Apr 28, 2025 · 1h 2m · 20vc

Plural Partner, Taavet Hinrikus: Why Founders Will Realise Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed Rounds · 20VC with Harry Stebbings

Taavet Hinrikus · 39m spoken Harry Stebbings · 14m spoken
0:00 / 0:00
▶ Watch on YouTube →

gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions

In this episode of 20VC, host Harry Stebbings interviews Wise co-founder and Plural partner Taavet Hinrikus about how operator-led venture capital funds can disrupt the industry by aligning incentives with founders and backing highly ambitious deep-tech startups that secure European geopolitical sovereignty.

How this conversation actually went

Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Harry holds 26.2% of the talking time here. How this is scored →

Harry as informed peer 5.9 Guest teaching 4.2 Guest disagreement 3.0 Harry pushing back 3.8
05100:0015:0030:0045:001:00:000:38–3:27 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 From Skype to Wise: Taavet Hinrikus's Angel Investing Journey Harry establishes strong context by quoting Doug Leone on venture shifting from a boutique community to a commoditized industry. Taavet politely reframes the premise by breaking venture down into sub-components.3:27–6:10 · Harry as informed peer 7/10 Spreadsheet Monkeys vs. True Operating Scar Tissue Harry demonstrates deep market knowledge by citing Spark's Nabil and naming companies like Lovable, Midjourney, and Bolt to challenge Taavet's critique of predictable SaaS spreadsheet investing. Taavet clarifies how spotting trillion-dollar companies differs from mid-stage SaaS.6:10–9:56 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 How Operator Mindset Shapes True Partner Dynamics Harry structures the discussion around sourcing, selecting, securing, and servicing to test whether operator background grants a real advantage. Taavet explains how founder scar tissue creates better partner alignment.9:56–12:48 · Harry as informed peer 7/10 The Power of Repeat Founders and the Enterprise SaaS Injustice Harry quotes Delian from Founders Fund to question repeat founders who play it safe with enterprise SaaS instead of tackling grand challenges. Taavet agrees with the critique while Harry playfully defends his ongoing passion for SaaS.12:48–16:35 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Disrupting the Traditional Management Fee Model Harry pushes the standard GP counter-argument that high management fees are needed to pay competitive salaries and build platform teams. Taavet forcefully rejects this framing, telling VCs to earn their keep through DPI rather than deployment fees.16:35–20:36 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Limits of the 10-Year Fund Lifecycle Harry brings up Fred Wilson's take on liquidity while Taavet explains Plural's unusual practice of partners writing personal checks and paying their own legal fees. Harry expresses genuine surprise at Plural's legal fee policy.20:36–24:08 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Timeline Misalignment: The Ultimate Founder-Investor Conflict Harry asks incisive questions about portfolio construction and reserve strategies. Both host and guest agree that standard pro-rata reserve allocation is an analytical cop-out.24:08–27:27 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Tough Love of Founder-Investors Harry observes that former founders deliver much direct, unvarnished feedback to founders compared to traditional VCs who worry about NPS. Taavet concurs, detailing Plural's 100x return requirement and consensus-free IC.27:27–29:39 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Partner Collaboration, Peer Feedback, and GP Autonomy Harry identifies a major structural flaw in ICs where partner knowledge asymmetry ruins discussion quality. Taavet explains Plural's process of partner autonomy combined with honest, brutal peer feedback.29:39–31:52 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 The Danger of Compressed Timelines and Fomented Processes Harry probes how Plural handles compressed term sheet timelines driven by founder urgency. Taavet rejects the premise for deep tech deals, noting that rush processes mostly belong to momentum spreadsheet investing.31:52–34:37 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Ditching Scoring Systems for Direct Peer Calibrations Harry advocates for formal scoring systems to track partnership picking history over time. Taavet playfully dismisses changing their process, humorously claiming they are already brilliant.34:37–37:49 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Rejecting Liquidation Preferences and Championing Capital Efficiency Harry brings up US trends eliminating liquidation preferences and board seat expansion. Taavet delivers a masterclass on capital efficiency, contrasting Wise's $100M burn for $10B+ value with capital-inefficient venture peers.37:49–39:57 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 VCs as a Commodity: The True Test of Partnership in Bad Times Harry cites Keith Raboy on founder value-add. Taavet forcefully reframes VCs as a commodity, warning investors against ghosting portfolio companies during bad times.39:57–42:28 · Harry as informed peer 7/10 How Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed and the Future of Venture Returns Harry presents a robust argument that multi-stage mega-funds are destroying seed rounds by treating early checks as cheap call options. Taavet firmly pushes back, arguing founders will realize multi-stage checks offer no guarantees.42:28–47:03 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Imperative of European Sovereignty and Tech Independence Taavet outlines the geopolitical imperative for European tech sovereignty post-Ukraine war. Harry pushes back strongly against complete decoupling, pointing out the economic realities of global trade.47:03–49:57 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 The Critical Need for European Alternatives to American Tech Taavet argues against relying on US technology with kill switches. Harry directly questions whether top-down state capital declarations, like Germany's trillion-euro announcement, are effective.49:57–52:27 · Harry as informed peer 7/10 Geopolitical Concerns in the Baltics Taavet highlights Baltic defense concerns while Harry presses on political structural barriers, arguing 4-year election cycles impede long-term technology strategy.52:27–55:02 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Overcoming Barriers: Early-Stage Capital and Ambition Harry brings up standard critiques regarding European ambition and work ethic. Taavet reframes