Oct 1, 2020 · 46m · 20vc

20VC: What Is Founder Narrative Fit and How to Detect and Invest In It, How To Avoid Consensus Thinking When Investing, Price Sensititivity; When To Pay Up vs Stay Disciplined & From New York Times To General Catalyst; Why Venture and Journalism are Not S

Katherine Boyle · 30m spoken Harry Stebbings · 14m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews General Catalyst partner Catherine Boyle about how her background in investigative journalism shapes her venture capital strategy. Boyle discusses her core framework of 'Founder Narrative Fit,' strategies for non-consensus investing in regulated sectors like defense tech, and her macro outlook on the decline of institutional trust and new media dynamics.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 32.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 3.8 Guest teaching 4.7 Guest disagreement 1.8 Harry pushing back 2.5
05100:0015:0030:0045:003:35–6:49 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Catherine Boyle's Path from Journalism to Venture Capital Harry asks standard background questions about Katherine's transition from journalism at the Washington Post to venture capital. Katherine provides a detailed biographical narrative without any friction or pushback.6:49–9:14 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Parallels Between Journalism and Venture Capital Harry asks Katherine to unpack her concept of reason and revelation in investing. Katherine educates the host by drawing on political philosophy concepts from Leo Strauss to explain decision-making frameworks in venture.9:14–12:01 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Building Internal Conviction and Challenging Assumptions Harry prompts Katherine on conviction and lessons from Founders Fund. Katherine contrasts proactive investors like Hemant Taneja with reactive investors like Brian Singerman.12:01–14:32 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Reactive vs. Proactive Investing Styles Harry brings up Mike Moritz and Jeff Lewis to discuss career paths. Katherine shares an anecdote about standing her ground and fundamentally disagreeing with Moritz when he claimed journalists could no longer succeed in VC.14:32–17:34 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Defining Founder Narrative Fit and Evaluating Obsession Harry presses on how generalist investors can evaluate founder obsession in deep technical domains. Katherine explains her framework of asking 'how' questions to test whether a founder has thoroughly thought through their thesis.17:34–20:19 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Navigating Compressed Timelines and Market Timing Risks Harry highlights the risks of compressed fundraising timelines and market timing. Katherine clarifies the distinction between pure market timing risk and riding macro tailwinds that accelerate existing behavior.20:19–23:03 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Building Defensibility in Regulated Markets Harry cites Brian Singerman's complex coordination thesis regarding regulated markets. Katherine reframes the issue by distinguishing between waiting for regulatory changes versus navigating established procurement rules.23:03–26:50 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Taking Multi-Stage Capital at the Seed Stage Harry breaks his usual polite stance to forcefully challenge multi-stage funds investing at seed, pointing out price insensitivity, signaling risk, and misaligned incentives. Katherine holds her ground, emphasizing long-term board courage and alignment over round mechanics.26:50–30:15 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Reinvestment Decisions and Stage-Specific Dynamics Harry asks informed questions about price discipline and aggressive pre-empting. Katherine explains stage-specific dynamics in deep tech and notes that in venture there is far more shame in losing on price than winning on price.30:15–33:29 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 The Decline of Institutional Trust and Rise of New Media Harry asks why Katherine is obsessed with media shift dynamics. Katherine delivers a mini-lecture outlining three main structural drivers behind the devolution of institutional media trust.33:29–38:43 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Preference Falsification and the Narrowing of Public Discourse Harry asks a direct question on whether democracy still exists given self-censorship. Katherine educates on preference falsification citing political literature, explaining how modern institutions induce fear of speaking freely.38:43–43:40 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Quickfire Round: Books, Remote Diligence, and Ophelia Health In the quickfire section, Harry asks about reading materials, remote diligence challenges, and