Jan 2, 2019 · 22m · a16z

a16z Podcast | The Storage Renaissance

Peter Levine · 7m spoken Mike Matchett · 6m spoken Haoyuan 'H.Y.' Li · 5m spoken Sonal Chokshi · 2m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the a16z Podcast, industry experts discuss 'The Storage Renaissance,' exploring how falling memory costs, machine-generated data, and unified virtualization layers are transforming cloud architecture, edge computing, and real-time artificial intelligence.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. The host holds 11.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 3.7 Guest teaching 5.4 Guest disagreement 1.4 The host pushing back 2.1
05100:0010:0020:000:48–3:01 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Why Storage Matters and the Concept of Data Gravity Host Sonal probes why storage matters, framing data growth as a potential difference of degree vs kind. Guests introduce fundamental data gravity concepts to educate the host on why scaling old storage methods fails.3:01–5:08 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Evolution of Storage Formats and Machine-Generated Data Peter Levine reframes the definition of data from human input to sensor/machine data, while explaining how mobile supply chains lower enterprise cost curves. Sonal listens and offers light humor.5:08–9:23 · The host as informed peer 3/10 In-Memory Storage Architectures and Cost Reductions Guests debate the limits of in-memory architecture. Mike Matchett offers mild combativeness by pointing out hardware supply constraints that counter pure in-memory optimism, prompting Peter to clarify edge computing models.9:23–11:47 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Multi-Cloud Ecosystems and In-Memory Tiering Sonal asks precise questions about enterprise multi-cloud storage sprawl and forces H.Y. Li to explain why in-memory tiering specifically solves the performance and cost problems.11:47–14:11 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Machine Learning and In-Memory Processing Acceleration Peter Levine and Mike Matchett deliver detailed technical explanations connecting machine learning iterative compute demands with in-memory architectures like Spark, with minimal host intervention.14:11–16:40 · The host as informed peer 6/10 Virtualizing Storage via Unified Abstraction Layers Sonal demonstrates strong technical domain synthesis by framing H.Y.'s explanation of data silos as the need for a unified virtualization abstraction layer, which H.Y. strongly confirms.16:40–20:14 · The host as informed peer 4/10 The Changing Role of IT and Predictive Analytics Mike and Peter discuss the shifting role of IT toward real-time predictive analytics. Mike gently interrupts Peter to push the predictive timeline from 'tomorrow' to real-time micro-decisions.0:48–3:01 · Guest teaching 5/10 Why Storage Matters and the Concept of Data Gravity Host Sonal probes why storage matters, framing data growth as a potential difference of degree vs kind. Guests introduce fundamental data gravity concepts to educate the host on why scaling old storage methods fails.3:01–5:08 · Guest teaching 6/10 Evolution of Storage Formats and Machine-Generated Data Peter Levine reframes the definition of data from human input to sensor/machine data, while explaining how mobile supply chains lower enterprise cost curves. Sonal listens and offers light humor.5:08–9:23 · Guest teaching 6/10 In-Memory Storage Architectures and Cost Reductions Guests debate the limits of in-memory architecture. Mike Matchett offers mild combativeness by pointing out hardware supply constraints that counter pure in-memory optimism, prompting Peter to clarify edge computing models.9:23–11:47 · Guest teaching 5/10 Multi-Cloud Ecosystems and In-Memory Tiering Sonal asks precise questions about enterprise multi-cloud storage sprawl and forces H.Y. Li to explain why in-memory tiering specifically solves the performance and cost problems.11:47–14:11 · Guest teaching 6/10 Machine Learning and In-Memory Processing Acceleration Peter Levine and Mike Matchett deliver detailed technical explanations connecting machine learning iterative compute demands with in-memory architectures like Spark, with minimal host intervention.14:11–16:40 · Guest teaching 5/10 Virtualizing Storage via Unified Abstraction Layers Sonal demonstrates strong technical domain synthesis by framing H.Y.'s explanation of data silos as the need for a unified virtualization abstraction layer, which H.Y. strongly confirms.16:40–20:14 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Changing Role of IT and Predictive Analytics Mike and Peter discuss the shifting role of IT toward real-time predictive analytics. Mike gently interrupts Peter to push the predictive timeline from 'tomorrow' to real-time micro-decisions.0:48–3:01 