Seed-stage startups should not have formal boards of directors
Jeff Fagnan · 20VC: Why Partners Are There To Save Each Other From Themselves, Why Effective Reserve Allocation Is The Hardest Question In Venture & What Makes The Truly Special Board Members with Jeff Fagnan, Founding Partner @ Accomplice · Aug 13, 2018 · at 30:30
Jeff Fagnan, Founding Partner at Accomplice, discusses startup board dynamics and governance on 20VC.
0:00 / 0:09exact quote · 9.6s
720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“First off, I don't think seed stage companies should have boards, I really think that they can get misdirected when all they really should be focusing on is talent aggregation and product market fit.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Jeff Fagnan
Individual partner accountability beats large VC consensus committees
“Fewer people taking deeper accountability for decisions was much better than this approach.”
Consensus decision-making cost Atlas Venture the Dropbox seed round
“And if that would have been the case, you know, Dropbox, we would have led to see the series a and probably kept a drew in Boston and it would have just changed everything.”
Accomplice does not reserve follow-on capital for $1.5M seed checks
“When we write an initial seed check of say a million and a half, we are usually not reserving behind that company.”
Force-ranking early-stage portfolio companies is a dangerous practice
“Forced ranking at an early stage portfolio is really dangerous.”