recent deals. Katherine summarizes takeaways from Plato's Republic and Ross Douthat's work.3:35–6:49 · Guest teaching 3/10 Catherine Boyle's Path from Journalism to Venture Capital Harry asks standard background questions about Katherine's transition from journalism at the Washington Post to venture capital. Katherine provides a detailed biographical narrative without any friction or pushback.6:49–9:14 · Guest teaching 5/10 Parallels Between Journalism and Venture Capital Harry asks Katherine to unpack her concept of reason and revelation in investing. Katherine educates the host by drawing on political philosophy concepts from Leo Strauss to explain decision-making frameworks in venture.9:14–12:01 · Guest teaching 4/10 Building Internal Conviction and Challenging Assumptions Harry prompts Katherine on conviction and lessons from Founders Fund. Katherine contrasts proactive investors like Hemant Taneja with reactive investors like Brian Singerman.12:01–14:32 · Guest teaching 5/10 Reactive vs. Proactive Investing Styles Harry brings up Mike Moritz and Jeff Lewis to discuss career paths. Katherine shares an anecdote about standing her ground and fundamentally disagreeing with Moritz when he claimed journalists could no longer succeed in VC.14:32–17:34 · Guest teaching 4/10 Defining Founder Narrative Fit and Evaluating Obsession Harry presses on how generalist investors can evaluate founder obsession in deep technical domains. Katherine explains her framework of asking 'how' questions to test whether a founder has thoroughly thought through their thesis.17:34–20:19 · Guest teaching 4/10 Navigating Compressed Timelines and Market Timing Risks Harry highlights the risks of compressed fundraising timelines and market timing. Katherine clarifies the distinction between pure market timing risk and riding macro tailwinds that accelerate existing behavior.20:19–23:03 · Guest teaching 5/10 Building Defensibility in Regulated Markets Harry cites Brian Singerman's complex coordination thesis regarding regulated markets. Katherine reframes the issue by distinguishing between waiting for regulatory changes versus navigating established procurement rules.23:03–26:50 · Guest teaching 4/10 Taking Multi-Stage Capital at the Seed Stage Harry breaks his usual polite stance to forcefully challenge multi-stage funds investing at seed, pointing out price insensitivity, signaling risk, and misaligned incentives. Katherine holds her ground, emphasizing long-term board courage and alignment over round mechanics.26:50–30:15 · Guest teaching 5/10 Reinvestment Decisions and Stage-Specific Dynamics Harry asks informed questions about price discipline and aggressive pre-empting. Katherine explains stage-specific dynamics in deep tech and notes that in venture there is far more shame in losing on price than winning on price.30:15–33:29 · Guest teaching 6/10 The Decline of Institutional Trust and Rise of New Media Harry asks why Katherine is obsessed with media shift dynamics. Katherine delivers a mini-lecture outlining three main structural drivers behind the devolution of institutional media trust.33:29–38:43 · Guest teaching 7/10 Preference Falsification and the Narrowing of Public Discourse Harry asks a direct question on whether democracy still exists given self-censorship. Katherine educates on preference falsification citing political literature, explaining how modern institutions induce fear of speaking freely.38:43–43:40 · Guest teaching 4/10 Quickfire Round: Books, Remote Diligence, and Ophelia Health In the quickfire section, Harry asks about reading materials, remote diligence challenges, and recent deals. Katherine summarizes takeaways from Plato's Republic and Ross Douthat's work.3:35–6:49 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Catherine Boyle's Path from Journalism to Venture Capital Harry asks standard background questions about Katherine's transition from journalism at the Washington Post to venture capital. Katherine provides a detailed biographical narrative without any friction or pushback.6:49–9:14 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Parallels Between Journalism and Venture Capital Harry asks Katherine to unpack her concept of reason and revelation in investing. Katherine educates the host by drawing on political philosophy concepts from Leo Strauss to explain decision-making frameworks in venture.9:14–12:01 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Building Internal Conviction and Challenging Assumptions Harry prompts Katherine on conviction and lessons from Founders Fund. Katherine contrasts proactive investors like Hemant Taneja with reactive investors like Brian Singerman.12:01–14:32 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Reactive vs. Proactive Investing Styles Harry brings up Mike Moritz and Jeff Lewis to discuss career paths. Katherine