Jan 2, 2019 · 32m · a16z

a16z Podcast | Beyond One Size Fits All for Startup Employee Options

Ben Horowitz · 18m spoken Sonal Chokshi · 6m spoken Scott Kupor · 5m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

Ben Horowitz and Scott Kupor join Sonal Chokshi to analyze the historical flaws of traditional 90-day startup option exercise windows and present custom, innovative equity compensation models tailored to modern company lifecycles.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The host holds 20.1% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 4.4 Guest teaching 5.0 Guest disagreement 2.0 The host pushing back 3.4
05100:0010:0020:0030:000:00–3:25 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Historical Origins and the 90-Day Option Exercise Window Sonal admits ignorance regarding the 2000s stock option pricing scandal, prompting Ben to explain the historical accounting rules and how the 90-day exercise window created an inadvertent class divide between wealthy and non-wealthy employees.3:25–6:03 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Unintended Consequences of 10-Year Extensions and Longer IPO Timelines Scott and Ben educate the host on how longer IPO timelines distort traditional 4-year vesting models, leaving former employees with illiquid stock while diluting active employees.6:03–8:22 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Equity Allocation Dynamics Between Early and Late Employees Sonal asks whether the conversation is falsely pitting early vs late employees against each other, but Ben explicitly reframes her premise as incorrect while Scott explains 83(b) tax elections.8:22–14:14 · The host as informed peer 6/10 Alternative Vesting and Grant Models: Snapchat and Tesla Sonal strongly challenges the guests by arguing that tying equity strictly to long tenure creates adverse selection and penalizes mobile top talent. Ben counters her framing by advising her to embrace compensation complexity rather than simply railing against it.14:14–18:01 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Cash vs. Equity Compensation Mechanics and RSUs Sonal presses the guests on cash constraints and proposes RSUs as a middle-ground alternative. Ben and Scott walk through why RSUs are far less valuable than options for early-stage startup workers.18:01–20:05 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Managing Retention Incentives and Avoiding Zombie Employees Sonal introduces the concept of dead equity and zombie employees who stay solely due to golden handcuffs. Ben and Scott validate her point, agreeing that misaligned retention incentives generate unproductive employee behavior.20:05–23:08 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Strategic Principles for Designing Custom Option Structures Sonal summarizes the core discussion points and references the WhatsApp effect of extreme leverage per engineer, while Ben and Scott discuss matching vesting structures to liquidity events.23:08–27:32 · The host as informed peer 5/10 VC Alignment, Employee Transparency, and Compensation Education Sonal cites internal people operations expertise to stress employee transparency, leading Ben to share personal anecdotes about not understanding option terminology during his early career.27:32–32:24 · The host as informed peer 6/10 Ben Horowitz's CEO Compensation Blueprint and Industry Experiments Sonal prompts Ben for his personal CEO compensation blueprint and actively references alternative industry experiments such as Andrew Mason's progressive equity and Eric Ries's LTSE.0:00–3:25 · Guest teaching 7/10 Historical Origins and the 90-Day Option Exercise Window Sonal admits ignorance regarding the 2000s stock option pricing scandal, prompting Ben to explain the historical accounting rules and how the 90-day exercise window created an inadvertent class divide between wealthy and non-wealthy employees.3:25–6:03 · Guest teaching 6/10 Unintended Consequences of 10-Year Extensions and Longer IPO Timelines Scott and Ben educate the host on how longer IPO timelines distort traditional 4-year vesting models, leaving former employees with illiquid stock while diluting active employees.6:03–8:22 · Guest teaching 6/10 Equity Allocation Dynamics Between Early and Late Employees Sonal