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Why Storage Matters and the Concept of Data Gravity Host Sonal probes why storage matters, framing data growth as a potential difference of degree vs kind. Guests introduce fundamental data gravity concepts to educate the host on why scaling old storage methods fails.3:01–5:08 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Evolution of Storage Formats and Machine-Generated Data Peter Levine reframes the definition of data from human input to sensor/machine data, while explaining how mobile supply chains lower enterprise cost curves. Sonal listens and offers light humor.5:08–9:23 · Guest disagreement 3/10 In-Memory Storage Architectures and Cost Reductions Guests debate the limits of in-memory architecture. Mike Matchett offers mild combativeness by pointing out hardware supply constraints that counter pure in-memory optimism, prompting Peter to clarify edge computing models.9:23–11:47 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Multi-Cloud Ecosystems and In-Memory Tiering Sonal asks precise questions about enterprise multi-cloud storage sprawl and forces H.Y. Li to explain why in-memory tiering specifically solves the performance and cost problems.11:47–14:11 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Machine Learning and In-Memory Processing Acceleration Peter Levine and Mike Matchett deliver detailed technical explanations connecting machine learning iterative compute demands with in-memory architectures like Spark, with minimal host intervention.14:11–16:40 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Virtualizing Storage via Unified Abstraction Layers Sonal demonstrates strong technical domain synthesis by framing H.Y.'s explanation of data silos as the need for a unified virtualization abstraction layer, which H.Y. strongly confirms.16:40–20:14 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Changing Role of IT and Predictive Analytics Mike and Peter discuss the shifting role of IT toward real-time predictive analytics. Mike gently interrupts Peter to push the predictive timeline from 'tomorrow' to real-time micro-decisions.0:48–3:01 · The host pushing back 3/10 Why Storage Matters and the Concept of Data Gravity Host Sonal probes why storage matters, framing data growth as a potential difference of degree vs kind. Guests introduce fundamental data gravity concepts to educate the host on why scaling old storage methods fails.3:01–5:08 · The host pushing back 1/10 Evolution of Storage Formats and Machine-Generated Data Peter Levine reframes the definition of data from human input to sensor/machine data, while explaining how mobile supply chains lower enterprise cost curves. Sonal listens and offers light humor.5:08–9:23 · The host pushing back 2/10 In-Memory Storage Architectures and Cost Reductions Guests debate the limits of in-memory architecture. Mike Matchett offers mild combativeness by pointing out hardware supply constraints that counter pure in-memory optimism, prompting Peter to clarify edge computing models.9:23–11:47 · The host pushing back 3/10 Multi-Cloud Ecosystems and In-Memory Tiering Sonal asks precise questions about enterprise multi-cloud storage sprawl and forces H.Y. Li to explain why in-memory tiering specifically solves the performance and cost problems.11:47–14:11 · The host pushing back 1/10 Machine Learning and In-Memory Processing Acceleration Peter Levine and Mike Matchett deliver detailed technical explanations connecting machine learning iterative compute demands with in-memory architectures like Spark, with minimal host intervention.14:11–16:40 · The host pushing back 3/10 Virtualizing Storage via Unified Abstraction Layers Sonal demonstrates strong technical domain synthesis by framing H.Y.'s explanation of data silos as the need for a unified virtualization abstraction layer, which H.Y. strongly confirms.16:40–20:14 · The host pushing back 2/10 The Changing Role of IT and Predictive Analytics Mike and Peter discuss the shifting role of IT toward real-time predictive analytics. Mike gently interrupts Peter to push the predictive timeline from 'tomorrow' to real-time micro-decisions.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 42.6% · guest 57.4%0:00 · the host 42.6% · guest 57.4%3:00 · the host 1.9% · guest 98.1%3:00 · the host 1.9% · guest 98.1%6:00 · the host 3.3% · guest 96.7%6:00 · the host 3.3% · guest 96.7%9:00 · the host 6.8% · guest 93.2%9:00 · the host 6.8% · guest 93.2%12:00 · the host 6.6% · guest 93.4%12:00 · the host 6.6% · guest 93.4%15:00 · the host 11.3% · guest 88.7%15:00 · the host 11.3% · guest 88.7%18:00 · the host 2.7% · guest 97.3%18:00 · the host 2.7% · guest 97.3%21:00 · the host 22.8% · guest 77.2%21:00 · the host 22.8% · guest 77.2%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 7:06 Mike pushes back on total in-memory dominance

