Sep 12, 2022 · 1h 8m · news

Will Quist: Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Really “Venture Capital” | 20VC #924 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Will Quist · 45m spoken Harry Stebbings · 13m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of 20VC, Harry Stebbings interviews Will Quist of Slow Ventures, exploring why the vast majority of modern venture capital is actually growth equity, how to apply rigorous non-consensus frameworks to early-stage investing, and key strategies for fund design.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 23.1% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 4.6 Guest teaching 4.0 Guest disagreement 2.6 Harry pushing back 4.1
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:00:000:00–6:36 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 Opening Title Sequence Harry welcomes Will and asks friendly introductory questions about his journey from water polo to venture capital. Will recounts his background and jokes that Harry isn't nerdy enough to remember Red Herring magazine.6:36–12:51 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Venture Capital Harry brings up Will's provocative claim that 95 percent of VC isn't venture capital, bringing up real-world valuation drops like Bird and Casper. Will frames the distinction between Venture Classic and New Venture.12:51–18:35 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Non-Consensus Strategy: Going One Click Out Harry aggressively pushes back on Will's theory that multi-stage funds care about seed conflicts or losses, pointing out that they view seed checks as minor option bets. Will explains his concept of going one click out from consensus.18:35–22:53 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Five Levers of Enterprise Value and Four States of Answers When Will outlines his TAM evaluation questions, Harry interrupts to argue that looking backward excludes market creation. Will quickly corrects him, explaining that a zero spend response acts as an enterprise value discount rather than an automatic pass.22:53–33:15 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Underwriting Risk and the Reality of Market vs. Founder Harry shares a personal investment failure to argue that market conditions trump founder quality, but Will claims product value prop is paramount. Harry forcefully interjects that macro and political black swans can invalidate even the best value props.33:15–1:00:14 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Fund Mechanics: Portfolio Management, Secondaries, and Firm Design The pair engage in a peer-level peer discussion on LP incentive structures, secondary sales dynamics, and reserve strategies. Will offers mental models like special forces versus infantry and elk hunting to illustrate firm operations.1:00:14–1:06:58 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Quick-Fire Round: Underrated Angels, Branding, and Medicare Harry leads a rapid-fire sequence touching on books, underrated angels, Tiger Global, startup branding, and Will's recent investment in Fair Square Medicare.0:00–6:36 · Guest teaching 1/10 Opening Title Sequence Harry welcomes Will and asks friendly introductory questions about his journey from water polo to venture capital. Will recounts his background and jokes that Harry isn't nerdy enough to remember Red Herring magazine.6:36–12:51 · Guest teaching 4/10 Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Venture Capital Harry brings up Will's provocative claim that 95 percent of VC isn't venture capital, bringing up real-world valuation drops like Bird and Casper. Will frames the distinction between Venture Classic and New Venture.12:51–18:35 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Non-Consensus Strategy: Going One Click Out Harry aggressively pushes back on Will's theory that multi-stage funds care about seed conflicts or losses, pointing out that they view seed checks as minor option bets. Will explains his concept of going one click out from consensus.18:35–22:53 · Guest teaching 6/10 The Five Levers of Enterprise Value and Four States of Answers When Will outlines his TAM evaluation questions, Harry interrupts to argue that looking backward excludes market creation. Will quickly corrects him, explaining that a zero spend response acts as an enterprise value discount rather than an automatic pass.22:53–33:15 · Guest teaching 5/10 Underwriting Risk and the Reality of Market vs. Founder Harry shares a personal investment failure to argue that market conditions trump founder quality, but Will claims product value prop is paramount. Harry forcefully interjects that macro and political black swans can invalidate even the best value props.33:15–1:00:14 · Guest teaching 5/10 Fund Mechanics: Portfolio Management, Secondaries, and Firm Design The pair engage in a peer-level peer discussion on LP incentive structures, secondary sales dynamics, and reserve strategies. Will offers mental models like special forces versus infantry and elk hunting to illustrate firm operations.1:00:14–1:06:58 · Guest teaching 3/10 Quick-Fire Round: Underrated Angels, Branding, and Medicare Harry leads a rapid-fire sequence touching on books, underrated angels, Tiger Global, startup branding, and Will's recent investment in Fair Square Medicare.0:00–6:36 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Opening Title Sequence Harry welcomes Will and asks friendly introductory questions about his journey from water polo to venture capital. Will recounts his background and jokes that Harry isn't nerdy enough to remember Red Herring magazine.6:36–12:51 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Venture Capital Harry brings up Will's provocative claim that 95 percent of VC