why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Bialecki: AI Surrogates Will Soon Conduct Podcast Conversations for People
“I do think we're not far off from, you know, you and I could have this conversation and it's actually neither of us that are here present. It's just, but it's us, right? It's, you know, whatever's going on in our brains kind of hooked up.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Bialecki: Klaviyo has at least 10x expansion potential remaining
“So when we think about, you know, all the people that we can help plus the other applications, plus the fact we can make them better at using each of those applications, That trifecta, I think there's, you know, at least a 10 X, probably a lot more in there.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Bialecki: Future software will run autonomously without human operators
“I think so much of soft, the software of the future, it's gonna be able to, you know, play itself. We think about software that is actually, you use it better because you don't have to be the user.”
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Bialecki: Software will sell direct outputs over tools within 10-20 years
“I think that's generally the right direction. I'm maybe a little skeptical of how fast, you know, we get there. But I do think if you fast forward, you know, 1020 years, I think there's a lot of processes where, yeah, hey, I just need the output.”