this as European humility versus American bragging and dismisses regulatory excuses.55:02–57:20 · Harry as informed peer 6/10 Wise's London IPO & Public Markets Strategy Harry shares insights from interviewing London Stock Exchange CEO Julia Hoggart and asks about US valuation premiums. Taavet provides a nuanced breakdown of public listings.57:20–59:40 · Harry as informed peer 5/10 Personal Wealth, Skype, and Financial Independence Harry asks personal questions about how wealth alters personal mindsets. Taavet clarifies he achieved financial independence early via Skype, enabling a pure focus on upside.59:40–1:02:14 · Harry as informed peer 4/10 Quick Fire: Estonian Ecosystem & Next Big Accelerators Harry conducts a quickfire round covering Estonian tech, public equities, and Synthesia. Taavet reveals he has never bought a public stock, picking Berkshire Hathaway as a sole exception.0:38–3:27 · Guest teaching 3/10 From Skype to Wise: Taavet Hinrikus's Angel Investing Journey Harry establishes strong context by quoting Doug Leone on venture shifting from a boutique community to a commoditized industry. Taavet politely reframes the premise by breaking venture down into sub-components.3:27–6:10 · Guest teaching 4/10 Spreadsheet Monkeys vs. True Operating Scar Tissue Harry demonstrates deep market knowledge by citing Spark's Nabil and naming companies like Lovable, Midjourney, and Bolt to challenge Taavet's critique of predictable SaaS spreadsheet investing. Taavet clarifies how spotting trillion-dollar companies differs from mid-stage SaaS.6:10–9:56 · Guest teaching 3/10 How Operator Mindset Shapes True Partner Dynamics Harry structures the discussion around sourcing, selecting, securing, and servicing to test whether operator background grants a real advantage. Taavet explains how founder scar tissue creates better partner alignment.9:56–12:48 · Guest teaching 2/10 The Power of Repeat Founders and the Enterprise SaaS Injustice Harry quotes Delian from Founders Fund to question repeat founders who play it safe with enterprise SaaS instead of tackling grand challenges. Taavet agrees with the critique while Harry playfully defends his ongoing passion for SaaS.12:48–16:35 · Guest teaching 6/10 Disrupting the Traditional Management Fee Model Harry pushes the standard GP counter-argument that high management fees are needed to pay competitive salaries and build platform teams. Taavet forcefully rejects this framing, telling VCs to earn their keep through DPI rather than deployment fees.16:35–20:36 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Limits of the 10-Year Fund Lifecycle Harry brings up Fred Wilson's take on liquidity while Taavet explains Plural's unusual practice of partners writing personal checks and paying their own legal fees. Harry expresses genuine surprise at Plural's legal fee policy.20:36–24:08 · Guest teaching 4/10 Timeline Misalignment: The Ultimate Founder-Investor Conflict Harry asks incisive questions about portfolio construction and reserve strategies. Both host and guest agree that standard pro-rata reserve allocation is an analytical cop-out.24:08–27:27 · Guest teaching 3/10 The Tough Love of Founder-Investors Harry observes that former founders deliver much direct, unvarnished feedback to founders compared to traditional VCs who worry about NPS. Taavet concurs, detailing Plural's 100x return requirement and consensus-free IC.27:27–29:39 · Guest teaching 3/10 Partner Collaboration, Peer Feedback, and GP Autonomy Harry identifies a major structural flaw in ICs where partner knowledge asymmetry ruins discussion quality. Taavet explains Plural's process of partner autonomy combined with honest, brutal peer feedback.29:39–31:52 · Guest teaching 4/10 The Danger of Compressed Timelines and Fomented Processes Harry probes how Plural handles compressed term sheet timelines driven by founder urgency. Taavet rejects the premise for deep tech deals, noting that rush processes mostly belong to momentum spreadsheet investing.31:52–34:37 · Guest teaching 4/10 Ditching Scoring Systems for Direct Peer Calibrations Harry advocates for formal scoring systems to track partnership picking history over time. Taavet playfully dismisses changing their process, humorously claiming they are already brilliant.34:37–37:49 · Guest teaching 6/10 Rejecting Liquidation Preferences and Championing Capital Efficiency Harry brings up US trends eliminating liquidation preferences and board seat expansion. Taavet delivers a masterclass on capital efficiency, contrasting Wise's $100M burn for $10B+ value with capital-inefficient venture peers.37:49–39:57 · Guest teaching 5/10 VCs as a Commodity: The True Test of Partnership in Bad Times Harry cites Keith Raboy on founder value-add. Taavet forcefully reframes VCs as a commodity, warning investors against ghosting portfolio companies during bad times.39:57–42:28 · Guest teaching 5/10 How Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed and the Future of Venture Returns Harry presents a robust argument that multi-stage mega-funds are destroying seed rounds by treating early checks as cheap call options. Taavet firmly pushes back, arguing founders will realize multi-stage checks offer no guarantees.42:28–47:03 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Imperative of European Sovereignty and Tech Independence Taavet outlines the geopolitical imperative for European tech sovereignty post-Ukraine war. Harry pushes back strongly against complete decoupling, pointing out the economic realities of global trade.47:03–49:57 · Guest teaching 5/10 The Critical Need for European Alternatives to American Tech Taavet argues against relying on US technology with kill switches. Harry directly questions whether top-down state capital declarations, like Germany's trillion-euro announcement, are effective.49:57–52:27 · Guest teaching 4/10 Geopolitical Concerns in the Baltics Taavet highlights Baltic defense concerns while Harry presses on political structural barriers, arguing 4-year election cycles impede long-term technology strategy.52:27–55:02 · Guest teaching 5/10 Overcoming Barriers: Early-Stage Capital and Ambition Harry brings up standard critiques regarding European ambition and work ethic. Taavet reframes this as European humility versus American bragging and dismisses regulatory excuses.55:02–57:20 · Guest teaching 5/10 Wise's London IPO & Public Markets Strategy Harry shares insights from interviewing London Stock Exchange CEO Julia Hoggart and asks about US valuation premiums. Taavet provides a nuanced breakdown of public listings.57:20–59:40 · Guest teaching 4/10 Personal Wealth, Skype, and Financial Independence