Mike Matchett tempers Peter Levine's optimism for all-memory storage by citing vendor predictions of global hardware chip and drive shortages, forcing a more nuanced architectural view.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 2:40 Host challenges need for new storage paradigms

Sonal Chokshi refuses to accept that more data automatically requires a new storage architecture, asking why existing systems cannot simply be scaled bigger and better.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 4:10 Peter redefines data and storage economics

Peter Levine educates the panel on how autonomous vehicle sensors fundamentally alter what constitutes data beyond human typing, and how mobile supply chains rewrite data center cost structures.

The host holds their own ▶ 15:02 Host introduces system abstraction concept

Sonal Chokshi displays technical insight by correctly identifying that bridging legacy systems with modern data movement requires a unified software abstraction layer.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Why Storage Matters and the Concept of Data Gravity 4513 Host Sonal probes why storage matters, framing data growth as a potential difference of degree vs kind. Guests introduce fundamental data gravity concepts to educate the host on why scaling old storage methods fails.
Evolution of Storage Formats and Machine-Generated Data 2611 Peter Levine reframes the definition of data from human input to sensor/machine data, while explaining how mobile supply chains lower enterprise cost curves. Sonal listens and offers light humor.
In-Memory Storage Architectures and Cost Reductions 3632 Guests debate the limits of in-memory architecture. Mike Matchett offers mild combativeness by pointing out hardware supply constraints that counter pure in-memory optimism, prompting Peter to clarify edge computing models.
Multi-Cloud Ecosystems and In-Memory Tiering 5513 Sonal asks precise questions about enterprise multi-cloud storage sprawl and forces H.Y. Li to explain why in-memory tiering specifically solves the performance and cost problems.
Machine Learning and In-Memory Processing Acceleration 2611 Peter Levine and Mike Matchett deliver detailed technical explanations connecting machine learning iterative compute demands with in-memory architectures like Spark, with minimal host intervention.
Virtualizing Storage via Unified Abstraction Layers 6513 Sonal demonstrates strong technical domain synthesis by framing H.Y.'s explanation of data silos as the need for a unified virtualization abstraction layer, which H.Y. strongly confirms.
The Changing Role of IT and Predictive Analytics 4522 Mike and Peter discuss the shifting role of IT toward real-time predictive analytics. Mike gently interrupts Peter to push the predictive timeline from 'tomorrow' to real-time micro-decisions.

Statements from this episode (13)

Prediction Not checkable as stated
Falling memory costs will unify storage and compute memory
“With the cost of system memory decreasing, memory for both storage and compute will be the exact same thing.”
Sonal Chokshi Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 0:06
Insight
Storage is the most complex infrastructure element due to data gravity
“Storage is really the most complex part of that equation. It takes a lot of effort to protect data, to manage data. Data has gravity. It has momentum. It has Weight in history. So storage is really the critical piece to get right.”
Mike Matchett Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 2:00
Prediction Didn’t hold up
Sensor and machine data volume will expand by orders of magnitude
“It will be literally orders of magnitude and in the exact mathematical sense, orders of magnitude, more data that needs to be stored in process.”
Peter Levine Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 4:56
Prediction Open · timeframe Mar 2022
Disk drives, tape drives, and SSDs will all go away
“We will have much more in-memory data, systems that literally live in real memory, and the notion of disk drives and tape drives and even SSDs will all go away.”
Peter Levine Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 5:35
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Storage vendors forecast a global hardware shortage within 3 to 5 years
“They're forecasting that there just simply isn't going to be enough storage for all the data we're collecting in a midterm horizon, like three to five years that we're creating so much data that There won't be enough chips. There won't be enough hard drives. T…”
Mike Matchett Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 7:30
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Edge endpoints will process data locally instead of centralized streaming
“If you think about the new world of distributed computing, the data that gets collected in a self-driving car or some endpoint is going to be, the information will be processed at that endpoint. It won't be translated back to a central storage pool. The inform…”
Peter Levine Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:18
Assertion Supported
Autonomous vehicles generate 10 gigabytes of data per mile driven
“Self-driving car collects 10 gigabytes of data a mile, right?”
Peter Levine Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 8:44
Assertion Contradicted
Computer memory costs drop 50 percent every eight months
“The cost is decreasing very fast. It's about every eight months, the cost decreased by 50%.”
Haoyuan 'H.Y.' Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 11:25
Insight
Machine learning cannot function effectively without in-memory processing
“Unless we get to in memory processing and in-memory data structures, machine learning doesn't really work.”
Peter Levine Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 12:47
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Manually moving data across storage environments takes weeks and degrades value
“Today, if people want to really see the global data, they move the data manually from one storage to another storage to put them together to analyze it. Even though the data could be in memory in a final storage, But because of this manual process or this proc…”
Haoyuan 'H.Y.' Li Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 14:23
Prediction Not checkable as stated
IT departments will lead corporate machine learning adoption
“So IT departments are really going to be looked at as the point of the sword in bringing these advances to the company and not just being seen as reactive operators of infrastructure on the back end. And that's a big shift.”
Mike Matchett Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 18:26
Prediction Held up
Storage-class memory will ship within a couple quarters
“Well, I think we mentioned the storage class memory that's coming out Intel, Some other folks making a very fast, close to the chip memory that's actually storage. So it'll be faster again than flash, maybe a little bit slower than today's DRAM, but it's going…”
Mike Matchett Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 20:20
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Companies will face 'data poverty' within two years
“I think there's going to be some companies kind of surprised in a year or two to find that they're not going to have access to the data that they're going to really want to have that's relevant to what they need to do to make the predictions to optimize their …”
Mike Matchett Jan 2, 2019 ▶ 21:08
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.