs
“GPUs are wonderful for training the deep learning algorithms, but I think there is still a lot of space in rapid testing or inference time Chips where it can be used in recognition, you know, in devices, in embedded devices.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 3:33
Opinion
Fei-Fei Li: Dedicated AI Hardware Is Early as Algorithms Haven't Matured
“I think we're still in the exploratory stage because the algorithms are not matured enough yet.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 4:21
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Frank Chen: Taping out a custom silicon ASIC costs $50 million
“It's fifty million dollars to tape out.”
Frank Chen Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 5:50
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Fei-Fei Li: Many Industry Applications Rely on Non-Deep Machine Learning
“In fact, many, many industry applications today still use some of the most powerful machine learning algorithms that are not deep.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:01
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Deep Learning Originated in the 1960s and 1970s
“Deep learning is not the newest. It's actually developed in the sixties, seventies by people like Kunihiko Fukushima, then carried out by Jeff Hinton and Yang Lecun and their colleagues.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:10
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Deep learning cannot yet enable interactive observational robot learning
“You want to just, you know, like show and talk about what tasks there is and have the robot observe and learn. That kind of training scenario we cannot do in deep learning yet.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 9:54
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Fei-Fei Li: How to achieve artificial general intelligence remains largely unknown
“Specific task-driven applications are part of AI and important, but there is also the AGI, artificial general intelligence of reasoning, abstraction, Communication, emotional interaction, understanding of intention and purpose, formulation of knowledge underst…”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 10:27
Opinion
Fei-Fei Li: AlphaGo's unexpected moves against Lee Sedol demonstrate AI creativity
“If you look at the four or five matches of AlphaGo, there were multiple moments when AlphaGo made a movement. Master Li Sado was really surprised. And if you look at the Go community, people were just amazed by the kind of Creativity AlphaGo has in terms of ma…”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 11:14
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Fei-Fei Li: No existing AI math framework enables emotional and intuitive creativity
“The kind of creativity we're talking about blending our logical thinking, emotional thinking, and just, you know, intuitive thinking. And I haven't seen today's any work that builds on the kind of mathematical formulation that would enable that.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 12:48
Assertion Supported
Frank Chen: George Hotz built a self-driving car single-handedly at Comma.ai
“George at Comma.ai who built a self-driving car by himself, like one person.”
Frank Chen Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 17:09
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Google holds early self-driving advantage in data and algorithms
“Companies like Google, even though they didn't have cars at the beginning, they had algorithms. They started this early, so they now have both data and algorithms.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 17:51
Opinion
Fei-Fei Li: I would never put my kids in early Tesla Autopilot
“So when Tesla's autopilot came out, I watched some of the YouTube videos. As a mom, I would never want to put my kids or myself into those cars.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 19:06
Assertion Supported
Sonal Chokshi: Nissan employs a full-time anthropologist for autonomous vehicle design
“Nissan has a, an anthropologist on staff, Dr. Melissa Shefkin, or Shefkin, I forgot how to pronounce her last name, but She's an anthropologist whose full-time job is to study these issues in order to build it into the actual design, and it's not just like sof…”
Sonal Chokshi Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 20:51
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Human brain and motor speed are drastically slower than transistors
“Compared to computers, humans are extremely slow computing machines. The information transfer in our brain is very slow compared to transistors. And add on top of that, our motor system You know, from our brain to our muscles is even slower.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:39
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Fei-Fei Li: Naive pedestrian yielding rules cause autonomous robots to stall
“We tested that. If we do that, the robot will never go anywhere because in a very crowded space, there's always people. If the robot just follows the most naive rule of I'll yield to people all the time, the robot would just be sitting there from the starting …”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 25:41
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Autonomous navigation robots currently require location-by-location training
“As of now, we have to train them Location by location. We have to gather data.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 28:22
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Stanford CS undergrads are 25% to 30% women
“It's about 25 to 30% in undergraduate that we have women, and then this thing just goes down as you Oh, it goes down as you go higher up.”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 31:38
Assertion Supported
Fei-Fei Li: Humanistic framing statistically increases high school girls' AI interest
“We conducted a rigorous evaluation project on this hypothesis. Can humanism increase the interest in AI? And we found a statistically significant difference From the beginning to the, to before and after for these girls thinking. And that particular paper is p…”
Fei-Fei Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 36:53
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.