Harry asks personal questions about how wealth alters personal mindsets. Taavet clarifies he achieved financial independence early via Skype, enabling a pure focus on upside.59:40–1:02:14 · Guest teaching 3/10 Quick Fire: Estonian Ecosystem & Next Big Accelerators Harry conducts a quickfire round covering Estonian tech, public equities, and Synthesia. Taavet reveals he has never bought a public stock, picking Berkshire Hathaway as a sole exception.0:38–3:27 · Guest disagreement 2/10 From Skype to Wise: Taavet Hinrikus's Angel Investing Journey Harry establishes strong context by quoting Doug Leone on venture shifting from a boutique community to a commoditized industry. Taavet politely reframes the premise by breaking venture down into sub-components.3:27–6:10 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Spreadsheet Monkeys vs. True Operating Scar Tissue Harry demonstrates deep market knowledge by citing Spark's Nabil and naming companies like Lovable, Midjourney, and Bolt to challenge Taavet's critique of predictable SaaS spreadsheet investing. Taavet clarifies how spotting trillion-dollar companies differs from mid-stage SaaS.6:10–9:56 · Guest disagreement 2/10 How Operator Mindset Shapes True Partner Dynamics Harry structures the discussion around sourcing, selecting, securing, and servicing to test whether operator background grants a real advantage. Taavet explains how founder scar tissue creates better partner alignment.9:56–12:48 · Guest disagreement 2/10 The Power of Repeat Founders and the Enterprise SaaS Injustice Harry quotes Delian from Founders Fund to question repeat founders who play it safe with enterprise SaaS instead of tackling grand challenges. Taavet agrees with the critique while Harry playfully defends his ongoing passion for SaaS.12:48–16:35 · Guest disagreement 5/10 Disrupting the Traditional Management Fee Model Harry pushes the standard GP counter-argument that high management fees are needed to pay competitive salaries and build platform teams. Taavet forcefully rejects this framing, telling VCs to earn their keep through DPI rather than deployment fees.16:35–20:36 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Limits of the 10-Year Fund Lifecycle Harry brings up Fred Wilson's take on liquidity while Taavet explains Plural's unusual practice of partners writing personal checks and paying their own legal fees. Harry expresses genuine surprise at Plural's legal fee policy.20:36–24:08 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Timeline Misalignment: The Ultimate Founder-Investor Conflict Harry asks incisive questions about portfolio construction and reserve strategies. Both host and guest agree that standard pro-rata reserve allocation is an analytical cop-out.24:08–27:27 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Tough Love of Founder-Investors Harry observes that former founders deliver much direct, unvarnished feedback to founders compared to traditional VCs who worry about NPS. Taavet concurs, detailing Plural's 100x return requirement and consensus-free IC.27:27–29:39 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Partner Collaboration, Peer Feedback, and GP Autonomy Harry identifies a major structural flaw in ICs where partner knowledge asymmetry ruins discussion quality. Taavet explains Plural's process of partner autonomy combined with honest, brutal peer feedback.29:39–31:52 · Guest disagreement 3/10 The Danger of Compressed Timelines and Fomented Processes Harry probes how Plural handles compressed term sheet timelines driven by founder urgency. Taavet rejects the premise for deep tech deals, noting that rush processes mostly belong to momentum spreadsheet investing.31:52–34:37 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Ditching Scoring Systems for Direct Peer Calibrations Harry advocates for formal scoring systems to track partnership picking history over time. Taavet playfully dismisses changing their process, humorously claiming they are already brilliant.34:37–37:49 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Rejecting Liquidation Preferences and Championing Capital Efficiency Harry brings up US trends eliminating liquidation preferences and board seat expansion. Taavet delivers a masterclass on capital efficiency, contrasting Wise's $100M burn for $10B+ value with capital-inefficient venture peers.37:49–39:57 · Guest disagreement 5/10 VCs as a Commodity: The True Test of Partnership in Bad Times Harry cites Keith Raboy on founder value-add. Taavet forcefully reframes VCs as a commodity, warning investors against ghosting portfolio companies during bad times.39:57–42:28 · Guest disagreement 5/10 How Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed and the Future of Venture Returns Harry presents a robust argument that multi-stage mega-funds are destroying seed rounds by treating early checks as cheap call options. Taavet firmly pushes back, arguing founders will realize multi-stage checks offer no guarantees.42:28–47:03 · Guest disagreement 4/10 The Imperative of European Sovereignty and Tech Independence Taavet outlines the geopolitical imperative for European tech sovereignty post-Ukraine war. Harry pushes back strongly against complete decoupling, pointing out the economic realities of global trade.47:03–49:57 · Guest disagreement 4/10 The Critical Need for European Alternatives to American Tech Taavet argues against relying on US technology with kill switches. Harry directly questions whether top-down state capital declarations, like Germany's trillion-euro announcement, are effective.49:57–52:27 · Guest disagreement 3/10 Geopolitical Concerns in the Baltics Taavet highlights Baltic defense concerns while Harry presses on political structural barriers, arguing 4-year election cycles impede long-term technology strategy.52:27–55:02 · Guest disagreement 4/10 Overcoming Barriers: Early-Stage Capital and Ambition Harry brings up standard critiques regarding European ambition and work ethic. Taavet reframes this as European humility versus American bragging and dismisses regulatory excuses.55:02–57:20 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Wise's London IPO & Public Markets Strategy Harry shares insights from interviewing London Stock Exchange CEO Julia Hoggart and asks about US valuation premiums. Taavet provides a nuanced breakdown of public listings.57:20–59:40 · Guest disagreement 2/10 Personal Wealth, Skype, and Financial Independence Harry asks personal questions about how wealth alters personal mindsets. Taavet clarifies he achieved financial independence early via Skype, enabling a pure focus on upside.59:40–1:02:14 · Guest disagreement 1/10 Quick