The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Rachleff: People with $1M to $5M cannot access elite investment products
“Even though they had made Even on the order of one to five million dollars, they still couldn't afford access to the best investment products and services.”
Rachleff: Charles Schwab's automated service cannot match Wealthfront on net returns
“Great example of that is Charles Schwab. They introduced a service last year that's the equivalent to what we introduced in It is in no way comparable on a net-of-fee, after-tax, risk-adjusted basis to what our service has evolved to today.”
Rachleff: Premier VCs sustain returns because $5B companies replaced $500M companies
“Interestingly, there are about, just about as many companies worth five billion today as there were worth five hundred million 20 years ago, which is why the premier venture capitalists are generating the same phenomenal returns today that they did 20 years ag…”