Nov 14, 2022 · 58m · news

Cathie Wood: Elon & Twitter; Why Facebook is a Value Stock Now; ARK's Performance | 20VC #949 · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Cathie Wood · 45m spoken Harry Stebbings · 7m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this interview, Cathie Wood, Founder, CEO, and CIO of ARK Invest, discusses her investment philosophy, her strong critique of passive index investing, and how ARK manages risk and maintains high conviction during severe market drawdowns. She also details the launch and operational structure of the ARK Venture Fund, explaining how she aims to democratize venture capital for everyday retail investors through a collaborative, transparent research-driven model.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 13.9% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 4.7 Guest teaching 4.7 Guest disagreement 2.5 Harry pushing back 4.9
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:32–3:43 · Harry as informed peer 1/10 The Danger of Passive Index Investing Harry asks a broad personal backstory question, allowing Cathie to monologue on her critique of benchmark-based passive investing. Host pushback is zero as this is largely a guest exposition segment.3:43–7:22 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Lessons from Tupelo Capital Management Harry brings up researched details on Cathie's former firm Tupelo, but Cathie directly corrects his premise about her timeline and AUM decline. She explicitly states she takes full responsibility for 2000 but not for subsequent asset declines after her exit.7:22–10:35 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Navigating the Venture Capital Cycle and Crossover Investing Harry questions launching a VC product in a saturated market where capital is chasing too few deals. Cathie reframes the setup by contrasting public drawdown severity with private down rounds.10:35–12:50 · Harry as informed peer 3/10 Maintaining Conviction in Down Markets and Portfolio Concentration Harry confronts Cathie with a direct, personal question asking if she ever doubts herself when her fund's stocks drop 80 to 90 percent. Cathie explains her data-driven research model and portfolio concentration approach.12:50–15:04 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Solvency Risks and High-Conviction Plays: Tesla and Invitae Harry presses Cathie with the classic market axiom regarding whether markets can remain irrational longer than companies remain solvent. Cathie points to historical examples like Tesla in 2019 to defend liquidity options.15:04–18:08 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Sell Discipline and the Nvidia Example Harry asks how ARK manages sell discipline when public growth strategies often encourage endless holding. Cathie details ARK's 15% hurdle rate return threshold and gives Nvidia as a specific historical sell example.18:08–20:33 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Large-Cap Tech, Passive Investing, and Bear Market Ends Harry asks a structural market question about how much large-cap tech performance is driven by passive index flows. Cathie agrees and details how ARK differentiated its strategy away from FAANG stocks.20:33–23:47 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Addressing Criticisms of Risk Management and Volatility Harry directly raises public criticism, asking why people suggest ARK has zero risk management. Cathie pushes back forcefully, asserting that risk allocation rests with external asset allocators rather than thematic fund managers.23:47–26:28 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Asset Retention and Why ARK Hasn't Seen Massive Outflows Harry pushes on why ARK hasn't suffered massive capital outflows despite severe performance drawdowns. Cathie credits their open-source research and direct retail communication model for asset retention.26:28–28:31 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 The Transparency Strategy: Playing Poker with Cards Face Up Harry cites a journalistic critique comparing ARK's public research model to playing poker with cards turned up. Cathie responds by arguing that proprietary information is an outdated concept in the modern era.28:31–33:03 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Democratizing Venture Capital for Retail Investors Harry challenges Cathie's retail VC initiative, calling the management of 50,000 small retail LPs a fundamental nightmare. Cathie explains the operational setup using interval fund structures and Titan's platform.33:03–38:59 · Harry as informed peer 7/10 Zero Carry Fee Structure and Talent Alignment Harry actively interrupts Cathie to reject the