Fire: Estonian Ecosystem & Next Big Accelerators Harry conducts a quickfire round covering Estonian tech, public equities, and Synthesia. Taavet reveals he has never bought a public stock, picking Berkshire Hathaway as a sole exception.0:38–3:27 · Harry pushing back 2/10 From Skype to Wise: Taavet Hinrikus's Angel Investing Journey Harry establishes strong context by quoting Doug Leone on venture shifting from a boutique community to a commoditized industry. Taavet politely reframes the premise by breaking venture down into sub-components.3:27–6:10 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Spreadsheet Monkeys vs. True Operating Scar Tissue Harry demonstrates deep market knowledge by citing Spark's Nabil and naming companies like Lovable, Midjourney, and Bolt to challenge Taavet's critique of predictable SaaS spreadsheet investing. Taavet clarifies how spotting trillion-dollar companies differs from mid-stage SaaS.6:10–9:56 · Harry pushing back 3/10 How Operator Mindset Shapes True Partner Dynamics Harry structures the discussion around sourcing, selecting, securing, and servicing to test whether operator background grants a real advantage. Taavet explains how founder scar tissue creates better partner alignment.9:56–12:48 · Harry pushing back 4/10 The Power of Repeat Founders and the Enterprise SaaS Injustice Harry quotes Delian from Founders Fund to question repeat founders who play it safe with enterprise SaaS instead of tackling grand challenges. Taavet agrees with the critique while Harry playfully defends his ongoing passion for SaaS.12:48–16:35 · Harry pushing back 5/10 Disrupting the Traditional Management Fee Model Harry pushes the standard GP counter-argument that high management fees are needed to pay competitive salaries and build platform teams. Taavet forcefully rejects this framing, telling VCs to earn their keep through DPI rather than deployment fees.16:35–20:36 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Limits of the 10-Year Fund Lifecycle Harry brings up Fred Wilson's take on liquidity while Taavet explains Plural's unusual practice of partners writing personal checks and paying their own legal fees. Harry expresses genuine surprise at Plural's legal fee policy.20:36–24:08 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Timeline Misalignment: The Ultimate Founder-Investor Conflict Harry asks incisive questions about portfolio construction and reserve strategies. Both host and guest agree that standard pro-rata reserve allocation is an analytical cop-out.24:08–27:27 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Tough Love of Founder-Investors Harry observes that former founders deliver much direct, unvarnished feedback to founders compared to traditional VCs who worry about NPS. Taavet concurs, detailing Plural's 100x return requirement and consensus-free IC.27:27–29:39 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Partner Collaboration, Peer Feedback, and GP Autonomy Harry identifies a major structural flaw in ICs where partner knowledge asymmetry ruins discussion quality. Taavet explains Plural's process of partner autonomy combined with honest, brutal peer feedback.29:39–31:52 · Harry pushing back 3/10 The Danger of Compressed Timelines and Fomented Processes Harry probes how Plural handles compressed term sheet timelines driven by founder urgency. Taavet rejects the premise for deep tech deals, noting that rush processes mostly belong to momentum spreadsheet investing.31:52–34:37 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Ditching Scoring Systems for Direct Peer Calibrations Harry advocates for formal scoring systems to track partnership picking history over time. Taavet playfully dismisses changing their process, humorously claiming they are already brilliant.34:37–37:49 · Harry pushing back 3/10 Rejecting Liquidation Preferences and Championing Capital Efficiency Harry brings up US trends eliminating liquidation preferences and board seat expansion. Taavet delivers a masterclass on capital efficiency, contrasting Wise's $100M burn for $10B+ value with capital-inefficient venture peers.37:49–39:57 · Harry pushing back 3/10 VCs as a Commodity: The True Test of Partnership in Bad Times Harry cites Keith Raboy on founder value-add. Taavet forcefully reframes VCs as a commodity, warning investors against ghosting portfolio companies during bad times.39:57–42:28 · Harry pushing back 6/10 How Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed and the Future of Venture Returns Harry presents a robust argument that multi-stage mega-funds are destroying seed rounds by treating early checks as cheap call options. Taavet firmly pushes back, arguing founders will realize multi-stage checks offer no guarantees.42:28–47:03 · Harry pushing back 6/10 The Imperative of European Sovereignty and Tech Independence Taavet outlines the geopolitical imperative for European tech sovereignty post-Ukraine war. Harry pushes back strongly against complete decoupling, pointing out the economic realities of global trade.47:03–49:57 · Harry pushing back 6/10 The Critical Need for European Alternatives to American Tech Taavet argues against relying on US technology with kill switches. Harry directly questions whether top-down state capital declarations, like Germany's trillion-euro announcement, are effective.49:57–52:27 · Harry pushing back 6/10 Geopolitical Concerns in the Baltics Taavet highlights Baltic defense concerns while Harry presses on political structural barriers, arguing 4-year election cycles impede long-term technology strategy.52:27–55:02 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Overcoming Barriers: Early-Stage Capital and Ambition Harry brings up standard critiques regarding European ambition and work ethic. Taavet reframes this as European humility versus American bragging and dismisses regulatory excuses.55:02–57:20 · Harry pushing back 4/10 Wise's London IPO & Public Markets Strategy Harry shares insights from interviewing London Stock Exchange CEO Julia Hoggart and asks about US valuation premiums. Taavet provides a nuanced breakdown of public listings.57:20–59:40 · Harry pushing back 2/10 Personal Wealth, Skype, and Financial Independence Harry asks personal questions about how wealth alters personal mindsets. Taavet clarifies he achieved financial independence early via Skype, enabling a pure focus on upside.59:40–1:02:14 · Harry pushing back 1/10 Quick Fire: Estonian Ecosystem & Next Big Accelerators Harry conducts a quickfire round covering Estonian tech, public equities, and Synthesia. Taavet reveals he has never bought a public stock, picking Berkshire Hathaway as a sole exception.

