Sep 21, 2016 · 33m · 20vc

20VC: Why Valuation Is A Stupid Concept, VC Is Ripe For Disruption & Not All LPs Are Made Equal with Michael Skok, Founding Partner @ Underscore VC

Michael Skok · 22m spoken Harry Stebbings · 9m spoken
0:00 / 0:00

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of The 20 Minute VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Michael Skok, Founding Partner at Underscore VC, about disrupting traditional venture capital through community alignment, transparent operations, and vector funding. Skok explains why early-stage valuations are often misguided and presents strategic frameworks for market evaluation and startup success.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 28.5% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 2.8 Guest teaching 4.1 Guest disagreement 1.4 Harry pushing back 1.5
05100:0010:0020:0030:002:39–4:41 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Michael Skok's Background and Founding Underscore VC Harry asks a open welcoming question about Michael's background and the founding of Underscore VC. Michael explains his transition from entrepreneur to VC and how a listening tour led to founding the firm.4:41–9:09 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Disrupting the VC Model & Building Community Alignment Harry probes Michael's definition of founder alignment by citing Founder Collective's contrasting policy of not following on past seed. Michael praises FC but argues the 40-year-old traditional VC model is ripe for disruption and details Underscore's community carry platform.9:09–13:49 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 LP Strategy, Selection, and Long-Term Fund Raising Harry asks whether LPs can provide strategic value to portfolio companies. Michael categorizes their LP base into co-investors, cause-based supporters, and passive capital, emphasizing the need for patient long-term capital.13:49–16:41 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Early Stage Investment Focus and Vector Funding Harry asks about portfolio construction and early-stage strategy. Michael introduces vector funding, explaining how committing $5M upfront from Seed through Series A allowed Mautic to scale rapidly without fundraising friction.16:41–19:12 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Funding Milestones and the Minimum Viable Segment Harry references Jeff Clavier's standard 24-36 month runway benchmark. Michael agrees and builds on this by explaining milestone-driven funding vectors and introducing his proprietary Minimum Viable Segment framework.19:12–21:32 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Assessing Market Creation with the BLACK Framework Harry asks how VCs evaluate market creation in undefined spaces. Michael delivers a mini-lecture explaining his BLACK framework (Blatant, Latent, Aspirational, Critical).21:35–25:20 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Rethinking Valuation and Ownership When Harry asks about managing valuation in hyper-competitive deals, Michael forcefully rejects the question's premise, declaring valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' at early stage. He advocates for open-source investing and blowing up the traditional VC black box.25:20–29:38 · Harry as informed peer 2/10 Quick-Fire Round & Mautic Case Study Harry conducts a quick-fire round where Michael reveals he initially rejected Mautic due to a bad experience with Joomla until his community core changed his mind. Michael ends the segment by flipping the microphone to interview Harry about his own motivation.2:39–4:41 · Guest teaching 2/10 Michael Skok's Background and Founding Underscore VC Harry asks a open welcoming question about Michael's background and the founding of Underscore VC. Michael explains his transition from entrepreneur to VC and how a listening tour led to founding the firm.4:41–9:09 · Guest teaching 4/10 Disrupting the VC Model & Building Community Alignment Harry probes Michael's definition of founder alignment by citing Founder Collective's contrasting policy of not following on past seed. Michael praises FC but argues the 40-year-old traditional VC model is ripe for disruption and details Underscore's community carry platform.9:09–13:49 · Guest teaching 4/10 LP Strategy, Selection, and Long-Term Fund Raising Harry asks whether LPs can provide strategic value to portfolio companies. Michael categorizes their LP base into co-investors, cause-based supporters, and passive capital, emphasizing the need for patient long-term capital.13:49–16:41 · Guest teaching 4/10 Early Stage Investment Focus and Vector Funding Harry asks about portfolio construction and early-stage strategy. Michael introduces vector funding, explaining how committing $5M upfront from Seed through Series A allowed Mautic to scale rapidly without fundraising friction.16:41–19:12 · Guest teaching 5/10 Funding Milestones and the Minimum Viable Segment Harry references Jeff Clavier's standard 24-36 month runway benchmark. Michael agrees and builds on this by explaining milestone-driven funding vectors and introducing his proprietary Minimum Viable Segment framework.19:12–21:32 · Guest teaching 5/10 Assessing Market Creation with the BLACK Framework Harry asks how VCs evaluate market creation in undefined spaces. Michael delivers a mini-lecture explaining his BLACK framework (Blatant, Latent, Aspirational, Critical).21:35–25:20 · Guest teaching 6/10 Rethinking Valuation and Ownership When Harry asks about managing valuation in hyper-competitive deals, Michael forcefully rejects the question's premise, declaring valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' at early stage. He advocates for open-source investing and blowing up the traditional VC black box.25:20–29:38 · Guest teaching 3/10 Quick-Fire Round & Mautic Case Study Harry conducts a quick-fire round where Michael reveals he initially rejected Mautic due to a bad experience with Joomla until his community core changed his mind. Michael ends the segment by flipping the microphone to interview Harry about his own motivation.2:39–4:41 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Michael Skok's Background and Founding Underscore VC Harry