premise that a 0% carry fee structure can attract top venture talent. Cathie defends the model by citing internal parent-level equity distribution across unified analyst teams.38:59–43:57 · Harry as informed peer 8/10 Winning Allocation and Deal Access as a Crossover Fund Harry demonstrates high expertise by naming top VC partners and specific deal dynamics to ask if ARK can win competitive allocations. Cathie argues that their research brand opens doors directly with founders.43:57–46:52 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Capital Planning and Scaling the Innovation Market Harry asks a technical fund construction question on how capital planning works in an open-ended evergreen fund structure. Cathie explains their flexible deployment strategy across secondaries and convertibles.46:52–58:23 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Underwriting Risk and Long-Term Time Horizons Harry asks about underwriting risk before steering into a fast-paced quick-fire round covering Meta, Twitter, and investment horizons. The dynamic is polite and conversational.1:32–3:43 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Danger of Passive Index Investing Harry asks a broad personal backstory question, allowing Cathie to monologue on her critique of benchmark-based passive investing. Host pushback is zero as this is largely a guest exposition segment.3:43–7:22 · Guest teaching 7/10 Lessons from Tupelo Capital Management Harry brings up researched details on Cathie's former firm Tupelo, but Cathie directly corrects his premise about her timeline and AUM decline. She explicitly states she takes full responsibility for 2000 but not for subsequent asset declines after her exit.7:22–10:35 · Guest teaching 5/10 Navigating the Venture Capital Cycle and Crossover Investing Harry questions launching a VC product in a saturated market where capital is chasing too few deals. Cathie reframes the setup by contrasting public drawdown severity with private down rounds.10:35–12:50 · Guest teaching 4/10 Maintaining Conviction in Down Markets and Portfolio Concentration Harry confronts Cathie with a direct, personal question asking if she ever doubts herself when her fund's stocks drop 80 to 90 percent. Cathie explains her data-driven research model and portfolio concentration approach.12:50–15:04 · Guest teaching 4/10 Solvency Risks and High-Conviction Plays: Tesla and Invitae Harry presses Cathie with the classic market axiom regarding whether markets can remain irrational longer than companies remain solvent. Cathie points to historical examples like Tesla in 2019 to defend liquidity options.15:04–18:08 · Guest teaching 5/10 Sell Discipline and the Nvidia Example Harry asks how ARK manages sell discipline when public growth strategies often encourage endless holding. Cathie details ARK's 15% hurdle rate return threshold and gives Nvidia as a specific historical sell example.18:08–20:33 · Guest teaching 4/10 Large-Cap Tech, Passive Investing, and Bear Market Ends Harry asks a structural market question about how much large-cap tech performance is driven by passive index flows. Cathie agrees and details how ARK differentiated its strategy away from FAANG stocks.20:33–23:47 · Guest teaching 5/10 Addressing Criticisms of Risk Management and Volatility Harry directly raises public criticism, asking why people suggest ARK has zero risk management. Cathie pushes back forcefully, asserting that risk allocation rests with external asset allocators rather than thematic fund managers.23:47–26:28 · Guest teaching 5/10 Asset Retention and Why ARK Hasn't Seen Massive Outflows Harry pushes on why ARK hasn't suffered massive capital outflows despite severe performance drawdowns. Cathie credits their open-source research and direct retail communication model for asset retention.26:28–28:31 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Transparency Strategy: Playing Poker with Cards Face Up Harry cites a journalistic critique comparing ARK's public research model to playing poker with cards turned up. Cathie responds by arguing that proprietary information is an outdated concept in the modern era.28:31–33:03 · Guest teaching 5/10 Democratizing Venture Capital for Retail Investors Harry challenges Cathie's retail VC initiative, calling the management of 50,000 small retail LPs a fundamental nightmare. Cathie explains the operational setup using interval fund structures and Titan's platform.33:03–38:59 · Guest teaching 5/10 Zero Carry Fee Structure and Talent Alignment Harry actively interrupts Cathie to reject the premise that a 0% carry fee structure can attract top venture talent. Cathie defends the model by citing internal parent-level equity