speaking balance: gold is Harry, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)

0:00 · Harry 36.7% · guest 63.3%0:00 · Harry 36.7% · guest 63.3%3:00 · Harry 27.8% · guest 72.2%3:00 · Harry 27.8% · guest 72.2%6:00 · Harry 37.2% · guest 62.8%6:00 · Harry 37.2% · guest 62.8%9:00 · Harry 32.2% · guest 67.8%9:00 · Harry 32.2% · guest 67.8%12:00 · Harry 25.4% · guest 74.6%12:00 · Harry 25.4% · guest 74.6%15:00 · Harry 19% · guest 81%15:00 · Harry 19% · guest 81%18:00 · Harry 22.8% · guest 77.2%18:00 · Harry 22.8% · guest 77.2%21:00 · Harry 21% · guest 79%21:00 · Harry 21% · guest 79%24:00 · Harry 37.9% · guest 62.1%24:00 · Harry 37.9% · guest 62.1%27:00 · Harry 21.5% · guest 78.5%27:00 · Harry 21.5% · guest 78.5%30:00 · Harry 28.6% · guest 71.4%30:00 · Harry 28.6% · guest 71.4%33:00 · Harry 10.9% · guest 89.1%33:00 · Harry 10.9% · guest 89.1%36:00 · Harry 10.7% · guest 89.3%36:00 · Harry 10.7% · guest 89.3%39:00 · Harry 32.2% · guest 67.8%39:00 · Harry 32.2% · guest 67.8%42:00 · Harry 15.4% · guest 84.6%42:00 · Harry 15.4% · guest 84.6%45:00 · Harry 22.7% · guest 77.3%45:00 · Harry 22.7% · guest 77.3%48:00 · Harry 32.8% · guest 67.2%48:00 · Harry 32.8% · guest 67.2%51:00 · Harry 30.5% · guest 69.5%51:00 · Harry 30.5% · guest 69.5%54:00 · Harry 16.3% · guest 83.7%54:00 · Harry 16.3% · guest 83.7%57:00 · Harry 37% · guest 63%57:00 · Harry 37% · guest 63%1:00:00 · Harry 33.2% · guest 66.8%1:00:00 · Harry 33.2% · guest 66.8%
Sharpest disagreement ▶ 13:51 Taavet dismisses VC management fee justifications