asks a open welcoming question about Michael's background and the founding of Underscore VC. Michael explains his transition from entrepreneur to VC and how a listening tour led to founding the firm.4:41–9:09 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Disrupting the VC Model & Building Community Alignment Harry probes Michael's definition of founder alignment by citing Founder Collective's contrasting policy of not following on past seed. Michael praises FC but argues the 40-year-old traditional VC model is ripe for disruption and details Underscore's community carry platform.9:09–13:49 · Guest disagreement 1/10 LP Strategy, Selection, and Long-Term Fund Raising Harry asks whether LPs can provide strategic value to portfolio companies. Michael categorizes their LP base into co-investors, cause-based supporters, and passive capital, emphasizing the need for patient long-term capital.13:49–16:41 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Early Stage Investment Focus and Vector Funding Harry asks about portfolio construction and early-stage strategy. Michael introduces vector funding, explaining how committing $5M upfront from Seed through Series A allowed Mautic to scale rapidly without fundraising friction.16:41–19:12 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Funding Milestones and the Minimum Viable Segment Harry references Jeff Clavier's standard 24-36 month runway benchmark. Michael agrees and builds on this by explaining milestone-driven funding vectors and introducing his proprietary Minimum Viable Segment framework.19:12–21:32 · Guest disagreement 0/10 Assessing Market Creation with the BLACK Framework Harry asks how VCs evaluate market creation in undefined spaces. Michael delivers a mini-lecture explaining his BLACK framework (Blatant, Latent, Aspirational, Critical).21:35–25:20 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Rethinking Valuation and Ownership When Harry asks about managing valuation in hyper-competitive deals, Michael forcefully rejects the question's premise, declaring valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' at early stage. He advocates for open-source investing and blowing up the traditional VC black box.25:20–29:38 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Quick-Fire Round & Mautic Case Study Harry conducts a quick-fire round where Michael reveals he initially rejected Mautic due to a bad experience with Joomla until his community core changed his mind. Michael ends the segment by flipping the microphone to interview Harry about his own motivation.2:39–4:41 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Michael Skok's Background and Founding Underscore VC Harry asks a open welcoming question about Michael's background and the founding of Underscore VC. Michael explains his transition from entrepreneur to VC and how a listening tour led to founding the firm.4:41–9:09 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Disrupting the VC Model & Building Community Alignment Harry probes Michael's definition of founder alignment by citing Founder Collective's contrasting policy of not following on past seed. Michael praises FC but argues the 40-year-old traditional VC model is ripe for disruption and details Underscore's community carry platform.9:09–13:49 · Harry pushing back 2/10 LP Strategy, Selection, and Long-Term Fund Raising Harry asks whether LPs can provide strategic value to portfolio companies. Michael categorizes their LP base into co-investors, cause-based supporters, and passive capital, emphasizing the need for patient long-term capital.13:49–16:41 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Early Stage Investment Focus and Vector Funding Harry asks about portfolio construction and early-stage strategy. Michael introduces vector funding, explaining how committing $5M upfront from Seed through Series A allowed Mautic to scale rapidly without fundraising friction.16:41–19:12 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Funding Milestones and the Minimum Viable Segment Harry references Jeff Clavier's standard 24-36 month runway benchmark. Michael agrees and builds on this by explaining milestone-driven funding vectors and introducing his proprietary Minimum Viable Segment framework.19:12–21:32 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Assessing Market Creation with the BLACK Framework Harry asks how VCs evaluate market creation in undefined spaces. Michael delivers a mini-lecture explaining his BLACK framework (Blatant, Latent, Aspirational, Critical).21:35–25:20 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Rethinking Valuation and Ownership When Harry asks about managing valuation in hyper-competitive deals, Michael forcefully rejects the question's premise, declaring valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' at early stage. He advocates for open-source investing and blowing up the traditional VC black box.25:20–29:38 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Quick-Fire Round & Mautic Case Study Harry conducts a quick-fire round where Michael reveals he initially rejected Mautic due to a bad experience with Joomla until his community core changed his mind. Michael ends the segment by flipping the microphone to interview Harry about his own motivation.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 90.1% · guest 9.9%0:00 · Harry 90.1% · guest 9.9%3:00 · Harry 15.4% · guest 84.6%3:00 · Harry 15.4% · guest 84.6%6:00 · Harry 4.7% · guest 95.3%6:00 · Harry 4.7% · guest 95.3%9:00 · Harry 22.8% · guest 77.2%9:00 · Harry 22.8% · guest 77.2%12:00 · Harry 10.1% · guest 89.9%12:00 · Harry 10.1% · guest 89.9%15:00 · Harry 12.8% · guest 87.2%15:00 · Harry 12.8% · guest 87.2%18:00 · Harry 14.2% · guest 85.8%18:00 · Harry 14.2% · guest 85.8%21:00 · Harry 25.5% · guest 74.5%21:00 · Harry 25.5% · guest 74.5%24:00 · Harry 10.4% · guest 89.6%24:00 · Harry 10.4% · guest 89.6%27:00 · Harry 8.2% · guest 91.8%27:00 · Harry 8.2% · guest 91.8%30:00 · Harry 93.6% · guest 6.4%30:00 · Harry 93.6% · guest 6.4%33:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%33:00 · Harry 100% · guest 0%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 21:52 Valuation is a Stupid Concept

