The Exchanges

Every argument clarity score on this site is built from rows on this page. Each question and answer was assessed with names hidden, the host's own answers included, on four things from 1 to 5: directness (does it answer the question asked), coherence (do the ideas follow), precision (concrete details and clear references), compression (says a lot per word). The weighted mix (30/30/25/15) is the exchange score. A person's published score averages their exchange scores on raw tape only, at least 8 of them, shrunk toward the cohort mean. Full method →

Seth Bannon argument clarity score 4.6/5 from 31 exchanges on raw tape · average scores: directness 4.9 · coherence 5 · precision 4.5 · compression 4.1 record → ← everyone

Every exchange below was scored with names hidden, four dimensions each from 1 to 5. An exchange's score is 0.30·directness + 0.30·coherence + 0.25·precision + 0.15·compression. The published score averages the raw tape exchange scores and shrinks small samples toward the cohort mean, so five great answers can't beat twenty good ones. Produced feed rows count only toward coarse estimates, never toward a full score.

clear all ✕
31exchanges match
31on raw tape
0redirected or not addressed
Answered raw tape D 4 · C 5 · P 4 · Cm 4 4.30

Q You mentioned that the funding life cycle. I'm intrigued. I often speak to growth investors interested in, as you can imagine, consumer, fintech, enterprise, SaaS. I don't often come across Biotech and deep tech growth investors. Do you think that's a sufficient pool of capital moving forward for this deep tech innovations to really sustain them through their life cycle?

A I think a lot of money is moving into this space. So right now, this very moment, I think it's a little shaky, but in terms of us as seed investors, you know, we need to see what that landscape will look like two to three to four to five years from now. And when we see what the later stage investors are doing and we see a lot more later stage funds spinning up Biotech specific, either pools of capital or hiring biotech partners. We think that the transition is definitely heading that way. Even if you look at something early stage like Y Combinator, right, they have invested way more attention and resources into attracting and helping synthetic biology and biotech companies than they did four years ago. Four years ago, they weren't doing it at all.

AI assessment note: “we think that the transition is definitely heading that way.”

← previous page 2
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.