Taavet aggressively pushes back on Harry's defense of VC management fees, telling GPs to earn their right through DPI rather than collecting guaranteed fees.

Hardest push from Harry ▶ 39:57 Harry challenges Taavet on multi-stage funds destroying seed

Harry forcefully asserts that multi-stage mega-funds are ruining seed rounds by treating $5M checks as high-velocity option plays, refusing to accept Taavet's milder view.

Biggest teaching moment ▶ 34:57 Taavet schools VCs on true capital efficiency

Taavet breaks down Wise's extreme capital efficiency ($100M burned for $10B+ value) to show Harry how inefficient most venture-backed startups actually are.

Harry holds his own ▶ 4:55 Harry demonstrates market knowledge on AI growth models

Harry cites Spark's Nabil along with specific breakout companies like Midjourney and Lovable to counter Taavet's premise that SaaS investing remains predictable spreadsheet work.

the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
ChapterTopicHarry as informed peerGuest teachingGuest disagreementHarry pushing backWhy
From Skype to Wise: Taavet Hinrikus's Angel Investing Journey 5322 Harry establishes strong context by quoting Doug Leone on venture shifting from a boutique community to a commoditized industry. Taavet politely reframes the premise by breaking venture down into sub-components.
Spreadsheet Monkeys vs. True Operating Scar Tissue 7435 Harry demonstrates deep market knowledge by citing Spark's Nabil and naming companies like Lovable, Midjourney, and Bolt to challenge Taavet's critique of predictable SaaS spreadsheet investing. Taavet clarifies how spotting trillion-dollar companies differs from mid-stage SaaS.
How Operator Mindset Shapes True Partner Dynamics 6323 Harry structures the discussion around sourcing, selecting, securing, and servicing to test whether operator background grants a real advantage. Taavet explains how founder scar tissue creates better partner alignment.
The Power of Repeat Founders and the Enterprise SaaS Injustice 7224 Harry quotes Delian from Founders Fund to question repeat founders who play it safe with enterprise SaaS instead of tackling grand challenges. Taavet agrees with the critique while Harry playfully defends his ongoing passion for SaaS.
Disrupting the Traditional Management Fee Model 6655 Harry pushes the standard GP counter-argument that high management fees are needed to pay competitive salaries and build platform teams. Taavet forcefully rejects this framing, telling VCs to earn their keep through DPI rather than deployment fees.
The Limits of the 10-Year Fund Lifecycle 6533 Harry brings up Fred Wilson's take on liquidity while Taavet explains Plural's unusual practice of partners writing personal checks and paying their own legal fees. Harry expresses genuine surprise at Plural's legal fee policy.
Timeline Misalignment: The Ultimate Founder-Investor Conflict 5423 Harry asks incisive questions about portfolio construction and reserve strategies. Both host and guest agree that standard pro-rata reserve allocation is an analytical cop-out.
The Tough Love of Founder-Investors 6333 Harry observes that former founders deliver much direct, unvarnished feedback to founders compared to traditional VCs who worry about NPS. Taavet concurs, detailing Plural's 100x return requirement and consensus-free IC.
Partner Collaboration, Peer Feedback, and GP Autonomy 6324 Harry identifies a major structural flaw in ICs where partner knowledge asymmetry ruins discussion quality. Taavet explains Plural's process of partner autonomy combined with honest, brutal peer feedback.
The Danger of Compressed Timelines and Fomented Processes 5433 Harry probes how Plural handles compressed term sheet timelines driven by founder urgency. Taavet rejects the premise for deep tech deals, noting that rush processes mostly belong to momentum spreadsheet investing.
Ditching Scoring Systems for Direct Peer Calibrations 6444 Harry advocates for formal scoring systems to track partnership picking history over time. Taavet playfully dismisses changing their process, humorously claiming they are already brilliant.
Rejecting Liquidation Preferences and Championing Capital Efficiency 6633 Harry brings up US trends eliminating liquidation preferences and board seat expansion. Taavet delivers a masterclass on capital efficiency, contrasting Wise's $100M burn for $10B+ value with capital-inefficient venture peers.
VCs as a Commodity: The True Test of Partnership in Bad Times 6553 Harry cites Keith Raboy on founder value-add. Taavet forcefully reframes VCs as a commodity, warning investors against ghosting portfolio companies during bad times.
How Multi-Stage Funds Damage Seed and the Future of Venture Returns 7556 Harry presents a robust argument that multi-stage mega-funds are destroying seed rounds by treating early checks as cheap call options. Taavet firmly pushes back, arguing founders will realize multi-stage checks offer no guarantees.
The Imperative of European Sovereignty and Tech Independence 6546 Taavet outlines the geopolitical imperative for European tech sovereignty post-Ukraine war. Harry pushes back strongly against complete decoupling, pointing out the economic realities of global trade.
The Critical Need for European Alternatives to American Tech 6546 Taavet argues against relying on US technology with kill switches. Harry directly questions whether top-down state capital declarations, like Germany's trillion-euro announcement, are effective.
Geopolitical Concerns in the Baltics 7436 Taavet highlights Baltic defense concerns while Harry presses on political structural barriers, arguing 4-year election cycles impede long-term technology strategy.
Overcoming Barriers: Early-Stage Capital and Ambition 6544 Harry brings up standard critiques regarding European ambition and work ethic. Taavet reframes this as European humility versus American bragging and dismisses regulatory excuses.
Wise's London IPO & Public Markets Strategy 6524 Harry shares insights from interviewing London Stock Exchange CEO Julia Hoggart and asks about US valuation premiums. Taavet provides a nuanced breakdown of public listings.
Personal Wealth, Skype, and Financial Independence 5422 Harry asks personal questions about how wealth alters personal mindsets. Taavet clarifies he achieved financial independence early via Skype, enabling a pure focus on upside.
Quick Fire: Estonian Ecosystem & Next Big Accelerators 4311 Harry conducts a quickfire round covering Estonian tech, public equities, and Synthesia. Taavet reveals he has never bought a public stock, picking Berkshire Hathaway as a sole exception.

Statements from this episode (59)

