The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Kim: Micro VC seed funds now outperform larger traditional venture funds
“Ultimately, I think our thesis proved out these smaller funds do outperform, and these smaller funds have effectively become early stage venture capital today.”
Kim: Early-stage LP direct investing suffers from severe adverse selection
“At the high level, I do think that there are substantial issues with LPs investing directly. First and foremost is adverse selection. If an opportunity is available to the LP, why are they being shown this? Is something wrong with the company? Does the fund ma…”
Kim: Top VCs maximize ownership and squeeze LPs out of Series A
“If there is, at the earliest stages, a company that is High quality with high quality investors coming in. LPs are probably the last in line in terms of getting access to that. So imagine a seed funded company by one of our fund managers, a high quality firm l…”
Kim: 1% seed stakes do not move the needle in typical exits
“The typical venture exit is between 50 to a hundred million. If you own 10% of that company, that's ten million dollars back at a hundred million dollar exit. Ten million back to a seed fund is very meaningful. If you own one percent, you get the same kind of …”