Nov 13, 2017 · 41m · 20vc

20VC: a16z's Alex Rampell on The Struggle Between Innovation vs Distribution, When How To Determine Whether An Application is Optimised Through Centralised or Decentralised Networks & Why Most ICOs Today Are Ridiculous

Alex Rampell · 32m spoken Harry Stebbings · 7m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Andreessen Horowitz General Partner Alex Rampell on startup go-to-market strategies, data network effects, and crypto tokenomics. Rampell shares insights from his entrepreneurial journey, evaluating how startups can successfully navigate distribution battles against entrenched industry incumbents.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 20.2% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 2.2 Guest teaching 4.5 Guest disagreement 2.3 Harry pushing back 1.3
05100:0015:0030:002:56–6:27 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Alex Rampell's Background and Journey to VC Harry asks standard biographical questions regarding Alex's early entrepreneurial history and transition to venture capital. Alex elaborates on writing shareware as a child and his operating experience leading up to Andreessen Horowitz without any friction or pushback.6:27–10:38 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 The Dynamics of Innovation vs. Distribution Harry relays a question from Chris Dixon about operational learnings, prompting Alex to explain his core innovation versus distribution framework. Harry offers a brief clarifying query on whether startups should prioritize distribution pre-product, which Alex addresses constructively.10:38–15:21 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Navigating Consumer Startup Fallow Periods and Dominant Platforms Harry demonstrates preparation by citing specific consumer startup thesis points from Jeremy Levine and Eric Feng. Alex nuances the fallow period claim and educates on data network effects using database read/write mechanics and Google's open-source AI strategy.15:21–22:31 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Identifying Growth Inflection Points and Transactional Distribution Harry asks broad questions about inflection points and their long-term sustainability. Alex delivers an extensive breakdown using SoFi's student loan pricing and point-of-sale transactional distribution analogies like selling ketchup alongside french fries.22:31–31:12 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Blockchain Realities, Enterprise Uses, and the ICO Landscape Harry introduces community questions on ICOs and references Charlie Lee's concerns. Alex exhibits strong contrarian combativeness toward corporate blockchain hype, calling IBM's ads absurd and comparing private bank blockchains to standard Oracle databases, while explaining true protocol monetization.31:12–39:12 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Corporate M&A Perspectives on Tokenized Business Models Harry guides the episode through corporate M&A on tokens and a fast-paced quickfire round. Alex offers sharp opinions on startup valuation traps, parodying founders who dismiss pricing discipline, and explains his thesis for investing in Propel.2:56–6:27 · Guest teaching 3/10 Alex Rampell's Background and Journey to VC Harry asks standard biographical questions regarding Alex's early entrepreneurial history and transition to venture capital. Alex elaborates on writing shareware as a child and his operating experience leading up to Andreessen Horowitz without any friction or pushback.6:27–10:38 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Dynamics of Innovation vs. Distribution Harry relays a question from Chris Dixon about operational learnings, prompting Alex to explain his core innovation versus distribution framework. Harry offers a brief clarifying query on whether startups should prioritize distribution pre-product, which Alex addresses constructively.10:38–15:21 · Guest teaching 5/10 Navigating Consumer Startup Fallow Periods and Dominant Platforms Harry demonstrates preparation by citing specific consumer startup thesis points from Jeremy Levine and Eric Feng. Alex nuances the fallow period claim and educates on data network effects using database read/write mechanics and Google's open-source AI strategy.15:21–22:31 · Guest teaching 5/10 Identifying Growth Inflection Points and Transactional Distribution Harry asks broad questions about inflection points and their long-term sustainability. Alex delivers an extensive breakdown using SoFi's student loan pricing and point-of-sale transactional distribution analogies like selling ketchup alongside french fries.22:31–31:12 · Guest teaching 6/10 Blockchain Realities, Enterprise Uses, and the ICO Landscape Harry introduces community questions on ICOs and references Charlie Lee's concerns. Alex exhibits strong contrarian combativeness toward corporate blockchain hype, calling IBM's ads absurd and comparing private bank blockchains to standard Oracle databases, while explaining true protocol monetization.31:12–39:12 · Guest teaching 4/10 Corporate M&A Perspectives on Tokenized Business Models Harry guides the episode through corporate M&A on tokens and a fast-paced quickfire round. Alex offers sharp opinions on startup valuation traps, parodying founders who dismiss pricing discipline, and explains his thesis for investing in Propel.2:56–6:27 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Alex Rampell's Background and Journey to VC Harry asks standard biographical questions regarding