Feb 26, 2019 · 27m · a16z

a16z Podcast | To All the Robots I've Loved Before

Kate Darling · 20m spoken Hanne Tidnam · 5m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of the a16z Podcast, host Hannah interviews MIT Media Lab researcher Dr. Kate Darling to explore humanity's evolving psychological, ethical, and legal relationships with robots. The discussion examines why humans naturally anthropomorphize physical machines, how intentional design influences emotional attachment, and how historical animal legal frameworks can guide future robot regulation.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. How this is scored →

The host as informed peer 3.1 Guest teaching 4.7 Guest disagreement 1.4 The host pushing back 1.4
05100:0010:0020:000:50–3:59 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Physicality, Movement, and Why Robots Trigger Anthropomorphism Host asks baseline exploratory questions about why physical movement triggers human projection of agency. Guest explains how physical presence tricks the brain compared to flat screens, citing Roombas and Japanese factory assembly lines.3:59–6:12 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Therapeutic Social Robots and the PARO Baby Seal Case Host mentions reading about therapeutic robots for dementia patients. Guest details why the PARO baby seal design is psychologically effective without needing prior user instruction.6:12–9:36 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Human Empathy, Vandalism, and the Hitchbot Experiment Host connects robot violence to historical debates on video game desensitization. Guest explains that physical embodiment forces researchers to re-examine those assumptions.9:36–12:47 · The host as informed peer 2/10 Empirical Research on Human Hesitation to Harm Robots Host prompts guest on experimental methods for measuring empathy toward objects. Guest describes lab subjects hesitating to smash named robots with hammers and trying to rationalize their actions.12:47–15:15 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Regulatory Challenges and Moral Panic Around Sex Robots Host asks for alternative models beyond human replacement. Guest dismisses science-fiction anthropomorphism in favor of treating autonomous systems as property and legal tools similar to animals.15:15–17:38 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Human Hypocrisy and Selective Empathy Toward Animals and Robots Host questions whether using animal models creates more confusion given human inconsistency toward animals. Guest argues humans are hypocrites who base empathy on cultural affection rather than biological sentience.17:38–19:41 · The host as informed peer 3/10 Intentional Design Choices for Functional vs. Companion Robots Host introduces the police dog comparison when discussing functional task orientation. Guest expands on the dangers of military personnel developing emotional attachments to expendable hardware like bomb disposal units.19:41–23:36 · The host as informed peer 5/10 Historical Legal Frameworks for Animal Harm and Robot Liability Host demonstrates subject domain familiarity by bringing up a previous interview regarding medieval rat trials. Guest details historical Roman property laws and modern dog licensing frameworks as templates for robot liability.23:36–25:51 · The host as informed peer 4/10 Autonomous Weapons, Unintended Consequences, and War Ethics Host pushes back on liability confusion by asserting that accountability should obviously fall on the programmer or owner. Guest rejects this premise with a 'No', citing Soviet anti-tank dogs as a historical example of emergent, unpredictable behavior in autonomous war agents.0:50–3:59 · Guest teaching 3/10 Physicality, Movement, and Why Robots Trigger Anthropomorphism Host asks baseline exploratory questions about why physical movement triggers human projection of agency. Guest explains how physical presence tricks the brain compared to flat screens, citing Roombas and Japanese factory assembly lines.3:59–6:12 · Guest teaching 4/10 Therapeutic Social Robots and the PARO Baby Seal Case Host mentions reading about therapeutic robots for dementia patients. Guest details why the PARO baby seal design is psychologically effective without needing prior user instruction.6:12–9:36 · Guest teaching 4/10 Human Empathy, Vandalism, and the Hitchbot Experiment Host connects robot violence to historical debates on video game desensitization. Guest explains that physical embodiment forces researchers to re-examine those assumptions.9:36–12:47 · Guest teaching 5/10 Empirical Research on Human Hesitation to Harm Robots Host prompts guest on experimental methods for measuring empathy toward objects. Guest describes lab subjects hesitating to smash named robots with hammers and trying to rationalize their actions.12:47–15:15 · Guest teaching 6/10 Regulatory Challenges and Moral Panic Around Sex Robots Host asks for alternative models beyond human replacement. Guest dismisses science-fiction anthropomorphism in favor of treating autonomous systems as property and legal tools similar to animals.15:15–17:38 · Guest teaching 5/10 Human Hypocrisy and Selective Empathy Toward Animals and Robots Host questions whether using animal models creates more confusion given human inconsistency toward animals. Guest argues humans are hypocrites who base empathy on cultural affection rather than biological sentience.17:38–19:41 · Guest teaching 4/10 Intentional Design Choices for Functional vs. Companion Robots Host introduces the police dog comparison when discussing functional task orientation. Guest expands on the dangers of military personnel developing emotional attachments to expendable hardware like bomb disposal units.19:41–23:36 · Guest teaching 5/10 Historical Legal Frameworks for Animal Harm and Robot Liability Host demonstrates subject domain familiarity by bringing up a previous interview regarding medieval rat trials. Guest details historical Roman property laws and modern dog licensing frameworks as templates for robot liability.23:36–25:51 · Guest teaching 6/10 Autonomous Weapons, Unintended