Sep 21, 2016 · 33m · 20vc
20VC: Why Valuation Is A Stupid Concept, VC Is Ripe For Disruption & Not All LPs Are Made Equal with Michael Skok, Founding Partner @ Underscore VC
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Michael Skok, Founding Partner at Underscore VC, about disrupting traditional venture capital through community alignment, transparent operations, and vector funding. Skok explains why early-stage valuations are often misguided and presents strategic frameworks for market evaluation and startup success.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 28.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Michael directly rejects the premise of Harry's question about valuation competition by calling valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' when assessing early-stage founders.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 4:41 Founder Collective Counter-ExampleHarry pushes back on Michael's claim of founder alignment by explicitly citing Founder Collective's model of never following on as a competing benchmark for true alignment.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 18:00 Minimum Viable Segment (MVS)Michael educates Harry on product-market fit progression by introducing his proprietary 'Minimum Viable Segment' concept that sits between MVP and broader market traction.
Harry holds his own ▶ 16:41 Citing Jeff Clavier on RunwayHarry displays sharp domain knowledge by citing investor Jeff Clavier's specific preference for 24-36 months of runway when questioning Michael on portfolio cash planning.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Skok's Background and Founding Underscore VC | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Harry asks a open welcoming question about Michael's background and the founding of Underscore VC. Michael explains his transition from entrepreneur to VC and how a listening tour led to founding the firm. | |
| Disrupting the VC Model & Building Community Alignment | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | Harry probes Michael's definition of founder alignment by citing Founder Collective's contrasting policy of not following on past seed. Michael praises FC but argues the 40-year-old traditional VC model is ripe for disruption and details Underscore's community carry platform. | |
| LP Strategy, Selection, and Long-Term Fund Raising | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Harry asks whether LPs can provide strategic value to portfolio companies. Michael categorizes their LP base into co-investors, cause-based supporters, and passive capital, emphasizing the need for patient long-term capital. | |
| Early Stage Investment Focus and Vector Funding | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | Harry asks about portfolio construction and early-stage strategy. Michael introduces vector funding, explaining how committing $5M upfront from Seed through Series A allowed Mautic to scale rapidly without fundraising friction. | |
| Funding Milestones and the Minimum Viable Segment | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | Harry references Jeff Clavier's standard 24-36 month runway benchmark. Michael agrees and builds on this by explaining milestone-driven funding vectors and introducing his proprietary Minimum Viable Segment framework. | |
| Assessing Market Creation with the BLACK Framework | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Harry asks how VCs evaluate market creation in undefined spaces. Michael delivers a mini-lecture explaining his BLACK framework (Blatant, Latent, Aspirational, Critical). | |
| Rethinking Valuation and Ownership | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | When Harry asks about managing valuation in hyper-competitive deals, Michael forcefully rejects the question's premise, declaring valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' at early stage. He advocates for open-source investing and blowing up the traditional VC black box. | |
| Quick-Fire Round & Mautic Case Study | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Harry conducts a quick-fire round where Michael reveals he initially rejected Mautic due to a bad experience with Joomla until his community core changed his mind. Michael ends the segment by flipping the microphone to interview Harry about his own motivation. |