isn't venture capital, bringing up real-world valuation drops like Bird and Casper. Will frames the distinction between Venture Classic and New Venture.12:51–18:35 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Non-Consensus Strategy: Going One Click Out Harry aggressively pushes back on Will's theory that multi-stage funds care about seed conflicts or losses, pointing out that they view seed checks as minor option bets. Will explains his concept of going one click out from consensus.18:35–22:53 · Guest disagreement 4/10 The Five Levers of Enterprise Value and Four States of Answers When Will outlines his TAM evaluation questions, Harry interrupts to argue that looking backward excludes market creation. Will quickly corrects him, explaining that a zero spend response acts as an enterprise value discount rather than an automatic pass.22:53–33:15 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Underwriting Risk and the Reality of Market vs. Founder Harry shares a personal investment failure to argue that market conditions trump founder quality, but Will claims product value prop is paramount. Harry forcefully interjects that macro and political black swans can invalidate even the best value props.33:15–1:00:14 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Fund Mechanics: Portfolio Management, Secondaries, and Firm Design The pair engage in a peer-level peer discussion on LP incentive structures, secondary sales dynamics, and reserve strategies. Will offers mental models like special forces versus infantry and elk hunting to illustrate firm operations.1:00:14–1:06:58 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Quick-Fire Round: Underrated Angels, Branding, and Medicare Harry leads a rapid-fire sequence touching on books, underrated angels, Tiger Global, startup branding, and Will's recent investment in Fair Square Medicare.0:00–6:36 · Harry pushing back 0/10 Opening Title Sequence Harry welcomes Will and asks friendly introductory questions about his journey from water polo to venture capital. Will recounts his background and jokes that Harry isn't nerdy enough to remember Red Herring magazine.6:36–12:51 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Venture Capital Harry brings up Will's provocative claim that 95 percent of VC isn't venture capital, bringing up real-world valuation drops like Bird and Casper. Will frames the distinction between Venture Classic and New Venture.12:51–18:35 · Harry pushing back 7/10 The Non-Consensus Strategy: Going One Click Out Harry aggressively pushes back on Will's theory that multi-stage funds care about seed conflicts or losses, pointing out that they view seed checks as minor option bets. Will explains his concept of going one click out from consensus.18:35–22:53 · Harry pushing back 6/10 The Five Levers of Enterprise Value and Four States of Answers When Will outlines his TAM evaluation questions, Harry interrupts to argue that looking backward excludes market creation. Will quickly corrects him, explaining that a zero spend response acts as an enterprise value discount rather than an automatic pass.22:53–33:15 · Harry pushing back 7/10 Underwriting Risk and the Reality of Market vs. Founder Harry shares a personal investment failure to argue that market conditions trump founder quality, but Will claims product value prop is paramount. Harry forcefully interjects that macro and political black swans can invalidate even the best value props.33:15–1:00:14 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Fund Mechanics: Portfolio Management, Secondaries, and Firm Design The pair engage in a peer-level peer discussion on LP incentive structures, secondary sales dynamics, and reserve strategies. Will offers mental models like special forces versus infantry and elk hunting to illustrate firm operations.1:00:14–1:06:58 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Quick-Fire Round: Underrated Angels, Branding, and Medicare Harry leads a rapid-fire sequence touching on books, underrated angels, Tiger Global, startup branding, and Will's recent investment in Fair Square Medicare.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 19.4% · guest 80.6%0:00 · Harry 19.4% · guest 80.6%3:00 · Harry 1.6% · guest 98.4%3:00 · Harry 1.6% · guest 98.4%6:00 · Harry 24.6% · guest 75.4%6:00 · Harry 24.6% · guest 75.4%9:00 · Harry 21.2% · guest 78.8%9:00 · Harry 21.2% · guest 78.8%12:00 · Harry 37.7% · guest 62.3%12:00 · Harry 37.7% · guest 62.3%15:00 · Harry 25.4% · guest 74.6%15:00 · Harry 25.4% · guest 74.6%18:00 · Harry 11.1% · guest 88.9%18:00 · Harry 11.1% · guest 88.9%21:00 · Harry 24.9% · guest 75.1%21:00 · Harry 24.9% · guest 75.1%24:00 · Harry 43.4% · guest 56.6%24:00 · Harry 43.4% · guest 56.6%27:00 · Harry 13.9% · guest 86.1%27:00 · Harry 13.9% · guest 86.1%30:00 · Harry 40.6% · guest 59.4%30:00 · Harry 40.6% · guest 59.4%33:00 · Harry 21.5% · guest 78.5%33:00 · Harry 21.5% · guest 78.5%36:00 · Harry 34.6% · guest 65.4%36:00 · Harry 34.6% · guest 65.4%39:00 · Harry 26.3% · guest 73.7%39:00 · Harry 26.3% · guest 73.7%42:00 · Harry 25.5% · guest 74.5%42:00 · Harry 25.5% · guest 74.5%45:00 · Harry 34.5% · guest 65.5%45:00 · Harry 34.5% · guest 65.5%48:00 · Harry 24.8% · guest 75.2%48:00 · Harry 24.8% · guest 75.2%51:00 · Harry 26.3% · guest 73.7%51:00 · Harry 26.3% · guest 73.7%54:00 · Harry 19.8% · guest 80.2%54:00 · Harry 19.8% · guest 80.2%57:00 · Harry 11.2% · guest 88.8%57:00 · Harry 11.2% · guest 88.8%1:00:00 · Harry 11.3% · guest 88.7%1:00:00 · Harry 11.3% · guest 88.7%1:03:00 · Harry 9.1% · guest 90.9%1:03:00 · Harry 9.1% · guest 90.9%1:06:00 · Harry 22.3% · guest 77.7%1:06:00 · Harry 22.3% · guest 77.7%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 20:09 Will rejects Harry's market creation argument