shares an anecdote about standing her ground and fundamentally disagreeing with Moritz when he claimed journalists could no longer succeed in VC.14:32–17:34 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Defining Founder Narrative Fit and Evaluating Obsession Harry presses on how generalist investors can evaluate founder obsession in deep technical domains. Katherine explains her framework of asking 'how' questions to test whether a founder has thoroughly thought through their thesis.17:34–20:19 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Navigating Compressed Timelines and Market Timing Risks Harry highlights the risks of compressed fundraising timelines and market timing. Katherine clarifies the distinction between pure market timing risk and riding macro tailwinds that accelerate existing behavior.20:19–23:03 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Building Defensibility in Regulated Markets Harry cites Brian Singerman's complex coordination thesis regarding regulated markets. Katherine reframes the issue by distinguishing between waiting for regulatory changes versus navigating established procurement rules.23:03–26:50 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Taking Multi-Stage Capital at the Seed Stage Harry breaks his usual polite stance to forcefully challenge multi-stage funds investing at seed, pointing out price insensitivity, signaling risk, and misaligned incentives. Katherine holds her ground, emphasizing long-term board courage and alignment over round mechanics.26:50–30:15 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Reinvestment Decisions and Stage-Specific Dynamics Harry asks informed questions about price discipline and aggressive pre-empting. Katherine explains stage-specific dynamics in deep tech and notes that in venture there is far more shame in losing on price than winning on price.30:15–33:29 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Decline of Institutional Trust and Rise of New Media Harry asks why Katherine is obsessed with media shift dynamics. Katherine delivers a mini-lecture outlining three main structural drivers behind the devolution of institutional media trust.33:29–38:43 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Preference Falsification and the Narrowing of Public Discourse Harry asks a direct question on whether democracy still exists given self-censorship. Katherine educates on preference falsification citing political literature, explaining how modern institutions induce fear of speaking freely.38:43–43:40 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Quickfire Round: Books, Remote Diligence, and Ophelia Health In the quickfire section, Harry asks about reading materials, remote diligence challenges, and recent deals. Katherine summarizes takeaways from Plato's Republic and Ross Douthat's work.3:35–6:49 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Catherine Boyle's Path from Journalism to Venture Capital Harry asks standard background questions about Katherine's transition from journalism at the Washington Post to venture capital. Katherine provides a detailed biographical narrative without any friction or pushback.6:49–9:14 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Parallels Between Journalism and Venture Capital Harry asks Katherine to unpack her concept of reason and revelation in investing. Katherine educates the host by drawing on political philosophy concepts from Leo Strauss to explain decision-making frameworks in venture.9:14–12:01 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Building Internal Conviction and Challenging Assumptions Harry prompts Katherine on conviction and lessons from Founders Fund. Katherine contrasts proactive investors like Hemant Taneja with reactive investors like Brian Singerman.12:01–14:32 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Reactive vs. Proactive Investing Styles Harry brings up Mike Moritz and Jeff Lewis to discuss career paths. Katherine shares an anecdote about standing her ground and fundamentally disagreeing with Moritz when he claimed journalists could no longer succeed in VC.14:32–17:34 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Defining Founder Narrative Fit and Evaluating Obsession Harry presses on how generalist investors can evaluate founder obsession in deep technical domains. Katherine explains her framework of asking 'how' questions to test whether a founder has thoroughly thought through their thesis.17:34–20:19 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Navigating Compressed Timelines and Market Timing Risks Harry highlights the risks of compressed fundraising timelines and market timing. Katherine clarifies the distinction between pure market timing risk and riding macro tailwinds that accelerate existing behavior.20:19–23:03 