Alex's early entrepreneurial history and transition to venture capital. Alex elaborates on writing shareware as a child and his operating experience leading up to Andreessen Horowitz without any friction or pushback.6:27–10:38 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Dynamics of Innovation vs. Distribution Harry relays a question from Chris Dixon about operational learnings, prompting Alex to explain his core innovation versus distribution framework. Harry offers a brief clarifying query on whether startups should prioritize distribution pre-product, which Alex addresses constructively.10:38–15:21 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Navigating Consumer Startup Fallow Periods and Dominant Platforms Harry demonstrates preparation by citing specific consumer startup thesis points from Jeremy Levine and Eric Feng. Alex nuances the fallow period claim and educates on data network effects using database read/write mechanics and Google's open-source AI strategy.15:21–22:31 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Identifying Growth Inflection Points and Transactional Distribution Harry asks broad questions about inflection points and their long-term sustainability. Alex delivers an extensive breakdown using SoFi's student loan pricing and point-of-sale transactional distribution analogies like selling ketchup alongside french fries.22:31–31:12 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Blockchain Realities, Enterprise Uses, and the ICO Landscape Harry introduces community questions on ICOs and references Charlie Lee's concerns. Alex exhibits strong contrarian combativeness toward corporate blockchain hype, calling IBM's ads absurd and comparing private bank blockchains to standard Oracle databases, while explaining true protocol monetization.31:12–39:12 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Corporate M&A Perspectives on Tokenized Business Models Harry guides the episode through corporate M&A on tokens and a fast-paced quickfire round. Alex offers sharp opinions on startup valuation traps, parodying founders who dismiss pricing discipline, and explains his thesis for investing in Propel.2:56–6:27 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Alex Rampell's Background and Journey to VC Harry asks standard biographical questions regarding Alex's early entrepreneurial history and transition to venture capital. Alex elaborates on writing shareware as a child and his operating experience leading up to Andreessen Horowitz without any friction or pushback.6:27–10:38 · Harry pushing back 2/10 The Dynamics of Innovation vs. Distribution Harry relays a question from Chris Dixon about operational learnings, prompting Alex to explain his core innovation versus distribution framework. Harry offers a brief clarifying query on whether startups should prioritize distribution pre-product, which Alex addresses constructively.10:38–15:21 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Navigating Consumer Startup Fallow Periods and Dominant Platforms Harry demonstrates preparation by citing specific consumer startup thesis points from Jeremy Levine and Eric Feng. Alex nuances the fallow period claim and educates on data network effects using database read/write mechanics and Google's open-source AI strategy.15:21–22:31 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Identifying Growth Inflection Points and Transactional Distribution Harry asks broad questions about inflection points and their long-term sustainability. Alex delivers an extensive breakdown using SoFi's student loan pricing and point-of-sale transactional distribution analogies like selling ketchup alongside french fries.22:31–31:12 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Blockchain Realities, Enterprise Uses, and the ICO Landscape Harry introduces community questions on ICOs and references Charlie Lee's concerns. Alex exhibits strong contrarian combativeness toward corporate blockchain hype, calling IBM's ads absurd and comparing private bank blockchains to standard Oracle databases, while explaining true protocol monetization.31:12–39:12 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Corporate M&A Perspectives on Tokenized Business Models Harry guides the episode through corporate M&A on tokens and a fast-paced quickfire round. Alex offers sharp opinions on startup valuation traps, parodying founders who dismiss pricing discipline, and explains his thesis for investing in Propel.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%0:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%3:00 · Harry 11.5% · guest 88.5%3:00 · Harry 11.5% · guest 88.5%6:00 · Harry 9.9% · guest 90.1%6:00 · Harry 9.9% · guest 90.1%9:00 · Harry 13.9% · guest 86.1%9:00 · Harry 13.9% · guest 86.1%12:00 · Harry 9.9% · guest 90.1%12:00 · Harry 9.9% · guest 90.1%15:00 · Harry 7% · guest 93%15:00 · Harry 7% · guest 93%18:00 · Harry 5.8% · guest 94.2%18:00 · Harry 5.8% · guest 94.2%21:00 · Harry 13.8% · guest 86.2%21:00 · Harry 13.8% · guest 86.2%24:00 · Harry 2.4% · guest 97.6%24:00 · Harry 2.4% · guest 97.6%27:00 · Harry 10.8% · guest 89.2%27:00 · Harry 10.8% · guest 89.2%30:00 · Harry 12.6% · guest 87.4%30:00 · Harry 12.6% · guest 87.4%33:00 · Harry 7.7% · guest 92.3%33:00 · Harry 7.7% · guest 92.3%36:00 · Harry 4.1% · guest 95.9%36:00 · Harry 4.1% · guest 95.9%39:00 · Harry 90.2% · guest 9.8%39:00 · Harry 90.2% · guest 9.8%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 22:52 Calling enterprise blockchain hype absurd