asks whether the conversation is falsely pitting early vs late employees against each other, but Ben explicitly reframes her premise as incorrect while Scott explains 83(b) tax elections.8:22–14:14 · Guest teaching 6/10 Alternative Vesting and Grant Models: Snapchat and Tesla Sonal strongly challenges the guests by arguing that tying equity strictly to long tenure creates adverse selection and penalizes mobile top talent. Ben counters her framing by advising her to embrace compensation complexity rather than simply railing against it.14:14–18:01 · Guest teaching 6/10 Cash vs. Equity Compensation Mechanics and RSUs Sonal presses the guests on cash constraints and proposes RSUs as a middle-ground alternative. Ben and Scott walk through why RSUs are far less valuable than options for early-stage startup workers.18:01–20:05 · Guest teaching 3/10 Managing Retention Incentives and Avoiding Zombie Employees Sonal introduces the concept of dead equity and zombie employees who stay solely due to golden handcuffs. Ben and Scott validate her point, agreeing that misaligned retention incentives generate unproductive employee behavior.20:05–23:08 · Guest teaching 4/10 Strategic Principles for Designing Custom Option Structures Sonal summarizes the core discussion points and references the WhatsApp effect of extreme leverage per engineer, while Ben and Scott discuss matching vesting structures to liquidity events.23:08–27:32 · Guest teaching 3/10 VC Alignment, Employee Transparency, and Compensation Education Sonal cites internal people operations expertise to stress employee transparency, leading Ben to share personal anecdotes about not understanding option terminology during his early career.27:32–32:24 · Guest teaching 4/10 Ben Horowitz's CEO Compensation Blueprint and Industry Experiments Sonal prompts Ben for his personal CEO compensation blueprint and actively references alternative industry experiments such as Andrew Mason's progressive equity and Eric Ries's LTSE.0:00–3:25 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Historical Origins and the 90-Day Option Exercise Window Sonal admits ignorance regarding the 2000s stock option pricing scandal, prompting Ben to explain the historical accounting rules and how the 90-day exercise window created an inadvertent class divide between wealthy and non-wealthy employees.3:25–6:03 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Unintended Consequences of 10-Year Extensions and Longer IPO Timelines Scott and Ben educate the host on how longer IPO timelines distort traditional 4-year vesting models, leaving former employees with illiquid stock while diluting active employees.6:03–8:22 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Equity Allocation Dynamics Between Early and Late Employees Sonal asks whether the conversation is falsely pitting early vs late employees against each other, but Ben explicitly reframes her premise as incorrect while Scott explains 83(b) tax elections.8:22–14:14 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Alternative Vesting and Grant Models: Snapchat and Tesla Sonal strongly challenges the guests by arguing that tying equity strictly to long tenure creates adverse selection and penalizes mobile top talent. Ben counters her framing by advising her to embrace compensation complexity rather than simply railing against it.14:14–18:01 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Cash vs. Equity Compensation Mechanics and RSUs Sonal presses the guests on cash constraints and proposes RSUs as a middle-ground alternative. Ben and Scott walk through why RSUs are far less valuable than options for early-stage startup workers.18:01–20:05 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Managing Retention Incentives and Avoiding Zombie Employees Sonal introduces the concept of dead equity and zombie employees who stay solely due to golden handcuffs. Ben and Scott validate her point, agreeing that misaligned retention incentives generate unproductive employee behavior.20:05–23:08 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Strategic Principles for Designing Custom Option Structures Sonal summarizes the core discussion points and references the WhatsApp effect of extreme leverage per engineer, while Ben and Scott discuss matching vesting