Consequences, and War Ethics Host pushes back on liability confusion by asserting that accountability should obviously fall on the programmer or owner. Guest rejects this premise with a 'No', citing Soviet anti-tank dogs as a historical example of emergent, unpredictable behavior in autonomous war agents.0:50–3:59 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Physicality, Movement, and Why Robots Trigger Anthropomorphism Host asks baseline exploratory questions about why physical movement triggers human projection of agency. Guest explains how physical presence tricks the brain compared to flat screens, citing Roombas and Japanese factory assembly lines.3:59–6:12 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Therapeutic Social Robots and the PARO Baby Seal Case Host mentions reading about therapeutic robots for dementia patients. Guest details why the PARO baby seal design is psychologically effective without needing prior user instruction.6:12–9:36 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Human Empathy, Vandalism, and the Hitchbot Experiment Host connects robot violence to historical debates on video game desensitization. Guest explains that physical embodiment forces researchers to re-examine those assumptions.9:36–12:47 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Empirical Research on Human Hesitation to Harm Robots Host prompts guest on experimental methods for measuring empathy toward objects. Guest describes lab subjects hesitating to smash named robots with hammers and trying to rationalize their actions.12:47–15:15 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Regulatory Challenges and Moral Panic Around Sex Robots Host asks for alternative models beyond human replacement. Guest dismisses science-fiction anthropomorphism in favor of treating autonomous systems as property and legal tools similar to animals.15:15–17:38 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Human Hypocrisy and Selective Empathy Toward Animals and Robots Host questions whether using animal models creates more confusion given human inconsistency toward animals. Guest argues humans are hypocrites who base empathy on cultural affection rather than biological sentience.17:38–19:41 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Intentional Design Choices for Functional vs. Companion Robots Host introduces the police dog comparison when discussing functional task orientation. Guest expands on the dangers of military personnel developing emotional attachments to expendable hardware like bomb disposal units.19:41–23:36 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Historical Legal Frameworks for Animal Harm and Robot Liability Host demonstrates subject domain familiarity by bringing up a previous interview regarding medieval rat trials. Guest details historical Roman property laws and modern dog licensing frameworks as templates for robot liability.23:36–25:51 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Autonomous Weapons, Unintended Consequences, and War Ethics Host pushes back on liability confusion by asserting that accountability should obviously fall on the programmer or owner. Guest rejects this premise with a 'No', citing Soviet anti-tank dogs as a historical example of emergent, unpredictable behavior in autonomous war agents.0:50–3:59 · The host pushing back 1/10 Physicality, Movement, and Why Robots Trigger Anthropomorphism Host asks baseline exploratory questions about why physical movement triggers human projection of agency. Guest explains how physical presence tricks the brain compared to flat screens, citing Roombas and Japanese factory assembly lines.3:59–6:12 · The host pushing back 0/10 Therapeutic Social Robots and the PARO Baby Seal Case Host mentions reading about therapeutic robots for dementia patients. Guest details why the PARO baby seal design is psychologically effective without needing prior user instruction.6:12–9:36 · The host pushing back 2/10 Human Empathy, Vandalism, and the Hitchbot Experiment Host connects robot violence to historical debates on video game desensitization. Guest explains that physical embodiment forces researchers to re-examine those assumptions.9:36–12:47 · The host pushing back 1/10 Empirical Research on Human Hesitation to Harm Robots Host prompts guest on experimental methods for measuring empathy toward objects. Guest describes lab subjects hesitating to smash named robots with hammers and trying to rationalize their actions.12:47–15:15 · The host pushing back 1/10 Regulatory Challenges and Moral Panic Around Sex Robots Host asks for alternative models beyond human replacement. Guest dismisses science-fiction anthropomorphism in favor of treating autonomous systems as property and legal tools similar to animals.15:15–17:38 · The host pushing back 2/10 Human Hypocrisy and Selective Empathy Toward Animals and Robots Host questions whether using animal models creates more confusion given human inconsistency toward animals. Guest argues humans are hypocrites who base empathy on cultural affection rather than biological sentience.17:38–19:41 · The host pushing back 0/10 Intentional Design Choices for Functional vs. Companion Robots Host introduces the police dog comparison when discussing functional task orientation. Guest expands on the dangers of military personnel developing emotional attachments to expendable hardware like bomb disposal units.19:41–23:36 · The host pushing back 1/10 Historical Legal Frameworks for Animal Harm and Robot Liability Host demonstrates subject domain familiarity by bringing up a previous interview regarding medieval rat trials. Guest details historical Roman property laws and modern dog licensing frameworks as templates for robot liability.23:36–25:51 · The host pushing back 5/10 Autonomous Weapons, Unintended Consequences, and War Ethics Host pushes back on liability confusion by asserting that accountability should obviously fall on the programmer or owner. Guest rejects this premise with a 'No', citing Soviet anti-tank dogs as a historical example of emergent, unpredictable behavior in autonomous war agents.

