Mar 29, 2021 · 34m · 20vc
20VC: Benchmark's Peter Fenton on The Single Question That Defines The Art of Early Stage Venture, Marketing Timing Risk, Why The Oversupply of Capital Is Good & His Biggest Lessons from 12 Years On The New Relic Board
0:00 / 0:00
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Benchmark General Partner Peter Fenton about early-stage venture investing, market timing, capital abundance, and building deep trust and vulnerability with founders.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 24.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
Harry as informed peer 3.3 Guest teaching 5.7 Guest disagreement 1.7 Harry pushing back 2.1
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 15:40 Fenton flatly rejects host's macro concern
When Stebbings asks if Fenton shares his and Bill Gurley's anxiety over the oversupply of capital, Fenton bluntly responds with 'No, I don't have that same fear' and reframes overcapitalization as beneficial entropy for innovation.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 15:23 Stebbings confronts Fenton with Gurley's overcapitalization thesisStebbings refuses to accept standard venture optimism by directly invoking Bill Gurley's warnings on oversupply of capital and explicitly declaring his own deep nervousness.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 23:19 Fenton educates on feedback psychology in boardroomsWhen Stebbings asks how to directly call out founders on boards, Fenton explains human emotional defenses to critique and educates on using validation and Nonviolent Communication instead of direct confrontation.
Harry holds his own ▶ 17:04 Stebbings challenges high entry valuations with PE multiple comparisonStebbings demonstrates deep market expertise by bringing up the compression of venture multiples down to PE-like levels due to elevated entry valuations.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Origin Story of New Relic | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Stebbings introduces the origin story setup about a golf course, which Fenton humorously corrects by explaining he is terrible at golf before relaying how he convinced Lou Cirne to accept venture funding and a board. | |
| Fostering Trust and Vulnerability in Founder Relationships | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Stebbings asks how to foster founder trust, allowing Fenton to deliver a deep breakdown of vulnerability, anti-authoritarian board structures, and Jeff Bezos' concept of failure as tuition. | |
| Market Dynamics and Unlocking Latent Demand | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | Stebbings quotes Fenton's previous interview statements to prompt a discussion on market sizing. Fenton schools on how early-stage venture is about converting latent potential energy into kinetic demand through product experience. | |
| Market Timing Risk and Managing Capital Intensity | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Stebbings asks about market timing risk vs product quality. Fenton explains market preconditions like Ruby on Rails and cloud adoption, and how managing expense intensity prevents getting ahead of adoption curves. | |
| Oversupply of Capital and Evolution of Venture Valuations | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | Stebbings pushes Fenton by bringing up Bill Gurley's warning on capital oversupply and citing PE-like venture multiple compression. Fenton directly rejects the premise, arguing capital oversupply drives innovation and entropy, and reframes valuation precision as secondary to identifying massive market winners. | |
| Principles of Effective Board Governance and Nonviolent Communication | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | Stebbings shares his own board struggle around calling out founders. Fenton provides detailed masterclass guidance on social-emotional dynamics, nonviolent communication, and validation before critique. | |
| Personal Vulnerability, Humility, and the Craft of Venture Capital | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | Stebbings asks Fenton about his vulnerability given his 'deity' status in venture. Fenton rejects the pedestal, quoting Mike Moritz to reframe venture capital as an active daily craft requiring constant insecurity and growth. |
Statements from this episode (21)
Fenton: Founder Workload Is Unaffected by Investor Base or Board Structure
“Once you start a business and you're working on it, you don't work more or less hard based on the investor base or the governance structure.”
Fenton: Top Talent Seeks Companies Creating Maximum Equity Value
“The best people are going to want to work for a company that's going to create the best equity value.”
Fenton: Corporate Boards Create a Superstructure of Mistrust for Founders
“And a board represents a governance structure. And so there are many people who, like myself, are highly anti-authoritarian. If we see authority, we immediately don't trust it. And so that's one of the challenges, that you create a structure that has the super…”
Fenton: Over-Invest in Early Vulnerability Because Bad News Drives Learning
“So by over investing at the beginning in vulnerability, allowing for the bad news to carry just as much space for compassion, good feelings, bad feelings, all those things, because bad news typically is a catalyst to learning.”
Fenton: Early Venture Converts Latent Demand Into Kinetic Product Traction
“I think so much of the art of early stage venture is to ask the question of, can you unlock consumption? Can you tap into a latent potential energy of demand that can be made kinetic through a product experience that's radically easier to engage with and more …”
Fenton: Startups require external tailwinds larger than themselves to scale
“The second major variable in investment was in any of these market segments, there needs to be an outside force, in my experience, something you don't create, you know, an energy source that's bigger than a startup.”
Fenton: Airtable is a grand simplification of the database
“Airtable for me is a great example of a grand simplification of the database.”
Fenton: Benchmark backed New Relic when it was just founder Lou Cirne
“If you look at the Series A, there were four people. Now, of course, we committed to Lou, and it was just Lou.”
Fenton: 2021 Venture Capital Is Overfunding Non-Existent Market Preconditions
“One of the bigger risks that's going on in 2021 is there's a lot of invested capital is going in to market preconditions that either don't exist or are still too early to support the economic development of the businesses.”
Fenton: Capital Oversupply Is Good for Innovation Because It Increases Entropy
“I personally think that oversupply of capital is historically a good thing for innovation insofar as it creates higher degrees of entropy.”
Fenton: Benchmark Invested $3.25M for 27% of New Relic's Series A
“We put 3.25 million in to buy 27% of the company with a 20% management pool. That's a series of investment. There was no seed. There was no precede.”
Fenton: Initial valuation does not matter if an early-stage startup succeeds
“If you zoom out, Harry, big picture, if the company works, if it really works, it doesn't matter.”
Fenton: Benchmark typically maintains board commitments for 12 years
“In the case of New Relic, I was on that board for 12 years. That's a pretty standard commitment for us.”
Fenton: CFO Mark Sackleben is the unsung hero of New Relic's success
“The unsung hero of New Relic's financial success is Mark Sackleb and the CFO. Lou brought in early, and Mark would write a crisp, succinct narrative with the team that laid out the core business metrics with the story behind them.”
Fenton: The Immediate Human Response to Board Critique Is Defensiveness
“If you're threatened, and the emotions of fear take over, you're not going to hear the feedback. You may hear it an hour later, or a day later, a month later, but in the moment, the human response to critique is defense, and it takes a highly evolved founder t…”
Fenton: Board Members Who Focus on Giving Answers Shouldn't Serve
“If you think your role is to provide the answers, then I think you probably shouldn't be in the boardroom.”
Fenton: Most board directors fail at asking questions over giving answers
“And I think most directors failed this. I have failed at this multiple times, and I will continue to fail at it, because it's sometimes a lot easier just to give the answer.”
Fenton: Believing You Mastered VC Destroys Your Capacity to Perform
“The minute you think that you figured it out and that you've mastered it, you've shut down your capacity to do it effectively.”