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Building Defensibility in Regulated Markets Harry cites Brian Singerman's complex coordination thesis regarding regulated markets. Katherine reframes the issue by distinguishing between waiting for regulatory changes versus navigating established procurement rules.23:03–26:50 · Harry pushing back 8/10 Taking Multi-Stage Capital at the Seed Stage Harry breaks his usual polite stance to forcefully challenge multi-stage funds investing at seed, pointing out price insensitivity, signaling risk, and misaligned incentives. Katherine holds her ground, emphasizing long-term board courage and alignment over round mechanics.26:50–30:15 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Reinvestment Decisions and Stage-Specific Dynamics Harry asks informed questions about price discipline and aggressive pre-empting. Katherine explains stage-specific dynamics in deep tech and notes that in venture there is far more shame in losing on price than winning on price.30:15–33:29 · Harry pushing back 1/10 The Decline of Institutional Trust and Rise of New Media Harry asks why Katherine is obsessed with media shift dynamics. Katherine delivers a mini-lecture outlining three main structural drivers behind the devolution of institutional media trust.33:29–38:43 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Preference Falsification and the Narrowing of Public Discourse Harry asks a direct question on whether democracy still exists given self-censorship. Katherine educates on preference falsification citing political literature, explaining how modern institutions induce fear of speaking freely.38:43–43:40 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Quickfire Round: Books, Remote Diligence, and Ophelia Health In the quickfire section, Harry asks about reading materials, remote diligence challenges, and recent deals. Katherine summarizes takeaways from Plato's Republic and Ross Douthat's work.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%0:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%3:00 · Harry 26.9% · guest 73.1%3:00 · Harry 26.9% · guest 73.1%6:00 · Harry 20.7% · guest 79.3%6:00 · Harry 20.7% · guest 79.3%9:00 · Harry 22.3% · guest 77.7%9:00 · Harry 22.3% · guest 77.7%12:00 · Harry 22.4% · guest 77.6%12:00 · Harry 22.4% · guest 77.6%15:00 · Harry 28% · guest 72%15:00 · Harry 28% · guest 72%18:00 · Harry 26.2% · guest 73.8%18:00 · Harry 26.2% · guest 73.8%21:00 · Harry 23.6% · guest 76.4%21:00 · Harry 23.6% · guest 76.4%24:00 · Harry 35.5% · guest 64.5%24:00 · Harry 35.5% · guest 64.5%27:00 · Harry 23.9% · guest 76.1%27:00 · Harry 23.9% · guest 76.1%30:00 · Harry 11.5% · guest 88.5%30:00 · Harry 11.5% · guest 88.5%33:00 · Harry 30.9% · guest 69.1%33:00 · Harry 30.9% · guest 69.1%36:00 · Harry 19.4% · guest 80.6%36:00 · Harry 19.4% · guest 80.6%39:00 · Harry 7.2% · guest 92.8%39:00 · Harry 7.2% · guest 92.8%42:00 · Harry 49.9% · guest 50.1%42:00 · Harry 49.9% · guest 50.1%45:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%45:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 13:22 Katherine rejecting Mike Moritz's view on journalists in VC

Katherine describes directly telling legendary VC Mike Moritz that she fundamentally disagreed with his assertion that journalists could no longer become great venture capitalists.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 24:53 Harry challenging multi-stage firm seed dynamics

Harry explicitly steps out of his agreeable persona to counter Katherine's framing, arguing that multi-stage firms entering seed rounds create price insensitivity, signaling risk, and misaligned pricing incentives.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 33:29 Katherine explaining preference falsification

Katherine re-contextualizes Harry's existential question about democracy by citing political philosophy texts on preference falsification and detailing how corporate and social pressures mirror authoritarian censorship mechanics.

Harry holds his own ▶ 24:53 Harry demonstrating deep market mechanics on seed rounds

Harry showcases expert domain knowledge by breaking down how multi-stage funds pay inflated seed valuations to secure ownership at later stages, squeezing out stage-specific seed investors.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Catherine Boyle's Path from Journalism to Venture Capital 2300 Harry asks standard background questions about Katherine's transition from journalism at the Washington Post to venture capital. Katherine provides a detailed biographical narrative without any friction or pushback.
Parallels Between Journalism and Venture Capital 3511 Harry asks Katherine to unpack her concept of reason and revelation in investing. Katherine educates the host by drawing on political philosophy concepts from Leo Strauss to explain decision-making frameworks in venture.