Alex forcefully ridicules corporate blockchain marketing, calling an IBM advertisement the most absurd sentence he has ever heard and telling a bank CEO that a private internal blockchain is simply an Oracle database.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 10:38 Challenging guest on consumer fallow periods using competitor theses

Harry pushes back on potential market optimism by bringing up specific thesis counterarguments from Bessemer's Jeremy Levine and Eric Feng regarding incumbent distribution dominance.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 28:01 Explaining protocol monetization through internet domain analogies

Alex educates the host and audience on how tokens solve a fundamental computer science business model problem by comparing ICO protocol incentives to monetizing early internet protocols like TCP/IP via domain names.

Harry holds his own ▶ 10:38 Citing specific VC peers to counter distribution dynamics

Harry demonstrates high domain awareness and research by citing specific top-tier venture capitalists and their detailed arguments to steer the conversation into high-level strategic debate.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Alex Rampell's Background and Journey to VC 1310 Harry asks standard biographical questions regarding Alex's early entrepreneurial history and transition to venture capital. Alex elaborates on writing shareware as a child and his operating experience leading up to Andreessen Horowitz without any friction or pushback.
The Dynamics of Innovation vs. Distribution 2422 Harry relays a question from Chris Dixon about operational learnings, prompting Alex to explain his core innovation versus distribution framework. Harry offers a brief clarifying query on whether startups should prioritize distribution pre-product, which Alex addresses constructively.
Navigating Consumer Startup Fallow Periods and Dominant Platforms 3522 Harry demonstrates preparation by citing specific consumer startup thesis points from Jeremy Levine and Eric Feng. Alex nuances the fallow period claim and educates on data network effects using database read/write mechanics and Google's open-source AI strategy.
Identifying Growth Inflection Points and Transactional Distribution 2511 Harry asks broad questions about inflection points and their long-term sustainability. Alex delivers an extensive breakdown using SoFi's student loan pricing and point-of-sale transactional distribution analogies like selling ketchup alongside french fries.
Blockchain Realities, Enterprise Uses, and the ICO Landscape 3652 Harry introduces community questions on ICOs and references Charlie Lee's concerns. Alex exhibits strong contrarian combativeness toward corporate blockchain hype, calling IBM's ads absurd and comparing private bank blockchains to standard Oracle databases, while explaining true protocol monetization.
Corporate M&A Perspectives on Tokenized Business Models 2431 Harry guides the episode through corporate M&A on tokens and a fast-paced quickfire round. Alex offers sharp opinions on startup valuation traps, parodying founders who dismiss pricing discipline, and explains his thesis for investing in Propel.

