Sep 12, 2022 · 1h 8m · news
Will Quist: Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Really “Venture Capital” | 20VC #924 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this episode of 20VC, Harry Stebbings interviews Will Quist of Slow Ventures, exploring why the vast majority of modern venture capital is actually growth equity, how to apply rigorous non-consensus frameworks to early-stage investing, and key strategies for fund design.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 23.1% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Will directly dismisses Harry's premise that backward-looking spend checks kill market-creation investments, telling him 'No, you don't have to say no'.
Hardest push from Harry ▶ 26:41 Harry refuses Will's focus on product value propositionHarry forcefully interrupts Will's assertion that product value prop is all that matters, arguing that macro devaluations and political shifts destroy businesses regardless of product strength.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 20:05 Will re-educates Harry on underwriting frameworksWill corrects Harry's misunderstanding regarding market creation, demonstrating that asking backward-looking TAM questions yields an input data point to calculate a valuation discount rather than a deal refusal.
Harry holds his own ▶ 14:31 Harry demonstrates deep knowledge of multi-stage behaviorHarry uses concrete deal terms and firm behaviors to challenge Will's thesis, arguing multi-stage funds do not fear conflicts or seed losses because twenty million dollar seed checks are rounding errors.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Harry as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Harry pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening Title Sequence | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Harry welcomes Will and asks friendly introductory questions about his journey from water polo to venture capital. Will recounts his background and jokes that Harry isn't nerdy enough to remember Red Herring magazine. | |
| Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Venture Capital | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | Harry brings up Will's provocative claim that 95 percent of VC isn't venture capital, bringing up real-world valuation drops like Bird and Casper. Will frames the distinction between Venture Classic and New Venture. | |
| The Non-Consensus Strategy: Going One Click Out | 6 | 4 | 3 | 7 | Harry aggressively pushes back on Will's theory that multi-stage funds care about seed conflicts or losses, pointing out that they view seed checks as minor option bets. Will explains his concept of going one click out from consensus. | |
| The Five Levers of Enterprise Value and Four States of Answers | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | When Will outlines his TAM evaluation questions, Harry interrupts to argue that looking backward excludes market creation. Will quickly corrects him, explaining that a zero spend response acts as an enterprise value discount rather than an automatic pass. | |
| Underwriting Risk and the Reality of Market vs. Founder | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | Harry shares a personal investment failure to argue that market conditions trump founder quality, but Will claims product value prop is paramount. Harry forcefully interjects that macro and political black swans can invalidate even the best value props. | |
| Fund Mechanics: Portfolio Management, Secondaries, and Firm Design | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 | The pair engage in a peer-level peer discussion on LP incentive structures, secondary sales dynamics, and reserve strategies. Will offers mental models like special forces versus infantry and elk hunting to illustrate firm operations. | |
| Quick-Fire Round: Underrated Angels, Branding, and Medicare | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Harry leads a rapid-fire sequence touching on books, underrated angels, Tiger Global, startup branding, and Will's recent investment in Fair Square Medicare. |