Straight Answers
An LLM assessed 585 question → answer exchanges, the host's own answers included. Speaker names were hidden during assessment. Each exchange was marked answered, partly, redirected or not addressed, with a quote as its source. Every exchange below is timestamped and plays. How it works →
These readings are observational: the transcript shows whether the question was answered directly, whatever the reason. It is an AI reading of a public exchange, never a claim about intent, and the tape is one tap away on every row. full disclaimer →
Every one of the 219 people on the record is accounted for: 3 carry a full rate (8 or more assessed questions on raw tape), 128 more have their questions counted (18 of them with at least one not answered directly; too few raw questions for a fair percentage, edited feed included), and the remaining 88 never took a direct question in any tape we hold: compilations, panels and cameo appearances leave nothing to assess.
No needle for Scott Galloway: fewer than 8 assessed questions on raw tape, and a percentage on a sample that small would mislead. Their counts are real: 1 not answered directly in 6 assessed questions.
Scott Galloway: every exchange, playable
The question asked, then the AI assessment note from the answer. Tap to play the moment. Not addressed = the question was not engaged; redirected = acknowledged, then steered elsewhere.
All speakers
All 3 people with 8 or more assessed questions on raw tape. Click a name to see their exchanges. highest rate none identified small samples
| Person | Not answered directly (%) | Redirected + not addressed | Questions | Argument clarity /5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Berman CEO, WaitWhat | 38% | 3 | 8 | 3.7 |
| Reid Hoffman Partner, Greylock | 12% | 2 | 17 | 4.1 |
| Angela Duckworth Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania | 11% | 1 | 9 | 4.1 |
Percentages come from raw unedited recordings only: produced podcast audio has tangents and stumbles cut in the edit, which moves the speaker up by about 12 percentile points. The small-sample counts include the produced feed. This is a reading of a transcript. It is not an accusation of dishonesty, and there are many good reasons not to answer a question directly (confidential numbers, unreleased products, someone else's news to break).