Opinion
Hinrikus: Standard 2% VC management fees misalign investors from startup outcomes
“Fundamentally, the idea of collecting a two, two and a half percent management fee does not really make sense. It does not align us with the outcomes.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 12:56
Insight
Hinrikus: Plural rejects startup investments lacking 100x potential
“If we can't imagine a hundred X, we should not be entertaining the idea of this deal.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 27:02
Disclosure
Taavet Hinrikus made 30 to 50 angel investments annually after Wise
“I went into overdrive once I stopped running wise, doing 30, 40, 50 deals a year.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 1:16
Disclosure
Taavet Hinrikus deployed significant liquidity into Bolt secondaries in 2017
“I spent a lot of my limited liquidity buying up secondaries in, in Bolt in like, 2017.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 2:06
Assertion Supported
Hinrikus: The vast majority of European VC partners lack operating experience
“I, you know, I've said many times is that if you look at the European landscape, majority, vast majority of the European GPs have not spent a single day working in a real company. They've worked in consulting firms, banks, but they haven't worked in a real ope…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 4:25
Insight
Taavet Hinrikus: Venture capital is fundamentally a brand game
“Frankly, I think venture is a brand game.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 8:35
Assertion Supported
Hinrikus: Half of Plural's backed founders are repeat entrepreneurs
“Approximately half of the founders we back are repeat entrepreneurs.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 9:27
Insight
Hinrikus: Repeat Founders Target Bigger Goals, Yielding Larger Potential Outcomes
“So repeat founders, they typically go for a much bigger goal. You know, Torsten did a gaming company, then he went into defense. And we can talk about Danny Alecke as the first company was e-commerce. And then he took on a massive challenge of building Spotify…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 10:20
Opinion
Hinrikus: Unexcited to back repeat founders building in their previous category
“Like, I don't think I would be that excited to back a founder who built Fintech company one and then goes on to build Fintech company two.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 10:54
Opinion
Hinrikus: It is hard to get excited about traditional enterprise SaaS
“There are many great founders building great enterprise SaaS companies, but for me personally, it's pretty hard to get excited about the good old SaaS company.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 11:25
Insight
Hinrikus: Investor alignment depends on investing personal capital alongside LP funds
“I think there is one thing if you're a rich investor and you play with only other people's money, there's a different thing if you're a rich investor and you're investing your own money. So I think it's a question of alignment and hopefully we'll talk more abo…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 12:17
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Plural charges half the traditional VC management fee
“At Plural, we charge about half the management fee, and we think we are much better aligned.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 13:06
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: Early Wise customer support agents made $1M at IPO
“And I think the customer support agents who joined in the beginning, they all made a million dollars when Wise went public.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 14:11
Opinion
Hinrikus: VCs shouldn't make big money just for deploying capital
“I don't think people in venture should make a lot of money just because they are deploying capital.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 14:35
Assertion Partly supported
Hinrikus: SpaceX Has Faced Zero Liquidity Issues as a Private Company
“You know, the best example of all is maybe SpaceX today. It's a private company has had zero liquidity issues. So there is a secondary market always open.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 16:00
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: Deep Tech Startups Require 10 to 15 Years for Liquidity
“And maybe for deep tech companies, it's 10 to 12. You know, if you hit the bad patch in the markets, it becomes 15.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 17:15
Insight
Hinrikus: Venture Investors Must Be More Disciplined About Returning Capital Early
“I think also maybe at some point people just need to be more disciplined in returning some capital early.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 17:24
Disclosure
Plural partners are collectively the largest investor in their fund
“We are the biggest investor in the fund ourselves.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 18:10
Disclosure
Plural lead partners write personal checks for every fund deal
“And additionally, every deal we do, the lead partner of the deal writes a personal check.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 18:13
Disclosure
Plural covers its own legal fees instead of charging portfolio startups
“Well, we pay our own legal fees. Vast majority of venture deals, as in the term sheets, that you pay your investors legal fees.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 19:56
Insight
Hinrikus: Timeline misalignment is the main under-discussed founder-investor conflict
“Timeline misalignment. Investors wanting their money back before the founder, which is a kind of a hard one.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 20:44
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Plural doesn't believe funds can control sector composition
“You know, in plural, We really don't think we have much control over fund composition.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 21:23
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus expects Plural Fund II reserves to be under half the fund
“Fund two. We kind of drew the line roughly in the middle. I think probably we end up with slightly less than half for reserves.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 23:03
Insight
Hinrikus: Uniformly exercising pro-rata rights is a VC cop-out
“Fundamentally, I agree with the idea that just doing your prorata is a cop out. You either want to do nothing or triple down.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 23:33
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: Plural will not write follow-on checks without GDP-level impact
“We kind of promise we're not going to give up before you, but it doesn't mean we're going to write bad money after good money. We've told our founders, we're here to have GDP level impact. If your company's not doing it, I'm sorry, We should not continue fundi…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 25:01
Prediction Held up
Plural caps each partner at two to three investments per year
“Every investor can only do a limited number of deals per year. You know, it looks at two to three deals per year is the right pacing.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 25:57
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Plural does not vote on deal decisions in investment committee
“And given that we don't vote on deals, the committee discussions are very honest, very brutal.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 27:16
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Plural partners do not all need to meet founders before investing
“No, absolutely not. And I think there is probably no company where all the partners met the founders before the deal. It's typically one or few partners that meets, meets a company.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 28:41
Insight
Hinrikus: Top VC firms shouldn't force GPs to seek IC approval for deals
“So we give them a lot of trust, and we kind of felt that it doesn't make sense to hire someone brilliant and tell them you have to come on Mondays to ask permission to do a deal.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 29:00
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Plural lead partners frequently pull deals after peer feedback
“We have many cases where after hearing the feedback, the lead partner is like, hey guys, you know, Ian, you raised great points. Karina, what you said about your experience in the market is very true, and I'm not gonna do the deal. Many cases where this happen…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 29:24
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Fast-tracked personal investments in 2020-2021 resulted in big losses
“20, 20, 21, there was a lot of deals done, you know, under the gun basically. I did some myself personally, made some big losses.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 31:22
Opinion
Hinrikus: Exceptional startups rarely push hyper-fast investment timelines
“I don't see the crazy companies moving so quickly. That's the momentum spreadsheet investing, which starts moving way quicker.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 31:45
