The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
O'Driscoll: Meta won't build a major business selling LLaMA APIs
“It's not that they want to open source Lama and make money off it. They won't. It's not that they want to even have an API offering of Lama, something like, you know, a, an anthropic offering that just won't be big.”
Douwe Kiela: The open-source AI ecosystem exists solely due to Meta's LLaMA
“This whole flourishing that you see right now of open source models that basically comes from Meta's generosity in giving Lama away for free. And if they hadn't done that, then you wouldn't see that.”
Stebbings: Meta's productization of Llama AI models has been very poor
“I would say that Facebook is the same like Lama and the productization around Lama has been bluntly very, very poor at the moment.”
Stebbings: Meta open-sources Llama because its true value is proprietary data
“Why does Facebook open source Lama? Because the values in the data that they have. A hundred percent.”
Douwe Kiela: Meta's Original LLaMA Was Trained Entirely on Open Data
“So the LAMA model was not trained on any proprietary data. It was just trained on open data on the web.”