structures to liquidity events.23:08–27:32 · Guest disagreement 1/10 VC Alignment, Employee Transparency, and Compensation Education Sonal cites internal people operations expertise to stress employee transparency, leading Ben to share personal anecdotes about not understanding option terminology during his early career.27:32–32:24 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Ben Horowitz's CEO Compensation Blueprint and Industry Experiments Sonal prompts Ben for his personal CEO compensation blueprint and actively references alternative industry experiments such as Andrew Mason's progressive equity and Eric Ries's LTSE.0:00–3:25 · The host pushing back 1/10 Historical Origins and the 90-Day Option Exercise Window Sonal admits ignorance regarding the 2000s stock option pricing scandal, prompting Ben to explain the historical accounting rules and how the 90-day exercise window created an inadvertent class divide between wealthy and non-wealthy employees.3:25–6:03 · The host pushing back 1/10 Unintended Consequences of 10-Year Extensions and Longer IPO Timelines Scott and Ben educate the host on how longer IPO timelines distort traditional 4-year vesting models, leaving former employees with illiquid stock while diluting active employees.6:03–8:22 · The host pushing back 5/10 Equity Allocation Dynamics Between Early and Late Employees Sonal asks whether the conversation is falsely pitting early vs late employees against each other, but Ben explicitly reframes her premise as incorrect while Scott explains 83(b) tax elections.8:22–14:14 · The host pushing back 7/10 Alternative Vesting and Grant Models: Snapchat and Tesla Sonal strongly challenges the guests by arguing that tying equity strictly to long tenure creates adverse selection and penalizes mobile top talent. Ben counters her framing by advising her to embrace compensation complexity rather than simply railing against it.14:14–18:01 · The host pushing back 6/10 Cash vs. Equity Compensation Mechanics and RSUs Sonal presses the guests on cash constraints and proposes RSUs as a middle-ground alternative. Ben and Scott walk through why RSUs are far less valuable than options for early-stage startup workers.18:01–20:05 · The host pushing back 4/10 Managing Retention Incentives and Avoiding Zombie Employees Sonal introduces the concept of dead equity and zombie employees who stay solely due to golden handcuffs. Ben and Scott validate her point, agreeing that misaligned retention incentives generate unproductive employee behavior.20:05–23:08 · The host pushing back 2/10 Strategic Principles for Designing Custom Option Structures Sonal summarizes the core discussion points and references the WhatsApp effect of extreme leverage per engineer, while Ben and Scott discuss matching vesting structures to liquidity events.23:08–27:32 · The host pushing back 3/10 VC Alignment, Employee Transparency, and Compensation Education Sonal cites internal people operations expertise to stress employee transparency, leading Ben to share personal anecdotes about not understanding option terminology during his early career.27:32–32:24 · The host pushing back 2/10 Ben Horowitz's CEO Compensation Blueprint and Industry Experiments Sonal prompts Ben for his personal CEO compensation blueprint and actively references alternative industry experiments such as Andrew Mason's progressive equity and Eric Ries's LTSE.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 18.8% · guest 81.2%0:00 · the host 18.8% · guest 81.2%3:00 · the host 1.7% · guest 98.3%3:00 · the host 1.7% · guest 98.3%6:00 · the host 13.6% · guest 86.4%6:00 · the host 13.6% · guest 86.4%9:00 · the host 37.4% · guest 62.6%9:00 · the host 37.4% · guest 62.6%12:00 · the host 12.6% · guest 87.4%12:00 · the host 12.6% · guest 87.4%15:00 · the host 8.4% · guest 91.6%15:00 · the host 8.4% · guest 91.6%18:00 · the host 35.3% · guest 64.7%18:00 · the host 35.3% · guest 64.7%21:00 · the host 25.9% · guest 74.1%21:00 · the host 25.9% · guest 74.1%24:00 · the host 23.5% · guest 76.5%24:00 · the host 23.5% · guest 76.5%27:00 · the host 29.9% · guest 70.1%27:00 · the host 29.9% · guest 70.1%30:00 · the host 13.8% · guest 86.2%30:00 · the host 13.8% · guest 86.2%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 13:08 Embrace the Complexity