distribution across unified analyst teams.38:59–43:57 · Guest teaching 5/10 Winning Allocation and Deal Access as a Crossover Fund Harry demonstrates high expertise by naming top VC partners and specific deal dynamics to ask if ARK can win competitive allocations. Cathie argues that their research brand opens doors directly with founders.43:57–46:52 · Guest teaching 5/10 Capital Planning and Scaling the Innovation Market Harry asks a technical fund construction question on how capital planning works in an open-ended evergreen fund structure. Cathie explains their flexible deployment strategy across secondaries and convertibles.46:52–58:23 · Guest teaching 4/10 Underwriting Risk and Long-Term Time Horizons Harry asks about underwriting risk before steering into a fast-paced quick-fire round covering Meta, Twitter, and investment horizons. The dynamic is polite and conversational.1:32–3:43 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Danger of Passive Index Investing Harry asks a broad personal backstory question, allowing Cathie to monologue on her critique of benchmark-based passive investing. Host pushback is zero as this is largely a guest exposition segment.3:43–7:22 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Lessons from Tupelo Capital Management Harry brings up researched details on Cathie's former firm Tupelo, but Cathie directly corrects his premise about her timeline and AUM decline. She explicitly states she takes full responsibility for 2000 but not for subsequent asset declines after her exit.7:22–10:35 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Navigating the Venture Capital Cycle and Crossover Investing Harry questions launching a VC product in a saturated market where capital is chasing too few deals. Cathie reframes the setup by contrasting public drawdown severity with private down rounds.10:35–12:50 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Maintaining Conviction in Down Markets and Portfolio Concentration Harry confronts Cathie with a direct, personal question asking if she ever doubts herself when her fund's stocks drop 80 to 90 percent. Cathie explains her data-driven research model and portfolio concentration approach.12:50–15:04 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Solvency Risks and High-Conviction Plays: Tesla and Invitae Harry presses Cathie with the classic market axiom regarding whether markets can remain irrational longer than companies remain solvent. Cathie points to historical examples like Tesla in 2019 to defend liquidity options.15:04–18:08 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Sell Discipline and the Nvidia Example Harry asks how ARK manages sell discipline when public growth strategies often encourage endless holding. Cathie details ARK's 15% hurdle rate return threshold and gives Nvidia as a specific historical sell example.18:08–20:33 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Large-Cap Tech, Passive Investing, and Bear Market Ends Harry asks a structural market question about how much large-cap tech performance is driven by passive index flows. Cathie agrees and details how ARK differentiated its strategy away from FAANG stocks.20:33–23:47 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Addressing Criticisms of Risk Management and Volatility Harry directly raises public criticism, asking why people suggest ARK has zero risk management. Cathie pushes back forcefully, asserting that risk allocation rests with external asset allocators rather than thematic fund managers.23:47–26:28 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Asset Retention and Why ARK Hasn't Seen Massive Outflows Harry pushes on why ARK hasn't suffered massive capital outflows despite severe performance drawdowns. Cathie credits their open-source research and direct retail communication model for asset retention.26:28–28:31 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Transparency Strategy: Playing Poker with Cards Face Up Harry cites a journalistic critique comparing ARK's public research model to playing poker with cards turned up. Cathie responds by arguing that proprietary information is an outdated concept in the modern era.28:31–33:03 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Democratizing Venture Capital for Retail Investors Harry challenges Cathie's retail VC initiative, calling the management of 50,000 small retail LPs a fundamental nightmare. Cathie explains the operational setup using interval fund structures and Titan's platform.33:03–38:59 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Zero Carry Fee Structure and Talent Alignment Harry actively interrupts Cathie to reject the premise that a 