The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Data Collective passed on Gusto follow-ons because it wasn't deep tech
“We didn't follow on. We didn't raise our hand to be the big dog in successive rounds. And it had nothing to do with the quality of the company. And people trust us when we explain that because the company was a wonderfully engineered, great SAS company deliver…”
Data Collective's Opportunity Fund is contractually forbidden from outside investments
“Our opportunity fund is in fact contractually prohibited from chasing deals outside of our portfolio.”
Data Collective passes on standard SaaS deals favored by Jason Lemkin
“We regretfully either say no up front or don't follow on in the kind of companies that somebody like Jason Lempton is going to make a fortune in.”
Data Collective avoided micro-VC fund size to write larger initial checks
“We made a very conscious decision from the very beginning of our first institutional fund not to be a micro VC, not to be in the 30 to fifty million dollar fund size category, because if you disagree with conventional wisdom about a series A and you want to wr…”