Opinion
Hinrikus: Founders mistakenly treat large fundraising as ultimate success metric
“I think founders too often think fundraising and large fundraisers is ultimate measure of success.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 35:33
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Wise built over $10B of value while burning $100M primary capital
“Wise only raised hundred sixty million primary capital, and we only burned through about a hundred million of primary capital. Hundred million primary capital to build in excess of ten billion of value.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 36:01
Opinion
Hinrikus: Startup boards dominated by VCs are ineffective
“The things that I don't like about boards, they oftentimes become way too big, way too quickly. You know, your C round investor takes a board seat, your A round investor takes a board seat, your B round investor takes a board seat, your C and D. So you end up …”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 36:49
Insight
Hinrikus: Active founders should serve on other startup boards
“Also, founders who are building companies, at some point it might be good for them to be on one board of another person building a business. You know, I think it's good for both.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 37:35
Insight
Hinrikus: Venture capital is a commodity, so founders can negotiate lower dilution
“We are a commoditized product, Harry. VCs are a commodity. You can press them down.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 38:03
Insight
Hinrikus: No venture capitalist will ever fight for a founder's equity ownership
“No VC will ever fight for the founder's ownership. You need to fight for it.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 38:19
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: Multi-stage firms' high-volume seed strategy will fail as founders wise up
“I don't think this game will last. I think the best founders will realize that getting a check on good terms from a multistage firm is by no means a guarantee of raising money from them in the future.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 40:26
Prediction Open · timeframe Apr 2030
Hinrikus: Median Venture Capital Returns Will Decline as the Asset Class Matures
“The best investors will continue generating best returns, but I think the median is probably gonna come down over time.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 42:06
Disclosure
Hinrikus: Plural Was Created to Drive European Sovereignty and GDP-Level Impact
“Even zooming out when we were starting to think about plural in 20, 21. So we raised our first one in 20, 22. So thinking of creating plural, we were, we had two things which were really important. European sovereignty and GDP level impact.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 42:42
Opinion
Hinrikus: The US Can No Longer Be Trusted to Protect Europe
“And the ways that US cannot be trusted anymore to be the protector of Europe.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 43:31
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: Critical Tech Sectors Will Divide into a Tripolar World
“A lot of sectors where I think we're going to be living in a, It's a tripolar world. Is that a word? Did I make it up? So there's gonna be an American version. Let's call it Android. There is a European version, Helsing, a Chinese version. Defense, space, ener…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 43:57
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: The world is entering a period of technological decoupling
“I think we are going into a world of decoupling for a while. I'm kind of hopeful that Western world will come closer together after going through a rough patch, but you know, this is these are complex topics.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 46:47
Opinion
Hinrikus: Europe cannot trust tech solutions vulnerable to US interference
“If we don't, if we can't guarantee that the Android solution works, regardless of what people do in the US, we cannot trust it.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 47:23
Opinion
Hinrikus: Europe must control data access and kill switches for robotics
“If we talk about anything that gets visual audio information, robots, cameras, we probably want to control who has access to the information we gather, and who has access to a kill switch.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 47:42
Opinion
Hinrikus: European countries must raise defense spending to 3–5% of GDP
“Defense contributions, you know, we were not at two percent in Europe before Estonia was ahead, but in, and Poland was ahead, but, you know, we need to get to three, four, five percent everywhere. And same in other critical industries.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 49:40
Prediction Open · timeframe Apr 2030
Hinrikus: Russia will attempt to attack another European country
“I think it's a very serious, very real concern. We should be living under the assumption that whatever happened in Ukraine now, Russia will try in another country over the next years, and we need to be ready for this.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 50:09
Opinion
Hinrikus: Regulation never prevents top entrepreneurs from starting companies
“No entrepreneur ever Has not started a company because of regulation. So best entrepreneurs say goes through walls made out of titanium to make it happen. So I think, you know, in some sense, you know, it's an excuse.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 53:55
What-if
Hinrikus: Wise would not have received a pricing premium in the US
“I don't believe Wise would have a pricing premium in the US.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 55:52
Opinion
Hinrikus: The UK stock market is subprime due to weak institutional backing
“We don't have enough retail participation in the UK. We don't have enough institutional participation from the pension funds. So I do think UK stock market is subprime in that sense.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 56:06
Opinion
Hinrikus: Revolut should list in US if expanding there
“If he wants to build a big, I think here's, here's what I would tell Nick. If he wants to build a big business in the US, then he should go public in the US.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 57:09
Disclosure
Hinrikus didn't sell Wise secondary shares until valuation hit billions
“Not until we were valued at billions. I didn't sell a single, single share of second secondary, but after that I've done it in a, I would say systematic way.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 57:57
Assertion Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus has been financially independent since 2002 via Skype options
“I was also lucky to make money from being the first employee at Skype from stock options. So in that sense, I've been financially Independent since 2002, three.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 58:07
Opinion
Taavet Hinrikus: European Governments Should Be Largest Customers for Local Startups
“More capital for deep tech investment. Look at encouraging entrepreneurship. Look at reducing the regulatory burden. And I think the way we do government purchasing decisions, whether it's in defense or other areas, the government should be the biggest custome…”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 59:13
Assertion Partly supported
Hinrikus: Estonia Has the Highest Number of Unicorns Per Capita Globally
“We have the biggest number of unicorns per capita, and nobody knows this.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 59:55
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus: Revolut Is Likely Europe's Next Major Startup Ecosystem Accelerator
“I mean, I have to say there seems to be a lot of companies coming from Revolut today, which is pretty, pretty cool to see. I don't know how many of them are doing exciting things compared to do, trying to do fintech widgets, but maybe today I'd say Revolut.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 1:00:26
Disclosure
Hinrikus reveals he has never purchased a single public stock
“I have never bought a public stock.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 1:01:01
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Hinrikus predicts Europe will rebuild its critical industries
“I've become a whole lot more optimistic on Europe. I think, frankly, everything that has happened in relation to US, I've become so much more bullish on Europe. We will rebuild the critical industries.”
Taavet Hinrikus Apr 28, 2025 ▶ 1:01:30

Shorts cut from this episode

▶ VCs Who Invest Their Personal Money! 😮 · 20VC with Harry St (@18:14) ▶ Millionaires: Wise’s First Employees 💸 · 20VC with Harry St (@14:14) ▶ Europe Needs Independence from US Defense ⚔️ · 20VC with Har (@47:14) ▶ Do European VCs Have The Right Experience? 🤔 · 20VC with Ha (@4:31) ▶ If We Can't See 100x, We Don't Do The Deal 🚀 · 20VC with Ha (@0:17)
Made with StarZero

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 1,200 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.