0% carry fee structure can attract top venture talent. Cathie defends the model by citing internal parent-level equity distribution across unified analyst teams.38:59–43:57 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Winning Allocation and Deal Access as a Crossover Fund Harry demonstrates high expertise by naming top VC partners and specific deal dynamics to ask if ARK can win competitive allocations. Cathie argues that their research brand opens doors directly with founders.43:57–46:52 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Capital Planning and Scaling the Innovation Market Harry asks a technical fund construction question on how capital planning works in an open-ended evergreen fund structure. Cathie explains their flexible deployment strategy across secondaries and convertibles.46:52–58:23 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Underwriting Risk and Long-Term Time Horizons Harry asks about underwriting risk before steering into a fast-paced quick-fire round covering Meta, Twitter, and investment horizons. The dynamic is polite and conversational.1:32–3:43 · Harry pushing back 0/10 The Danger of Passive Index Investing Harry asks a broad personal backstory question, allowing Cathie to monologue on her critique of benchmark-based passive investing. Host pushback is zero as this is largely a guest exposition segment.3:43–7:22 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Lessons from Tupelo Capital Management Harry brings up researched details on Cathie's former firm Tupelo, but Cathie directly corrects his premise about her timeline and AUM decline. She explicitly states she takes full responsibility for 2000 but not for subsequent asset declines after her exit.7:22–10:35 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Navigating the Venture Capital Cycle and Crossover Investing Harry questions launching a VC product in a saturated market where capital is chasing too few deals. Cathie reframes the setup by contrasting public drawdown severity with private down rounds.10:35–12:50 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Maintaining Conviction in Down Markets and Portfolio Concentration Harry confronts Cathie with a direct, personal question asking if she ever doubts herself when her fund's stocks drop 80 to 90 percent. Cathie explains her data-driven research model and portfolio concentration approach.12:50–15:04 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Solvency Risks and High-Conviction Plays: Tesla and Invitae Harry presses Cathie with the classic market axiom regarding whether markets can remain irrational longer than companies remain solvent. Cathie points to historical examples like Tesla in 2019 to defend liquidity options.15:04–18:08 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Sell Discipline and the Nvidia Example Harry asks how ARK manages sell discipline when public growth strategies often encourage endless holding. Cathie details ARK's 15% hurdle rate return threshold and gives Nvidia as a specific historical sell example.18:08–20:33 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Large-Cap Tech, Passive Investing, and Bear Market Ends Harry asks a structural market question about how much large-cap tech performance is driven by passive index flows. Cathie agrees and details how ARK differentiated its strategy away from FAANG stocks.20:33–23:47 · Harry pushing back 7/10 Addressing Criticisms of Risk Management and Volatility Harry directly raises public criticism, asking why people suggest ARK has zero risk management. Cathie pushes back forcefully, asserting that risk allocation rests with external asset allocators rather than thematic fund managers.23:47–26:28 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Asset Retention and Why ARK Hasn't Seen Massive Outflows Harry pushes on why ARK hasn't suffered massive capital outflows despite severe performance drawdowns. Cathie credits their open-source research and direct retail communication model for asset retention.26:28–28:31 · Harry pushing back 5/10 The Transparency Strategy: Playing Poker with Cards Face Up Harry cites a journalistic critique comparing ARK's public research model to playing poker with cards turned up. Cathie responds by arguing that proprietary information is an outdated concept in the modern era.28:31–33:03 · Harry pushing back 7/10 Democratizing Venture Capital for Retail Investors Harry challenges Cathie's retail VC initiative, calling the management of 50,000 small retail LPs a fundamental nightmare. Cathie explains the operational setup using interval fund structures and Titan's platform.33:03–38:59 · Harry pushing back 8/10 Zero Carry Fee Structure and