why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Only a few European payment startups will survive the current hype
“If you look into the payment space, there's no way that yeah, all of these innovative players and ideas will succeed. So out of the hundreds of companies just in Europe, Focusing on, on these disruptive changes. I think that at the end, just a few will succeed…”
Prediction Partly held up
Fintech funding will triple again in 2015 alongside increased M&A
“We will see similar growth in this year, just because also a little, a lot of big players out of the traditional financial industry are joining the game. So there will be more M&A activities, more even more fundings and investment rounds.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Blockchain is a game changer, but Bitcoin faces a difficult future
“The future of blockchain is big. The future of Bitcoin is difficult, but I would separate it. So I think blockchain is really a game changer, and Bitcoin just a small part of the whole blockchain development.”
Prediction Partly held up
Major telcos will launch mobile payments to compete with Facebook and Snapchat
“I think there are much more other big players offering similar services in the next few months, including a lot of the big telcos, because they're not really interested just to let the Facebooks and Snapchats taking away this interesting interaction to the end…”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Swiss fintech will compete directly with the UK by 2017
“But I mean, it looks promising that we will accelerate and hopefully, I would say in two years from now can catch up and compete directly to first movers like the UK, for example.”