why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Cohen: Audience fragmentation is legacy television's greatest ongoing macro threat
“The biggest challenge, the macro challenge, the most interesting challenges is about that fragmentation and that digital transition. And that's very challenging for a legacy broadcaster like the BBC or like a network in the US, CBS, ABC, when you can see those…”
Opinion
Stebbings: BBC compensation cannot match modern independent creator earning potential
“Like, the BBC's salary incentive structure is not nearly as attractive as what one can earn in a modern media world.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Cohen: BBC receives 10x to 20x more young applicants than open roles
“And yeah, there's, there is, I'm sure, 10 x, 20 x the amount of young people who want to work at the BBC than they have roles for.”
Assertion Partly supported
Stebbings: UK TikTok news creator reached 10M followers and faced BBC attacks
“There's a TikTok star who does kind of news in the UK, and he has ten million followers now. And the BBC attacked him recently.”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Stebbings: $250 Diet Coke promotion pushed 20VC to #2 in UK
“I remember going with three friends to a football stadium, and having 500 Diet Coke cans strapped in, like, drinks, rucksacks, and saying, we'll give you a free Diet Coke, if you'll give us your phone for a review. And we spent, like, the 50 P each, so like, a…”