Ben directly dismisses Sonal's pushback against long tenure incentives, telling her that compensation is complex and she should embrace the complexity rather than railing against people who highlight it.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 10:45 Employee Mobility Defense

Sonal firmly pushes back against back-loaded vesting models, contending that high-performing employees earn their equity and naturally desire career mobility without facing adverse selection.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 1:55 Stock Option Scandal and Class Divide

After Sonal explicitly admits not knowing about the 2000s stock option scandal, Ben explains the historical regulatory changes and how 90-day windows created a class disparity between rich and non-rich employees.

The host holds their own ▶ 29:40 Progressive Equity Framework

Sonal demonstrates strong industry knowledge by bringing up Andrew Mason's progressive equity framework to broaden the scope of compensation innovation.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Historical Origins and the 90-Day Option Exercise Window 2711 Sonal admits ignorance regarding the 2000s stock option pricing scandal, prompting Ben to explain the historical accounting rules and how the 90-day exercise window created an inadvertent class divide between wealthy and non-wealthy employees.
Unintended Consequences of 10-Year Extensions and Longer IPO Timelines 2611 Scott and Ben educate the host on how longer IPO timelines distort traditional 4-year vesting models, leaving former employees with illiquid stock while diluting active employees.
Equity Allocation Dynamics Between Early and Late Employees 4635 Sonal asks whether the conversation is falsely pitting early vs late employees against each other, but Ben explicitly reframes her premise as incorrect while Scott explains 83(b) tax elections.
Alternative Vesting and Grant Models: Snapchat and Tesla 6657 Sonal strongly challenges the guests by arguing that tying equity strictly to long tenure creates adverse selection and penalizes mobile top talent. Ben counters her framing by advising her to embrace compensation complexity rather than simply railing against it.
Cash vs. Equity Compensation Mechanics and RSUs 5646 Sonal presses the guests on cash constraints and proposes RSUs as a middle-ground alternative. Ben and Scott walk through why RSUs are far less valuable than options for early-stage startup workers.
Managing Retention Incentives and Avoiding Zombie Employees 5314 Sonal introduces the concept of dead equity and zombie employees who stay solely due to golden handcuffs. Ben and Scott validate her point, agreeing that misaligned retention incentives generate unproductive employee behavior.
Strategic Principles for Designing Custom Option Structures 5412 Sonal summarizes the core discussion points and references the WhatsApp effect of extreme leverage per engineer, while Ben and Scott discuss matching vesting structures to liquidity events.
VC Alignment, Employee Transparency, and Compensation Education 5313 Sonal cites internal people operations expertise to stress employee transparency, leading Ben to share personal anecdotes about not understanding option terminology during his early career.
Ben Horowitz's CEO Compensation Blueprint and Industry Experiments 6412 Sonal prompts Ben for his personal CEO compensation blueprint and actively references alternative industry experiments such as Andrew Mason's progressive equity and Eric Ries's LTSE.

Statements from this episode (23)