Talent Alignment Harry actively interrupts Cathie to reject the premise that a 0% carry fee structure can attract top venture talent. Cathie defends the model by citing internal parent-level equity distribution across unified analyst teams.38:59–43:57 · Harry pushing back 8/10 Winning Allocation and Deal Access as a Crossover Fund Harry demonstrates high expertise by naming top VC partners and specific deal dynamics to ask if ARK can win competitive allocations. Cathie argues that their research brand opens doors directly with founders.43:57–46:52 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Capital Planning and Scaling the Innovation Market Harry asks a technical fund construction question on how capital planning works in an open-ended evergreen fund structure. Cathie explains their flexible deployment strategy across secondaries and convertibles.46:52–58:23 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Underwriting Risk and Long-Term Time Horizons Harry asks about underwriting risk before steering into a fast-paced quick-fire round covering Meta, Twitter, and investment horizons. The dynamic is polite and conversational.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 21% · guest 79%0:00 · Harry 21% · guest 79%3:00 · Harry 14.4% · guest 85.6%3:00 · Harry 14.4% · guest 85.6%6:00 · Harry 11.9% · guest 88.1%6:00 · Harry 11.9% · guest 88.1%9:00 · Harry 13.1% · guest 86.9%9:00 · Harry 13.1% · guest 86.9%12:00 · Harry 7.5% · guest 92.5%12:00 · Harry 7.5% · guest 92.5%15:00 · Harry 15.8% · guest 84.2%15:00 · Harry 15.8% · guest 84.2%18:00 · Harry 14.7% · guest 85.3%18:00 · Harry 14.7% · guest 85.3%21:00 · Harry 14.5% · guest 85.5%21:00 · Harry 14.5% · guest 85.5%24:00 · Harry 12.7% · guest 87.3%24:00 · Harry 12.7% · guest 87.3%27:00 · Harry 10.4% · guest 89.6%27:00 · Harry 10.4% · guest 89.6%30:00 · Harry 20.9% · guest 79.1%30:00 · Harry 20.9% · guest 79.1%33:00 · Harry 26.4% · guest 73.6%33:00 · Harry 26.4% · guest 73.6%36:00 · Harry 0.1% · guest 99.9%36:00 · Harry 0.1% · guest 99.9%39:00 · Harry 23.6% · guest 76.4%39:00 · Harry 23.6% · guest 76.4%42:00 · Harry 14.8% · guest 85.2%42:00 · Harry 14.8% · guest 85.2%45:00 · Harry 15.5% · guest 84.5%45:00 · Harry 15.5% · guest 84.5%48:00 · Harry 17.1% · guest 82.9%48:00 · Harry 17.1% · guest 82.9%51:00 · Harry 5.3% · guest 94.7%51:00 · Harry 5.3% · guest 94.7%54:00 · Harry 7.8% · guest 92.2%54:00 · Harry 7.8% · guest 92.2%57:00 · Harry 7.7% · guest 92.3%57:00 · Harry 7.7% · guest 92.3%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 4:10 Cathie Rejects Tupelo Narrative

Cathie forcefully corrects Harry's premise regarding her record at Tupelo, clarifying that she was not present for most of the drawdown and took full responsibility only for the period she managed.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 34:39 Harry Interrupts on Zero Carry

Harry interrupts Cathie mid-explanation to directly refuse her framing that a fee-only fund works, arguing that top venture talent demands massive carry upside.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 4:10 Correcting Tupelo AUM and Timeline

Cathie educates Harry on her actual tenure and performance at Tupelo Capital, dismantling his assertion that assets dropped under her watch from 1.2 billion to 200 million.

Harry holds his own ▶ 38:59 Citing VC Deal Dynamics and Star Partners

Harry demonstrates deep venture industry knowledge by citing specific anecdotes like Ben Horowitz gifting Databricks' CEO to win allocation, questioning how ARK can compete without star VC partners.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
The Danger of Passive Index Investing 1320 Harry asks a broad personal backstory question, allowing Cathie to monologue on her critique of benchmark-based passive investing. Host pushback is zero as this is largely a guest exposition segment.
Lessons from Tupelo Capital Management 4732 Harry brings up researched details on Cathie's former firm Tupelo, but Cathie directly corrects his premise about her timeline and AUM decline. She explicitly states she takes full responsibility for 2000 but not for subsequent asset declines after her exit.
Navigating the Venture Capital Cycle and Crossover Investing 4523 Harry questions launching a VC product in a saturated market where capital is chasing too few deals. Cathie reframes the setup by contrasting public drawdown severity with private down rounds.
Maintaining Conviction in Down Markets and Portfolio Concentration 3426 Harry confronts Cathie with a direct, personal question asking if she ever doubts herself when her fund's stocks drop 80 to 90 percent. Cathie explains her data-driven research model and portfolio concentration approach.