Michael directly rejects the premise of Harry's question about valuation competition by calling valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' when assessing early-stage founders.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 4:41 Founder Collective Counter-Example

Harry pushes back on Michael's claim of founder alignment by explicitly citing Founder Collective's model of never following on as a competing benchmark for true alignment.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 18:00 Minimum Viable Segment (MVS)

Michael educates Harry on product-market fit progression by introducing his proprietary 'Minimum Viable Segment' concept that sits between MVP and broader market traction.

Harry holds his own ▶ 16:41 Citing Jeff Clavier on Runway

Harry displays sharp domain knowledge by citing investor Jeff Clavier's specific preference for 24-36 months of runway when questioning Michael on portfolio cash planning.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Michael Skok's Background and Founding Underscore VC 1200 Harry asks a open welcoming question about Michael's background and the founding of Underscore VC. Michael explains his transition from entrepreneur to VC and how a listening tour led to founding the firm.
Disrupting the VC Model & Building Community Alignment 5424 Harry probes Michael's definition of founder alignment by citing Founder Collective's contrasting policy of not following on past seed. Michael praises FC but argues the 40-year-old traditional VC model is ripe for disruption and details Underscore's community carry platform.
LP Strategy, Selection, and Long-Term Fund Raising 3412 Harry asks whether LPs can provide strategic value to portfolio companies. Michael categorizes their LP base into co-investors, cause-based supporters, and passive capital, emphasizing the need for patient long-term capital.
Early Stage Investment Focus and Vector Funding 2401 Harry asks about portfolio construction and early-stage strategy. Michael introduces vector funding, explaining how committing $5M upfront from Seed through Series A allowed Mautic to scale rapidly without fundraising friction.
Funding Milestones and the Minimum Viable Segment 4512 Harry references Jeff Clavier's standard 24-36 month runway benchmark. Michael agrees and builds on this by explaining milestone-driven funding vectors and introducing his proprietary Minimum Viable Segment framework.
Assessing Market Creation with the BLACK Framework 2500 Harry asks how VCs evaluate market creation in undefined spaces. Michael delivers a mini-lecture explaining his BLACK framework (Blatant, Latent, Aspirational, Critical).
Rethinking Valuation and Ownership 3652 When Harry asks about managing valuation in hyper-competitive deals, Michael forcefully rejects the question's premise, declaring valuation a 'stunningly stupid concept' at early stage. He advocates for open-source investing and blowing up the traditional VC black box.
Quick-Fire Round & Mautic Case Study 2321 Harry conducts a quick-fire round where Michael reveals he initially rejected Mautic due to a bad experience with Joomla until his community core changed his mind. Michael ends the segment by flipping the microphone to interview Harry about his own motivation.