Assertion Supported
Horowitz: Pre-2000s accounting laws forced 90-day startup option windows
“And the then accounting laws basically said that if you gave an employee more than, you know, a very short window to exercise, you would potentially create a very large accounting charge, which would make it impossible for the company to ever go public or be a…”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 1:19
Assertion Supported
Horowitz: Startups kept 90-day option windows even after accounting laws changed
“So they changed the law and the law, the new law kind of made it okay to have a longer exercise period, but nobody changed the practice.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 2:11
Insight
Horowitz: 90-day option windows create a wealth disparity for startup employees
“If you're rich and you have 90 days to exercise, that's fine because you can buy your stock options. But if you're not rich, then you can't. And so now we've created this class thing.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 2:23
Assertion Supported
Horowitz: Adam D'Angelo invented the 10-year option exercise window
“Adam D'Angelo solved that rich-poor dichotomy by introducing the ten-year vest.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 3:18
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Horowitz: Ten-year exercise windows significantly increase stock option value
“You've made compensation packages far more valuable in that a ten-year option is much more valuable than having to buy the stock in 90 days, no matter who you are.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 3:30
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Horowitz: Employees actually retain less net equity under 10-year exercise windows
“Employees who got, say.one percent of the company were actually, actually get less of the company in a ten-year exercise scheme than in a ninety-day exercise scheme.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 4:04
Assertion Supported
Cooper: Startups historically went public within four to six years on average
“We used to have, you know, four-year options with this ninety-day, you know, option to exercise in a period where companies used to go public in four or six years on average.”
Scott Kupor Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 4:59
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Cooper: Early employees bypass the 90-day exercise issue via Section 83(b)
“The other thing that the early employees typically have available to them is what's called 83 B, which allows them to essentially early exercise their options when the strike price is still very low and therefore the cash out of pocket required to do so is rel…”
Scott Kupor Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 7:06
Assertion Supported
Horowitz: Snapchat innovated by back-loading employee equity vesting into year four
“Snapchat, I think is doing a very interesting innovation by having most of the vesting occur later in the fourth year, as opposed to in the first year.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:57
Insight
Horowitz: An employee's fourth year is more valuable than their first
“And that's just a way of saying, look, if you're here, that fourth year is just more valuable to us. And I think objectively it is, but that's not reflected either in the current compensation scheme.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 9:06
Assertion Partly supported
Cooper: Tesla grants smaller initial equity, favoring larger performance refreshers later
“And one of the things that Tesla does is, instead of the typical practice, which is most people get a very significant grant, you know, the day they join the company, and then over time, they might get some refresher grants, but those refresher grants are ofte…”
Scott Kupor Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 9:27
Insight
Horowitz: Employee tenure compensation rewards accumulated institutional knowledge, not single-point output
“One of the things that you're trying to value with tenure is knowledge and not actually kind of the value of the work in a single point in time.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 11:12
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Horowitz: Initial startup equity reflects past reputation rather than actual performance
“Your stock option package that you got before you put that two years in where you did 10 X what everybody else did was set on work you did before you even got there.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 11:51
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Horowitz: Startups consistently allocate more equity to new hires than performance grants
“There's no company that I know of that allocates More money to performance grants than new hire grants.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 13:06
Insight
Horowitz: Startup failure is usually the founder's fault, not the employee's
“If we're just talking pure compensation, then I think cash is actually a better vehicle than stock, because one, like, stock is variant, and you may not get paid not because you can't invest, but because the thing goes to zero. And is that really your fault as…”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 15:34
Insight
Horowitz: 10-year option exercise windows incentivize employees to leave startups
“If you have a 10 year exercise, there is potentially an incentive for people to leave in the sense that I can walk out with my stock that I have, and I can get a brand new offer from a new company.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 18:18
Insight
Horowitz: The tech industry needs four or five standard equity compensation models
“So, you know, it really probably needs to not be one size fits all. I think that if every company had a different scheme, You do get into a weird thing for potential employees and recruiting, so I think we might do a disservice to the industry by doing that, b…”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:16
Opinion
Horowitz: Tesla and WhatsApp require fundamentally different employee option plans
“Tesla's option plan cannot be the same as WhatsApp's, or it probably should not be.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:51
Insight
Cooper: Startups should offer larger equity grants over longer vesting periods
“Maybe an answer is to think about, gee, people should get more options, you know, even more options they do today, but with the understanding that they vest over a longer period such that it ties more closely to when you think the liquidity happens.”
Scott Kupor Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 22:39
Disclosure
Horowitz: I lost my own startup options due to the 90-day rule
“Look, I have been an employee at a startup. I've lost options. Over the 90 day exercise window that I can afford, you know, like, you know, really can afford it. I got, you know, three kids and 26 years old and all that kind of thing. So I understand the issue…”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 24:22
Opinion
Horowitz: The biggest sin of 90-day options was lack of employee understanding
“Yeah, I think that was probably the biggest sin Of the ninety-day exercise era is that a tiny number of employees actually understood that that was the case.”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 25:26
Insight
Horowitz: Back-loaded vesting enables larger overall equity option packages
“What I'm saying is because the vesting is back and loaded and the stock is going to go disproportionately to the people who stay longer that I can then afford to give out bigger packages because of the people who leave after a year are not going to walk away w…”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 29:07
Assertion Contradicted
Horowitz: Andrew Mason capped founder and executive equity gains at $50 million
“In Andrew's model, he basically puts a kind of cap on what the CEO, the founders and executives can make, you know, and it's a dollar cap. And once they hit their dollar cap, which is whatever their kind of financial independence threshold is, and I think it w…”
Ben Horowitz Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 30:10
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.