Building Internal Conviction and Challenging Assumptions 3411 Harry prompts Katherine on conviction and lessons from Founders Fund. Katherine contrasts proactive investors like Hemant Taneja with reactive investors like Brian Singerman.
Reactive vs. Proactive Investing Styles 4532 Harry brings up Mike Moritz and Jeff Lewis to discuss career paths. Katherine shares an anecdote about standing her ground and fundamentally disagreeing with Moritz when he claimed journalists could no longer succeed in VC.
Defining Founder Narrative Fit and Evaluating Obsession 4413 Harry presses on how generalist investors can evaluate founder obsession in deep technical domains. Katherine explains her framework of asking 'how' questions to test whether a founder has thoroughly thought through their thesis.
Navigating Compressed Timelines and Market Timing Risks 3413 Harry highlights the risks of compressed fundraising timelines and market timing. Katherine clarifies the distinction between pure market timing risk and riding macro tailwinds that accelerate existing behavior.
Building Defensibility in Regulated Markets 4523 Harry cites Brian Singerman's complex coordination thesis regarding regulated markets. Katherine reframes the issue by distinguishing between waiting for regulatory changes versus navigating established procurement rules.
Taking Multi-Stage Capital at the Seed Stage 6448 Harry breaks his usual polite stance to forcefully challenge multi-stage funds investing at seed, pointing out price insensitivity, signaling risk, and misaligned incentives. Katherine holds her ground, emphasizing long-term board courage and alignment over round mechanics.
Reinvestment Decisions and Stage-Specific Dynamics 5523 Harry asks informed questions about price discipline and aggressive pre-empting. Katherine explains stage-specific dynamics in deep tech and notes that in venture there is far more shame in losing on price than winning on price.
The Decline of Institutional Trust and Rise of New Media 3621 Harry asks why Katherine is obsessed with media shift dynamics. Katherine delivers a mini-lecture outlining three main structural drivers behind the devolution of institutional media trust.
Preference Falsification and the Narrowing of Public Discourse 5734 Harry asks a direct question on whether democracy still exists given self-censorship. Katherine educates on preference falsification citing political literature, explaining how modern institutions induce fear of speaking freely.
Quickfire Round: Books, Remote Diligence, and Ophelia Health 3411 In the quickfire section, Harry asks about reading materials, remote diligence challenges, and recent deals. Katherine summarizes takeaways from Plato's Republic and Ross Douthat's work.

Statements from this episode (36)

What-if
Boyle: Poor Washington Post Business Model Forced Her Departure From Journalism
“So I probably would have been a journalist the rest of my life Had it not been for just a terrible business model when I was at the post.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 4:31
Insight
Boyle: Venture Capital and Journalism Hunt for the Same Three Elements
“They're the exact same job, except in journalism, you write a story, and in venture, you write a check. But you really are hunting for the same things. So the three components of a great story are strong protagonists, A contrarian hook or thesis that really ma…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 7:01
Insight
Boyle: Great Investing Requires Balancing Reason and Revelation
“I very much believe that investing is this unique combination of reason and revelation, and that understanding that mix is sort of the key to being a great investor, and I think it's also the key to being a great journalist.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 7:45
Insight
Boyle: Probabilistic Thinking Distinguishes Venture Capital From Journalism
“I'd say the biggest difference is the probabilistic thinking that you have to have as an investor. That's definitely not something that journalists think about in terms of looking at upside or looking at opportunity.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 7:58
Assertion Supported
Stebbings: Founders Fund lacks traditional Monday partner meetings
“Founders Fund is quite famous for having quite a loose investment decision making process, not with the kind of traditional partner meetings every Monday.”