speaking balance: gold is the host, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%0:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%3:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%6:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%9:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%12:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%15:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%18:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%21:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%24:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%27:00 · the host 0% · guest 100%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 24:07 Direct rejection of host's simple liability model

When the host suggests liability obviously belongs to the programmer or owner, the guest flatly responds 'No' and rejects the assumption that autonomous errors are merely code glitches.

Hardest push from the host ▶ 24:07 Host challenges war crime accountability framing

The host interrupts the guest's dilemma on war crimes to challenge why accountability wouldn't simply rest with the party who programmed and deployed the system.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 24:10 Soviet anti-tank dog historical counterexample

The guest educates the host on how autonomous systems produce unforeseen consequences by citing the Soviets training anti-tank dogs that unintentionally blew up their own tanks.

The host holds their own ▶ 20:44 Host referencing prior research on animal trials

The host demonstrates specific historical expertise by citing her interview with Peter Leeson regarding judicial trials against crop-destroying rats.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicThe host as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementThe host pushing backWhy
Physicality, Movement, and Why Robots Trigger Anthropomorphism 2311 Host asks baseline exploratory questions about why physical movement triggers human projection of agency. Guest explains how physical presence tricks the brain compared to flat screens, citing Roombas and Japanese factory assembly lines.
Therapeutic Social Robots and the PARO Baby Seal Case 2410 Host mentions reading about therapeutic robots for dementia patients. Guest details why the PARO baby seal design is psychologically effective without needing prior user instruction.
Human Empathy, Vandalism, and the Hitchbot Experiment 4412 Host connects robot violence to historical debates on video game desensitization. Guest explains that physical embodiment forces researchers to re-examine those assumptions.
Empirical Research on Human Hesitation to Harm Robots 2511 Host prompts guest on experimental methods for measuring empathy toward objects. Guest describes lab subjects hesitating to smash named robots with hammers and trying to rationalize their actions.
Regulatory Challenges and Moral Panic Around Sex Robots 3621 Host asks for alternative models beyond human replacement. Guest dismisses science-fiction anthropomorphism in favor of treating autonomous systems as property and legal tools similar to animals.
Human Hypocrisy and Selective Empathy Toward Animals and Robots 3522 Host questions whether using animal models creates more confusion given human inconsistency toward animals. Guest argues humans are hypocrites who base empathy on cultural affection rather than biological sentience.
Intentional Design Choices for Functional vs. Companion Robots 3410 Host introduces the police dog comparison when discussing functional task orientation. Guest expands on the dangers of military personnel developing emotional attachments to expendable hardware like bomb disposal units.
Historical Legal Frameworks for Animal Harm and Robot Liability 5511 Host demonstrates subject domain familiarity by bringing up a previous interview regarding medieval rat trials. Guest details historical Roman property laws and modern dog licensing frameworks as templates for robot liability.
Autonomous Weapons, Unintended Consequences, and War Ethics 4635 Host pushes back on liability confusion by asserting that accountability should obviously fall on the programmer or owner. Guest rejects this premise with a 'No', citing Soviet anti-tank dogs as a historical example of emergent, unpredictable behavior in autonomous war agents.

