why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Prediction Not checkable as stated
Gutierrez: Technology companies will replace traditional banks as future primary lenders
“And I think what you're saying is banks are reeling from like all this regulatory changes, but at the same time with technology, they're just not able to keep up, and you're saying the face of the new lenders of tomorrow are more technology companies and less,…”
Assertion Contradicted
Gutierrez: Credit Card Act slashed addressable credit card market to 17%
“So the Credit Card Act by itself, before, ah, about 50% of households in America were part of the addressable market for credit card lending, and after the Credit Card Act, it's more around 17%.”
Assertion Partly supported
Gutierrez: Post-2008 regulations dropped available revolving credit by over $900 billion
“Revolving credit availability has dropped on an outstanding basis by over three hundred billion, on an available basis by over nine hundred billion.”
Assertion Supported
Gutierrez: Credit card availability to non-prime market dropped by $120B
“From 2009 to more recently, ah, there's been a reduction of about a hundred and twenty billion dollars of, Credit card availability to the subprime, nonprime market.”
Assertion Supported
Gutierrez: Progreso Financiero issued over 500,000 loans with single-digit losses
“We actually lent to all of these people over 500,000 loans, and we did it with single digit losses, so we're, you know, we're pretty proud of ourselves there.”