Will directly dismisses Harry's premise that backward-looking spend checks kill market-creation investments, telling him 'No, you don't have to say no'.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 26:41 Harry refuses Will's focus on product value proposition

Harry forcefully interrupts Will's assertion that product value prop is all that matters, arguing that macro devaluations and political shifts destroy businesses regardless of product strength.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 20:05 Will re-educates Harry on underwriting frameworks

Will corrects Harry's misunderstanding regarding market creation, demonstrating that asking backward-looking TAM questions yields an input data point to calculate a valuation discount rather than a deal refusal.

Harry holds his own ▶ 14:31 Harry demonstrates deep knowledge of multi-stage behavior

Harry uses concrete deal terms and firm behaviors to challenge Will's thesis, arguing multi-stage funds do not fear conflicts or seed losses because twenty million dollar seed checks are rounding errors.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
Opening Title Sequence 1110 Harry welcomes Will and asks friendly introductory questions about his journey from water polo to venture capital. Will recounts his background and jokes that Harry isn't nerdy enough to remember Red Herring magazine.
Why 95% of Venture Capital is Not Venture Capital 5423 Harry brings up Will's provocative claim that 95 percent of VC isn't venture capital, bringing up real-world valuation drops like Bird and Casper. Will frames the distinction between Venture Classic and New Venture.
The Non-Consensus Strategy: Going One Click Out 6437 Harry aggressively pushes back on Will's theory that multi-stage funds care about seed conflicts or losses, pointing out that they view seed checks as minor option bets. Will explains his concept of going one click out from consensus.
The Five Levers of Enterprise Value and Four States of Answers 5646 When Will outlines his TAM evaluation questions, Harry interrupts to argue that looking backward excludes market creation. Will quickly corrects him, explaining that a zero spend response acts as an enterprise value discount rather than an automatic pass.
Underwriting Risk and the Reality of Market vs. Founder 6557 Harry shares a personal investment failure to argue that market conditions trump founder quality, but Will claims product value prop is paramount. Harry forcefully interjects that macro and political black swans can invalidate even the best value props.
Fund Mechanics: Portfolio Management, Secondaries, and Firm Design 6524 The pair engage in a peer-level peer discussion on LP incentive structures, secondary sales dynamics, and reserve strategies. Will offers mental models like special forces versus infantry and elk hunting to illustrate firm operations.
Quick-Fire Round: Underrated Angels, Branding, and Medicare 3312 Harry leads a rapid-fire sequence touching on books, underrated angels, Tiger Global, startup branding, and Will's recent investment in Fair Square Medicare.