Solvency Risks and High-Conviction Plays: Tesla and Invitae 5426 Harry presses Cathie with the classic market axiom regarding whether markets can remain irrational longer than companies remain solvent. Cathie points to historical examples like Tesla in 2019 to defend liquidity options.
Sell Discipline and the Nvidia Example 4525 Harry asks how ARK manages sell discipline when public growth strategies often encourage endless holding. Cathie details ARK's 15% hurdle rate return threshold and gives Nvidia as a specific historical sell example.
Large-Cap Tech, Passive Investing, and Bear Market Ends 5423 Harry asks a structural market question about how much large-cap tech performance is driven by passive index flows. Cathie agrees and details how ARK differentiated its strategy away from FAANG stocks.
Addressing Criticisms of Risk Management and Volatility 5547 Harry directly raises public criticism, asking why people suggest ARK has zero risk management. Cathie pushes back forcefully, asserting that risk allocation rests with external asset allocators rather than thematic fund managers.
Asset Retention and Why ARK Hasn't Seen Massive Outflows 4526 Harry pushes on why ARK hasn't suffered massive capital outflows despite severe performance drawdowns. Cathie credits their open-source research and direct retail communication model for asset retention.
The Transparency Strategy: Playing Poker with Cards Face Up 4535 Harry cites a journalistic critique comparing ARK's public research model to playing poker with cards turned up. Cathie responds by arguing that proprietary information is an outdated concept in the modern era.
Democratizing Venture Capital for Retail Investors 6537 Harry challenges Cathie's retail VC initiative, calling the management of 50,000 small retail LPs a fundamental nightmare. Cathie explains the operational setup using interval fund structures and Titan's platform.
Zero Carry Fee Structure and Talent Alignment 7548 Harry actively interrupts Cathie to reject the premise that a 0% carry fee structure can attract top venture talent. Cathie defends the model by citing internal parent-level equity distribution across unified analyst teams.
Winning Allocation and Deal Access as a Crossover Fund 8538 Harry demonstrates high expertise by naming top VC partners and specific deal dynamics to ask if ARK can win competitive allocations. Cathie argues that their research brand opens doors directly with founders.
Capital Planning and Scaling the Innovation Market 5524 Harry asks a technical fund construction question on how capital planning works in an open-ended evergreen fund structure. Cathie explains their flexible deployment strategy across secondaries and convertibles.
Underwriting Risk and Long-Term Time Horizons 5423 Harry asks about underwriting risk before steering into a fast-paced quick-fire round covering Meta, Twitter, and investment horizons. The dynamic is polite and conversational.

Statements from this episode (41)

Disclosure
Cathie Wood: ARK Invest focuses on five converging innovation platforms
“So we've centered our research and investing around Five innovation platforms genomic sequencing robotics, energy storage, artificial intelligence, and blockchain technology and those are all converging.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 2:42
Opinion
Wood: Passive index investing has reached an extreme and dangerous level
“And I think even though the onus or the burden of proof is on us because passive has done so well. Over the past 20 years, it's been self-fulfilling as more and more assets moved into passive or benchmark sensitive. I think the pendulum has swung too far, and …”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 3:14
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Cathie Wood Expects Significant Private Market Drawdowns
“What I do believe could be a set of significant drawdowns in the private world that has already happened in the public world.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 8:31
Prediction Held up
ARK Venture Fund Targets 75% Private, 25% Public Allocation
“Our desire is to get it close to 75% private and 25% public to allow more liquidity.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 8:53
Opinion
Cathie Wood: Private Markets Value Innovation Better Than Public Markets
“The private markets have innovation more right in terms of valuation than the public markets do.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 9:36
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Cathie Wood: Fundamentals Will Disrupt Benchmark Investing Within Years
“Fundamentals are going to disrupt that way of thinking during the next few years.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 10:28
Insight
Wood: 80-90% stock drops increase expected five-year total returns
“What we see as our stocks go down 80 to 90%, if we're right we're seeing the total rate of return expectation increase for the next five years.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 11:41
Disclosure
Cathie Wood: ARK averages down and concentrates portfolios in market drawdowns
“We average down during risk off periods, and we also concentrate our portfolios towards our highest conviction names.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 12:21
