The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 11 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 2 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Misaligned AI will competently scheme and take over in 2029
“And then it turned out that somewhere along this transition, so at some point in 20, 29, you went from AIs that were kind of misaligned and reward hacky and sloppy and weren't really trying to do the right thing to AIs that are like competently scheming agains…”
AI research and development will be fully automated by early 2029
“In terms of what I would recommend people plan as though is happening, I think I would recommend planning as though full automation of AR and D maybe. Start of year, 20, 29, maybe earlier. And then also AR and D being like quite, quite automated by 20, 28, pos…”
Automating AI research and hardware manufacturing enables AI takeovers
“If AIs could just automate AIR&D and automate, like, sort of the industrial process of building more computers, then you could quickly end up in a In a process where sort of like robots are building robots and the whole world is greatly transformed. And that v…”
AI-driven robotic expansion could drive 200x global GDP growth in 2030s
“We're imagining sort of the robot population or like, you know, quality adjusted population, basically like doubling or quadrupling every year, which, because that's almost all of the like sort of relevant, productive capacity of the economy itself means the e…”
Software engineering within AI companies will be fully automated by 2028
“But then that actually really happens by sort of early in 20, 28, like SWE is fully automated. SWE within AI companies is fully automated.”
Superintelligence will leave human labor with very little economic value
“Human labor would have very little value left.”
Greenblatt: AI research taste and conceptual breakthroughs are improving and will not lag behind
“AIs seem Significantly better at engineering and grungy stuff and sort of just keeping trying than they seem to be at conceptual breakthroughs, but their ability to do sort of these. Breakthroughs, especially in easy to verify domains are improving. And like, …”
AI capabilities could rapidly jump from human-level to wildly superhuman
“Where I think a concern that we have is like on the default trajectory, you maybe go straight from like AI systems that are like competitive with humans to AI systems that are wildly superhuman in a very short period of time.”
Greenblatt: Superintelligence will not suddenly emerge from cheap compute recipes
“It doesn't look like we're going to suddenly end up in a regime where like you could train super intelligence with a really cheap recipe, as opposed to it being more of an iterative thing where like the cost keeps going down, the capabilities keep going up. Th…”
Greenblatt: Annual AI progress in 2029 will be 4x to 5x faster than in 2025
“But in 20, 29, it's actually the case that you're getting like four X as much AI progress or possibly five X as much AI progress. As you got, like, as you got in 25, sort of weighing up the relevant metrics.”
Greenblatt: Plan A will likely fail due to lacking US state capacity and political will
“And so I don't expect this to happen basically because I think the U S may not be competent enough to pull it off. Just like the U S government just doesn't, isn't necessarily have the state capacity. And in addition to that, I think I worry that like, I don't…”