Statements from this episode (17)

Insight
Quist: Venture capital exists to fund testable high-upside experiments
“I fundamentally believe the point of venture capital, right, is to allow a founder to run an experiment against a hypothesis that is knowable, testable, right? Where a true answer dramatically changes the enterprise value of the company.”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 7:12
Opinion
Quist: Only 5% of venture capital funds classic early-stage venture bets
“Five percent of the industry or the capital of the industry, I think is really seeking out classic venture bets and the rest of it is piling on into growth”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 8:53
Insight
Quist: Venture capital follows the evolutionary path of private equity
“When I look at whether it's investment banking, mutual funds, hedge funds, private equity, and now venture, they've all followed a very similar curve where early on in the assets class lifestyle or business model lifestyle, it's really subscale and it's volati…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 11:34
Opinion
Stebbings: Sequoia is the only major multi-stage VC honoring portfolio conflicts
“I think the only big multistage fund that does care and honor it really well is Sequoia.”
Harry Stebbings Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 14:39
Disclosure
Quist: Slow Ventures avoids consensus seed deals to back non-consensus ideas
“I think we would say we concede the consensus game at the earliest stages. We think our job is to go a click out further on a belief system than in other people.”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 16:48
Insight
Quist: Effective TAM analysis focuses on past spending on inefficient solutions
“I think a lot of TAM analyses, like, starts off on the wrong foot. I like to ask, and I think the question you want to have about marketizing is, most products are built to solve a problem. Most problems are solved, but inefficiently. And so the question I hav…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 19:23
Insight
Quist: All competitive startup moats eventually erode over time
“I think as soon as you begin talking about a product, there's only a few ways people have ever created defensibility. And I know it all erodes. There's no sure thing modes, but there are higher walls than others, right? Around network effects, intellectual pro…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 20:42
Insight
Stebbings: Market dynamics matter more than founder quality in startup success
“I lost money recently because I invested in a company And the founder was world class. Fantastic founder. But in a market that, hell or high water, you could not make money, and then the business was no longer able to exist. And I learned, actually, market win…”
Harry Stebbings Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 25:25
Insight
Quist: Underwriting startups with multiple novel theories is exponentially riskier
“Being novel, having a novel theory and being correct, having one of them in your life is a low odds proposition. There just aren't that many. Having two isn't linear risk or the odds of being right on two vectors is exponentially lower. And I think that there'…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 29:25
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Quist: Mid-sized VC funds will struggle to find alpha by 2027
“I think the pie gets bigger. But unfortunately it subsists less people. Goldman and Morgan are much more profitable than a lot of other investment banks. And so I think you'll see firms that have picked a quadrant and set up their organization and strategy wor…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 34:25
Disclosure
Quist: Industry Ventures returned 10-12x on LiveRamp's Series B acquisition
“There's a company called LiveRamp that Oren Hoffman founded, that I was lucky enough to lead the Series B. And this was at a time when ad tech related products were kind of written off, right? As hard to differentiate, hard to find novelty, hard to find defens…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 43:20
Disclosure
Quist: Slow Ventures passed on leading Deel's seed round over valuation
“We were negotiating to be the lead of the seed, and I literally were like this far apart and decided that was too far apart.”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 46:14
What-if
Stebbings: Regrets not selling secondary stakes in startup investments in 2021
“Last year I had a chance to get out on a load of different options, well, you know, investments and I didn't. I always believed the hold on to your winners, hold on to your winners. I should have sold.”
Harry Stebbings Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 50:03
Insight
Quist: Accumulating top companies beats holding a diversified venture portfolio
“You're almost always better off accumulating stock in those companies over the first eight years of their life than you are in any diversified venture portfolio.”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 54:42
Disclosure
Quist: Slow Ventures will not pursue a multi-stage fund strategy
“I think the amount of human capital and what it means on a daily basis to be a competitive multi-stage firm is not what we do. It's not our strength. It's not our DNA.”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 58:53
Opinion
Quist: Every venture capitalist should read Michael Mauboussin's The Success Equation
“Professionally, it's the success equation by Mike Mabusian. No, no, no, no full stop. Everyone in venture should read it. It's, it changed how I operate day to day.”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 1:00:24
Prediction Held up
Quist: Tiger Global will retrench and deploy less private capital annually
“I think they retrench probably at slightly smaller scale on the private side, the public book. I don't know. There aren't a lot of firm, not a lot of public books that have recovered from being down that far. But they're kind of an unprecedented institution in…”
Will Quist Sep 12, 2022 ▶ 1:01:23

Shorts cut from this episode

▶ How Venture Capital is like Elk Hunting 🦌🎯 #shorts · 20VC (@38:35) ▶ Why is 95% of venture capital NOT venture capital? #shorts · (@6:56) ▶ What the F*** is Venture Capital #shorts · 20VC with Harry S (@7:11)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.