Assertion Supported
Wood: ARK cut flagship ARKK holdings from 58 to 32 names
“So we've moved our flagship portfolio ARKK from 58 names down to 32, 33 names and we're further consolidating in this risk-off period, but we tend to bottom out in that low thirties range.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 12:31
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Cathie Wood: Invitae will become a top molecular diagnostic testing company
“And we think they have streamlined and are going to become one of the most, if not the most important molecular diagnostic testing company.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 14:39
Disclosure
Cathie Wood: ARK holds private molecular diagnostics startup Freenome
“And I'll also say that in the private world, we think a contender is Freenome. And we have that as one of our first holdings.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 14:53
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Cathie Wood: ARK requires a minimum 15% hurdle rate for public portfolios
“Many of our stocks were beginning to fall below our minimum hurdle rate of return over a five year period. That number is 15% for the public portfolios.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 15:35
Disclosure
Wood: ARK completely sold Nvidia before buying back after stock tumbled
“We ended up selling out of Nvidia and only recently since it has had a tumble. Have we re-initiated our position?”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 16:45
Opinion
Wood: ARK has the best innovation analyst team in the world
“I do believe we have the best analyst team when it comes to innovation in the world, and the reason we do is because their responsibilities are broken out not by sector or industry, but by technology.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 17:24
Assertion Supported
Wood: FAANGs, Microsoft, and Nvidia made up nearly 50% of Nasdaq 100 in 2021
“Last year the market reached all-time highs in twenty-twenty-one as we were selling off, and it was the Fangs, it was Microsoft, it was Nvidia, and those, if you look at the Nasdaq 100, account for, account ed at that time, for nearly 50% of that index”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 18:21
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Wood: ARK outperformance signals market is nearing the end of a bear market
“Our strategies are starting to outperform now on days When some of these big benchmarks don't, and that's what usually happens as we're coming towards the end of a bear market.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 19:42
Disclosure
Wood: ARK portfolios have under 5% overlap with major equity benchmarks
“Less than 10% of our portfolio is, or I should say less than, there's much less than a 10% overlap between us and any, you know, it's usually less than five percent.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 20:20
Opinion
Wood: Institutional asset allocators hold a massive short on disruptive innovation
“We're giving asset allocators an opportunity to make up for the massive short that we believe they have in their portfolios. And that short is truly disruptive innovation.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 21:09
Opinion
Cathie Wood: Equity benchmark stocks represent past success, not future growth
“Whereas these benchmark stocks are more about the past and their past successes.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 22:33
Disclosure
Cathie Wood: ARK sells companies showing management turmoil during fund concentration
“We're selling a lot of our portfolio to concentrate. And again, some of those sales are very good because we have a doubt. Wait a minute. There's a management turmoil or a lot of turnover and just, you know, little red flags that don't force us. They may be we…”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 22:56
Assertion Supported
Wood: ARK Invest generated $17 billion in net inflows in 2021
“So last year, our net flows, now they were front end loaded to be sure they were seventeen billion dollars. That's net. There were redemptions, but we kept seventeen billion of the flows last year.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 25:19
Assertion Supported
Wood: ARK lost under $1 billion in net outflows in 2022
“This year, we haven't even outflowed one billion, you know, out of that seventeen billion.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 25:37
Insight
Wood: Investment edge comes from synthesizing information, not owning data
“Information is ubiquitous. It's how you put it together.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 27:27
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Wood: Withholding research will be seen as provincial within 3 to 5 years
“And I think it will be Considered a very provincial in let's say three to five years time to hear a firm saying, well, we don't share any of our research because it's our secret sauce.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 27:30
Disclosure
Wood: ARK combines Wright's Law cost-modeling with a six-point innovation score