Harry Stebbings Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 9:15
Opinion
Boyle: Hemant Taneja Is the Best Proactive Investor in Venture Capital
“Hey Montanesia is the best proactive investor in the business. He's someone who can see the future 10 years out and build companies from scratch as a co-founder with them and see them come to fruition.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 11:06
Opinion
Boyle: Brian Singerman Is Silicon Valley's Best Reactive Investor
“The flip side of that is someone like Brian Singerman, who I think is one of the best reactive investors in the Valley, where he has no theses, doesn't think about the future, and just listens to the founder and the story and uses his own frameworks and is abl…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 11:31
Insight
Boyle: Venture Capital Resembles a Multiplayer Strategy Game
“And so I think the big takeaway from my thinking there is that, you know, he was the first person to tell me that investing is much more like a multiplayer strategy game than it is like any other asset class.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 11:46
Insight
Boyle: Journalist VC's Superpower Is Listening and Pressure-Testing Founder Conviction
“I'd say that the core superpower of a former journalist or the core superpower of many investors is to just listen to the And actually decide whether you believe the story to be true, and then be kind of a helpful, almost Socratic guide to the founder on their…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 12:22
Insight
Boyle: Young VCs Are Highly Mimetic and Desperate for Peer Validation
“And to me, that was some of the most liberating advice that I had received, because this field is so mimetic, and so many young people start out their careers wanting to impress other investors, and they're desperate to get into the hot deals because other peo…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 13:57
Disclosure
Boyle Invests Almost Solely Based on Founder Narrative Fit
“I invest almost solely in what I call founder narrative fit, where I'm really, really focused on kind of certain traits and a founder.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 14:49
Assertion Supported
Boyle: Nova Credit was the only credit reporting agency built for immigrants
“With Novacreda and Misha, there really isn't another Credit reporting agency built for immigrants. No one else is building in that sector.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 16:59
Assertion Supported
Boyle: In 2017, No Silicon Valley Startup Competed With Defense Incumbents
“There are very few companies, and particularly in 2017, when Andrew was founded, there wasn't anyone in Silicon Valley building a new defense contractor that wanted to compete with Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 17:06
Insight
Boyle: A Founder's Willingness to Teach Is Fundraising's Most Vital Part
“The more that you can demonstrate that you are learning, and the more that the founder is willing to teach you, to me, that is probably the most important part of the fundraising process.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 18:40
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Boyle: COVID exposed both how and what K-12 students learn
“I think we're seeing, and I think every person with children right now is seeing this, that like there is a Huge change happening in K through 12 education because of COVID. And the two things that I think have really changed are parents are now aware of how t…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 19:17
Insight
Boyle: Navigating regulatory hurdles unlocks markets dominated by slow incumbents
“And if you can get through the regulatory hurdles or the procurement hurdles and see that market on the other side, you are competing against the slowest moving incumbents because they have had an effective monopoly for decades. That's true of education. That'…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 21:13
Disclosure
Boyle Avoids Investing in Binary Regulatory Bets
“There are companies that have been successful off of pure regulatory change, but I think that often leads to a lot of people running towards a regulatory change, and that's not sort of the way that I invest.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 22:42
Opinion
Boyle: Anduril's Founding Team Is Equivalent to the 1998 Chicago Bulls
“Andrew was a very special case and that this team is So excellent. I mean, it really is, you know, I think everyone's watching The Last Dads, but it really is the 98 Chicago Bulls. I mean, this is such an extraordinary team that had worked together before, eve…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 23:25
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Boyle: Every Successful Founder Will Face Intense Scrutiny Over Next Decade
“And I think the biggest thing that I'm predicting will happen in the next 10 years to founders is that if you plan on being a successful founder, you are going to have a target on your back. It doesn't matter whether you are building a defense company or wheth…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 24:13
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Stebbings: Multi-Stage Funds Pay $40M Seed Valuations Versus Standard $15M
“Bluntly, if multi-stage funds right now is the way that I see it, it's like completely price insensitive. I'm doing deals now where I end up not doing them because bluntly, they'll pay forty million pre when everyone else is paying 15, because they just don't …”
Harry Stebbings Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 25:01
Disclosure
Boyle: General Catalyst Didn't Lead an Anduril Round Until Series B
“With Anderil, we invested in the seed. We also invested in the A, but we didn't lead around until the series B when we co-led with Founders Fund.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 27:11