Statements from this episode (21)

Insight
Movement and physicality cause humans to project intent onto robots
“With robots, I think they speak to our primal brain even more than like a stuffed animal or some other object that we might anthropomorphize because they combine movement and physicality in this way that makes us automatically project intent onto them.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 0:59
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Consumers name Roombas and insist on repairing the exact same unit
“People will do it even with very, very simple robots, just like the Roomba vacuum cleaner. You know, it's not a very compelling anthropomorphic robot, and yet people will name them and feel bad for them when they get It's stuck and insist on getting the same o…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 1:40
Insight
Humans subconsciously treat physical robots like living things, not toasters
“As we integrate these robots into these shared spaces, it's really important to understand that people treat them differently than other devices, and they don't treat them like toasters. They treat them subconsciously like living things”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 2:32
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Japanese manufacturer has assembly line robots do morning aerobics with workers
“There's this company in Japan that has this You know, standard assembly line for manufacturing, and like a lot of companies, they have people working alongside the robots on the assembly line, and so the people will come in and they do these aerobics in the mo…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 3:12
Insight
Nurturing therapeutic robots provides vital psychological benefits to elderly patients
“A lot of people think it's creepy, like we're giving old people robots and like having them nurture something that's not alive, but then you look at some of the advantages of having them have this experience when their lives have been reduced to being taken ca…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 4:45
Assertion Supported
Care facilities use therapeutic social robots as alternatives to medication
“They've been able to use these robots as Alternatives to medication for calming distressed patients.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 5:05
Insight
Unfamiliar animal designs help social robot users suspend disbelief more easily
“It's also not trying to be A cat or anything that you would be more intimately familiar with, because no one has actually held a baby seal before. Right. And so it's much easier to suspend your disbelief and just, like, go with it.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 5:49
Assertion Supported
Hitchbot traversed Canada safely before being vandalized beyond repair in Philadelphia
“There was this robot called Hitchbot that hitchhiked all the way across the entire country of Canada, just relying on the kindness of strangers. It was trying to do a road trip through the U.S., and it made it to Philadelphia, and then it got vandalized beyond…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 6:30
Assertion Supported
Giving a robot a name increases human hesitation to harm it
“When the robot's name is Frank, people hesitate more.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 11:11
Assertion Supported
Studies measure human brain waves while participants watch robots being tortured
“Other studies have measured people's brain waves while they watch videos of robots being tortured.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 12:29
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Darling: No empirical evidence exists to guide regulatory policy on sex robots
“And the fact is we have no evidence to guide us in what we should be doing.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 13:30
Opinion
Darling: Robot regulation debates are distorted by pop culture and sci-fi
“Unfortunately, a lot of the discussions are just fueled by, you know, superstition or moral panic, or in this context, a lot of it is science fiction and pop culture and our constant tendency to compare robots to humans and look at them as human replacements v…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 13:42
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Darling: Society will integrate robots similarly to how humans integrated animals
“Throughout history, we've treated some animals as property, as tools, some animals we've turned into our companions, and I think that that is how we're going to start integrating robotic technology as well. We're going to be treating a lot of it like products …”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 14:39
Insight
Human empathy for animals is based on cuteness and culture, not biology
“We fancy ourselves as caring about, you know, the inner biological workings of the animals and whether animals can suffer, and we actually don't care about any of that. We care about what animals we relate to, and a lot of that is cultural and emotional, and a…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 16:01
Assertion Supported
Save the Whales campaign only gained traction after people heard whale songs
“The history of animal rights is full of stories like this, like, The Save the Whales campaign didn't start until people recorded whales singing. Before that, people did not care about whales, but then once we heard that they can sing and make this beautiful mu…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 16:51
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Darling predicts society will manipulate robot designs similarly to animal breeds
“So I think we're gonna see the same types of manipulations of the robot breeds.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 18:05
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Soldiers' emotional attachment to military robots creates dangerous battlefield hesitation
“In the military, you have soldiers who become emotionally attached to the robots that they work with, and that can be anything from inefficient to dangerous because you don't want them hesitating for even a second to use these machines the way that they're int…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 18:52
Insight
Animal legal history provides a framework for regulating autonomous, unpredictable robots
“And I think we're forgetting that we have a ton of history with animals where we have things that we've treated as property that can make autonomous, unpredictable decisions that can cause harm.”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 20:03
Assertion Supported
Autonomous weapons create an accountability gap in existing war crime laws
“One of the interesting conversations that's happening right now is around autonomous weapon systems and accountability for harm in settings of war, where we have war crimes, but they require intentionality, and if a robot is committing a war crime, then there'…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 23:47
Assertion Supported
Soviet WWII anti-tank dog program failed due to unpredictable animal behavior
“For example, the Soviets, they trained dogs to run under tanks, enemy tanks, and they had explosives attached to them, and they were meant to blow up the tanks. And a bunch of things went wrong. So, first of all, they had trained the dogs on their own tank, Wh…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 24:38
Insight
Japan's Shinto history makes cultural acceptance of robots much easier
“Like in Japan, they have this whole history of Shintoism and treating objects as things with souls, and so it's, I think, easier for them to view robots as just another thing with a soul, and they don't have this contradiction inside themselves of, oh, I'm tre…”
Kate Darling Feb 26, 2019 ▶ 26:26
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,000 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.