“We're sizing opportunities using Wright's law, a relative of Moore's law, to try and understand cost declines, and then we do our bottom-up analysis. We are as stock research driven as any other bottom-up team out there, and then we have a six-point overlay ju…”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 28:02
Opinion
Wood: Retail Investors Often Know More About Innovation Than Institutional LPs
“If we were to use knowledge as the metric for accreditation the accredited investors for ARC Would be those retail investors. They have, they are passionate about innovation, and they know so much about it, and many of them are working in the industry or in th…”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 29:36
Opinion
Wood: Wealth-based SEC investor accreditation rules are un-American
“It's truly not American to use income and asset thresholds when knowledge could be an accreditation, ah, measure or metric.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 30:22
Disclosure
ARK Invest Partners With Titan for Venture Fund Distribution
“Titan is our partner, our distribution partner. It is an app, Andreessen Horowitz funded app, and we are the first outside equity fund that they are putting on this platform, and they are going to help us help our retail investors get to know our companies, Wi…”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 32:07
Assertion Supported
Wood: Investors pay 40% more fees in traditional VC than ARK
“If you were to compare our fees all in management fees all in the 2.75 versus the venture venture two and 20, That top quartile fund you would have to pay 40% more in fees over time.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 35:09
Disclosure
Wood: ARK uses same research analysts for public and private markets
“We are not using different analysts for private than public because they've been following these private companies the whole time.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 36:09
Disclosure
Wood: ARK Invest gives all research analysts company equity from day one
“We give all of our analysts equity and arc from the beginning.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 36:51
Insight
Stebbings: Venture is the only asset class where assets choose capital
“In venture, it is one of the only asset classes, I believe, where the asset chooses the capital. In all others, the capital chooses the asset,”
Harry Stebbings Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 39:00
Assertion Partly supported
Wood: ExxonMobil mines Bitcoin to capture flared gas in six fields
“So Exxon's doing that. It's six different, maybe many more now, fields around the world.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 42:14
Prediction Held up
Cathie Wood: ARK Venture Fund will not lead deals initially
“We will not be leading deals right now.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 45:06
Prediction Open · timeframe Nov 2032
Wood: Disruptive innovation market cap will hit $210T in ten years
“We believe today that truly disruptive technologically enabled innovation is priced in the global markets, public and private, at somewhere in the seven to eight trillion dollar range. So it's less than 10% of the global equity cap, public and private. We beli…”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 45:47
Assertion Partly supported
Wood: ARK Venture Fund marks all holdings to market daily
“They will be able to look at their portfolios here every day now, and because everything will be marked to market every day.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 47:51
Assertion Supported
Wood: ARK Venture Fund sets a $500 minimum investment
“If you can't have a long-term time horizon, you probably shouldn't be involved or just with 500 dollars, maybe you can take that risk. Because that is our minimum.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 48:38
Assertion Supported
Wood: Meta maintains 3B+ users and 67% DAU/MAU engagement ratio
“So daily average users over monthly average users, 67% hasn't changed. Has three billion plus users.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 50:31
Disclosure
Wood: Personal portfolio is all-in on innovation, crypto, and private funds
“I think advisors looking at how I have positioned my own portfolio are shocked at how much I'm all in to innovation. Between our funds crypto and private funds.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 54:26
Opinion
Wood: Tesla stock does not price in its massive autonomous opportunity
“Because we believe the autonomous opportunity is massive and is not priced at all in Tesla stock we would still put Tesla near the top or at the top of the pack.”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 55:32
Insight
Wood: Zoom and Microsoft lead enterprise comms cloud rip-and-replace cycle
“It and Microsoft are the two beneficiaries of the first rip and replace cycle that we've seen in the enterprise communication space since the early nineties when Cisco was building out the internet now, but that was on-prem and hardware oriented. Now we're mov…”
Cathie Wood Nov 14, 2022 ▶ 55:49

Shorts cut from this episode

▶ Markets to grow by $200 TRILLION? 😲📈 #shorts · 20VC with H (@45:58) ▶ How to Fix Bitcoin's Energy Problem⚡️🤔 #shorts · 20VC with (@41:38)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.