Statements from this episode (15)

Insight
Startups Must Get Distribution Before Incumbents Get Innovation
“The battle between every startup and incumbent comes down to whether the startup can get the distribution before the incumbent can build the innovation.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 7:55
Insight
Modern Tech Incumbents Aggressively Acquire Disruptive Threats Early
“The newer companies are being much, much more aggressive about finding the potential disruptive threat and taking them out early.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 11:57
Prediction Not checkable as stated
New Tech Platforms Will Emerge or Displace Incumbents Within Years
“I'd be surprised if we only have the large five incumbent technology platforms and there's not a sixth or a seventh or maybe there are only five because one of those gets displaced. Within a couple of years.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 12:16
Insight
Data Network Effects Function Like Database Writes and Reads
“Think of it as a database with writes and reads. Those are the two actions that you typically perform in a database. As the number of writes goes up, the value of each read goes up as well, because the value of a read initially is close to nil, but as the numb…”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 12:55
Insight
Proprietary Data Gives Big Tech an Unbeatable AI Recruiting Advantage
“It's also an HR advantage, because if you are the smartest person from your PhD program at Stanford, and you like machine learning and AI, where do you want to work? Well, you could go work for some startup, where they also downloaded TensorFlow, but they have…”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 14:28
Assertion Partly supported
Google Search Ad Clicks for Life Insurance Cost $50 to $100
“If you go to Google and you search life insurance, the click is 50 dollars or a hundred dollars.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 17:58
Insight
Point-of-Transaction Ads Outperform Facebook and Google Advertising
“What's the best place to advertise in the world? It's actually not when somebody's driving on the freeway and sees a big ad. It's not on Facebook. It's not on Google. It's often when people are in, they're actually buying something because, you know, the best …”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 20:44
Opinion
Enterprise Blockchain Is a Meaningless Buzzword Compared to Centralized Databases
“A lot of people that say, I want a blockchain, the same people that a few years ago were saying, we want big data, which in a couple years were saying, like, oh, AI is very important to us. I think it's become a buzzword that almost means nothing. They mean so…”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 23:38
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Bitcoin Failed as a Currency but Works as a Store of Value
“Bitcoin has not worked as a currency, but I believe it has worked and will continue to work as a store of value.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 28:07
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Inexperienced Teams Raising $100M Through ICOs Will Mostly Fail
“I'm just going to go tap into an ICO, and then they raise a hundred million dollars, and they don't know what to do with it, and they have no experience whatsoever. Like, sometimes that's not, I mean, maybe those will end well, but I would take the other side …”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 30:42
Opinion
Most ICOs Are Ridiculous, but Protocol Tokenization Is a Real Innovation
“The vast majority of ICOs are kind of ridiculous right now, But there are a few that are very, very interesting and represent a true innovation in a inherently kind of business model and computer science problem of the last 30 years, which is how do you moneti…”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 30:54
Insight
Corporate Incumbents Counter-Strike Startups More Effectively Than Silicon Valley Admits
“I actually do think that the ability of large incumbents to go mount a counter-revolutionary strike is Is actually not as atypical as a lot of people in Silicon Valley mock them for.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 33:07
Disclosure
Overpricing TrialPay's Funding Round Impaired Subsequent Fundraising and M&A
“One of the things that I learned at trial pay was that we raised one of our rounds of funding at way too high of a price, and I paid for that because then, guess what, I couldn't, it was hard to sell the company. It was hard to raise money after that”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 34:26
Prediction Not checkable as stated
a16z Optimizes for Ownership Percentage Rather Than Entry Valuation
“For us, it doesn't matter if we invest at twelve million pre or fifteen million pre or eighteen million pre. Like, there's really no difference. Like, we're optimizing for ownership, and that's what we really care about.”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 35:09
Disclosure
Alex Rampell Passes on Great Founders Solely Due to Overvaluation
“I've turned down a number of companies on valuation, not because I didn't believe in the team, not because I didn't believe in the founder, but I just didn't think that there was going to be a sucker that would pay an even higher price next time”
Alex Rampell Nov 13, 2017 ▶ 35:44
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.