Statements from this episode (17)

Insight
Skok: Venture capital is a commodity while founder time is priceless
“Capital is clearly a commodity and entrepreneurs lives clearly aren't.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 3:30
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Skok: Venture capital suffers from poor alignment between founders, VCs, and LPs
“There isn't good alignment, whether people like it or not, between the entrepreneur, their VC, and the VC, and their GPs, and sorry, and their LPs in many instances.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 4:27
Disclosure
Underscore VC shares carried interest with community advisors
“First of all, we're going to take a chunk of our carry, and we're going to make it accessible to what we call our community, which is the cause.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 7:16
Assertion Supported
Underscore VC's inaugural fund is backed by a $40B+ LP base
“The fund has been oversubscribed very quickly. We were able to select the VC, sorry, the LPs who really understood the model and wanted to get behind it. I'm happy to tell you that, you know, that's well over forty billion dollars worth of capital in the found…”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 9:52
Assertion Not publicly verifiable
Skok: Underscore VC founders committed 5x traditional GP capital
“I mean, we put five times as much capital in individually as the founders here than would traditionally be the case.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 10:46
Assertion Supported
Michael Skok: Demandware raised $70M before going public
“I've invested in companies like Demandware, for example, which probably took about seventy million dollars worth of capital before we got it public.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 11:54
Insight
Skok: Emerging VCs should target endowments over individual investors
“It's very important to look at this as a business that is At least a decade long fund at a time, and you never really know the results of your fund's performance for some number of years. So you need to get investors who are very patient, and you have the you …”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 13:06
Disclosure
Underscore VC commits $5M Series A checks alongside initial seed funding
“We'll give you a seed check to get the initial team together, but we'll also do something we've called vector funding, which is right. Very clear basis for them, for the entrepreneur to go from seed all the way through to series a and commit to that series a, …”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 15:53
Assertion Contradicted
Mautic Acquired Over 50,000 Customers in First Year
“And for him, what that's meant is in his first year, he's gone from zero customers to well over 50,000 customers”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 16:20
Insight
Startups should target a Minimum Viable Segment before broader market fit
“MVP is great, but I'll tell you the next big milestone that most people miss is in product market fit. They say, Oh, well, you're going to go prove that that product's being accepted by the market. Yes. But the market's huge if you're going up to something sig…”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 18:01
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Skok: Infrastructure startups take up to 3 years to reach MVS
“In some cases, I've seen it, for example, when you get into infrastructure products, you know, this is things like, for example, data warehousing as a service, companies like Casino that are doing that. That could take three years, because you're knocking down…”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 18:34
Insight
Skok: Category-creating startups begin by addressing latent, unrecognized customer needs
“In many instances, if you're creating something, you're going to start at a latent aspirational level. You really won't have customers begging for what you're doing because you're creating it. They don't know they have that need.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 20:50
Opinion
Michael Skok: Early-stage startup valuation is a stunningly stupid concept
“Well, first of all, valuation is just a stunningly stupid concept. Who on earth can value a person? I can't. And at the stage that we're working at, we're valuing people.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 21:54
Disclosure
Underscore VC runs diligence and deal flow transparently in the cloud
“In fact, our core members, when they're investing with us, get to watch us and participate in a whole cloud based investing program, because the way in which we do our investments is, you know, we eat our own cooking here. So everything is in the cloud because…”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 24:12
Insight
Skok: Blogging helps founders organize thoughts and attract relevant support
“I do encourage entrepreneurs to blog because I think rather than reading other people's blogging for yourself is actually, first of all, great therapy, and secondly, it brings people to understand how they might help you.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 27:31
Disclosure
Skok: 11 Underscore community members co-invested in Mautic alongside the firm
“11 of them wrote personal checks alongside us, which made it very easy for us to, you know, write our check and commit to the thing.”
Michael Skok Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 29:10
Disclosure
Harry Stebbings originally launched 20VC to secure a post-law school job
“I actually started always with the intention of getting a job at the end of law school. And then the show kind of slightly accelerated my leaving of law school.”
Harry Stebbings Sep 21, 2016 ▶ 30:42
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.