Insight
Boyle: Deep Tech Is Easier to Fund at Seed and Series B
“It's a lot easier to invest in seed in series B than it is to invest in A, and there's a reason for that, and that's because a lot of the companies I work with are deep tech companies, or they're engineering driven, and there is little traction at the A, so th…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 27:35
Insight
Boyle: Capital-Intensive Startups Should Raise Larger Seed Rounds
“If you are building a company that's going to take more capital, it makes sense to raise a larger seed because you know that it's going to take you much longer to get to those Series A milestones and those Series B milestones.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 27:54
Insight
Boyle: There Is Far More Shame in Losing on Price Than Overpaying
“I'm always amazed at investors who mock other investors for paying up for companies, and I think there's far more shame in losing on price than winning on price, and no one really wants to say that”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 29:02
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Boyle: Global Trust in Legacy Institutions Is Steadily Declining
“The broader thesis that I have is that we are watching this incredible global decline of institutional trust, and it's not just media, it's the U.S. Government, it's Brexit, it's university education, the Catholic Church, it's any institution that used to hold…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 30:42
Assertion Supported
Boyle: Substack and Patreon Let Creators Out-Earn Legacy Media Institutions
“You get amazing companies like Substack and Patreon and other creator-led companies that allow the creator to make more money than they could in these bloated institutions.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 32:34
Opinion
Stebbings: Society No Longer Fundamentally Operates as a Democracy
“I don't think we fundamentally live in a democracy anymore, because I know I don't, and I know that pretty much everyone around me is too afraid to say how they truly feel.”
Harry Stebbings Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 33:19
Opinion
Boyle: Corporate and Social Pressures Mirror Soviet-Era Censorship
“And we've seen sort of that current that was really in existence under the former Soviet Union move to what we call democratic countries. But instead of that being influenced from kind of the state, it's been influenced from companies and from other people and…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 34:07
Opinion
Boyle: Media Is Narrowing Into Private Channels Due To Social Backlash
“And so I very much believe that we've entered a time where it's very difficult to say what you believe, and that's why these narrow communities and these, you know, whether it's a Substack newsletter or whether it's a signal channel where you can talk to a sma…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 34:19
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Boyle: Middle-Tier Media Publications Will Collapse First
“I do think that we'll see the middle fallout first. I mean, we've already seen the middle fallout in terms of sort of small metro papers. And so, 100%, I do think we're going to see that trend.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 35:02
Prediction Held up
Boyle: Top Journalists Will Leave Premier News Institutions for Independent Platforms
“So I do think you can see a shift even at the top, even at the Washington Post and the New York Times, where people will opt out of those premier institutions because they value the freedom to monetize their following. And they also value the freedom to say wh…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 35:37
Insight
Boyle: Institutional Transparency Breeds Mistrust and Causes Legacy Institutions to Crumble
“Sort of this transparency that we were all looking forward to over the last decade to make things just much more elucidated to us, and I think what we're seeing is that actually that transparency breeds a lot of mistrust. These institutions only have their pow…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 36:15
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Boyle: Anduril Solved a 30-Year Government Defense Incentive Problem
“Same thing with creating new defense companies like Andrel. For 30 years, the government has not been able to figure out how do we build new technology and how do we incentivize Silicon Valley to work with us, and Andrel has figured out how to align the incent…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 38:15
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Boyle: Post-COVID trends will split between major infrastructure and communal living
“I think those are two prescriptions and two solutions that we're actually going to see coming out of COVID. We're going to see people building these intense infrastructure projects, or I hope we do, you know, sort of the Marc Andreessen, it's time to build. Bu…”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 39:35
Insight
Boyle: Founders optimize too much for valuation and brand over mission alignment
“I think people optimize too much for brand and price and sort of short-term effects, and they're not looking solely for mission-driven people who are mission-aligned with them who will have their back and have courage when things get tough.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 40:56
Insight
Boyle: Venture capital incentives favor software over long-horizon infrastructure projects
“The thing that I would change slightly is the incentives are really great for software. It's really hard to build large projects with large time horizons in the venture asset class.”
Katherine Boyle Oct 1, 2020 ▶ 41:24
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.